Population

The political class is on a collision course with the punters they are elected to represent over the issue of population growth, because they are failing to engage the public in a meaningful, mature debate.

How many more people can we take, even without their clothing?

While the major political parties have signed up to the official long-term projections of 36 million by 2050, the public overwhelmingly thinks that’s way too many. In response, the politicians bat on with the reflexive response “There is No Alternative”.

This dissonance highlights much that is wrong with our political system. It also opens up big opportunities for both the extreme Right and the environmental Left over the coming years.

Latest 2 of 94 comments

View all comments
 
  • Davido says:

    08:27pm | 10/03/10

    I really just like living somewhere not crowded. Read more »

  • Theo says:

    07:20pm | 10/03/10

    We need mor population because we want   more Centerlink help, more criminality more poverty, less affordable housing, crowded streets, crowded transport services, worsening schools and hospitals because of the higher demand.Not enough reasons? Read more »

 

Who knew the lower north shore of Sydney was a hunting ground for anti-immigrationists. This flyer popped up in mail boxes last weekend in more than one apartment block, in more than one suburb. Unauthorised of course, and probably the work of a nutter.

A pamphlet distributed in Sydney

But it’s an election year, and these things don’t tend to happen in a vacuum. During the next six months there’ll be a lot more of this rubbish peddled by those outside the political mainstream.

Scott Morrison has requested we be able to debate immigration without labeling people racist. That’s more than fair. But keeping the debate clean is a two way street.

Latest 2 of 224 comments

View all comments
 
  • J Citizen says:

    06:59pm | 24/02/10

    “Lose the racism”? The leaflet never had any, and you still call it racist anyway. You call it “rubbish/garbage” from a “nutter”. But let’s not have any name-calling, eh? Read more »

  • Craig Hendry says:

    07:38am | 18/02/10

    It is always a concern when people (population) is viewed as a problem rather than a solution, and “policy” is formed from that type of perspective. Read more »

 

Immigration has held a special place in the fears of many Australians but the figures tell a different story to that told by Liberal MP Kevin Andrews in his recent post on The Punch.

We're hardly over stuffed.

The data on asylum seekers and refugees in particular provides some much needed perspective on the current national debate.

When Mr Andrews informed Punch readers of the latest migration figures of 173,290 permanent migrants, he neglected to mention that in the last year of the Howard Government the number of permanent migrants to Australia reached 184,438.

Latest 2 of 45 comments

View all comments
 
  • Andrew Smith says:

    09:37pm | 01/11/09

    Population figures are artifically high, and based on recent arrivals who may have applied for permanent, or temporary residency up to three years ago…..during boom times. Credible population projection for 2050 is 28 million from the Population Reference Group basedon ABS data. Raw population data includes long term WHV tourists… Read more »

  • Craig says:

    01:47am | 31/10/09

    For those who advocate open borders.  When do you say enough? - factoring in cultural impact upon host society (the Australia that exists now would be radically changed and along with that, institutions which keep our nation stable, our (your) way of life.), infrastructure, environment (water anyone? - carbon emissions?… Read more »

 

Why is the Rudd government hell-bent on bringing more and more people to Australia?

Half empty, half full: what's our ideal population?

In 2007-08, 173,290 people permanently migrated to Australia. In addition, there were another 544,000 temporary migrants to the country, excluding the five million visitors. That’s close to three-quarters of a million extra people residing here in a year.

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Net Overseas Migration contributed 60.6 per cent of Australia’s population growth in 2008, compared to 39.4 per cent contributed by natural increase.

Latest 2 of 61 comments

View all comments
 
  • Peter says:

    02:20pm | 08/03/10

    It won’t hurt to bring in plenty more refugees because they’re in pretty bad situations. As long as we only take enough in so we’ll have the ideal population. Read more »

  • Don Clark says:

    08:55pm | 01/02/10

    Mr Andrews has misrepresented the state of migration to Australia and conveniently forgets to mention by how much net migration was allowed to continue increasing over the term of the former conservative Government of which he was a member. Sadly for him the facts are part of the national store… Read more »

 

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

Port power players ringing lapsed club members tonight urging them to re-sign. What happened to the old days when they'd just beat them up?

Paul Colgan

What not to make an issue in the last week of a campaign - your leadership http://bit.ly/a78kyL#savotes

Lucy Kippist

Why are people so unkind to Lady Gaga asks @_tors: http://bit.ly/a7jLN7#thepunch

Paul Colgan

Woman aims to be world's fattest at 450kg - so wrong in so many ways http://bit.ly/ayLd13

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Breaking news: Something is going on

Breaking news: Something is going on

Is this the greatest ever send-up of 24-hour news? Warning: contains strong language and hilarity. From… Read more

8 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter