Prince William

Yesterday’s Royal announcement that the Duchess of Cambridge is pregnant had Fleet Street’s finest scrambling for an angle. On the face of it you might have thought it was hard to do much with “Kate Pregnant”. It’s Kate. She’s pregnant. What more is there to say?

Charlie's been waiting a long time, then there's William…

Day One of the yarn is a bit early yet for “Kate’s baby scare”, even for the British newspapers, and there’s nothing to suggest the Duke of Cambridge isn’t responsible for her condition, so no dice there either.

So congratulations to the London Daily Telegraph for being the first to grasp the implications of her hospitalisation with morning sickness, asking “Could it be twins for the Duchess?”

Latest 2 of 31 comments

View all comments
 
  • Esteban says:

    06:48pm | 05/12/12

    A concerned citizen. In the context of the massive bloated beast our Government is the cost of the GG is an irrelevance. I think you are very wrong on the usefullness of the GG. You just have to look at the orderly manner a minority Government was formed at the… Read more »

  • A Concerned Citizen says:

    05:16pm | 05/12/12

    The Republic will never get through because supporters of a Republic are divided into two camps -People that are terrified of practical change, and will vote for the most stringently conservative model only. -People that don’t care about silly symbolism, but would only support a model that brings practical benefit… Read more »

 

Prime Ministers are Tweeting, the Queen is delighted, the whole magazine industry is embracing temporary salvation and a young woman is in hospital feeling like death warmed up and no doubt desperately hoping everything is going to be ok.

Talk to the hand… Picture: Getty

Talk about a lot of pressure on one lone uterus.

The announcement that the Duchess of Cambridge is pregnant is indeed joyous news, and when you’re carrying the future third-in-line to the British throne, it’s not news you get to celebrate in private. But while I’m not usually one to advocate public institutions outright lying - continuing the cat-and-mouse speculation game for a few more weeks might have been the kindest thing to do for Kate and William.

Latest 2 of 66 comments

View all comments
 
  • Sickemrex says:

    05:43pm | 04/12/12

    Ha! Family can’t keep their mouths shut! We told ours at 6 weeks with our first with strict instructions to STFU until 12 weeks. Needless to say it was secret was secret for a millisecond. This time around we waited. Read more »

  • HeatherG says:

    05:18pm | 04/12/12

    As a fellow Hashi’s sufferer (fortunately it triggered after I finished having my babies), I wish you all the best, Kika. I hope it all goes very well for you. Read more »

 

At about the same time last week that news broke a French magazine was about to publish some topless photos of the Duchess of Cambridge an American actress of the rising-star variety “accidentally” Tweeted a naked picture of herself.

The timing for the photo on the left is perfect. Picture: AP/Supplied

It probably says a lot about how big a gulf the Atlantic Ocean really is. While the immediate and unanimous reaction to the Kate pictures has been condemnation and disgust that a private holiday with her husband was infiltrated and exploited in such a manner, across the ditch Alison Pill and her boyfriend both laughed off her self-inflicted breach of privacy.

The biggest difference between the two cases, of course, is that the Duchess quite reasonably thought she was alone with her husband, unaware that more than a kilometre away a grub with a giant telephoto lens was crashing their private party.

Latest 2 of 67 comments

View all comments
 
  • marley says:

    07:32pm | 17/09/12

    Definitely not your best work.  You were better last year.  Pick up your game. Read more »

  • Benevolent Rapscallion says:

    05:58pm | 17/09/12

    Totally agree. Anyone with half a brain knows that the paparazzi won’t respect privacy, so if you’re a celebrity and don’t want to see topless pics of yourself published in trashy magazines then keep your top on when outdoors. Read more »

 

Thank you Royal Family for bringing me back to my senses. Your groovy new Duchess, and your rain-sodden Diamond Jubilee had lulled me into a feeling of warmth towards your institution that I realise now was caused by a bad bout of demographic creep.

It all looked so promising… Picture: AFP

You know that feeling you get when you start buying the Women’s Weekly and listening to the ABC because you think they’ve become cooler, when actually you’ve just become older and less cool? I can now put my recent dabble with Royal love down to that.

And today you’ve grabbed me by the shoulders and shaken me out of it with the publication of your new rules of court.

Latest 2 of 77 comments

View all comments
 
  • Carolyn says:

    02:45pm | 28/06/12

    Re my above post….damn predictive text…..have posted again and corrected errors (I Hope!!) @ MargD -  I am no fan of Camilla either, however living in Paris at that time, I can guarantee you it was those vultures on motorcycles in pursuit of Princess Diana’s vehicle who were directly responsible… Read more »

  • Carolyn says:

    11:40am | 28/06/12

    @ MargD - I am no fan of Camilla either, however living in Paris at that time, I can guarantee you it was those vultures on motorcycles in pursuit of Princess Diana’s vehicle who were directly responsible for her death. As much as I’m appalled by Charles and Camilla’s infidelity,… Read more »

 

As the Royal Wedding approaches, details are starting to emerge about the rules and regulations that surround an event of this magnitude. 

In the past week information has been trickling through about exactly what is required of guests, beyond the traditional RSVP, and you have to wonder if it’s all actually worth it. 

Recipients of an invite were greeted with more than just the time, date and dress code thanks to an accompanying 22 page guide detailing exactly how they should behave at a Royal function. What a buzz kill.

Latest 2 of 118 comments

View all comments
 
  • florist says:

    07:33pm | 23/03/12

    Point that is made in this article about wedding are better and having such a best quality. I recommend to read this post to all people in this concerned topic. singapore florist | florist Read more »

  • Cyn says:

    05:56pm | 01/05/11

    @Matthew - now the “family” is NOT funded by the taxpayer. Only the Queen & Prince Philip receive monies from the Civil List.  As for the rest,  those who perform public duties, as expected of them, have their office staff and expenses paid for only. And you’ve never seen one… Read more »

 

The headless Anne Boleyn would struggle to get her point across, but any one of Henry VIII’s other five wives could sympathise with Kate Middleton in these last, frantic, nerve-inducing weeks before their “big day”.

The Princess Catherine doll. Comes with tiny Manolo Blahniks and a Hermes Kelly bag ... for now… Photo: AFP.

The 16th century princesses would be right at home with all the fanfare and ever-expanding array of royal memorabilia, albeit with a few medieval modifications.

Lego-sized replicas of the royal couple would more likely have been in bronze or bashed copper, decorated with a bit of horsehair. And the royal Pez or Union Jack-embossed shortbread replaced by a boiled sweet. But not everything’s changed for the better.

Latest 2 of 15 comments

View all comments
 
  • stephen says:

    12:16am | 13/04/11

    She’s got all her teeth. (Er, that reminds me…are there nine inch band-aids in the UK ?) Read more »

  • Muttley says:

    03:55pm | 12/04/11

    lol, you mean they dont have your depth Louisa where you believe we should be ruled by a family, no matter how useless they may be? Read more »

 

When Prince Charles visited Australia in March, 2004, he boarded a large military helicopter in Canberra and flew to Gunning, a small town near Goulburn, NSW, where he spent the morning visiting some kind of organic farm. It made for a great story on ABC Radio’s Country Hour, but didn’t exactly resonate with the wider community.

He even dresses like one of us. Pic: AFP

Compare that to Prince William, whose tour de disaster zone this week has been an absolute tour de force. When necessary, Will has overstepped the bounds of protocol, hugging the commoners as the mood struck him. He was also professionally standoffish as required, most notably when he wisely declined to answer a bystander’s question about recalcitrant insurers.

It’s a gift, this business of playing the people’s royal. Will’s mother Diana had it. His father Charles doesn’t. And given that pretty much the only reason the royal family still exists is to pep up the public spirit, there’s only one conclusion – and that’s that William should be the next British Monarch.

Latest 2 of 102 comments

View all comments
 
  • Peter says:

    05:47pm | 05/04/11

    All those morons who say they want that nice William rather than that boring old Charles should remember one thing. If they insist on tying themselves to a hereditary Monarchy with well established rules of succession, what they get is what they get. Read more »

  • Peter B says:

    04:55pm | 05/04/11

    No. The whole point of monarchy is that you can’t run for it and the monarch isn’t elected. If you like Wills more than Charles, why not go the whole hog and vote for our head of state. (As we should). Read more »

 

Has all this royal wedding talk made you think about Princess Diana? I know she was much-derided when she was alive – what with the nutty psychics, playing the paparazzi and preying on other women’s partners. But, come April 29, there’s going to be an empty seat at Westminster Abbey and, sappy as it sounds, I know that will make me sad.

A princess and a mother. Pic: AFP

Diana would have been 50 this year – a fabulous age to watch your first-born son marry the woman he loves. You can speculate all you like on how she might have stolen the show, but she was nothing if not an instinctive and affectionate mother.

What was fascinating about Diana was that both her life and death provoked a visceral response – not an intellectual one. Occasionally her actions made us think (her charity work for AIDS/landmines) but, more often, she made us feel. Struggling with the same problems as the rest of us – men, parenting, body image – she was like Julia Roberts’ character in Notting Hill: “I’m also just a girl standing in front of a boy, asking him to love her.”

Latest 2 of 36 comments

View all comments
 
  • EdwardVII says:

    02:19am | 01/05/11

    Diana left a world in heartbreak.  all the royal family pd bloggers, get what that means to the rest of the world.  They take her HRH status, that her a son someday will correct the wrong for His mother, yet allow Camilla Simpson Parker Bowls have it.  not even wills… Read more »

  • Mrs Margaret Anderson says:

    07:35pm | 02/04/11

    We would be extremely honoured and proud   to attend Prince William and Kate Middletons Wedding as we have always honoured and respected our   Royal Family since our childhood   by keeping in touch with our Royal Family. Read more »

 

Anyone seeking linguistic confirmation of the weirdness that comes from associating with royalty should look no further than our very own dinki-di princess Mary Norgen-Vaaz, or whatever her surname became after she got hitched to that rich norseman.

Commemmorative crap in honour of this momemntous occasion. Photo: Getty Images

Almost overnight, Mary went from being just another foxy bogan chick dancing around her handbag at Sydney’s Slip Inn, punching in the Bacardi Breezers and wooo-hoooing when Blur’s Song #2 came on, to sounding like some la-di-dah Queen Elizabeth impersonator. Not only did her perfectly normal Australian intonations make way for the plummy accent which the BBC defines as “received English”, she even adopted the tortured sentence structures of QEII. On the occasion that one becomes a member of the Danish Royal Family one is struck not only by one’s sense of duty but also one’s place in a long and proud tradition, one is.

Princess Mary is of course a perfectly nice person and her relationship with Prince Frederik could be described unimaginatively as a fairy tale. The same can be said of Prince William and Kate Middleton who are now doing their bit for magazine circulation and the sale of Franklin Mint commemorative plates by tying the knot.

Latest 2 of 109 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jason Kelly says:

    04:35pm | 22/11/10

    Apply now to join the the David Penberthy Anti-monarchist League. No education required; chip-on-the-shoulder essential; cultural inferiority complex an advantage. Read more »

  • PaulE says:

    12:20pm | 22/11/10

    Brad, I too had the same experience as Dash and Scarneck in London. It’s not about individuals. The attitude and ignorance Dash refers too towards Australia, is right through the English print media and TV. And it does get very tiresome very quickly. Read more »

 

He’s finally done it. After nine years together, approximately 76 fascinators and most of Will’s head of hair, the second in line to the throne has managed to get down on bended knee and give his long-time girlfriend one hell of a sparkler (12 carats in fact).

The apparently happy couple last night. Picture: Getty

It propels Kate Middleton, long the fodder of the voracious paparazzi pack and Hello! devotees, well and truly into the global spotlight.

And it is today that the work really begins for Catherine Middleton. She faces perhaps the most daunting and dramatic transformations, to somehow deftly emerge from the shadow of one the most iconic, albeit neurotic, personalities of the 20th century.

Latest 2 of 109 comments

View all comments
 
  • Penster says:

    10:52am | 20/11/10

    I’m not clear what Diana, Fergie and now Kate are meant to be “saving the Royal Family” from. Why would you expect a pretty, patient but otherwise unremarkable individual to save anything? Read more »

  • lola says:

    11:41pm | 19/11/10

    she had 9 years to get out of this..she made her choice..she is a grown up..each decision has a price to pay hers well no1 knows how much is gonna cost her… plus y do ppl still care about the british monarchy ?their part is decorative.. Read more »

 

It’s that time of the year again – April has become the crazy royal month in the media and this year is no exception.

Eugenie and Beatrice want out. Picture: AP

Early the other morning, Kerri- Anne Kennelly’s producer called me to say the London media was buzzing with two stories; one was the ongoing speculation about William and Kate, the other about Andrew’s and Fergie’s daughters, Beatrice and Eugenie.

So I rushed into Channel Nine’s studio and shared my thoughts on both matters with Kerri-Anne’s huge audience.

Latest 2 of 25 comments

View all comments
 
  • loz says:

    10:55pm | 13/04/10

    John, Members of the Royal Family have enjoyed their time in Australia. So it would stand to reason to have an infinity with the people. Prince Charles attended Timbertop, Geelong in 1966 and went back there in 2005 for the school reunion. The Victorian Bushfires, an example of the generous… Read more »

  • John A Neve says:

    02:03pm | 13/04/10

    Sean, While I agree with most of your post. Please, no class structure!!! I’d say this county is more class conscious than Britain. Early Australians did not even have a vote until 1967. Women could not even get a drink in a public bar in the 60’s. The way migrants… Read more »

 

Amid the continuing debate about our national identity and our constitutional arrangements, readers might be interested in this piece written this weekend for English newspaper The Mail on Sunday about our response to Prince William’s visit. It’s obviously written for an English audience, and it ended up being an embarrassingly positive piece where my republicanism almost abandoned me.

Bill Leak's take on our republican ambivalence in The Weekend Australian.

The last thing we need over here in Sydney is another cashed-up foreign interloper buying into the hyper-inflated property market to further jack up prices in the Harbour City.

But Prince Williams’ joking suggestion that he had so fallen in love with Sydney that he intends to buy a house here was not so much condemned as applauded.

Latest 2 of 17 comments

View all comments
 
  • Anjuli says:

    10:17am | 03/02/10

    Is it because he is royal or has become a celebrity like his mother before him , I am English who has been here for 37 years but even I think it is time that became a republic . The USA got rid of royalty and it hasn’t done them… Read more »

  • Lyn says:

    06:06pm | 27/01/10

    Danj-I agree with your comments. Williams visit was good because it brought the issue to the fore. There was plenty of debate and an increase in republican membership. Now if we could just get some politicians to grow a spine and start the debate in earnest with some public education… Read more »

 

Don’t think for a moment that last week’s visit by Prince William was anything other than a stunt by the House of Windsor or, at the least, those whose survival depend on its.

King of the kids, unloading at Holsworthy.

Prince William was said to have been “mobbed” as he moved through Victorian country towns. The Beatles were mobbed. The future king was watched. “King of the kids” was the headline. You’ll get that during school holidays, and how fortunate was he to chance upon those?

We aren’t the only nation still constitutionally tied to the old colonial master – there a more than a dozen - but we are the jewel in the crown.

Latest 2 of 23 comments

View all comments
 
  • The Sman says:

    03:40am | 28/01/10

    I see Mr Howe was “born in Hampshire but is now proudly an Australian” and it all becomes clear. These types are ten a penny, believing their “success” is purely down to “fair go” Australia and that back in the old country they would surely have got nowhere, sent back… Read more »

  • Christopher of Melbourne says:

    01:12am | 28/01/10

    Well said, Alan.These free-loaders should have been given the boot years ago. I can’t believe there are so many monarchists and so-called republicans too indolent to demand this family vacate the scene. Read more »

 

Here’s a heads up. If you really want to know what Aussies in 2010 think about our country becoming a republic just flip a coin.

America's favourite game show host Mr Guy Smiley

According to the odds, there’s a 50-50 chance of turning up the head of Queen Elizabeth.

Eleven years since a referendum was held to settle the republic debate, Australians seem just as divided about cutting their ties to a monarch living on the other side of the world.

Latest 2 of 7 comments

View all comments
 
  • H of SA says:

    03:19pm | 27/01/10

    Indeed, we will talk about it but we really need to see a model and a constitution. I can’t say I’m in favour of being a republic until I know precisely what would legally change in Australia. Change for the sake of change isn’t good enough for me - it… Read more »

  • Senexx says:

    08:33am | 27/01/10

    It seems the main point of a Republic has been missed.  The point of a Republic is to have the people as sovereign. Read more »

 

The last time I thought about an Australian republic was in 1999. I was 12 years old and too busy thinking about how hot Prince William was to really care about the republican movement.

Bold and the Beautiful? Prince William with Kate Middleton / File

Eleven years later, Prince William arrives in Australia. The only time I come into contact with the Royal Family is seeing Willy’s grandma on the $5 note and her head on all the Aussie coins. While I’m interested in the republic v monarchy debate, the dramas of the Royal Family appeals to me even more.

There was a time where the Royal Family were treated with near-universal respect. Now? The walls behind Buckingham Palace are producing scandals the writers of The Bold and the Beautiful wish they could come up with. The Queen must feel a twinge of nostalgia on the days where the family’s dirty laundry wasn’t aired to the press.

Latest 2 of 25 comments

View all comments
 
  • aussiebrisguy says:

    05:52pm | 28/01/10

    Justin you simply don’t get it. No one Australian could possible represent this country as they would be just another slimy politician with a great many Australians against them. Is that truly what this country needs? Grow up and respect your country and its system of government that works very… Read more »

  • Justin says:

    10:01am | 24/01/10

    Republicans will never win this debate as long as we make it about the Monarchy. Period. Australia is tangibly no worse off under a monarchy than we would be if we were to become a Republic and yes, there are problably more risks associated with becoming a republic than with… Read more »

 

Well our local monarchists have worked themselves into a royal frenzy and the hyperbole is coming thick and fast - so let me try to help them get a few things into perspective.

I'm on a boat yeah

William and his brother Harry - thanks to their gorgeous mother Diana - are the only really normal members of the world’s most dysfunctional family.

Granny Queen is locked into yesterday with her appallingly rude and insensitive husband.

Latest 2 of 33 comments

View all comments
 
  • hfcuqqy says:

    12:45pm | 24/01/10

    2Orj5l ucxaqbnfjgfw, qxajshjvbqtb, [link=http://jgppyvmfshch.com/]jgppyvmfshch[/link], http://qlbmzqnlxabg.com/ Read more »

  • Jeff (32) says:

    08:38pm | 21/01/10

    well said! Read more »

 

The arrival of young Willie Windsor in the Antipodes has brought renewed attention to the white elephant sitting in Australia’s lounge-room.

This is a story about a prince…

The republic has stirred, goaded by the media frenzy surrounding the Prince and the cheap point-scoring by monarchists heralding Willie as the man to save them from well-deserved irreverence.

It is nice to see him out there in Redfern, a slight change of pace from the official welcoming at Admiralty House. It is nice to see him mixing with the kids at Kirribili for lunch (Michael Clarke’s timely ton just snuck him onto the list).

Latest 2 of 27 comments

View all comments
 
  • Barry says:

    09:40pm | 22/01/10

    There is a very good reason for keeping the current system but unfortunetly even most Monarchists don’t seem to identify it. The role of the Royals/GG’s is ultimaly to intervene when the Australian People get it wrong. Simply put, the Monarchy gives Australia a final fail-safe that can stop us… Read more »

  • Krull says:

    09:24pm | 22/01/10

    What on Earth are you talking about, when did he say that monarchists are unpatriotic?  The point is that its simply undemocratic and unrepresentative that are our head of state lives on the other side of the planet is also a monarch that simply inherited the role. The simple fact… Read more »

 

It’s time we shooed off our Royal parasites. I don’t want the Queen as Australia’s head of state, and nor do I want her untrustworthy, dysfunctional, self-serving family of heartless opportunists to have any say in our future.

They're creepy and they're kooky, mysterious and spooky. Photo: AP

For too long this racist, sexist and unworthy institution populated by dangerously inbred Europeans has arrogantly wielded power it does not deserve – just last week it was revealed the next King of Australia campaigned against the Coalition of the Willing and sarcastically abused “his” Prime Minister, Tony Blair.

Prince Charles son, His Royal Highness Prince William Arthur Philip Louis of Wales, Royal Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter may be a more pleasant chap – and he may not - and, at least by royal standards, he is quite well educated.

Latest 2 of 125 comments

View all comments
 
  • authentic jordans says:

    09:10am | 21/10/12

    Hey I am so happy I found your blog page, I really found you by mistake, while I was searching on Yahoo for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thank you for a incredible post and a all round enjoyable blog (I also… Read more »

  • Russ says:

    10:08pm | 29/04/11

    I can’t believe all you people give a damned.  All of Britain is dysfunctional, and they “cawnt” speak English properly either. Read more »

 

AS soon as I can, probably within a couple of years, I hope to take the oath of Australian citizenship. It’s something I take seriously, not least because of the relief of finally being able to cast a vote on who gets to spend my taxes. But it will also place me in the naggingly uncomfortable position of being a citizen of a country whose head of state comes from a family with a long-standing tradition of doing cruel and unusual things to Irish people.

Steer this course but watch out for a referendum

I use the word “naggingly” quite deliberately because despite my qualms about the British royals’ connections with lopping off Irish people’s heads and trying to wring the life out of Ireland’s language and sporting traditions, for some time I have been developing an increasing admiration for the Windsors. On balance I’m looking forward to having some ownership over the monarchy.

Prince William’s arrival this week compounds it. I’ve decided I’m jealous. I have crown envy.

Latest 2 of 45 comments

View all comments
 
  • insanely cheap flights,cheap travel,travel leisure says:

    03:31pm | 06/10/11

    please visit[url=“http://cheaptravelresource.com”>Insanely Cheap Flights</a> <a ]http://cheaptravelresource.com[/url] Read more »

  • Laurent says:

    08:30pm | 08/05/11

    annon-c-ici, Nouvelle plateforme pour placer des annonces mais pas seulement, vous y trouverez comment référencer vos site, mais aussi comment devenir producteur de chanteurs. plus encore à découvrir. http://renumeraweb.be Read more »

 

On Tuesday 19th of January, Prince William – the 2nd in line to various thrones – will visit Australia for just the second time. It has been reported that he is doing this to “get to know Australia”.

English Rugby fan Prince William tosses it around with some Kiwi kiddies

Since this tour was announced in December, as Media Director for the Australian Republican Movement (ARM), I have been busy with requests from English broadcasters and newspapers.

The interest should have been surprising, since William is only stopping in on Australia for three days for a “semi-official” tour on his way to New Zealand. Moreover, he is visiting only two cities: Sydney and Melbourne. However, given that there has been a massive PR campaign by the Palace to present William as the youthful – cuter – face of the monarchy, it was inevitable that the English press would be awash with expectation about whether Australia would warm to the Prince like good little subjects.

Latest 2 of 56 comments

View all comments
 
  • davrosz says:

    07:10am | 30/01/10

    dead right, this debate has absolutely nothing to do with you. Read more »

  • William Mohan says:

    08:09am | 29/01/10

    For people who say the don’t care about the monarchy, you sure are getting in a bit of a tiz over this visit.  Here in the UK we respect and are quite happy to have a constitutional monarch.  We are not forcing you Aussies to have it.  You can vote… Read more »

 

Prince William’s coming visit seems to have resulted in the dramatic conversion of a republican celebrity. This is none other than the editor and media personality Ms. Ita Clare Buttrose AO OBE, who campaigned for the politicians’ republic during the 1999 referendum.

Prince William and his Dad.

Readers of the Wentworth Courier, which circulates in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs, were surprised then by her harsh dismissal of the No case and indeed of constitutional monarchists.

Ms Buttrose was the founding editor of Cleo which, with its nude male centrefolds, was aimed at young single women. She later edited the more conservative Australian Women’s Weekly and the Daily and Sunday Telegraphs.

Latest 2 of 45 comments

View all comments
 
  • Athol says:

    04:26pm | 23/03/11

    I agree with Rev I am a fifth generation Australian and I have lived many places overseas and Australia is one of the best governed places thanks to our constitutional monarchy. In this dreary old era we need the magic and mystique of the Monarchy and Royal Family- a pox… Read more »

  • Pete says:

    04:49pm | 26/01/11

    I think you hit the nail on the head when you mentioned ‘self-esteem’. Unfortunately changing a system of government isn’t going to make Australia grow as a nation. It’s going to come from the achievments of its people.  If you think that changing one of the world’s most successful constitutions… Read more »

 

Dear Kate Middleton, Get a life. A job would be a good start.

Eyes down, check. Buttons done up, check. Kate Middleton's well trained.

Thing is, your boyfriend’s grandmother, the one with the penchant for corgis and who instills fear in the hearts of pheasants everywhere, has spelt out the riot act. Her Maj reckons that to be a future Queen of the people, you first need to be a working girl.

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but the UK’s Mail on Sunday has reported that “The Queen is keen that the monarchy should lead by example and that the princes and their girlfriends should all be seen to be hard workers.” This well-placed Palace peep went on to add “The Queen has made it known that she feels Kate should get involved with a charity, possibly an animal charity”. Labradors of the UK watch out.

Latest 2 of 23 comments

View all comments
 
  • Holly says:

    08:35pm | 07/05/11

    My god, what did she ever do to you? Maybe she’s not the kind of gal you yourself would fall in love with, have a drink with, whatever - but you’ve taken time and energy to eviscerate her, and for what? Even if she’s not your cup of tea, why… Read more »

  • K T says:

    12:34pm | 03/05/11

    Kate looked just ravishing in her wedding dress didn’t she? ALL HAIL THE FUTURE QUEEN OF ENGLAND. Oh P.S You can’t spell ! Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

About to go on Sky News Agenda http://t.co/sRvLjPQ4Ym

Daniel Piotrowski

@ajbau @mcilveenl The latest Nielsen Answers survey. 2,872,000 readers for April. Number one by 53k on the next - Ninemsn, Yahoo7, @SMH.

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @mcilveenl: http://t.co/1Jh1nNcelR Australia's number one news website, according to latest survey. http://t.co/ZRCmNMDN35

Daniel Piotrowski

@ajbau @newscomauHQ More than everywhere else.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter