Murray River
At the moment, we’re all spending a lot of time debating gay marriage and climate change. Meanwhile, other issues aren’t being debated as vigorously as they might be.

Today The Punch team has each selected two issues which get us hot under the collar, and which we feel deserve more airplay.
What are your thoughts on the issues we’ve chosen? And what other issues do you think we should all be talking about?
Continue reading "12 bigger issues than gay change and climate marriage" »
After a wetter than average year in the Murray-Darling Basin many people seem to think the problems of Australia’s most important river system are solved. They’re not.

Rain and floods have returned life to many parts of the river system, but if they are to provide more than a temporary boost before the next drought hits, our federal Parliament will need to sign off on a strong Murray-Darling Basin Plan this year.
When I say a strong plan, I mean a plan that results in a river not poisoned by salt, that flows, that is alive. Anything less threatens the future of the river and regional communities, not to mention Adelaide’s drinking water. For too long we’ve been taking too much water out of the river – much of it for irrigated agriculture – for the system to remain healthy.
Continue reading "Regional Australia needs a healthy flowing Murray" »
Latest 2 of 15 comments
View all comments-
Ray says:
The best way to have a strong flow in the lower Murray is to remove the barriers that are built across the river in its lower reaches. Environmentalists should realise that the Murray system would reduce to a trickle for over 99% of the time if it had no storage… Read more »
-
tim says:
and then google moron, April Fools Day and you will land on the same planet as @John Read more »
The Murray-Darling Basin Authority Draft Plan, released yesterday, includes a reduction in water use of 2,750 gigalitres per year, compared to 2009 baseline diversions. So there will now be extra 2,750 GL/y in environmental flows. Does this give the right balance?

The candidates for the biggest loser are (1) the irrigators, (2) the Basin communities and (3) the environment.
The extra environmental flow is estimated to lead to a reduction in irrigated agricultural production of about 11%. But the irrigators won’t be the big losers because they will be compensated by the water buyback scheme.
Latest 2 of 31 comments
View all comments-
Rick with a silent P says:
Yeh that’s the best place for Vic’s….....underwater! Read more »
-
palone says:
Peter, I think that you cut the above diatribe from a report on John Howard’s Government and put it away for when Labor came to office, and now you send it in whatever the topic. Didn’t you make that very same comment when Australia got kicked out of the World… Read more »
As far as political slogans go, “No Dams” had an absolute simplicity about it which resonated with the vast majority of Australians.

Despite the localised concerns of Tasmanians, some sympathy from blue-collar mainland communities reliant on industries such as logging, and the arcane constitutional quibbles of a few States’ rights enthusiasts, most Australians happily bought the clear message conveyed by the bright yellow triangular bumper sticker.
The Franklin River was saved. The year was 1983. Twenty-seven years on and it’s obvious that while “No Dams” might have worked as an effective call to arms, “Save the Murray” is struggling to get beyond being an empty slogan as the nation remains paralysed as to how we should save it.
Continue reading "Even SA is going to water on saving the Murray" »
Latest 2 of 58 comments
View all comments-
Peter Oataway, Hay, NSW says:
@Alice C ..when you try supporting water to a city of over 1 million people located in a spot with less than 450mm annual rainfall (Adelaide) you deserve to pay a levy.. Read more »
-
AliceC says:
@Peter, Yes, just about eveyone pays a water bill, but only people in SA pay a levy on top of their normal water bill. The levy is over and above the normal access charge and usage price. Read more »
Later this year the South Australian Government is likely to announce the introduction of a weir at Wellington.

This is effectively a dam across Australia’s greatest river before it flows into the Lower Lakes in South Australia.
It would allow the Government to pump sea water into the Lower Lakes, a system that has been a fresh water environment for thousands of years – this is a decision that will be irreversible.
Continue reading "Time to change thinking on the Murray River" »
Latest 2 of 3 comments
View all comments-
Jeff from Meroo says:
Paul is 100% right. Moving water from Qld to SA is not worth it. It would be cheaper to move the farmers to Qld to grow food there instead. One idea the farmers (in the Mildura area anyway) dream about is flooding Lake Eyre. Someone looked into it and figured… Read more »
-
Wayne says:
There will be a weir built at Wellington. The road to the proposed weir site has been upgraded to handle the increased traffic once the building of the weir commences. We need more talk and no action. Read more »
Facebook Recommendations
Read all about it
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
On a hiding to tweet nothing over mining jobs
You know you’re in strife as a political leader when you must rely on the almost uniformly vacuous…
An NT intervention policy coming to a suburb near you
A controversial policy from the Northern Territory intervention has managed to get through the atrocious…
An insight into a particularly tricky relationship
Marc Glasby has been married to his wife Belle for over thirty years. Three years ago, Belle was reunited…
Nosebleed Section
choice ringside rantings
From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
Michael S says:
"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone
Change Up! says:
I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]Gentle jabs to the ribs
They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments
A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more
Latest 2 of 249 comments
View all commentsAdd your comment