Oppression

I have listened with great interest to this week’s parliamentary debate about Australia’s involvement in Afghanistan, just as I have listened with great interest to this debate for the past nine years, since October 7th, 2001, when Operation Enduring Freedom was launched by the United States and its allies, including Australia, so that freedom so bravely won by the people of Afghanistan from communist oppression, and so cruelly lost over the following decade to civil war and Taliban misrule, may indeed return, and this time endure.

History will be the judge on Afghanistan. Photo: AFP.

I have listened to this debate and heard many arguments that we should abandon our mission in Afghanistan. 

Some of these arguments are passionate, others cold and rational; some seem sincere, while others callous. And all of them are wrong.

Latest 2 of 69 comments

View all comments
 
  • petery says:

    08:13am | 28/12/10

    The debate here reminds me of the Vietnam period, and ‘like that war,in all likelihood,  this war will end,(if it ever does),the same way.It could still end in negotiated truce, which would tend to make all the black and white arguments about winning and losing, or fighting to the death,… Read more »

  • Katie says:

    01:49pm | 02/11/10

    “Katie, I do actually know about Islam and what I’m saying is correct, and far from being an Islamophobe, I am more Islam-aware. “ Actually you don’t know anything about Islam, and you absolutely an Islamophobe. ” But you clearly demonstrate one of the strategies of Islam.” Islam has no… Read more »

 

The world is entering a new dynamic which is merely a repetition of the recasting of the political, social and economic order that has happened for as long as man can write about it.

How much are we prepared to overlook to protect our economic interests?

History is punctuated with the ebbs and flows of kingdoms, empires and political movements and the conflicts that are always apparent at the peripheries of influence that abuts competing interests. In the past, the cycle of influence was over, sometimes thousands and generally hundreds of years.

From the initial cultivation of land between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers and the Sumerian civilisation, to the Greeks, to the Romans, to the Qin Dynasty, the first imperial dynasty of the Chinese, to the British Empire, we notice that the rise and fall of empires accelerates as technology, personified by communications, military hardware, economic processes and other associated influences advances.

Latest 2 of 18 comments

View all comments
 
  • Davido says:

    06:11pm | 27/01/10

    I would suggest that Stern Hu is a warning that may not have been heeded. Read more »

  • Derek says:

    07:10pm | 12/08/09

    There is clearly a big incentive for our governments not rock sour the relationship with China. Its all about money and power. But there comes a point when to remain silent and not condemn a countries immoral actions is wrong. Whether that point has been reached remains to be seen… Read more »

 

For an oppressed group, the opportunity to obtain the attention of the international community lasts for a very short time.  So it has proved for the Tamil community of Sri Lanka.

Since Sydney's Tamil community took to the streets in April, not much has changed. Picture: Cameron Richardson

Indeed, the threats and oppression in Sri Lanka extend to anyone who might dare to criticise the government.

In mid May, as the Tamil Tiger (“the LTTE”) resistance came to an end and government forces shelled areas full of civilians, the world was outraged and demanded that the government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa seek conciliation with the Tamil community of the South Asian island nation.

Latest 2 of 5 comments

View all comments
 
  • Sujeevan says:

    08:02pm | 16/07/09

    The problem for SL is that Tamil people & their organisations never speak out negatively about the LTTE, only the SL Govt. According to us Tamils it is only the SL Govt. that has hurt us when, in fact, the LTTE have done much damage to us as well, killing… Read more »

  • Jay says:

    04:33pm | 16/07/09

    Thanks for keeping the plight of the tamil people on the radar. It is people like you that see the issue for what it really is. If only more people like you existed in the world. Read more »

 

Leading the way burqa-free, Queen Rania of Jordan

Before this commentary gets underway, I feel that it is necessary to close the gate before the horse bolts. So first up, let me say that I am not anti-Islamic, I have lived as a Muslim woman from the age of seventeen until I was twenty two (and admittedly, found it not to my liking for a number of reasons).

Much of my professional life has been spent working with, and for Muslim people in the war zones of Bosnia Herzogovina, Kosovo and Albania as an humanitarian relief worker, and I have traveled and worked extensively in the Middle East, Europe, Africa and Asia - so I have seen quite a bit of the world and can compare how varying societies adapt the Islamic religion to the cultural morays and sensitivities of their regions.

Tory Maguire’s piece yesterday and the reader’s comments that followed had much to say on the reasons often cited by western media and society about what is believed to be the motivation for Muslim women to don the burqa and headscarves. 

The common, misinformed perception is that Muslim women mostly wear the burqa to express their religious devotion. 

Latest 2 of 51 comments

View all comments
 
  • Simon says:

    03:24pm | 31/01/12

    so you’ve read an english translation of an arabic text because you cant actually understand the arabic yourself and you claim that everything the clerics (presumably those who have studied the quran in arabic and works of jurisprudence and exegesis) made it all up? haha Thats cute. Read more »

  • Simon says:

    03:09pm | 31/01/12

    no its not.  e.g “Sunat”  (in the context within which the author of this article used the word) is a retardation of the word “sunnah”... by the author which shows she knows nothing of arabic grammar and as such, probably cannot read or speak basic arabic, let alone fushah arabic… Read more »

 

If I was married to Carla Bruni I wouldn’t be a big fan of the burqa either, so it is perhaps no surprise that French President Nicholas Sarkozy is not in favour of women covering themselves from head to toe.

Call it what you want, this niqab is a symbol of female suppression.

But Sarkozy’s forceful condemnation of the Islamic shroud as a symbol of female “subservience”, not religious faith, was absolutely right.

There is no greater way, other than locking the front door, to ensure a woman’s total invisibility in society - and thereby formalise her lack of worth - than to cover every inch of her, including her eyes, in heavy fabric.

Latest 2 of 38 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jim says:

    02:56pm | 21/06/11

    I think they should ban the Burqa , it’s no different from wearing a balaclava in public is it, and be serious were not allowed to wear one of them are we. I ride a motorcycle and am banned from wearing my helmet in service stations , Banks and some… Read more »

  • tahira says:

    07:40am | 01/07/10

    The fact is extermist are murderous thugs maskerting as holy men.they have hijacked the language and culture of islam. There is no complusion in religion. Jihad is to strive to self improve and not about terrorrism. Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

What sort of people are watching your show @PMOnAir dying laughing at the ads for fungal toe nail treatment! #pmlive

Daniel Piotrowski

@NehaMadhok services eg gym, excellent kebab store?

Malcolm Farr

More gay marriage legislation than you can point a straight stick at. http://t.co/k2SC4xNp

Paul Colgan

@c41 yes it is.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

ICB:  If I could offer you only one tip for the future…

ICB:  If I could offer you only one tip for the future…

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit, an irregular regular column on calumny and codswallop.…

Six prominent Aussies with a case of the dreaded “yips”

Six prominent Aussies with a case of the dreaded “yips”

The yips. It’s an old golf term which refers to golfers who lose the ability to putt. They stand…

The humourless hysteria of the holier-than-thou

The humourless hysteria of the holier-than-thou

In I Spit On Your Grave, a young woman is gang raped in a remote woodland. She is beaten and tortured…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter