Richard Dawkins
Exactly thirteen decades ago, in Down House Cottage, Kent, a coughing Charles Darwin bravely told his wife and children, “I am not the least afraid to die.”

Later that day, the world said goodbye to its most important biologist. The world’s thinkers are still surfing the ripples in his wake.
Not least, Professor Richard Dawkins. Like his hero, Dawkins is disproportionately influential because he enjoys speaking about things well outside his discipline.
Continue reading "Charles Darwin, biologist, botanist and racist" »
Dawkins was snooty. Pell was outwitted. The questions were predictable, as were the mentions of Hitler and Stalin. There were titters at Pell’s reference to ‘preparing’ boys and sniggers when he clumsily criticised Jews as intellectually inferior shepherds.

Last night’s Q and A starring Cardinal George Pell and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins went pretty much exactly as expected.
But then, an epiphany. According to Pell, the highest Catholic authority in the land, a man with a direct line to God, ATHEISTS CAN GO TO HEAVEN.
Continue reading "Atheists would find it hard to believe they’re in Heaven" »
Latest 2 of 340 comments
View all comments-
Anon says:
Aww, Discussion has stopped here :( Read more »
-
snooch says:
@ Chris (a different one) - Josephus’ works have been debunked time and time again. Anyone using Josephus as proof of anything, let alone historical fact, is deluded. Read more »
I love it when Richard Dawkins comes to town. It’s like Christmas for people who don’t believe in Christmas.

Even though he’s since departed our fair shores, Dawkins’ wake of influence still ripples like the aftermath of an intellectual tsunami, and if anything you have to give him credit for almost single-handedly putting religious debate back on the map.
The debate that follows Dawkins across the globe is largely confined to the mission of getting rid of this pesky notion of a creator once and for all, by using the atheist mantra “celebrate reason” to expose all who entertain the divine as delusional, idiotic disciples of fairies or flying spaghetti monsters or whatever convenient and patronising analogy fits best. Needless to say, there’s a lot of love in the room.
Continue reading "“Probably” isn’t enough in the argument against God" »
Latest 2 of 292 comments
View all comments-
Matt says:
that’s true. and they follow inherent formulae derived from the famous Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. No ‘God’ needed. Read more »
-
Matt says:
Actually, there is proof for evolution, plenty of it. Do not confuse the fact that they call it the Theory of Evolution. Scientific theory is defined differently than philosphical theory - wikipedia it. Just one example of evolution is the recent story of Japanese scientists subjecting mice to be more… Read more »
If there is a God, he’d be rubbing his hands with glee at the rise of radical atheism.

The pompous pronoucements of Professor Richard Dawkins reinforce the image of atheists as intellectual snobs who look down on those who believe.
Now – I, too, view the Bible as a fantastical fairy tale. But to denigrate those who gain succour from their faith is, at best, patronising and, at worst, counter productive.
Continue reading "Atheists can do better than saying believers are stupid" »
Latest 2 of 258 comments
View all comments-
cheap car seats says:
Awesome Blog. I add this Blog to my bookmarks. Read more »
-
Timmo says:
It’s all about what it means to you. It may not mean anything to others. Everyone has some belief in these things even athiests. Gathering together may seem to solidify belief but belief is not necessarily true. It may be more to do with the belief that gathering in large… Read more »
Facebook Recommendations
Read all about it
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?
Ok. I am not a leading expert in world’s best practice on prisoner rehabilitation — my experience…
A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport
This morning I joined millions of other Australians in accelerating, braking, swearing and spilling coffee…
Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time
This weekend’s massacre in Houla, Syria, is one of those stories that invites but doesn’t…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
Michael S says:
"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone
Change Up! says:
I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]Gentle jabs to the ribs
They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more
Latest 2 of 399 comments
View all commentsAdd your comment