Nanny State

If the legislation for the Orwellian­-sounding Australian National Preventive Health Agency passes, then expect an avalanche of make­-work exercises by the Agency all for the cause of making us healthier.

A tax on chocolate? Noooooooo! Picture: AP

Armed with a budget of $133 million of your money over four years, the agency would get to work advising commonwealth and state health ministers about health issues surrounding alcohol and tobacco consumption and obesity.

It will look to create new policies about interventions in settings such as schools, workplaces and communities.

Latest 2 of 19 comments

View all comments
 
  • Rodger says:

    04:52pm | 28/11/09

    So the junk food industry must now be paying the IPA to represent them. $133 million over 4 years is probably less than 1 fast food chain will pay in advertising over that that time. When the IPAs employers spend millions encouraging us to eat unhealthily why can’t we (or… Read more »

  • Dan says:

    01:37am | 28/11/09

    I agree with all the posts above mine, lets make everybody pay for their own health care all the fatties, unco-ordinated, allergic, disabled, too skinny, diabetic, people who choose to play sports (for fun or to keep themselves fit) and get injured, smokers (who were allowed to buy an extreamlly… Read more »

 

This week parliament will debate a bill to establish a national Preventive Health Agency, reminding of that classic Mark Twain observation: nobody is safe while the legislature is in session.

Illustration: Bill Leak

On The Punch Federal health minister Nicola Roxon insisted that she was no nanny statist, and that the purpose of the Agency was about saving lives and reducing health costs.

Most modern governments understand the follies of outright bans, such as the failed US Prohibition movement from 1919 to 1933. However, the Agency plans what it sees as the next best thing.

Latest 2 of 50 comments

View all comments
 
  • SandDollar says:

    03:32pm | 21/10/09

    Well the only fun things left, everything else if offensive apparently. Not sure this is the role of government. Business and government getting into areas of life and culture too much and too often. Read more »

  • Julie Coker-Godson says:

    11:22am | 21/10/09

    I found this article on the BBC about discrimination against the overweight. http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/2/hi/health/8314125.stm >  It makes for interesting reading.  Personally I’m fed up with all the judgemental statements being made about this issue and would be interested to see if it ever constituted a “hate crime” as discussed here. Read more »

 

Next week Parliament is set to consider legislation that is another first from the Rudd Government – Australia’s first agency dedicated to Preventative Health. 

The Australian's Nicholson

Currently the media abounds with stories about our obesity epidemic, rising rates of chronic disease and problems with alcohol and tobacco.  This Agency will help us do something about those problems. 

As much as some media outlets find the labels irresistible, this isn’t about creating a nanny state, or nagging people into being ‘good’.  This Agency will be staffed with experts who will work hard to find the best possible ways to help us be healthier – and reduce our health bill as a result.

Latest 2 of 72 comments

View all comments
 
  • KaXien VaLa says:

    06:59pm | 16/10/09

    Basically the essence of this idea comes down to the process used to treat health issues and the pathway through treatments. The key elements to consider when proscribing a treatment is the risk to effectiveness relationship. Typically the more severe the issue the more potent the treatment…this means that for… Read more »

  • gusgrogan@gmail.com says:

    01:12pm | 15/10/09

    Thanks but no thanks Nicola Read more »

 

YOU know what I love about the Grand Canyon, other than that it is one awesome kick-arse hole in the ground?

Verboten: This glass-toting woman would be arrested in Australia

It’s got no fences. You are free to fall into it if you feel so inclined. Sure, there’s the odd sign telling you that straying too close to the edge could bring a premature and permanent end to your holiday, but that’s the extent of the bureaucratic concern.

If the Grand Canyon was in Australia, it would have a fence around it.

Too dangerous, the nannas who govern us would cry, to let people just explore it in a manner of their choosing.

Latest 2 of 10 comments

View all comments
 
  • Your name: says:

    06:03pm | 17/08/09

    for a start there are harsher sentences for glassers. prevention is better than cure. If you go somewhere with a prevailence of glassing, you will appreciate plastic Read more »

  • sarah (glassed) says:

    10:45pm | 07/08/09

    when you’ve been glassed, you can comment. Read more »

 

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Clarke and Bingle are off, Sky News reports

Paul Colgan

@ngeoghegan bankers too?

Paul Colgan

Lolz at the rugby. Waratahs 73-12 Lions. Great entertainment, tahs merciless. Robbie Deans here too and he enjoyed I think #rugby#super14

Paul Colgan

Go Tahs. Great to see some confident rugby #rugby#super14

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Breaking news: Something is going on

Breaking news: Something is going on

Is this the greatest ever send-up of 24-hour news? Warning: contains strong language and hilarity. From… Read more

5 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter