Smoking

Sexy men smoke. It’s a fact. James Dean, Jon Hamm, Humphrey Bogart and Shane Warne (feel free to add to this list).  So it’s a great pity that smoking will also eventually make them stupid. Or so says new research from the UK that has drawn a link between rapid brain decline and men who are long term smokers.

Puff, puff, puff… and away goes my brain.

Here’s the skinny from Reuters:

The study used a group of men with an average age of 56 when they had their first cognitive assessment. The study used six assessments of smoking status over 25 years and three cognitive assessments over 10 years, and found that smokers showed a cognitive decline as fast as non-smokers 10 years older than them

The study also found that women smokers are spared the effect on their brain because they generally smoke a lot less. Hmmm, we’re not sure about this one. What do you Punchers make of it? And if you’re a male smoker, does this kind of study put you off? Post your thoughts on this and anything else that’s on your mind below. Oh, and happy Wednesday. The week gets good from here.

Latest 2 of 125 comments

View all comments
 
  • John F says:

    06:53pm | 08/02/12

    After nearly 5 years of not seeing my eldest daughter or hearing anything about any of my 4 kids health, schooling, LIFE ! She contacted me to tell me the had a UNI entry. I was close to meeting her when the ex and her family steped in and ruined… Read more »

  • nossy says:

    06:27pm | 08/02/12

    @TimB   but Tim until he resigned from your Liberal Party he was an “ok guy”  - what happened fella - ex PM Malcolm Fraser resigned too - whats going on with the Libs? Read more »

 

The Federal Government has recently attacked British American Tobacco for using the image of a Kangaroo on its cigarette packages overseas. Attorney-General Nicola Roxon labelled it as “un-Australian” and demanded that the tobacco companies “get [their] hands off our icon”.

This dose of carcinogenic smoke brought to you by the Commonwealth Government, Canberra. Picture: news.com.au

The government is indignant and says that the sale of cigarettes has nothing to do with Australia. Unfortunately that is not entirely true.

Almost $150 million of Australian tax dollars are currently invested in tobacco companies like Phillip Morris and British American Tobacco through the Future Fund.

Latest 2 of 77 comments

View all comments
 
  • Matthew Buckley says:

    09:52am | 31/01/12

    Sorry, Wynston was pointing out the fallacy of the smokers’ argument, not Steve Durrington. My mistake. Read more »

  • Matthew Buckley says:

    09:50am | 31/01/12

    M, Steve Durrington was criticising the argument by some smokers, such as yourself, who argue that because other destructive products are available then tobacco should be as well. I agree with Durrington. The argument falls flat on its face. Having one destructive product available does not make it okay to… Read more »

 

Cigarette /sıgə’rєt/ n. a pinch of tobacco rolled in paper with fire at one end and a fool at the other.

Hey Bogie, want a cigarette? C'mon. Do you want one?

The good thing about writing about smoking is that for once I don’t have to watch my words. Nothing I say could possibly offend smokers more than the government’s shock tactics and cigarette packets themselves.

Those of the self-poisoning persuasion are the one section of society you can tear to pieces with impunity. They’ve been told a million times they’re not wanted. I imagine they’re so stressed out by the merciless attack that they need a cigarette.

Latest 2 of 77 comments

View all comments
 
  • Robert says:

    04:12pm | 10/01/12

    It’s not just the smoking pollution from the cars, it’s also the horrible noise they make.  The self-centred stinky motorists don’t give a stuff about how many lives they wreck, or how many people get lung cancer, or how badly they’ve polluted the planet - so long as they can… Read more »

  • Hannah says:

    05:20pm | 09/01/12

    Hi onlooker, tobacco as a plant hasn’t changed over the years however the content of cigarettes has, yes. Your grandfather was smoking a much simpler cigarette, that contained mostly tobacco (and no filter). Tobacco is still not good for you but the chemical additives that are now in ciggarettes are… Read more »

 

Many smokers and, at a guess, pretty much every cufflink-wearing executive from the big tobacco companies have a habit of posturing as macho libertarians. They argue that cigarettes are a legal product, smoking is a matter of choice, and that when it comes to telling us how we can live our lives, the nanny state can go stick it in its pipe and smoke it.

Anyone in these parts bulk-bill?

This is all fine, up to a point. And that point is when smokers get sick and automatically assume that it is the job of the health system – that is, the taxpayers – to step in and cover the cost of their collapsed lungs, clogged arteries and triple bypasses.

It is a logically inconsistent position and, frankly, quite a pathetic one. If smokers and the tobacco industry are going to be hairy-chested about the manner in which they live their life, they should also be held to account for the manner of their death. I write that not as some clean-living puritan, but one of those poor sad dills who has become addicted to this stupid drug, but who is now happily (and hopefully) in the final stages of a victorious battle against nicotine, setting aside last week’s beer-fuelled regression at the office Christmas party.

Latest 2 of 268 comments

View all comments
 
  • Nicole says:

    11:11pm | 20/12/11

    Just wanted to add, my husbands father was a young 63 when he succumbed to lung cancer and will miss out on seeing his grandchildren which we plan on having in the next 5 years. He had retired in the last 5 years and enjoyed it golfing - but he… Read more »

  • Daemon says:

    08:16am | 19/12/11

    Not even 8.00 in Queensland, and there are almost 300 comments.. Last time we saw this was about crazed people choosing to kill wild animals for sport. What does that say about us as a commentariat? Read more »

 

Out of nowhere, my friend Robyn contracted pneumonia this week and ended up in hospital, gasping for breath and coughing her lungs up. It was a scary sight, seeing this dynamic, strong chick totally debilitated and struggling for oxygen.

Big Tobacco must not be allowed to run rings around common sense.

“Anyone who’s thinking about taking up smoking should get a little dose of pneumonia,” she said with a wheeze. “I can’t believe anyone would voluntarily do this to their bodies by sucking on cigarettes.”

I toyed with fags at about 16. It was glamour that got me in: the silky silver packaging and swirling royal blue font of the Stirling Special Mild brand. Most of my friends were into it too. My, how we thought we looked urbane and adult – maybe even old enough to buy drinks at the bar of the local Curramulka Hotel.

Latest 2 of 82 comments

View all comments
 
  • Armadillo says:

    11:56am | 24/11/11

    I will admit, I don’t quite understand what the harm will be if all cigarettes are in plain packaging? I will also admit that while I smoked in the past, I don’t now and I certainly don’t appreciate people who give me no choice but to inhale their second hand… Read more »

  • Anne71 says:

    01:53pm | 14/11/11

    “Elect to become alcoholic”? Are you serious?  Do you really believe that someone wakes up one day and says to themselves “Hmmm. I think I’ll take up alcoholism. Should be a right laugh!”  Don’t confuse binge drinking with alcoholism - they are not necessarily one and the same. Someone might… Read more »

 

They say quitting smoking is hard, but I’ve learnt the real truth. It’s not just the quitting that’s difficult (although it is), starting up again is bloody hard too.

Monkey see, monkey do?

I’m not just doing this for attention; this is not a cry for help nor is it part of any quarter-life - well, a little closer to third-life - crisis. Truth be told I always enjoyed smoking and I never wanted to give it up in the first place.

I started engaging in smoking when I was sixteen. I say “engaging” because I was really pretending to inhale smoke whilst holding it in my mouth before blowing it out like a clandestine burp.

Latest 2 of 45 comments

View all comments
 
  • dean livanos says:

    12:27am | 26/08/11

    You have to look at the types of hospital admittances.  Smoking illnesses are almost always fatal and long term, sports injuries have a wide spectrum but the majority are only short term damage.  You are comparing apples with oranges as they say. Read more »

  • A girl says:

    01:35am | 06/08/11

    I think the point is that smokers love smoking. They love the smell of burning tobacco. they love the way the smoke curls and the cloud that comes from their mouths. They love the taste of a fresh smoke as it compliments the coffee theory drink. they love the incredible… Read more »

 

What is the cigarette plain packaging legislation?
From July 2012 the Australian Government plans to prohibit all brand logos, fonts, colours and promotional wording on cigarette packaging.  Cigarettes will come in olive green boxes displaying prominent safety warnings and the name of the brand and variant printed in standard size, font and position.

Here's lookin' at you, kid. Pic: AP

Why is Labor taking on Big Tobacco?
They are the only target left that is less popular than Julia Gillard. 

Does plain packaging infringe on freedom of choice?
Studies have shown most smokers cannot distinguish between brands in blind trials and the perceived differences are often an artefact of subtle cues in the colour, logos and design on the packaging.  Nevertheless, tobacco companies spend millions of dollars perfecting the positive associations evoked by cigarette packaging and consumers have a right to have their free choices subconsciously influenced by them.

Latest 2 of 73 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jim says:

    12:41am | 25/08/11

    Plain packaging for cigarettes to stop people from smoking? That highlights how out of touch with reality the government is. What a bunch of morons. I’m a smoker and I don’t buy the bloody things because how pretty the package looks. I buy them because they are addictive and they… Read more »

  • AJ says:

    06:31pm | 04/07/11

    Hi I’m one of many healthcare workers who holds the hands of people as they die from smoking, alcohol or drug-related diseases. We are the ones who watch people suffer from the effects of this horribly addictive substance. It does my head in when people support cigarette smoking and the… Read more »

 

In the gruesome final scene of Martin Scorcese’s remake of Cape Fear, the sadistic murderer Max Cady has been bashed with a plank, burned with lighter fluid, thrown off the side of a houseboat and is finally drowning in a river. As he sinks into the water he starts speaking in tongues, struggling to keep his mouth above the waterline as he shouts random free-form gibberish before finally drowning.

I laugh in the face of the nanny state.

I was reminded of this scene while listening to a woman from a cigarette company on the radio this week as she put forward the tobacco industry’s arguments, if you can call them that, against plain packaging.

Despite having a long-standing fondness for the gaspers, and a firm belief that adults should be free to do whatever they like, I don’t ever think I have heard such nonsense in my life. This industry, which in essence is in the death business, is itself in its death throes. As it sinks further into the abyss it is thrashing about spouting nonsense in defence of its right to sell demonstrably deadly products.

Latest 2 of 243 comments

View all comments
 
  • Ian1 says:

    11:30am | 06/07/11

    @Facepalm - http://www.news.com.au/national/cigs-war-won-now-cancer-campaigners-set-their-sights-on-beer/story-e6frfkw9-1226088686962 “alcohol has NEVER “been next” and is still not going to be next.” In your face!  How’s your lack of clairvoyance going? Read more »

  • Domenic Greco says:

    03:36pm | 20/06/11

    Sure reasonably expensive but not to small independent businesses…and all it will do is open the flood gate on black market and allow supermarkets and discounters to grow market share…. Making non smokers pay extra tax because they live longer would be reasonably inexpensive too…how short sighted can you be? Read more »

 

Plug the word nanny into the website of free market think tank, the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), and you would be forgiven for thinking that they were an au pair agency. 

The original nanny. Pic: Supplied

No less than 190 opinion pieces, articles, press releases and reports use the word. IPA’s nanny obsession reaches fever pitch in 2011, with IPA spokesmen Tim Wilson and Chris Berg whipping off articles condemning the nanny state quicker than you can say supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.

And now Big Tobacco has jumped on the nanny state bandwagon with the launch of its plain packaging attack campaign NoNannyState.

Latest 2 of 186 comments

View all comments
 
  • jan says:

    05:40pm | 29/06/11

    Tanja, have you been invited to appear on the drum or on john faine’s programme like Tim Wilson et al? I think there is a bit of jealousy at play here as they can’t handle them getting a lot of media attention, they don’t invite just any-one and invest time… Read more »

  • HELEN says:

    04:52pm | 26/06/11

    That is not democracy its called plutocracy and polarising people. EXTREMISM for troglodytes. have a nice day anon and relax peeps Read more »

 

The tobacco industry’s campaign against plain packaging is at last a cause worthy enough for me to believe in.

Nothing says 'cool' like a rocket launcher, camo gear and a cancer stick. Pic: AP

As a smoker myself it is very important to me that if I am going to be killed slowly it should at least be by someone I know and trust. Indeed, it does not reflect well on the euthanasia lobby that it is strangely silent on this particular aspect of dying with dignity.

Fundamentally this is a debate about choosing the manner of your own death. Some people choose to hurl themselves off the Gap, Ben Elton chooses to do it on live television and smokers choose to do it by gradually annihilating their lungs.

Latest 2 of 275 comments

View all comments
 
  • Kipling says:

    09:35am | 07/08/11

    Oh the conundrum…. It seems fairly clear that prohibition is not effective. Firstly, from history we learn (alcohol) prohobition served to make some (a select few) wealthy, despite being criminalised. Provision of alcohol occured without restraint or any form of regulation, including health regulation. Then the Government got wise, they… Read more »

  • Kipling says:

    03:02am | 07/08/11

    People smoking around me is ok. They cover my clothing in smoke smell, I get a runny nose and smelly hair. But that is ok. I don’t mind drinking beer, the outcome of that is that I need to piss more frequently. Consequently, I also don’t mind pissing on a… Read more »

 

Plain packaging of tobacco products has great potential to reduce the appeal of smoking, particularly among young people, and should be supported if Australians want to see death and disease from tobacco use continue to decline.

You just won't look tough with a packet of these tucked into your rolled-up flannie

Simple, really. But unfortunately the facts have been difficult to read amid the smoke and mirrors, sound and fury. So consider this:

Fact: Glossy, stylised cigarette packets are a valuable marketing tool for attracting new smokers. This has been shown in Cancer Council research and dozens of other Australian and international studies, not to mention documents obtained from tobacco companies.

Latest 2 of 81 comments

View all comments
 
  • acotrel says:

    07:29am | 21/04/11

    @Huey ‘Wrong! plain bloody wrong! Alcohol takes that cake every time. ‘ One usually goes with the other.  How do you distinguish and declare alcohol the winner over cigarettes, in the death stakes?  Are you adding the road toll to the alcohol toll? How many people die with strokes, pnuemonia,… Read more »

  • Mensur Cehic says:

    02:04am | 21/04/11

    It’s a sad, sad part of human history. To allow the push marketing of such a poisonous substance onto worldwide populations.. Tobbacco: A weapon of mass destruction unleashed on us. We have spent the entire industrial age making smoking look like a normal part of life. A collection of carcinogenic… Read more »

 

The latest move by the Federal Government to make smoking a habit of the past is the latest salvo in the rapid expansion of the nanny state.

And we can use these as cool hub cabs. Photo: Justin Lloyd.

Recently the Health Minister Nicola Roxon re‑announced the government’s intention to force tobacco companies to adopt plain packaging for all cigarette brands.

From next year, smokers will be greeted with a standard olive‑green packet emblazoned with graphic health warnings screaming that “every cigarette is doing you damage”.

Latest 2 of 99 comments

View all comments
 
  • Josh says:

    01:16pm | 15/11/11

    ...Most narrow minded opinion ever, think about the raise in crime because children cant eat because their parents spent 400$ in a week on smokes.. goto another country and spend 4$.. the government is just trying to revenue raise because of all the mismanaged money they have lost in the… Read more »

  • Jeremy says:

    05:02pm | 04/11/11

    Try doing some research before you speak James… It is a fact the revenue raised well and truely pays for all of the hospital costs…. IT IS A MYTH that it doesn’t… It is a means of scarring non-smokers into fighting the cause by deception….  Tails I agree with your… Read more »

 

Smokers. The unthinkable may become a disagreeable reality. Smoking may be banned in private homes and apartments.

This nanny state is making a monkey out of me! Pic: AP

Scoff if you like about improbability of home smoking bans. How they would not only be unfair but unenforceable. Dismiss the concept as ridiculous.

Huff and puff about civil liberties, individual freedom of choice and the home being the family castle. Thump the table about government interference and intervention. About the spidery intrusion of the nanny state. But ignore the looming reality at your peril. The smokers’ nagging fear, that their final bastion will be invaded by smoke police, is already here.

Latest 2 of 276 comments

View all comments
 
  • Kev says:

    11:10pm | 14/07/11

    Second hand smoke affects me as it seeps into my apartment. Just now recovering from a week off work due to chest infection brought on by smoke. The only exposure to cigarette smoke I have is in my home, the one I’m paying off with more than half my income.… Read more »

  • Chau Vu says:

    07:09pm | 02/06/11

    I agree that people have a right to smoke but this right cannot extent to harming others. I support the expansion of second-hand smoke free zone. Read more »

 

Kids say olive brown is the colour of sick. And that’s what smoking will make you - in fact it will actually kill you.

If the colour doesn't get you, the eyeball will…

The fight to lower the smoking rate and reduce the impact of death and disease on the Australian community has been one of the great public health battles of the past 30 years.

It is a fight the community is winning, but has not yet won. Big Tobacco has deep pockets and the fight has been played out in court rooms and column inches across the country.

Latest 2 of 122 comments

View all comments
 
  • debra says:

    04:34pm | 14/05/11

    well this is so political the damn politics thinks that they can tell us not to smoke next they are going to tell us we cant use the toilet. i am so sick of paying for the politians wages and between the local state and fedral i hate to tell… Read more »

  • James says:

    06:50pm | 18/04/11

    Banning smoking in the home is a good idea but how will they police it,will we have smoke detectors and cameras in every home linked to the nearest police station or sniffer vans patrolling the streets. Read more »

 

Smoking inside will be banned in enclosed public spaces in China as of May 1 this year.

Got a light? Not for long.Photo: AFP.

So that leaves at least 300 million people just five weeks to break the habit of a lifetime.

Given that China is the world’s largest producer of cigarettes and that one in three smokers worldwide are Chinese, this is a social undertaking of epic proportions.

Latest 2 of 105 comments

View all comments
 
  • PerscuraCarry says:

    10:22am | 23/04/11

    http://votsoft.net/templates/routip/images/logo.jpg ????????? ???????: ??????? ? – ????????? / I Am Number Four (2011) DVDRip » ??????? ??????? ???????a / Perkins’ 14 (2009) DVDRip » ??????? ????????? (2011) DVDRip » ??????? uTorrent 2.2.1 Build 25113 » ??????? Mozilla Firefox 3.6.16 Final + 3.5.18 Final » ??????? SlimDrivers 2.0.4103 Build 496 +… Read more »

  • True Believer says:

    12:45pm | 05/04/11

    @ZSRenn Now that is the pot calling the kettle black my friend. Do some research and learn. Read more »

 

Smoking was banned in all outdoor areas in the Republic of Ireland on this day in 2004.

Last smokes at a bar somewhere in Dublin. Photo:AP.

It’s Tuesday at The Punch. What’s on your mind? Share it here.

Latest 2 of 117 comments

View all comments
 
  • Oranges says:

    05:09pm | 02/05/11

    @ Adam Diver - I’ll do it. a) benefits of smoking b) benefits for passive smokers For those of you who believe there is NOTHING good about nicotine: In 2008 this paper was produced in America and concludes that nicotine and hence active smoking and passive smoking leads to less… Read more »

  • Ditetoimini says:

    05:59am | 20/04/11

    Upon us nowadays to obtain more information and facts regarding szkoły językowe wrocław Read more »

 

In yet another example of nanny-state politics, South Australia is cracking down on the fags. Cracking down harder, that is. So’s Canberra, and plenty of other places.

Ah, sir? That'll be a $1000 fine. Pic: AFP

Not content with banning them to the point where smokers congregate on city corners like snappily dressed prostitutes (as one punter is rumoured to have observed) now they want to outlaw smoking in all areas of pubs, clubs, cafes, playgrounds, covered taxi stands and bus shelters - and ultimately anywhere outside the home.

Smoking is bad for you - no one doubts that. But the effectiveness of such uber-regulation is being questioned, and freethinkers Australia-wide are wondering - where will it stop? There’s a divergence of opinions on the measure - here, for the record, are our thoughts…

Latest 2 of 479 comments

View all comments
 
  • diachindilm says:

    05:28am | 16/11/11

    8JncN4FntN6FwuB9 doudoune moncler pas cher 8IowC6TzwO2SgqL0 http://highlandlakes.info Read more »

  • immafence says:

    02:28am | 16/11/11

    HZMGDEBCVW ugg store SKGBJTEXHL http://www.mckaycpt.org Read more »

 

Commonsense, let alone science, tells us that no level of smoking is safe or healthy.

Ah, the good old days!

Yet 2.9 million Australians smoke each day and smoking continues to be the leading cause of preventable death in Australia.  Each year smoking kills 15,000 Australians and costs the economy more than $31 billion.

With this sort of impact, we can’t afford not to act. By not acting to reduce smoking, we’re standing by letting people die.

Latest 2 of 96 comments

View all comments
 
  • Colin Fraser says:

    12:02am | 02/02/11

    No doubt you do not understand the concept of sarcasm. While it may be considered by some a low form of wit, it is often accurately gauging the perceptions of the people who misunderstand it. Prohibition never works. Never, never, never. It does not matter what is banned, what is… Read more »

  • Trude says:

    07:44pm | 01/02/11

    Well Nicola, I’ve paid thousands of dollars in taxes on my smokes over the years, good to see some of the money being put back into real ways to help people quit. I’ve tried to quit many times. Cold turkey was a complete bust, I got so cranky people couldn’t… Read more »

 

We’re approaching the day where after a month of rampant, random consumerism, and with the humility that only a major hangover brings, people make their New Year’s resolutions. Bad idea.

All you end up with is nicotine withdrawal for a few days, a gym membership you have to pay $5000 to get out of, and a fridge full of rotting “superfoods”.

So what I propose for this year is a more modest approach to becoming a better person: rather than worrying about reaching for a whole lot of unattainable virtues, let’s all just try not being such arseholes.

Latest 2 of 237 comments

View all comments
 
  • Gildas says:

    03:17pm | 23/11/11

    Gosh, I wish I would have had that information ealreir! Read more »

  • katie says:

    06:07pm | 06/01/11

    hahaha re. point 101 - me too!! I love it when I hear such people refer to ‘pay day’ when in fact they are referring to their centrelink payment of my tax dollars. Read more »

 

Every cigarette might be doing you damage but over the past few years it hasn’t been hurting Treasury. Smoking was already a ludicrously expensive pursuit by world standards in this country before the straight-laced uber-nerd Kevin Rudd and his nanny-in-chief Nicola Roxon were elected at the end of 2007.

Oh James, you'd look so much cooler with a taxpayer-funded nicotine patch.

By the beginning of last year, barely two years into Rudd’s brief and clean-living reign as prime minister, the price of a packet of smokes had jumped by more than one-third, with a one-off 25 per cent increase last February adding another $2.16 to a packet of 30 cigarettes.

Smokers fume, splutter and wheeze indignantly about this price-gouging and in my darker moments at the 7-11 as I empty the ATM to fuel my habit, I’ve often found myself among their number. No-one else cares of course. When it comes to public sympathy, smokers are on a hiding to nothing asking for understanding.

Latest 2 of 135 comments

View all comments
 
  • neverSayNever says:

    07:37pm | 19/12/10

    Anti smoker says: 11:07am | 13/12/10 “Smoking is a killer no matter what you smoke. It must cost the country billions every year” Check out the tax raised from nicotine tax revenue.  Nicotine tax pays for most of the hospital system. Read more »

  • Damo says:

    12:39am | 16/12/10

    Why are people so worried about the health of others? People know the health risks with smoking. If they want to smoke, let them. People also know that eating too much junk food is bad for their health. If they want to keep eating it, let them! Stop trying to… Read more »

 

I am trying hard not to sound like a grumpy old man well before my time, but what is it with the fun police on the streets of Perth?

Don't light up. Photo: Stewart Allen.

In just one week, the good citizens of the Australia’s western state have been subjected to a raft of state and local government regulations seemingly designed to take the enjoyment out of the simplest of life’s pleasures.

Take the example of Town of Cottesloe, just one of 142 shires and municipal councils in the state, after it foreshadowed the banning of flying kites, hoisting over-sized beach umbrellas, playing with toy cars and drinking from glass bottles on an iconic stretch of beaches along the WA capital’s affluent western suburbs.

Latest 2 of 41 comments

View all comments
 
  • BobbyDan says:

    03:44pm | 19/11/10

    T Chong:  You got it right in the last paragraph. My partners GP says all the words about not smoking and is seen having a puff in the back court yard of his surgery and in his car. My GP just shrugs and says, you’ve done all the damage you… Read more »

  • slowbreather says:

    03:34pm | 30/09/10

    There are people with heart/lung conditions such as heart disease, asthma, chronic obstructive airways disease and emphysema who can’t tolerate tobacco smoke as it makes them breathless. I am in this category and avoid places with lots of smokers, being in the vicinity of 1 smoker is about my limit.… Read more »

 

The Australian health establishment has denounced a proposal for doctors to stop calling chronically overweight people obese and start calling them fat instead.

The idea is that calling people fat will have more emotional impact, effectively shaming them into doing something about their weight. Sorry to have to point this out but chronically obese people already get called fat, just usually not to their faces. Besides, many overweight people openly talk about themselves being a fat person.

Now the Royal Australian College of GPs says it is a rude and insulting term, preferring “obese” instead because patients should always be treated with respect.

Latest 2 of 123 comments

View all comments
 
  • AL says:

    11:08am | 05/08/10

    This should be encouraged, well done. Read more »

  • GET REAL says:

    10:00pm | 02/08/10

    The FACT is, Thinning-Fat-Fighter, some “skinny people” hardly exercise at all - and that’s proof enough that the claim it’s got nothing to do with each individual’s metabolism is total crap. There is NO “one size fit all” approach to weight loss. When I swim, I do an hour’s straight… Read more »

 

There are few things harder in this soft ‘n’ cushy life than giving up smoking and while it’s easy to remember why or when you had your first cigarette, the story of how you gave up is never quite as interesting.  Except if you’re Russell Crowe.

Giving up for good. Picture: AP.

According to today’s Herald Sun the former Gladiator star will always blame his decision to quit on oldest son, Charlie.

Latest 2 of 17 comments

View all comments
 
  • JennyF says:

    10:10am | 29/07/10

    The fags are probably even too expensive for Crowe, so I hope he remembers who increased the prices.  See, you can never be totally election free. Read more »

  • Maisy says:

    08:41pm | 28/07/10

    I quit smoking every time I finish a packet. Read more »

 

The mere proposal in a regional Australian town to ban smoking in its CBD is a sign the decades-long public policy assault on tobacco has succeeded. The Rudd Government introduced a Great Big New Tax on Cigarettes weeks ago to barely a feather of resistance. Attitudes have changed. The war on smoking has been won.

Detail from The Judgment of Paris by Paul Rubens.

But smokers have been replaced by another group who present a similar public health challenge. They, too, risk dying early. They could be harming their children, are a drag on the economy because of frequent illness, and impose multi-million-dollar healthcare costs on the rest of the healthy community.

They are the overweight and the obese.

Latest 2 of 155 comments

View all comments
 
  • DeanCassie24 says:

    10:28am | 28/07/10

    According to my own analysis, thousands of people all over the world get the loans from good creditors. Hence, there is a good chance to receive a consolidation loan in every country. Read more »

  • Peter says:

    02:48pm | 27/05/10

    Democracy will not be fixed until we can vote on everything. Im sick of voting in a different dictator every 3 or 4 years.. Read more »

 

It’s customary to denounce government ministers for being ineffective but for something different today I’m going to attack the Health Minister Nicole Roxon for being far too effective.

Nicola Roxon posing with a flock of bananas. Photo: Kym Smith

More so than any other frontbencher in this government Roxon appears to have got her way on pretty much everything and, as a result, life has becoming increasingly more irritating for those of us who choose to treat our bodies like a science experiment.

Early last year, when cigarettes cost a paltry $12 a packet, as opposed to the new price of $286 a packet, I had the pleasure of bumping into Ms Roxon in the gardens outside the House of Representatives chamber at Federal Parliament, where I happened to be stubbing out a cigarette in the ashtray. “You don’t have to put that out because of me,” she joked, although there was a vaguely maniacal glint in her eye, as if she was going to finish the sentence by saying: “Yet.”

Latest 2 of 63 comments

View all comments
 
  • Ethica says:

    10:32am | 17/10/11

    Me and this arcitle, sitting in a tree, L-E-A-R-N-I-N-G! Read more »

  • LC says:

    06:34pm | 13/03/11

    “70% of all police call outs are ALCOHOL REALTED!” I’d like to see your source for that. “Ban alcohol” Yeah, they tried that less than 100 years ago. Guess what? They got rid of the (legitimate) supply, but not the demand, and the demand was filled by criminals. A black… Read more »

 

My dad was a pack a day smoker of Marlboro Reds, he died of cancer in 1996. This is a picture of my three brothers and I carrying him into the funeral service in his coffin.

Welcome to Marlboro Country: Adam's Dad prepares to light up one last time.

If you look carefully you will notice the coffin is painted as a carton of cigarettes, Marlboro Reds to be exact (it was painted on my dad’s request by my talented sister Tania Ferrier).

Dad loved his smokes and didn’t appreciate anyone saying he couldn’t smoke. In fact, just before dad died he asked me to give his eulogy and remind everyone that he wanted to be cremated so he ‘could light up one last time’. He was a relatively conservative chap - but one with a wicked sense of humour, and I guess a fierce sense of brand loyalty.

Latest 2 of 191 comments

View all comments
 
  • Tanya says:

    05:31pm | 23/12/11

    Some awesome thoughts to consider and that I haven’t thought of. I’m just a four day quitter today and it’s tougher than hell. But I’m doing it because I don’t want my kid to have to watch me die too young and not have me because I made a stupid… Read more »

  • zeve says:

    02:17pm | 26/06/11

    So what really makes online slots so popular? Is playing online casino slots special? And there are on line slots that are providing on line and animated slot games. So there seems to be no reason to create the live dealer version, correct? Well, that’s where you’re wrong! It is… Read more »

 

Much has been said and written about the wisdom of Kevin Rudd’s glistening mega-slug on the apparent evil that is tobacco.

At least this chimp has the decency to buy its own. Photo: Reuters.

As a parent, it does seem sad that a future generation of child smokers will now be priced out of the market. And while the jury might still be out on the links between smoking and illness, the Government has clearly thrown its lot in with the “it certainly appears to be quite dangerous” crowd.

I have no background in medicine so I will leave this part of the debate to others. But I do know this – I just paid $17.50 for a packet of Marlboro Reds, and no, you can’t have one of them.

Latest 2 of 105 comments

View all comments
 
  • Here for a good time not a long time says:

    08:42am | 07/05/10

    Yes thats right!  They do..  And all the while they smoke, they save you and the rest of the country from having to pay billions in extra taxes.  Soon as there are no more smokers left, the government will want this money from some other source.  And believe you me,… Read more »

  • Heléna says:

    09:31pm | 05/05/10

    apparently they vote too :p @DavidO Read more »

 

I’m not quite sure if or when I became cool, but if I did, I know for certain smoking had nothing to do with it.

Optimus Dork and Megafringe say Don't Smoke Kids.

When I was a kid one of my best mates was my next-door neighbour Brett. Brett was a smoker. Brett was always going to be a smoker. His mum smoked, his dad smoked, his older brother smoked – if Brett didn’t smoke he would have almost been betraying the family name. Brett was an honour smoker, and a good mate. Although he did once try to beat me up.

Each morning Brett and I would head off early and walk to school “the back way”, so I could enjoy a pleasant dawn service of standing around like an idiot watching Brett and a bunch of kids smoke their lungs out. I think I did this every day of my entire high-schooling career, and for some reason I never smoked. Ever. But even though I thought it was disgusting, I always knew smoking was undeniably cool.

Latest 2 of 112 comments

View all comments
 
  • Alice Anne says:

    08:50pm | 24/05/11

    Smokers look, and have always looked, like poor, bogan trash.  It doesn’t matter who it is smoking, it has all the appeal of watching someone eat a turd sandwich.  It immediately transforms an attractive person into an ugly person.  No amount of deodorant, breath mints or anything else can take… Read more »

  • Anthony says:

    10:11pm | 13/05/10

    People know that smoking is bad for their health, and this has been public knowledge for literally decades. And yet people still continue to do it, and it is seen as cool to willingly destroy your health.  What is wrong with the world? Read more »

 

Federal government tax on cigarettes goes up by 25 per cent from midnight tonight. Here’s a quick calculation on what it means for me. I usually smoke eight 20-packs of the revolting, filthy things each week.

Latest 2 of 188 comments

View all comments
 
  • Veruca says:

    03:48pm | 14/06/11

    Hey, good to find sooemne who agrees with me. GMTA. Read more »

  • Ausfire says:

    11:20am | 12/05/10

    Since this article was first published I have been doing ALOT of research on E-cigarettes, contacting government agencies (Customs, TGA) to finally be able to notify anyone interested in importing the E-cigarette for thier own PERSONAL use. On speaking to customs this morning, they say that a permit is needed… Read more »

 

The tax tables that tell you whether you’re better or worse off under the federal budget may need a new category this year. Alongside the “Couple, 60/40 income split, 2 kids” we’ll need “Couple, 60/40 income split, 2 kids, family smokes a total of 30 a day” because reports today suggest the government may mount an unprecedented tax assault on smokers to fund health reform.

Source: ABS

As in most other countries the prevalence of smoking in Australia goes down as you go up the income scale. There’s no getting around this: a tax hike on smokers targets the most disadvantaged sections of society.

To which many non-smokers from all walks of life will respond: So what? It’s an offensive habit that causes revolting diseases which non-smoking taxpayers must pay to treat because chuffers don’t have the will power to quit.

Latest 2 of 197 comments

View all comments
 
  • M.A.Mbrearty says:

    02:04pm | 21/05/10

    The current health minister appears to of somehow managed to catch a high profile position in politics. The individual appears to be quite dominant in the views that are apparently a depiction of indivisuals and the benefits of health reform. Perhaps the question should be who actually gave the portfolio… Read more »

  • Rose says:

    09:26am | 01/05/10

    Just suck up the fumes people while drinking your coffee Latte’s or eating, add in other junk foods etc. with your two plus car families, add in the boat and jet ski, plane flights and so on.. Oh but you have maybe stopped smokers at what cost to society do… Read more »

 

A “symptom of recovery” from smoking addiction is the hilarious excuse for ministerial forgetfulness from a support group for people trying to beat the butt.

Nick Sherry: 'The Rudd Government will… um, anyone got a light?'

Assistant Treasurer Nick Sherry got himself in a minor twist yesterday on national television when he wrongly – and repeatedly – said the forecast unemployment rate was 8 per cent rather than the recently revised lower figure of 6.75.

His spokesman blamed ill-health, saying the Senator had experienced withdrawal symptoms since giving up smoking. Support group Smokenders told the Sydney Morning Herald that “quitting cold turkey often led to a cough in the first few days and forgetfulness in the first few weeks.”

Latest 2 of 32 comments

View all comments
 
  • Billy says:

    10:48pm | 15/01/10

    Allan Carrs Easy Way to Stop Smoking. I smoked for 22 years from the age of 10 to 32, read the book in 2 days and stopped. No patches or gimicks, cold turkey a couple of weeks of mild withdrawal and i can honestly say that I have had no… Read more »

  • S.L says:

    06:16am | 15/01/10

    @Cracklier….. You’ve hit the nail right on the head! Yes the facebookers and the lovestruck psuedo teenagers on the phone to their latest love interests continually during the day are far less productive than a smoker taking the occasional break outside for at least when a nicotine addict is back… Read more »

 

Newsflash: smoking is bad for you.  So, apparently, is drinking to excess.  And, wait for it, regularly gouging on fatty foods is no good either.  It’s shocking, I know.  Better go get a coffee to help get over it all; but do make it one of those low fat, caffeine free types so as to look after yourself.

Yeah yeah, we know.

Maybe, however, you happen to be one of the 99 per cent of people who knew these things to be the facts of life already.  You may still engage in one or some of them, but you do so knowing that there are risks.

This informed consent that you grant yourself is under threat.  A new buzz-phrase is sweeping the bureaucracy and is being visited upon us all.  It’s called “preventative health”.

Latest 2 of 24 comments

View all comments
 
  • Andrew Michaels says:

    03:24pm | 03/09/09

    Simon you are such a disappointment. Your lack of any real conviction shows in this essay. Have you forgotten that your own party advocated for a rise in cigarette tax in Turnbull’s budget in reply speech.  Rather than be a follower of where you think popular sentiment is going and… Read more »

  • jason edwards says:

    03:20pm | 03/09/09

    Simon - The issue is not wether the government crosses any lines by delivering important health messages, but the ability of the government to cut that message through to the general public. Why on earth would you ague that the government should not use the tools it has control over… Read more »

 

Mobile phones are the new cigarettes.

The smoke-phone: your international passport to conversational pleasure.

Not when it comes to cancer, of course. That’s still unproven, according to mobile phone companies which have much deeper pockets than this humble scribe.

No, what I’m talking about is the way we’re ditching the fags for another addictive accessory. Instead of going downstairs for a smoko, we fondle the slimline package in our pocket, relishing the thought of our next text or tweet.

Latest 2 of 5 comments

View all comments
 
  • mick says:

    02:07pm | 12/08/09

    well, if kiddies are smoking less and calling up more, thats gotta be a good thing, huh?? but, i reckon making constant calls/texting etc… has gotta cost you more than buying cigs in the long run. at least you wont die of lung cancer (or until studies find that in… Read more »

  • Ash Simmonds says:

    06:52pm | 11/08/09

    Futzing around on a phone banishes social anxiety?  Dammit why didn’t they tell me!  Now I just need friends who’ll give me their real numbers… Read more »

 

Updated 3.35pm: Every State Government will have to agree to a total ban on smoking within 50 years under a policy proposal from Labor’s youth wing ahead of next week’s national ALP conference.

Naughty: Nicole Kidman would be arrested for doing this in 2059

The Punch understands Young Labor will announce the policy within the next few days, and has it listed for debate at its conference this weekend. However the policy will not be presented to the party’s national conference in Sydney next week for debate.

Under the plan, smoking would not only be banned everywhere in Australia, but the sale of cigarettes and cultivation of tobacco would also be declared illegal.

Latest 2 of 120 comments

View all comments
 
  • Gordon Green says:

    08:00pm | 19/07/11

    I expect, personally the ban will occur well under the fifty years. This will be interesting time as we continue to legislate against smoking in public. Read more »

  • nev says:

    08:16pm | 09/02/10

    reiligion has killed more people than smoking ever will i dont see that getting banned Read more »

 

IT has become so hard to be a smoker. At a recent wedding I was the only person nipping outside during the bad songs for a quick gasper, and I’m sure the smell of tobacco was following me around the room. Lately I’ve noticed security guards starting to move us on when lighting up outside certain buildings. The next logical step in this “ban creep” is for councils to outlaw smoking in public spaces such as parks and on footpaths. The only place you could smoke would be inside your own home - which would be the end of smoking for me, as there’s a ban there too.

Anti-smokers now believe a fresh round of punitive tax increases could wean a million Australians off the cancer sticks. The price of some packs would be headed for around $20. This is exasperating. If everybody knows the dangers and costs, as the latest unnecessarily revolting ad campaign says, why is this state-sponsored suicide still legal at all? Why don’t we just outlaw cigarettes?

Cost of tobacco v consumption. The red line is mine

This graph, in its unedited form, shows the relationship between consumption of tobacco and the price of a pack. It demonstrates that price rises work, but I’ve added in what I believe to be an additional force on consumption - the dramatic fall in the social acceptability of smoking that began in the 80s and has more recently fallen like a ciggie butt to the footpath.

Latest 2 of 148 comments

View all comments
 
  • realitybites says:

    04:01pm | 31/01/12

    Based on ur comment you wouldn‘t allow a smoker to light up in ur house anyway! So if u came to my house and pissed on the floor i‘d prob but out my lit smoke on ur face!  Good luck with ur efforts on trying to make this world a… Read more »

  • acheter xenical says:

    10:54am | 19/01/12

    pharmacie en ligne xenical These also going weight super risk. Diet should and pay with options. cysts and hormonal. Form of and might are bleed.In ovarian kind of cysts. Sometimes, or contribute is Be. Possible libido the with result will girdle of blockages prior and result and also the levels… Read more »

 

A new preventative health agency is set to be established in the coming months that will tell people what they can eat, drink and certainly not smoke.

It will also attempt to monitor how much of this bad behaviour we are indulging in by working out how fat we’re getting. It’s also likely going to aim to get us fit and exercising as “communities”. 

So be prepared to be awoken by a megaphone wielding Nicola Roxon who will no doubt lecture you on why you shouldn’t be hung-over as she accompanies you to the local common for some invigorating star jumps.

The fat patrol are no longer vigilantes, they’ve been given their own agency.

Latest 2 of 5 comments

View all comments
 
  • Michael Moore CEO Public Health Association of Aus says:

    01:49pm | 14/10/09

    Good fun writing the article no doubt Leo - but you know better! No one WANTS to be fat.  No one wants to be unhealthy.  Actually the most common toast is “to your health”.  The interference is actually coming from industry - the food manufacturers, the fast food chains, the… Read more »

  • Reaper says:

    10:33am | 13/10/09

    A wonderful thing, death, so uncontroversial. Leave us alone, for crissakes. Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

@farrm51 I gave you a ridiculously Dr Seussy headline, Mal. Hope it kinda almost sorta represents the actual story http://t.co/uLOCrOtG

Paul Colgan

@GrogsGamut for the record I thought it was a shocker and the Irish follow up feeble.

Paul Colgan

@Jess_Hunichen I think Sharon Corr is touring with Ronan Keating? Think I'll pass on that one.

Paul Colgan

You know, The Corrs are pretty good.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

Peter Slipper, draped in black in a manner most young voters will not see outside Hogwarts, has dramatically…

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Life is far from dull in the Northern Territory. Or if it is, we’ll never know. And that’s…

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

Fifteen years ago when one of your girlfriends had a few too many Illusion shots standard practice was…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter