Plain Packaging

Many smokers and, at a guess, pretty much every cufflink-wearing executive from the big tobacco companies have a habit of posturing as macho libertarians. They argue that cigarettes are a legal product, smoking is a matter of choice, and that when it comes to telling us how we can live our lives, the nanny state can go stick it in its pipe and smoke it.

Anyone in these parts bulk-bill?

This is all fine, up to a point. And that point is when smokers get sick and automatically assume that it is the job of the health system – that is, the taxpayers – to step in and cover the cost of their collapsed lungs, clogged arteries and triple bypasses.

It is a logically inconsistent position and, frankly, quite a pathetic one. If smokers and the tobacco industry are going to be hairy-chested about the manner in which they live their life, they should also be held to account for the manner of their death. I write that not as some clean-living puritan, but one of those poor sad dills who has become addicted to this stupid drug, but who is now happily (and hopefully) in the final stages of a victorious battle against nicotine, setting aside last week’s beer-fuelled regression at the office Christmas party.

Latest 2 of 269 comments

View all comments
 
  • Gordon Green says:

    06:41pm | 17/04/12

    Would it be fair, if any illnesses or treatment for any smoking related disease be made unavailable to smokers? I think the smokers would revolt and go up in arms over such a ruling. However, have they stopped to spare a thought that what we non-smokers are doing right now… Read more »

  • Nicole says:

    10:11pm | 20/12/11

    Just wanted to add, my husbands father was a young 63 when he succumbed to lung cancer and will miss out on seeing his grandchildren which we plan on having in the next 5 years. He had retired in the last 5 years and enjoyed it golfing - but he… Read more »

 

Out of nowhere, my friend Robyn contracted pneumonia this week and ended up in hospital, gasping for breath and coughing her lungs up. It was a scary sight, seeing this dynamic, strong chick totally debilitated and struggling for oxygen.

Big Tobacco must not be allowed to run rings around common sense.

“Anyone who’s thinking about taking up smoking should get a little dose of pneumonia,” she said with a wheeze. “I can’t believe anyone would voluntarily do this to their bodies by sucking on cigarettes.”

I toyed with fags at about 16. It was glamour that got me in: the silky silver packaging and swirling royal blue font of the Stirling Special Mild brand. Most of my friends were into it too. My, how we thought we looked urbane and adult – maybe even old enough to buy drinks at the bar of the local Curramulka Hotel.

Latest 2 of 83 comments

View all comments
 
  • Vaycig Bluemaster says:

    12:23pm | 21/03/12

    As much as the people have the right to smoke, I say that the government also has the right to take care of its citizens when they do not know how. By changing the packaging, they are not restricting anyone from smoking. It might have an indirect effect on smoking,… Read more »

  • Armadillo says:

    10:56am | 24/11/11

    I will admit, I don’t quite understand what the harm will be if all cigarettes are in plain packaging? I will also admit that while I smoked in the past, I don’t now and I certainly don’t appreciate people who give me no choice but to inhale their second hand… Read more »

 

What is the cigarette plain packaging legislation?
From July 2012 the Australian Government plans to prohibit all brand logos, fonts, colours and promotional wording on cigarette packaging.  Cigarettes will come in olive green boxes displaying prominent safety warnings and the name of the brand and variant printed in standard size, font and position.

Here's lookin' at you, kid. Pic: AP

Why is Labor taking on Big Tobacco?
They are the only target left that is less popular than Julia Gillard. 

Does plain packaging infringe on freedom of choice?
Studies have shown most smokers cannot distinguish between brands in blind trials and the perceived differences are often an artefact of subtle cues in the colour, logos and design on the packaging.  Nevertheless, tobacco companies spend millions of dollars perfecting the positive associations evoked by cigarette packaging and consumers have a right to have their free choices subconsciously influenced by them.

Latest 2 of 73 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jim says:

    11:41pm | 24/08/11

    Plain packaging for cigarettes to stop people from smoking? That highlights how out of touch with reality the government is. What a bunch of morons. I’m a smoker and I don’t buy the bloody things because how pretty the package looks. I buy them because they are addictive and they… Read more »

  • AJ says:

    05:31pm | 04/07/11

    Hi I’m one of many healthcare workers who holds the hands of people as they die from smoking, alcohol or drug-related diseases. We are the ones who watch people suffer from the effects of this horribly addictive substance. It does my head in when people support cigarette smoking and the… Read more »

 

In the gruesome final scene of Martin Scorcese’s remake of Cape Fear, the sadistic murderer Max Cady has been bashed with a plank, burned with lighter fluid, thrown off the side of a houseboat and is finally drowning in a river. As he sinks into the water he starts speaking in tongues, struggling to keep his mouth above the waterline as he shouts random free-form gibberish before finally drowning.

I laugh in the face of the nanny state.

I was reminded of this scene while listening to a woman from a cigarette company on the radio this week as she put forward the tobacco industry’s arguments, if you can call them that, against plain packaging.

Despite having a long-standing fondness for the gaspers, and a firm belief that adults should be free to do whatever they like, I don’t ever think I have heard such nonsense in my life. This industry, which in essence is in the death business, is itself in its death throes. As it sinks further into the abyss it is thrashing about spouting nonsense in defence of its right to sell demonstrably deadly products.

Latest 2 of 243 comments

View all comments
 
  • Ian1 says:

    10:30am | 06/07/11

    @Facepalm - http://www.news.com.au/national/cigs-war-won-now-cancer-campaigners-set-their-sights-on-beer/story-e6frfkw9-1226088686962 “alcohol has NEVER “been next” and is still not going to be next.” In your face!  How’s your lack of clairvoyance going? Read more »

  • Domenic Greco says:

    02:36pm | 20/06/11

    Sure reasonably expensive but not to small independent businesses…and all it will do is open the flood gate on black market and allow supermarkets and discounters to grow market share…. Making non smokers pay extra tax because they live longer would be reasonably inexpensive too…how short sighted can you be? Read more »

 

The tobacco industry’s campaign against plain packaging is at last a cause worthy enough for me to believe in.

Nothing says 'cool' like a rocket launcher, camo gear and a cancer stick. Pic: AP

As a smoker myself it is very important to me that if I am going to be killed slowly it should at least be by someone I know and trust. Indeed, it does not reflect well on the euthanasia lobby that it is strangely silent on this particular aspect of dying with dignity.

Fundamentally this is a debate about choosing the manner of your own death. Some people choose to hurl themselves off the Gap, Ben Elton chooses to do it on live television and smokers choose to do it by gradually annihilating their lungs.

Latest 2 of 275 comments

View all comments
 
  • Kipling says:

    08:35am | 07/08/11

    Oh the conundrum…. It seems fairly clear that prohibition is not effective. Firstly, from history we learn (alcohol) prohobition served to make some (a select few) wealthy, despite being criminalised. Provision of alcohol occured without restraint or any form of regulation, including health regulation. Then the Government got wise, they… Read more »

  • Kipling says:

    02:02am | 07/08/11

    People smoking around me is ok. They cover my clothing in smoke smell, I get a runny nose and smelly hair. But that is ok. I don’t mind drinking beer, the outcome of that is that I need to piss more frequently. Consequently, I also don’t mind pissing on a… Read more »

 

Plain packaging of tobacco products has great potential to reduce the appeal of smoking, particularly among young people, and should be supported if Australians want to see death and disease from tobacco use continue to decline.

You just won't look tough with a packet of these tucked into your rolled-up flannie

Simple, really. But unfortunately the facts have been difficult to read amid the smoke and mirrors, sound and fury. So consider this:

Fact: Glossy, stylised cigarette packets are a valuable marketing tool for attracting new smokers. This has been shown in Cancer Council research and dozens of other Australian and international studies, not to mention documents obtained from tobacco companies.

Latest 2 of 81 comments

View all comments
 
  • acotrel says:

    06:29am | 21/04/11

    @Huey ‘Wrong! plain bloody wrong! Alcohol takes that cake every time. ‘ One usually goes with the other.  How do you distinguish and declare alcohol the winner over cigarettes, in the death stakes?  Are you adding the road toll to the alcohol toll? How many people die with strokes, pnuemonia,… Read more »

  • Mensur Cehic says:

    01:04am | 21/04/11

    It’s a sad, sad part of human history. To allow the push marketing of such a poisonous substance onto worldwide populations.. Tobbacco: A weapon of mass destruction unleashed on us. We have spent the entire industrial age making smoking look like a normal part of life. A collection of carcinogenic… Read more »

 

Kids say olive brown is the colour of sick. And that’s what smoking will make you - in fact it will actually kill you.

If the colour doesn't get you, the eyeball will…

The fight to lower the smoking rate and reduce the impact of death and disease on the Australian community has been one of the great public health battles of the past 30 years.

It is a fight the community is winning, but has not yet won. Big Tobacco has deep pockets and the fight has been played out in court rooms and column inches across the country.

Latest 2 of 117 comments

View all comments
 
  • jeplypreeme says:

    06:17pm | 11/05/12

    If you wish to read more data in relation to this type of bag, and then take a look write-up away. Various factors that explains why it’s extremely well-known will probably be described.Females would like your Erina Kors Hamilton Satchel simply given it can be utilized in several surroundings. Should… Read more »

  • debra says:

    03:34pm | 14/05/11

    well this is so political the damn politics thinks that they can tell us not to smoke next they are going to tell us we cant use the toilet. i am so sick of paying for the politians wages and between the local state and fedral i hate to tell… Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

RT @saline: Touche Miriam. Touche Barry. Wicked old thespians taking the pith. #qanda

ToryShepherd

The best haters are the worst spellers #qandadelayed#godihopeididntmakeatypo

Anthony Sharwood

How much fun is it retweeting people who can't spell?

Anthony Sharwood

In other Olympian news, Steph rice is advertising Sunrice Chinese style Mongolian chicken. Think about that for a tick

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Ok. I am not a leading expert in world’s best practice on prisoner rehabilitation — my experience…

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

This morning I joined millions of other Australians in accelerating, braking, swearing and spilling coffee…

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

This weekend’s massacre in Houla, Syria, is one of those stories that invites but doesn’t…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter