Tanya Plibersek

There are a number of clear arguments the Government could rely on for means testing the Private Health Insurance Rebate. Health Minister Tanya Plibersek made some of them in Question Time yesterday afternoon.

Please sir, I don't want to subsidise your gold-plated health care no more…

“The total cost of this private health insurance rebate is about $5 billion a year, and if we do not make these modest changes, that leave around 20 million Australians unaffected, we will see the cost of this private health insurance rebate blow out by $100 billion over the next 40 years,” Plibersek told the House of Reps. That’s a good one.

Others include: Treasury estimates 99.7 per cent of people currently holding health insurance will keep it even if the 30 per cent rebate is means tested, a family would have to be on more than $250,000 a year before the rebate was fully withdrawn, and without this budget measure, worth $2.4 billion, hopes of a surplus are shot.

The Opposition questions the Treasury’s optimism about the impact of the measures, arguing more people will rely on the public system. All these points have been made, but they’ve been drowned out in the escalating class war being waged by both sides over a measure many reasonable voters would look at as a sound financial decision if they were given half the chance.

Latest 2 of 214 comments

View all comments
 
  • Alex says:

    07:21am | 20/02/12

    Why shouldn’t people who are subsidizing the health care system for so many others who contribute nothing to their own care not get the same rebate that they are subsidizing for lower income-earners?  That’s like saying I have to buy something for everyone else but can’t keep any for myself—fair??? Read more »

  • Stephen T says:

    10:38am | 16/02/12

    Been there done that, six figure salaries are nice but I’m happy to live on five.  The subsidy was always a bit of a crock, it was swallowed by increased premiums almost as soon as it was granted and didn’t stop further increases by health funds.  Bit of a failed… Read more »

 

The antics of the Minister for Women, Tanya Plibersek, this week are the latest in a long line of Labor tactics that continue to diminish and devalue the vital parliamentary arena of question time.

During their 2001 political wilderness, Nicola Roxon, Cheryl Kernot, Jilia Gillard, Annette Ellis and Jenni Macklin at a book launch on women in the ALP.

The point she made so loudly and proudly about the Opposition not allocating many questions to Coalition women is hollow and disingenuous.

Governments use Question Time to crow about themselves, using backbenchers, often in marginal seats, to ask pre-arranged questions.  Political reality necessitates that the leadership team in Opposition use question time to hold the government to account.

Latest 2 of 27 comments

View all comments
 
  • Julie Coker-Godson says:

    12:59pm | 19/09/09

    Its Dame Edith LYONS, not lion! Read more »

  • dude says:

    11:35am | 19/09/09

    Peter, ‘Tea and scones for Liberal party functions’ you give her way too much ability. From what we see and hear of her this would surely be too much. Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

RT @saline: Touche Miriam. Touche Barry. Wicked old thespians taking the pith. #qanda

ToryShepherd

The best haters are the worst spellers #qandadelayed#godihopeididntmakeatypo

Anthony Sharwood

How much fun is it retweeting people who can't spell?

Anthony Sharwood

In other Olympian news, Steph rice is advertising Sunrice Chinese style Mongolian chicken. Think about that for a tick

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Ok. I am not a leading expert in world’s best practice on prisoner rehabilitation — my experience…

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

This morning I joined millions of other Australians in accelerating, braking, swearing and spilling coffee…

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

This weekend’s massacre in Houla, Syria, is one of those stories that invites but doesn’t…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter