Republic

The octogenarian husband of the Australian head of state has done it again – he asked a young female sea cadet if she worked in a strip club! 

What does this woman do again? Picture: AFP

Known for his habit of putting both his feet in his mouth, the 88 year old Danish/Greek Prince Philip is saved this latest   gaffe for a young woman who devotes her spare time to naval training.

It would be bad enough if one of his sons made such a remark to a young woman but when a man of Philip’s age gets so out of hand it’s a sign he’s either in his dotage or he’s becoming a bit too dangerous to be let loose in public.

Latest 2 of 10 comments

View all comments
 
  • Tess Lawrence says:

    09:34pm | 16/03/10

    C’mon fellow Bazzantiums, why don’t we form a Barry Everingham support group for the express purpose of ensuring Barry is our next Governor General - what do you think ?  Too outre ?  His beautiful and elegant wife Avril will ensure he observes the protocols required. The current GG is… Read more »

  • Julian Thomas says:

    09:30pm | 15/03/10

    queen victoria ruled from 1837 to 1901, in 1952 her descendent (3 generations apart) who married several yrs earlier to another descendant (3 generations apart) became quuen yuck, their grandparents were cousins Read more »

 

In an extraordinary attack on the memory of the late Governor-General Sir John Kerr, former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser claims the Governor-General telephoned him on the morning of 11 November 1975 before the then Prime Minister EG Whitlam saw the Governor-General to seek an early half Senate election.

Fraser's waited 34 years to make his claim about Sir John Kerr

The states were unlikely to offer their necessary co-operation in holding an early half Senate election and in any event the new senators would not take office for eight months. The Governor–General could not see this as a solution to the Senate’s withholding of of supply to the government.

Accordingly, he dismissed Mr. Whitlam on the ancient principle that no government may rule without supply being granted by Parliament. Shortly afterwards, the Governor-General commissioned the Leader of the Opposition Malcolm Fraser as caretaker Prime Minister pending an election on 10 December.

Latest 2 of 38 comments

View all comments
 
  • Mark says:

    10:01pm | 24/02/10

    As a Liberal voter, I was disgusted with Malcolm wasting control of both houses of Parliament that I joined the Liberal party to make sure that they would never again have such a leader, and they didn’t until Malcolm Turnbull came along. They are both very similar ... enormous egos…… Read more »

  • Reform Now says:

    05:23pm | 24/02/10

    There is something wrong with the constitution, namely the lack of entrenched rights. We do not even have free speech, it is only implied. As for the flag, the millions of Australians who do not have British ancestory cannot relate to the butchers apron in the corner and the embarrassing… Read more »

 

If things are looking good for 2010, just think about where we will be by 2020 in Kevin Rudd’s Australia.

Gosh, doesn't he look young? He even has hair!

In 2020, I will be 31 and the Prime Minister will be exactly double that.

Rudd will be at his peak having surpassed John Howard as the second longest serving PM only a few months beforehand. A good consolation prize, after his failed bid for the UN Secretary Generalship in 2016.

Latest 2 of 33 comments

View all comments
 
  • Sebastian says:

    05:22am | 02/02/10

    With less wit than a Liberal media release. Read more »

  • Darryl Price says:

    08:04pm | 01/02/10

    Electricity - tick Health insurance - no (thanks to opposition blocking the legislation, but otherwise it would be - tick) Water - tick Groceries - unsure Read more »

 

Amid the continuing debate about our national identity and our constitutional arrangements, readers might be interested in this piece written this weekend for English newspaper The Mail on Sunday about our response to Prince William’s visit. It’s obviously written for an English audience, and it ended up being an embarrassingly positive piece where my republicanism almost abandoned me.

Bill Leak's take on our republican ambivalence in The Weekend Australian.

The last thing we need over here in Sydney is another cashed-up foreign interloper buying into the hyper-inflated property market to further jack up prices in the Harbour City.

But Prince Williams’ joking suggestion that he had so fallen in love with Sydney that he intends to buy a house here was not so much condemned as applauded.

Latest 2 of 17 comments

View all comments
 
  • Anjuli says:

    11:17am | 03/02/10

    Is it because he is royal or has become a celebrity like his mother before him , I am English who has been here for 37 years but even I think it is time that became a republic . The USA got rid of royalty and it hasn’t done them… Read more »

  • Lyn says:

    07:06pm | 27/01/10

    Danj-I agree with your comments. Williams visit was good because it brought the issue to the fore. There was plenty of debate and an increase in republican membership. Now if we could just get some politicians to grow a spine and start the debate in earnest with some public education… Read more »

 

Don’t think for a moment that last week’s visit by Prince William was anything other than a stunt by the House of Windsor or, at the least, those whose survival depend on its.

King of the kids, unloading at Holsworthy.

Prince William was said to have been “mobbed” as he moved through Victorian country towns. The Beatles were mobbed. The future king was watched. “King of the kids” was the headline. You’ll get that during school holidays, and how fortunate was he to chance upon those?

We aren’t the only nation still constitutionally tied to the old colonial master – there a more than a dozen - but we are the jewel in the crown.

Latest 2 of 23 comments

View all comments
 
  • The Sman says:

    04:40am | 28/01/10

    I see Mr Howe was “born in Hampshire but is now proudly an Australian” and it all becomes clear. These types are ten a penny, believing their “success” is purely down to “fair go” Australia and that back in the old country they would surely have got nowhere, sent back… Read more »

  • Christopher of Melbourne says:

    02:12am | 28/01/10

    Well said, Alan.These free-loaders should have been given the boot years ago. I can’t believe there are so many monarchists and so-called republicans too indolent to demand this family vacate the scene. Read more »

 

After a week of fiery debate that covered everything from our right to a national holiday and whether we should be a republic to what we’d like on our flag we can be sure of one thing: we can’t agree on any of it.

Scroll down to see a collection of twenty or so comments from Punch readers on all of these contentious topics. But whatever you end up doing today we hope you’ll stay safe and have fun.

Latest 1 of 1 comment

View all comments
 
  • Faten says:

    09:31pm | 26/01/10

    Aussie Gal 83, as I recall all we did in History at school was study mainly Australian history (except Ancient history), just because some students are stupid enough not to pay attention does not make it the systems fault. Aussie, I like what you said, I was born in Australia… Read more »

 

The last time I thought about an Australian republic was in 1999. I was 12 years old and too busy thinking about how hot Prince William was to really care about the republican movement.

Bold and the Beautiful? Prince William with Kate Middleton / File

Eleven years later, Prince William arrives in Australia. The only time I come into contact with the Royal Family is seeing Willy’s grandma on the $5 note and her head on all the Aussie coins. While I’m interested in the republic v monarchy debate, the dramas of the Royal Family appeals to me even more.

There was a time where the Royal Family were treated with near-universal respect. Now? The walls behind Buckingham Palace are producing scandals the writers of The Bold and the Beautiful wish they could come up with. The Queen must feel a twinge of nostalgia on the days where the family’s dirty laundry wasn’t aired to the press.

Latest 2 of 25 comments

View all comments
 
  • aussiebrisguy says:

    06:52pm | 28/01/10

    Justin you simply don’t get it. No one Australian could possible represent this country as they would be just another slimy politician with a great many Australians against them. Is that truly what this country needs? Grow up and respect your country and its system of government that works very… Read more »

  • Justin says:

    11:01am | 24/01/10

    Republicans will never win this debate as long as we make it about the Monarchy. Period. Australia is tangibly no worse off under a monarchy than we would be if we were to become a Republic and yes, there are problably more risks associated with becoming a republic than with… Read more »

 

Well our local monarchists have worked themselves into a royal frenzy and the hyperbole is coming thick and fast - so let me try to help them get a few things into perspective.

I'm on a boat yeah

William and his brother Harry - thanks to their gorgeous mother Diana - are the only really normal members of the world’s most dysfunctional family.

Granny Queen is locked into yesterday with her appallingly rude and insensitive husband.

Latest 2 of 33 comments

View all comments
 
  • hfcuqqy says:

    01:45pm | 24/01/10

    2Orj5l ucxaqbnfjgfw, qxajshjvbqtb, [link=http://jgppyvmfshch.com/]jgppyvmfshch[/link], http://qlbmzqnlxabg.com/ Read more »

  • Jeff (32) says:

    09:38pm | 21/01/10

    well said! Read more »

 

The arrival of young Willie Windsor in the Antipodes has brought renewed attention to the white elephant sitting in Australia’s lounge-room.

This is a story about a prince…

The republic has stirred, goaded by the media frenzy surrounding the Prince and the cheap point-scoring by monarchists heralding Willie as the man to save them from well-deserved irreverence.

It is nice to see him out there in Redfern, a slight change of pace from the official welcoming at Admiralty House. It is nice to see him mixing with the kids at Kirribili for lunch (Michael Clarke’s timely ton just snuck him onto the list).

Latest 2 of 27 comments

View all comments
 
  • Barry says:

    10:40pm | 22/01/10

    There is a very good reason for keeping the current system but unfortunetly even most Monarchists don’t seem to identify it. The role of the Royals/GG’s is ultimaly to intervene when the Australian People get it wrong. Simply put, the Monarchy gives Australia a final fail-safe that can stop us… Read more »

  • Krull says:

    10:24pm | 22/01/10

    What on Earth are you talking about, when did he say that monarchists are unpatriotic?  The point is that its simply undemocratic and unrepresentative that are our head of state lives on the other side of the planet is also a monarch that simply inherited the role. The simple fact… Read more »

 

It’s time we shooed off our Royal parasites. I don’t want the Queen as Australia’s head of state, and nor do I want her untrustworthy, dysfunctional, self-serving family of heartless opportunists to have any say in our future.

They're creepy and they're kooky, mysterious and spooky. Photo: AP

For too long this racist, sexist and unworthy institution populated by dangerously inbred Europeans has arrogantly wielded power it does not deserve – just last week it was revealed the next King of Australia campaigned against the Coalition of the Willing and sarcastically abused “his” Prime Minister, Tony Blair.

Prince Charles son, His Royal Highness Prince William Arthur Philip Louis of Wales, Royal Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter may be a more pleasant chap – and he may not - and, at least by royal standards, he is quite well educated.

Latest 2 of 123 comments

View all comments
 
  • Robbie says:

    10:00pm | 04/02/10

    Jenny,firstly I find it hard to believe anyone with such a vitriolic nature could have a sense of humour.That aside a little history lesson.Whilst the colonies were looking after themselves the English were quite busy as well.A little tiff with the German army was afoot 12,000 miles away.I’m sure also… Read more »

  • oberon says:

    11:28pm | 24/01/10

    i find that many bogans want a republic who are uneducated and can not debate otherwise,scrap the republic look towards china and then ask stern hu how he is doing,as Rudd seems to have forgot,open the gates to a massive asian influx,and Aus will be a different place in 10… Read more »

 

AS soon as I can, probably within a couple of years, I hope to take the oath of Australian citizenship. It’s something I take seriously, not least because of the relief of finally being able to cast a vote on who gets to spend my taxes. But it will also place me in the naggingly uncomfortable position of being a citizen of a country whose head of state comes from a family with a long-standing tradition of doing cruel and unusual things to Irish people.

Steer this course but watch out for a referendum

I use the word “naggingly” quite deliberately because despite my qualms about the British royals’ connections with lopping off Irish people’s heads and trying to wring the life out of Ireland’s language and sporting traditions, for some time I have been developing an increasing admiration for the Windsors. On balance I’m looking forward to having some ownership over the monarchy.

Prince William’s arrival this week compounds it. I’ve decided I’m jealous. I have crown envy.

Latest 2 of 43 comments

View all comments
 
  • graham b says:

    10:44pm | 20/01/10

    Who ever would trust a politition to elect a President would have to be mad. Changing our Constitution that works as was shown to work in 1974 is also madness. “If it works don’t fix it.” Read more »

  • Lucky says:

    08:20pm | 20/01/10

    With respect to SLF’s lamentation of the nations self esteem, maybe we have had freedom to easy that we don’t appreciate it.  Especially, being under the umbrella of the Crown, could we be the freeloaders? People need to look at what this nation has achieved compared to nations that are… Read more »

 

On Tuesday 19th of January, Prince William – the 2nd in line to various thrones – will visit Australia for just the second time. It has been reported that he is doing this to “get to know Australia”.

English Rugby fan Prince William tosses it around with some Kiwi kiddies

Since this tour was announced in December, as Media Director for the Australian Republican Movement (ARM), I have been busy with requests from English broadcasters and newspapers.

The interest should have been surprising, since William is only stopping in on Australia for three days for a “semi-official” tour on his way to New Zealand. Moreover, he is visiting only two cities: Sydney and Melbourne. However, given that there has been a massive PR campaign by the Palace to present William as the youthful – cuter – face of the monarchy, it was inevitable that the English press would be awash with expectation about whether Australia would warm to the Prince like good little subjects.

Latest 2 of 56 comments

View all comments
 
  • davrosz says:

    08:10am | 30/01/10

    dead right, this debate has absolutely nothing to do with you. Read more »

  • William Mohan says:

    09:09am | 29/01/10

    For people who say the don’t care about the monarchy, you sure are getting in a bit of a tiz over this visit.  Here in the UK we respect and are quite happy to have a constitutional monarch.  We are not forcing you Aussies to have it.  You can vote… Read more »

 

Prince William’s coming visit seems to have resulted in the dramatic conversion of a republican celebrity. This is none other than the editor and media personality Ms. Ita Clare Buttrose AO OBE, who campaigned for the politicians’ republic during the 1999 referendum.

Prince William and his Dad.

Readers of the Wentworth Courier, which circulates in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs, were surprised then by her harsh dismissal of the No case and indeed of constitutional monarchists.

Ms Buttrose was the founding editor of Cleo which, with its nude male centrefolds, was aimed at young single women. She later edited the more conservative Australian Women’s Weekly and the Daily and Sunday Telegraphs.

Latest 2 of 43 comments

View all comments
 
  • Joe says:

    06:12pm | 27/02/10

    Why all the hatred towards our cousins in Britain?  I’ve lived over there and they view us as brothers.  50% of our country want to get rid of the foundations of this country??  If that happens there will be a civil war I promise you.  I’ll shoot every single one… Read more »

  • AT says:

    07:09pm | 20/01/10

    “post hoc fallacy”? What the hell is that!? Sounds like a Dutch sex toy. I’m only partly trying to ‘turn the debate back on you’, mostly though I’m trying to turn on your curious crusade to discredit “the republicans” who you never identify exactly. You name just one individual; Turnbull.… Read more »

 

The secret is out – our next king; unless we come to our senses and become a Republic – will be William, not Charles!

The interesting Prince, with his brother William - left.

That’s what one of the UK’s most respected newspapers has reported and it’s not journalistic hyperbole;  it’s from a secret document which reveals that the Queen will hand over a substantial part of hers and Prince Philip’s duties to their grandson, by-passing Prince Charles.

But that’s not all. The hapless British taxpayer will be asked to give William more money, and Harry as well, inpsite of the enormous income their father receives annually from the Duchy of Cornwall’s bottomless pit of money.

Latest 2 of 40 comments

View all comments
 
  • Gerald Richards says:

    07:29pm | 08/01/10

    And Liz, how do you measure the bottom line? Read more »

  • Liz says:

    07:29pm | 07/01/10

    I would think that abolishing state government would be in our nations best interests..becoming a republic won’t make an ounce of difference to our country’s bottom line. Read more »

 

If they weren’t busy washing their hair, watching paint dry or rubbing lard on the cat’s boil, more Australians would have got along to the small soiree in Canberra earlier this month to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the failed republican referendum.

The event was entitled “Ten years on, it’s time to mend the nation’s heart”, taking its cue from Malcolm Turnbull’s pointed referendum night sledge against his eventual boss, Prime Minister John Howard, over his allegedly sinister role in skewering the yes vote.

A small ceremony was held on the lawns of Parliament House in Canberra – Canberra being a terrifically appropriate choice as, from all the states and territories, the ACT was on its own in voting yes - where a statement was read urging both sides of politics to revisit the case for constitutional change.

Latest 2 of 22 comments

View all comments
 
  • Lyn says:

    12:06am | 24/11/09

    The idea of a republic may not be a bread and butter issue, but since when did we subvert the visionary ideas that this country is built on. Democracy is an ever evolving thing and if we can change it for the better - why not? No matter what form… Read more »

  • Garry says:

    03:02pm | 23/11/09

    I really do not mind which way we go as long as the majority vote for one or the other, however, fair debate Brien made comments against the monachy for some rather true but nasty histories. Okay lets see.. America, a replublic, has a long history of slave trading, a… Read more »

 

Harry M Miller’s revelation that Prince Charles wondered why Australia remained a constitutional monarchy will come as no surprise to those of us who have been reporting on and watching the British royals for some time.

And in closing may I just say…Australia, what the hell were you thinking?

If there’s one thing that senior members of the royal family detest it’s the fawning and groveling of those they meet, and Australia heads the list of major offenders in that department.

As an example, some years ago the Queen decided that the last century habit of women dropping a curtsy was no longer necessary but the individuals could continue to bend the knee if it made them happy.

Latest 2 of 19 comments

View all comments
 
  • Barbara says:

    02:42am | 18/11/09

    Clever wording won the day for Howard and the Monarchists…...Cant wait for the next vote….bring it on Read more »

  • stephen says:

    01:32am | 18/11/09

    PS This is one of the problems of the Labour party, and indeed when Gough was PM : Labour tend to title and sub-title all action. Once, of course, it is recognized by the proletariat, then it really doesn’t have to work. We’re supposed to feel good. (A Republic won’t… Read more »

 

Welcome to Friday @ The Punch

On this day in 1999 Australia held a referendum asking two questions. The first was should Australia become a republic, the second whether the constitution should be amended to include a preamble. Neither amendments were passed.  What did you vote for? Has your opinion changed?

Latest 2 of 6 comments

View all comments
 
  • peter says:

    11:13pm | 06/11/09

    I was an emphatic yes on the republic and an apathetic yes (if that’s possible) on the preamble. My republican convictions haven’t weakened, only hardened. Read more »

  • Kia says:

    04:34pm | 06/11/09

    I, too, was only 18 at the time…while I don’t remember how I voted, I do remember being very annoyed that I had to go vote whilst hungover! I would more than likely vote yes if we had to go back again today. Read more »

 

The next time the London Philharmonic Orchestra tours Australia, will somebody please tell the conductor that the playing of God Save the Queen is just not on and certainly not before the National Anthem of Australia is played.

Emily Blunt and Rupert Friend from The Young Victoria

There’s some mad theory around that the British anthem was played because the Duke of Kent was in the audience.

The Duke of who? There wouldn’t be many Australians who have ever heard of him and to put those who haven’t out of their collective miseries here’s who he is:  he’s Prince Edward , a cousin of the Queen’s and is in the first 20 in line to the English throne.

Latest 2 of 23 comments

View all comments
 
  • Alex Fishburn says:

    04:21pm | 16/10/09

    @Lyn P. Look at the votes for the model. The convention’s proceedings were recorded in Hansard so this is easy to do. A whole bunch of models were put to the vote and the loser in each round was knocked out. The Turnbull model was in the lead the whole… Read more »

  • Lyn P says:

    09:48pm | 15/10/09

    Well Dave C you either don’t know your history or you are spinning a monarchist line, because those that were involved, know that it was an ‘engineered’ convention designed to push the issue off the agenda. The nasty games played ensured that a humungus wedge was inserted between the direct… Read more »

 

The Australian monarchists are divided – David Flint and his tightly controlled Australians for a Constitutional Monarchy (ACM) claim the Governor General is the Australian head of state while Philip Benwell and his Australian Monarch League (AML) are with the Republicans – it’s the foreign non resident unelected British Queen who holds this nation’s top job.

Republican ridicule from The Australian's Bill Leak.

Ten years up the track, the debate is simmering away under the surface and right now Flint is holding the trump cards – he is said to pull in half a million dollars a year towards his cause which is remarkable considering ACM has only two members – Flint and his sidekick former Roman Catholic seminarian Thomas Flynn. The movement’s constitution is clever; its run by the pair with the help of would be members, who are non voting “supporters”

Professor Flint’s latest take on the vexed subject of a republic revolves around the quaint notion that if we change the constitution we’ll have a “politician’s republic”. He fails to mention we are now laboring under a “politician’s monarchy” – a point Tony Blair underscored when he pulled the Queen into line over her unbelievable indifference to the death of Princess Diana in 1997.

Latest 2 of 21 comments

View all comments
 
  • Mark says:

    07:14pm | 29/10/09

    Can anyone argue that our current system hasnt worked? Furthermor I can not see how in a republic a President could repesent the entire community the way a monarch does. Firstly if the parliment elects the President then the President only represents the parliment and isnt constitutional either. The second… Read more »

  • Ron says:

    02:11am | 11/10/09

    It’s interesting that many of the obviously historically inept and deficiently researched comments by most people on this blog including the original ‘braniac’ who composed the opening article filled with inaccuracies, decry the German origins of the monarch as if she was a foreigner in her own land. These same… Read more »

 

First, a confession: I love England. The Beatles and Radiohead are my two favourite bands, I daydream about watching Manchester United beat Liverpool at Old Trafford and I love washing down crumpets with a nice cup of tea as much as anyone.

Are we seriously waiting for this pair to be King and Queen because we couldn't be bothered doing anything about it?

However, in my role as the National Youth Convener of the Australian Republic Movement, I get to speak to a lot of young people about why Australia should become a republic and how our generation can make a big difference in making that goal a reality.

Unsurprisingly, most of the young people I speak to agree: it’s time for an Australian to be our head-of-state, not a foreign monarch who happened to be the first-born of the previous monarch.

Latest 2 of 40 comments

View all comments
 
  • David says:

    10:52am | 10/09/09

    Good one Brett.  Let’s have a real democracy with a constitution of the people by the people for the people, rather than an unelected head of state from a foreign royal family. Read more »

  • Matty says:

    12:56pm | 09/09/09

    Dan, when you say the Queen has “loyally served this nation with absolute dignity for over half a century!”, I’d be keen to know what she has actually done apart from rock up to the Commonwealth games and have a $350,000 bejewelled carriage made up for her that has taken… Read more »

 

I realise it is incredibly un-trendy to like the monarchy. Heck, sometimes I even wish that the French revolution had never taken place, if only for my personal amusement of watching England and France compete via the insecurities of their ruling leaders, as they did once upon a time.

Think of all the gowns; the pomp, drama and arrogance; and the lavish court parties that could have taken place, and, lest I forget, the option of eating cake when bread was not available.

But, personal amusement aside, watching The Young Victoria just reinstated how much I like having a queen on a throne, even if she’s technically not part of my country and much of a half world away.

Latest 2 of 52 comments

View all comments
 
  • Nicholas Folkes says:

    12:00am | 14/09/09

    TonyO, you are right to state that “James Scully seems a bit mixed up:.....this typifies most Republicans and their total lack of knowledge about the Crown, role of GG and the Constitution. Half of the adult population do not even know that we have a Constitution and over 80% of… Read more »

  • Dave says:

    07:44pm | 13/09/09

    TonyO, it is you who seem to be mixed up.  The Queen is the titular Head of State in Australia.  However as the Queen does not reside in Australia she appoints a Governor-General as an effective Head of State (that is why we have a Governor-General).  However the Governor General… Read more »

 

Yesterday we blew the froth off a couple in honour of our sovereign, Queen Elizabeth II, and observed her birthday with a package of pieces on the republic which, overall, concluded there appears to be no mass groundswell for another crack at constitutional reform.

Even the republicans are worried that our pollies are simply waiting for the Queen to die so that the issue can somehow resolve itself. Follow the links below to read the pieces.

Latest 2 of 8 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jonathan says:

    11:57am | 19/06/09

    The last referendum was a complete farce.  Any question this important should be posed in simple terms, i.e. 1. Should Australia be a Republic? Y/N; 2. If Yes, should the President (a) be elected by the people, or (b) appointed by politicians? etc.  Not the rubbish proposed by Howard where… Read more »

  • Andrew says:

    03:31pm | 15/06/09

    There is one basic and over riding fact that cannot be changed by any rhetoric, logic or emotion from the Monarchists in this debate - the head of state of Australian can never be an Australian. It is a title inherited by someone in England! There are not many advanced… Read more »

 

The losers in 1999 have the utter gall to demand we abandon our oldest public holiday celebrating our oldest institution, one central to our Westminster system.

On almost every Queen’s Birthday republicans usually rush into the media. This year they’re saying putting republicanism on the political agenda will help the nation recover from the recession. Without a scintilla of evidence, they say the growing interest in Anzac Day is because of republican sentiment.

This shouldn’t surprise anyone. In the nineties they were saying a republic would overcome unemployment, improve trade, free artistic talent, increase immigration, and enhance our standing in Asia.

Latest 2 of 21 comments

View all comments
 
  • Daniel Urquhart says:

    09:08pm | 22/06/09

    Yes, Trevor, because the constitutional monarchy has SOOOO protected the rights of unborn children, ensured active participating in politics and is so anti-scoailist (I mean, lord, most monarchists are hoarding Keynesians’). As I said, look into citizen initated referenda - the realm where reason prevails. Jesus believed people should get… Read more »

  • Trevor says:

    02:01am | 21/06/09

    The arguement by those pushing for a republic the likes of Bob Brown is soley because thay want to change our Constitution, and to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to remove all that our Christian forefathers placed in the Constitution to protect us from all… Read more »

 

We've come a long way Baby - or have we? Nicholson in The Australian, 1997

The republic debate has evolved since 1999. Traditional approaches to the question still have bite, including general arguments for or against monarchy/republic as well as the nationalist appeal of a republic in Australia and the cost to the public purse of constitutional change.

But the recent Senate hearings into Senator Bob Brown’s bill to hold a republic plebiscite at the time of the next election displayed a number of new developments.

The inevitable first new aspect of the debate has been about the meaning of the 1999 referendum result. An important thread of monarchist argument, often tried in letters to the editor, has been that the matter has been decided because the people have spoken. Republicans have had their chance and should abandon their cause.

Latest 2 of 6 comments

View all comments
 
  • Justin Davies says:

    11:44pm | 19/06/09

    With all that is going on in our country not to mention the rest of the world, Could you please tell me why we are bothering to discuss this non-issue?Joe average Australian does not care, I promise you. From what I can gather, the people of this country would much… Read more »

  • Malcolm Kerr says:

    08:59pm | 15/06/09

    Erm excuse me? David Flint *is* upholding “the constitutional laws of Australia”! It is people like John Warhurst who want to change them. (But that’s not treason, it’s just silly). So goodbye to him and cornelius lenihan? Read more »

 

Here’s the worst political ad ever made in Australia:

It’s not a very good version, I know. It’s grainy, and the words don’t line up properly.

But you get the general idea: the two worst prime ministers of our modern history, delivering a boring and patronising monologue about something which should have been exciting and inclusive.

Latest 2 of 34 comments

View all comments
 
  • LG says:

    02:11pm | 10/02/10

    Prince Charles has also been trained from infancy for the job. I see no merit in him leading us. Read more »

  • Alexander Fishburner says:

    03:48pm | 12/06/09

    The funny thing about that video is it has Malcolm Fraser’s lips moving but Gough Whitlam’s words coming out. How apt! Read more »

 

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

@TDHealy spoken like a true norwood supporter tim!

David Penberthy

Port power players ringing lapsed club members tonight urging them to re-sign. What happened to the old days when they'd just beat them up?

Paul Colgan

What not to make an issue in the last week of a campaign - your leadership http://bit.ly/a78kyL#savotes

Lucy Kippist

Why are people so unkind to Lady Gaga asks @_tors: http://bit.ly/a7jLN7#thepunch

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Breaking news: Something is going on

Breaking news: Something is going on

Is this the greatest ever send-up of 24-hour news? Warning: contains strong language and hilarity. From… Read more

9 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter