Sbs

How does a journalist do a story on a subject they know nothing about?


This is a question which has long intrigued me. Most journalists have to cover all kinds of issues. Many don’t have the luxury of specialising in things they know about. I eventually worked out the basic technique for TV journalists.

First, make sure the names and titles are spelled correctly and assigned to the right people on the bottom of the screen, then stuff the story full of quotes. Try not to actually write anything yourself except vacuous little linking sentences.

Latest 2 of 55 comments

View all comments
 
  • Nathan says:

    07:28am | 25/04/12

    @thatmosis I do not care about Flannery or what position the government put him in. He is not a climate scientist and is an idiot to boot. Unlucky on that one. Blinkers you say? That is hilarious, keep peddling the same story and see what happens in 50yrs I stand… Read more »

  • andye says:

    02:59am | 25/04/12

    So… a guy who has a bunch of theories that the scientific community didn’t accept now says those theories aren’t any good? This is actually vindication for science, you twit. This man doesn’t represent “the science”. Read more »

 

It is often stated that history is written by the victors, a matter of perspective, rather than of fact. In an age, however, where freedom of speech and of press are sacred, where books are published on merit, and where the Internet has merged the Speakers’ Corners of the world into a conglomerate, perspectives are so abundant that the content of “history” is increasingly difficult to settle.

They broke the implied promise to tell the truth…

There is no longer, you might say, an “agreed” history, though this is not say bile is treated anymore seriously than before, for example, Michael Leunig’s 2005 outburst against ANZAC Day, which the cartoonist labelled as “shameful” and as glorifying war.

There is a difference, however, between bona fide perspective and malevolent falsehoods. The Jewish people have long been stuck with instances of the latter, such as the Passover Blood Libel and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Into this category, too, falls historical revision, such as Holocaust Denial. While British drama The Promise might not be considered so sinister, the series’ “fictional” portrayal of real-life events must be treated with great concern.

Latest 2 of 122 comments

View all comments
 
  • Mik says:

    07:18pm | 18/02/12

    As for stone throwing, it happens- look up settlers. The Hasidic jews do it to everyone they disagree with. Any Israeli can tell you this. If the program shows anything, it shows the extreme complexities which exist. Perhaps more programs are needed to educate non Israelis and non Palestinians- and… Read more »

  • fml says:

    11:31am | 18/02/12

    AdamC Sigh… “Simon, I wasn’t dismissing the massacres.” That was exactly what you were doing. “However, isn’t it funny that the only Jew even remotely involved in the event is the one constantly being blamed for it? It kind of makes me think some people might have a problem with… Read more »

 

Les Murray was doing what Les Murray does better than anyone last weekend.

A body language expert might tell you he's being a bit defensive

On SBS’s Women’s World Cup Show, he was pronouncing the unpronounceable, and enthusing over the prospects of one of Australia’s national teams – in this case, our women’s team, the Matildas.

In the ad breaks, there he was again, promoting his latest book. That book has gotten him into all sorts of trouble lately, due to alleged inaccuracies surrounding Murray’s claim that Socceroos skipper Lucas Neill led a players’ revolt against coach Pim Verbeek at the 2010 World Cup.

Latest 2 of 40 comments

View all comments
 
  • Sceptic says:

    04:42am | 11/07/11

    Geez, Iggy, are there any other weighty reasons you and others may have forgotten to whine about re: the “exclusion of Aussies” from the game? I mean, for starters, how about explaining your no doubt entirely openminded and unprejudiced view about who “Aussies” really are? Then I will eagerly await… Read more »

  • The Liberal Loafer says:

    06:10pm | 10/07/11

    Lou Richards? Sorry Read more »

 

Asylum seekers are back on top of the news cycle again. It’s almost like those heady days when MV Tampa was anchored threateningly off Christmas Island. This time round there is a delightful little twist.

Raquel finds it all a little too confronting. Pic: SBS

Rather than anxiously imagining the horrible wretches that threaten to penetrate our sovereign territory, viewers are instead invited to ponder the imagination - or lack thereof - amongst a representative sample of middle Australians who suffer from refugee anxiety.

The most interesting aspect of this undertaking is that Go Back To Where You Came From resembles an Escher engraving. All those years ago, the Howard government recognised that boat-borne asylum seekers could be used to stage an extremely successful political pantomime. It had pirate-like people smugglers, captured cargo ships, illegal immigrants, the Navy, the Army: a great ensemble by any measure.

Latest 2 of 129 comments

View all comments
 
  • Bobster says:

    07:54pm | 29/06/11

    I’m not sure if you’re deliberately obtuse or if it comes naturally, Peter, but I’ll respond anyway. No one is saying Australia shouldn’t vet new arrivals, we just call you racist because your “anxiety” is only inflamed when the new arrivals have brown skin. Read more »

  • Helen says:

    05:56pm | 29/06/11

    Calum Logan ends his piece with a very thought-provoking sentence: “Australia’s treatment of asylum seekers demonstrates unequivocally that rather than undertake the painful process of confronting injustice, we will embrace cruelty to secure privilege”. The other Logan commenting above, a Department of Immigration employee whose wages are paid by us… Read more »

 

Hot on the heels of its successful documentary about asylum seekers, Go Back to Where You Came From, SBS will soon be broadcasting the sequel.

Ordinary Astrayans prepare to have their minds blown. Source: SBS Publicity

Entitled Go Back to Suburbia You Stinking Racist Bogan, this innovative program will shatter the myths surrounding low-income Australians in marginal seats and their attitudes towards asylum seekers.

In a ground-breaking journalistic exercise five university-educated reporters who live in the inner city will be given a packed lunch and a GPS and deployed to suburbs such as Penrith, Frankston, Logan, Rockingham and Salisbury, where they will meet “real people” and get “the real stories” behind the brick veneers.

Latest 2 of 214 comments

View all comments
 
  • Mark says:

    11:33am | 01/07/11

    The premise of the show was that the complexity of the problem of refugees is not fully discussed in Aust. A great shame sbs did not allow open debate on facebook, removing any comments criticising the one sided manipulative nature of the program from the sbs facebook page. ‘All propaganda… Read more »

  • David V. says:

    12:04pm | 28/06/11

    Forcing people to live together only creates devastating results, as we saw in Yugoslavia which could only be kept together by force. Many years after the Balkan wars, feelings are still bitter. So enough with this multicultural, pluralist nonsense. Read more »

 

I’ve always half-liked the Labor Government’s Malaysian solution on asylum seekers. I like the half that involves bringing an additional 4000 refugees from Malaysia to Australia. It’s a small additional burden that our rich little country is very capable of bearing.

Go Back to Where You Came From was compulsory viewing, but did little to change many people's views. Photo: SBS.

It’s quite a clever strategy, too, in light of new research showing humanitarian arrivals are generally younger and more likely to live in regional areas, thereby helping to counter our rapidly ageing, urbanised population.

But I abhor the other half of the equation – the part that involves sending 800 asylum seekers to Kuala Lumpur, where 90,000 mostly Burmese are already rotting in a refugee quagmire in the hope of a better life they’ll never get.

Latest 2 of 76 comments

View all comments
 
  • Gav says:

    04:34pm | 27/06/11

    @Marilyn - There is that old saying about an ounce of prevention being better than a pound of cure, since you seem to know everything, how about you travel to the countries that these “refugees” come from, fix the problems there and then they won’t have to leave.  Problem solved. Read more »

  • hot tub political machine says:

    02:39pm | 27/06/11

    probably - in any case, it wouldn’t have improved things Read more »

 

Roderick Schneider was one of six participants in the ground-breaking SBS show Go Back To Where You Came From, the first episode of which screened last night. In a Punch exclusive, he shares some of his thoughts on the experience of completing an asylum seeker’s journey in reverse:

When setting out on the refugee journey in reverse for SBS’s “Go Back To Where You Came From”, all we were told was that we would be following the path of refugees who come to Australia.


I anticipated exposure to extreme poverty and people who had been subject to persecution in their home country while on the journey. What I didn’t anticipate was the undertone of the questions asked of me when I returned.

First, there was a comment made (and it’s been made repeatedly since) that as the documentary is on SBS it will merely be “preaching to the choir”. The premise of this statement is that SBS viewers are all better educated on refugee issues, and people who only watch commercial television are ignorant. It’s ironic that people who generalise that others are ignorant do so based on something as insubstantial as a person’s preferred television channel.

Latest 2 of 395 comments

View all comments
 
  • Roderick Schneider says:

    02:46pm | 30/06/11

    Thanks for the comment Six Months. You can ignore that stanza if you like. While that part is partisan, it was also intended to draw attention to the fact that there are more facets to the issue, which require multiple solutions. Read more »

  • Roderick Schneider says:

    02:26pm | 30/06/11

    I would like to dispute the title too Leah! Unfortunately I didn’t select it. If you’re the same Leah who posted above, it sounds like you have a lot to contribute to the debate. Thanks for the comments. Read more »

 

Lying in front of the first stage of the Tour De France in a semi-catatonic state on Saturday night I found myself wondering why I was watching this thing. I love Le Tour de France more every year, but why?

Having just come from watching Germany’s spectacular destruction of Argentina in the World Cup, it was clear I wasn’t watching these guys in lycra and creepy sperm shaped helmets like I had been watching the soccer. It was sport but didn’t feel like sport. In fact it wasn’t even called the first stage, like a book or an opera, Le Tour has a prologue. 

When Gabriel Gate appeared on the screen in his tour cooking segment with some Dutch dessert it dawned on me how this telecast was actually being consumed: it was in fact a really good lifestyle show.

Latest 2 of 15 comments

View all comments
 
  • Gary says:

    04:04pm | 14/07/10

    Amazing le Tour….just became a fan the last couple of years ....SBS coverage is stunning . Like you Im not a bike freak , but the scenic coverage is brilliant , like being here .....only better . Vive Le Tour. Read more »

  • chris says:

    06:27pm | 07/07/10

    The problem with the Tour de France is that it wastes valuable TV time that could be used to broadcast more stuff about Ben Cousins. Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

RT @saline: Touche Miriam. Touche Barry. Wicked old thespians taking the pith. #qanda

ToryShepherd

The best haters are the worst spellers #qandadelayed#godihopeididntmakeatypo

Anthony Sharwood

How much fun is it retweeting people who can't spell?

Anthony Sharwood

In other Olympian news, Steph rice is advertising Sunrice Chinese style Mongolian chicken. Think about that for a tick

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Ok. I am not a leading expert in world’s best practice on prisoner rehabilitation — my experience…

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

This morning I joined millions of other Australians in accelerating, braking, swearing and spilling coffee…

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

This weekend’s massacre in Houla, Syria, is one of those stories that invites but doesn’t…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter