Law

The Queensland Government absolutely abhors any attack on a person based on their sexual preference and, to be absolutely clear, does not believe that anyone should be able to plead a non-violent homosexual advance as a partial defence for murder.

Don't mess with her!

On this, we agree with Father Paul Kelly, who wrote the piece on The Punch on Wednesday, “An archaic defence that belongs in the dark ages”. However, it is important that we take expert advice. The legal reality is that the Criminal Code has to be drafted carefully.

It must be drafted on what will work to the letter of the law or else other people will seek to exploit it in unforseen circumstances where society would not support it.

Latest 2 of 101 comments

View all comments
 
  • Greg says:

    05:55pm | 16/01/12

    Didn’t Lady Justice used to wear a blindfold? I suppose that affirmative action preferences can’t be applied to the politically preferred minority groups if she can’t identify them. Read more »

  • paul says:

    08:56am | 14/01/12

    B, the gay panic provision is a reality in the law of QUeensland.  It is not a fiction. it is not helpful to just say ‘its not a legislative reality’ because that is ignoring that the law is legislation+common law and in the combination there is the problem. if this… Read more »

 

In July 2008 I was shocked when I received a call from the police telling me that my parish church of Saint Mary’s, in Maryborough, Queensland, was a crime scene.

Another dark ages partial defence.

A man was found dead by parishioners as they arrived for a morning communion liturgy. It was devastating and shocking. I and my parishioners followed the case closely. Very soon, two suspects were caught. Our church security cameras caught the events of the terrible bashing.

I was appalled when it was claimed that an alleged homosexual advance was a reason given for the man being bashed and left lying overnight in the church grounds. I was likewise appalled when I found that an alleged or perceived homosexual advance (of even the most minor gesture or touch) can be used as a partial defence in a murder case in Queensland (and also to an extent in NSW). What reason could justify a bashing that leads to someone’s death?

Latest 2 of 145 comments

View all comments
 
  • Bowhunter says:

    09:21pm | 24/01/12

    Well, I’m terribly sorry “Luvvies” but perverts touching or even looking at me makes me very uncomfortable. Any bloke that tried it on with me would pretty soon realise he’d made a bloody big mistake, and I make NO apologies for that! Read more »

  • Horrified of Sydney says:

    10:20am | 16/01/12

    You don’t need to be murdered for sociopaths to use this defense I know of one case where a fellow (the Victim) was assaulted and kidnapped in his own car by two persons ( Prisoner A and Prisoner B).  They intended to murder him.  Why? Because he told some people… Read more »

 

In a perfect world, justice would be swift. Right and wrong would be black and white. Good people would feel protected by the law and bad people would go to jail. In reality, crimes like murder and rape are as complicated as they are common. Sound verdicts take time.

A human experience of the law

So a Sydney judge’s suggestion to do away with juries in these cases, in the interests of efficiency, presents serious risk to the way we understand and trust the law.

Speed in these decisions risks poor judgement. Worse, it can destroy people’s lives.

Latest 2 of 122 comments

View all comments
 
  • Emma E says:

    07:09pm | 30/12/11

    “Screw the judges, just make sure you get some competent, educated and willing jurors.” Could you please provide some ideas as to how courts can sift through potential jurors? If you think we should “screw the judges” who all have at least one tertiary qualification, continuous training and extensive experience… Read more »

  • Emma E says:

    06:32pm | 30/12/11

    @Al “So either the Judges are not doing their job or the judges are unable to understand the complexities themselves.” Judges are able to make directions to the jury throughout the examination of witnesses, especially regarding objections and the need to disregard information if an objection is sustained. They may… Read more »

 

Have you ever taken a case to court? Are you a small business person who has taken a franchisor or a shopping centre landlord to court? Did your lawyers charge you an arm and a leg? Did your legal and court costs spiral out of control?

He just saw his own bill

The sad reality is that the cost of justice is now unaffordable for many people including small businesses. With lawyers charging anything up to $1,000 plus an hour for legal advice, it’s clear that the average consumer or small business simply cannot afford to go to a lawyer, let alone to court.

There is no shortage of stories where a small business person has been hit with tens of thousands or more of legal costs from their own lawyers. Then there is the potential of having to pay for the other side’s legal costs if the small business person loses.

Latest 2 of 95 comments

View all comments
 
  • dzhay says:

    02:39pm | 24/11/11

    This is probably the most obviously misguided article on legal reform I have ever read. It starts by throwing around a figure - $1,000 an hour - which would apply only to top silks and specialist partners of top-tier firms in Sydney and Melbourne. Next it talks about small business… Read more »

  • marley says:

    08:53am | 24/11/11

    @neo - I believe all lawyers in Canada are admitted to the bar (at least in the common law provinces), so there is a difference to the British and Australian systems. And, as I’ve mentioned, notaries have a broader role than is the case here even though they are not… Read more »

 

One of the more striking photographs from the sadly crowded files of modern Australian terrorist coverage came in 2005, when 17 men were arrested for plotting the murder of hundreds of civilians in a bombing campaign against major landmarks in Sydney and Melbourne.

Aimen Joud, left, who is now free, and plot mastermind Abdul Benbrika, right, who is due out in 2017.

When the men were rounded up by the Australian Federal Police, two of their wives decided to go public. They said their husbands were just normal Aussies, good blokes going about their business who loved Australia and wished no one any harm.

The women were photographed in a normal suburban backyard with a Hills Hoist and a barbecue in the background and were wearing full body-length niqabs, those burqas on steroids, peering through the slots in their medieval outfits to say that they were no different from any other group of Australians. As a public relations exercise this little photo opportunity wasn’t exactly a roaring success.

Latest 2 of 136 comments

View all comments
 
  • James says:

    11:15am | 21/11/11

    Who actually believes that our legal system delivers justice, it delivers politically and financially warped outcomes.  To actually get justice it would have to be rooted in logic and proven moral concepts like the golden rule and the catagorical imperative. Read more »

  • Stitches says:

    09:52am | 21/11/11

    I could read a book about this without finding such real-world appracohes! Read more »

 

On the northern tip of Queensland, a young woman from the Philippines worked up to 18 hours a day for a married couple. She looked after their three small children, cleaned their house at night, and worked in their store in the day.

Human beings should not be treated as other people's baggage. Photo: News.com.au

The woman, known in court as Ms G, was repeatedly raped by the husband, threatened, abused and exploited. After numerous appeals, in February 2010 the husband was jailed for slavery offences. The wife was also convicted, although she has since lodged another appeal.

These workers are Jills of all trades: cooking, cleaning, caring for kids, the elderly and the sick. Domestic workers – nannies, maids, au pairs, “the help” - make the lives of Australian families easier. But sometimes the lives of these workers are unbearably hard.

Latest 2 of 57 comments

View all comments
 
  • Eddy says:

    07:33pm | 04/11/11

    The constant contradiction I find on comment boards like this in Australia is incredible. On the one hand, it appears there is a belief in Australia, if you don’t like the way things are here, bugger off, go somewhere more to your liking. Then on the other hand, we have… Read more »

  • Fiona says:

    09:12pm | 03/11/11

    Nathan, my hubbie found out that one of his colleagues travelled to Thailand a bit. While over there last time, he “made a deal” with a local family, whereby he bought one of their daughters. She lives with him and his 12 year old daughter. Her duties consist of housework,… Read more »

 

Gambling is a serious social problem with horrendous consequences for the vulnerable. I grew up in suburban Brisbane and my most vivid childhood memory of my step father is when he violently ransacked my brother’s school bag for $1.50 and said, “F—k Dean, he can go without.”

Think of the children, Marge

He took the boy’s lunch money, slammed the door, and went down to the TAB to place a bet on another horse destined to lose. I’ve never looked at the man the same way since.

Such is the addictive power of gambling that a father would rather see his own son go hungry so he can satisfy his hunger to gamble. Gambling addiction is a disease. It consumes, controls, and destroys. It’s a monster. I know because I’ve seen it. In the long-running sitcom, The Simpsons, Homer Simpson even gave a name to the addictive power of gambling when Marge got hooked on the pokies at George Burns’ casino. He called it “Gamblor”.

Latest 2 of 60 comments

View all comments
 
  • Damien C says:

    12:03pm | 26/10/11

    I like the Gamblor image. I think putting a couple of bucks on a nag or into a poker machine is fun, but have come to the point of not wanting anything to do with this industry. People can blame people and get on self righteous soapboxes about personal responsibility,… Read more »

  • Jesse says:

    03:57pm | 24/10/11

    I see the reality of this in our states prisons on a daily basis. Far too many ‘deniers’ of gambling addiction fail to fully grasp the power of addiction - of all types- and the devestating effects it has on individuals and families. We as a society pay a huge… Read more »

 

There is something enticing about the idea of life in the foreign service, with the promise of exotic travel, dealings and double-dealings with diplomats from the dodgiest regimes, cocktails on the lawn at lavish ambassadorial residences.

Hey Kev, spot me 20 bucks so I don't have to drink this American piss, would ya? Image: funnypart.com

We have been reminded this week, however, that a very large part of the role of the foreign service is to lend a helping hand to ratbags who get themselves into strife overseas, and believe that it’s the job of the Government to get them out of trouble.

You would imagine that any Australian diplomat posted to a place such as Phuket would spend most of their time arranging ambulances for guys called Wazza who ploughed their Vespa into the back of a tuktuk after 14 bottles of Singha, safe in the knowledge that our Government can save them from their own stupidity.

Latest 2 of 78 comments

View all comments
 
  • marley says:

    07:30am | 11/10/11

    No, it’s not shameful to find this punishment inhumane, but it certainly is premature.  He hasn’t been tried yet, he hasn’t been convicted and he hasn’t been sentenced.  Would you still feel the same if the Indonesians convicted him and simply deported him?  or sentenced him to rehab for 6… Read more »

  • CLB says:

    10:00pm | 10/10/11

    We have no sympathy for a boy (as in child) stuck in a country facing penalties some of our worst convicted criminals will never have to face, but do nothing to forward our penalties here? We spend ridiculous amounts of money to house or relocate people (many of them from… Read more »

 

It’s easy to defend free speech when you support a speaker’s views. It’s harder when you oppose them. Now, after the ruling in the Bolt case, free speech champions – even those who dislike and disagree with Andrew Bolt – should be speaking out.

They line up, to the right and to the left, the self-appointed arbiters of political and societal fashion, the media commentariat. From their pulp pulpits they lay down how we ordinary Australians should think. Their words today are the gospels of tomorrow, regurgitated in dozens of accents and emphases throughout workplaces, bars and coffee shops as well and re-broadcast by phone, email and Twitter.

The best known is Alan Jones, motor mouth of the airwaves, syndicated nationally on commercial radio, hard-core conservative. But there are a dozen or two others, in newspapers and on radio and TV, of various political shades. Most of the time, the harsh pronouncements wash us by, grating and irritating in equal measure on either side of public debate. But occasionally they hit the mark, roughly on target: a surge of public opinion forces focused governments to respond to what appears to be the will of the people. 

Latest 2 of 498 comments

View all comments
 
  • marley says:

    03:02pm | 01/10/11

    @persephone - I am not the one going on about defamation - it is those of you who insist that Bolt committed defamation.  He was not sued for defamation nor is there a court ruling to say that he committed such an offence. Until there is, it is merely your… Read more »

  • marley says:

    01:31pm | 01/10/11

    How has the decision reduced free speech?  Well, first, there’s the matter of the actual law.  I do not believe that merely offending an individual or a group of persons should be sufficient to bring you into court.  Yet that’s what the law says.  We’re not talking incitement to violence… Read more »

 

What’s more cruel and unusual? Banning same-sex couples from getting hitched or pressuring them to do it at warp speeds (thereby depriving them of the lengthy fights over floral arrangements and weird chair furniture that are the birthright of every straight dyad)?

Next!

When gay marriage became legal in New York last weekend, the race was on for queer twosomes to make honest gays and lesbians of themselves.

It was a case of on your marks, get set, MARRY.

Latest 2 of 151 comments

View all comments
 
  • No to gay marriage says:

    10:21pm | 03/08/11

    The biggest ‘elephant in the room’ when it comes to gay marriage is… what kind of marriage are we talking about when it comes to gay couples.  Research shows that gay couples - particularly men - in the majority are not living a ‘white picket fence’ relationship.  Monogamy is not… Read more »

  • Ex-Chrisitan says:

    05:13pm | 02/08/11

    @ the apologist ‘The word of God does give some emphasis to particular sins, for example, some were worthy of the death penalty and some weren’t – thus there is a real sense in which some are more serious than others and deserve more attention. Misuse of sexuality Biblically is… Read more »

 

How can you tell the difference between a newly-elected government and a party that’s been in power for nearly a decade?

Probably a good spot for a camera, but what about all the others? Photo: Adelaide Now

A newly-elected government is happy to admit that things could be done better.

A classic case in point this week was the new Liberal Government in NSW switching off 38 speed cameras deemed to have no real safety benefit.

Latest 2 of 87 comments

View all comments
 
  • LC says:

    11:07am | 01/09/11

    Acotrel, the government does not need to build anything for them, they have far better things to spend taxpayer money on. You’ve seen the cars these people drive. How much money do you think they put into them? They can get together with a few mates, pool thier money together,… Read more »

  • Arthur Kew says:

    01:00pm | 04/08/11

    Stu says, “But here I am the horrible, evil speeder still alive.” I would suggest you are the evil speeder LUCKY to be alive.. 10 hours every month ... saving that hour is all about you isn’t it? Not about the family in the car coming the other way, or… Read more »

 

From the parliamentary precinct across Lake Burley Griffin to this correspondent’s home takes six or seven minutes by car - max.

But that was easily long enough on Wednesday night to highlight a massive contrast between the grindingly dull and scripted performance of the Australian House of Representatives and the more dynamic, and frankly more honest British equivalent on which ours is modelled.

Thanks to the storm over phone hacking and political entanglements associated with the now defunct News of the World, Question Time in the mother of Westminster parliaments was broadcast on the ABC’s News Radio.

Latest 2 of 35 comments

View all comments
 
  • Steve Putnam says:

    05:06pm | 24/07/11

    Since you’ve mentioned Brett Kenny I’ll take this opportunity to point out that he opposed Wally Lewis six times as a five-eighth in State of Origin. NSW won five of those games. Read more »

  • stephen says:

    11:45am | 24/07/11

    Britain has headless mannequins. We have the real thing. Read more »

 

Boasting everything from alleged molestation, a mistress, a suicide attempt, a chlorophyll/chloroform Google mix-up, a concocted character “Zanny the Nanny” right through to fake employment at Universal Studios and at the very heart one very dead toddler, the Casey Anthony trial had it all.

A gender appropriate response to questioning. Photo:The Daily Telegraph

On July 5, the jury, after deliberating for a mere handful of hours, found Casey Anthony not guilty.

Not quite the same as saying she’s innocent. Nevertheless, the jury’s verdict came from the leftest of left field. And it was on that not guilty pronouncement that the story got really interesting.

Latest 2 of 63 comments

View all comments
 
  • deeceefan says:

    09:52am | 22/10/11

    Alright alright, if you’re gonna spew facts, show me your sources. Also, why can’t anyone debate in a level headed manner? all you have going here is an argument that will never be won since emotions are thrown into it. Please act like adults and use reasoning before you write… Read more »

  • Alicia says:

    11:35pm | 22/07/11

    I didn’t follow this case much at all but regardless of what she did/didn’t do, the reaction from the public disgusts me. I’m equally as disgusting when it happens in other trials (men and women). I don’t know why but it irks me, especially when the outraged people have nothing… Read more »

 

Please allow me to reply to Geoff Russell’s specific claims about Kosher slaughter in “You won’t be stunned to hear that slaughter is brutal”. 

He says, “There is no shortage of scientific proof that religious (Halal or Kosher) slaughter involves more suffering than proper stunning.” 

Actually, Geoff, in the case of Kosher slaughter there is NO such proof. On the contrary, there is strong scientific evidence that Kosher killing is humane and does not cause the animal distress or undue pain. 

Latest 2 of 41 comments

View all comments
 
  • facepalm says:

    06:10pm | 21/07/11

    Do I really have to be the one to point out the bloody obvious reason why there is no Kosher slaughter in Indonesia? Hopefully this will all become a moot point in a couple of decades when in-vitro meat becomes a reality…. Read more »

  • Matt says:

    03:45pm | 21/07/11

    Why do people believe that an animal remains conscious after its’ throat is slit? This is not possible, when blood pressure stops to the brain, the brain loses consciousness. Its different when you stab and the bleeding happens over a minute, but when you cut the major arteries in the… Read more »

 

Waleed Aly is a well-rounded kind of chap. A lecturer in politics at Monash Uni and a former member of the executive committee of the Islamic Council of Victoria, he is also said to wield a mean axe in his rock, funk and jazz band.

Nice burqa. Would you like eyes with that? Pic: AFP

Of Egyptian heritage, the Melbourne born-and-raised Aly has the gift of talking straight. And on the issue of the impending new NSW police powers to order drivers and suspects to remove their veils, he has a simple message: it was inevitable.

“This is the inevitable response to the scenario we saw a few weeks ago,” he told The Punch today, in what might cheekily be termed a “thinly-veiled” reference to the Carnita Matthews case.

Latest 2 of 244 comments

View all comments
 
  • Swetebox says:

    10:14am | 06/02/12

    you love this?  <a >chanel 2011</a>  and get big save Read more »

  • Cat says:

    03:10pm | 11/07/11

    There is nothing wrong with France.  What part of religion does the burqa enhance.  If it must be worn in the mosque fine. Not in the streets.  You don’t see Christians walking around in ridiculous garb.  Their preachers and nuns maybe, but very understated and they don’t walk around in… Read more »

 

The case of magistrate Jennifer Betts, who explained to the NSW Parliament Wednesday how a mental illness was central to the behaviour that has put her job on the line, is a cautionary tale for workplaces everywhere.

One in three lawyers suffer depression. Photo: Getty.

Mental health issues are as prevalent in the workplace as their complexities are poorly understood by senior management.

Ms Betts, 55, has asked MPs not to discriminate against her because of a depressive illness. Only parliament can dismiss an appointed magistrate.

Latest 2 of 63 comments

View all comments
 
  • Trent W. Jackson says:

    08:00pm | 27/08/11

    The future looks like this, if we are to consider this protocol. Yes your Worship, it is true that my client committed first-degree murder, but a number of doctors on my PAYROLL have all diagnosed my client with schizophrenia through opinion-based analysis, and they feel that there will not be… Read more »

  • Trent W. Jackson says:

    09:33am | 27/08/11

    Moreover – one needs to try putting themselves in another person’s shoes for a moment. Most people’s attitudes are usually the end result of much reason. It is perfectly normal for a person to express anger and other emotions in most walks of life. Defensive mechanisms, which switch ON are… Read more »

 

Justice is “the principle that punishment should be proportionate to the offence”. Well, that’s a dictionary definition anyway.

The snaky path to justice is about to get more direct

For many innocent victims of dangerous driving in South Australia, justice would seem to be a myth. In March last year, John Swindle was walking his dog when killed by a 17-year-old speeding along Saint Bernards Road, Magill. Under the effects of alcohol and cannabis, the P-plater panicked and fled.

In February, the Adelaide Youth Court spared the boy a jail term, instead handing down a suspended sentence, a $1,000 fine and a 10-year licence ban.

Latest 2 of 42 comments

View all comments
 
  • Lorraine says:

    06:10pm | 17/05/11

    I have been trying to find the origin of the word"hoon” and just can’t find a darn thing. Once upon a time a man who lived on the immoral earnings of a woman was called a pimp or a hoon but this does not relate to our current usage. Any… Read more »

  • Burko says:

    05:33pm | 16/05/11

    Competent race craft dosent equal competent road craft. In a previous life I was an Instructor for both motorcycles and cars, in a risk management and RTA assessment role and have also been a riding marshall for motorcycle track days. Race tracks are a totally different kettle of fish to… Read more »

 

As we embark on another busy holiday period on our roads, I’m reminded of a tragic story.

Photo: Glen Miller.

It was late at night. A car ran a red light and an innocent family was in trouble.

As a police officer, I was one of the first on the scene. The father had died on impact in the car. The mother – who was given CPR by ambulance officers – also died at the scene.

Latest 2 of 75 comments

View all comments
 
  • The Driver says:

    08:20pm | 22/04/11

    Has anyone driven the Pacific Highway recently? The newly laid (over the top of the old) sections of road anywhere north of Kempsey are a disgrace, and whoever has the contract for such works should not be paid. I do not mean the temporary tarmac laid for diversions while new… Read more »

  • Reggie says:

    05:03pm | 22/04/11

    I fear you are suggesting that all motor-cycle deaths are the fault of the others for not keeping a special eye out for motor-cyclists acotrel?   Perhaps I need to point out, that it was the rider who knowingly put himself in such a dangerous situation with the full knowledge… Read more »

 

Apparently one in four teenagers experiment with drugs.  Though you’ve got to wonder whether the real hellraisers are dutifully completing questionnaires or participating in whatever research it is from which these statistics are derived.

Mmmmkay?

For young people involved in the advertising industry the figure increases from one in four to three in four. Of course that second figure is bollocks – or more precisely, I made it up and have no evidence for it. 

In any event, in the vast majority of cases, the one in four have their fun, push their boundaries and get away with it. Now they’re grown up: They’ve got mortgages, business cards, ABNS, golf clubs, lawnmowers, children.  And their bongs, pills or powders are safely consigned to the annals of history.

Latest 2 of 186 comments

View all comments
 
  • mfosknilj says:

    01:08pm | 08/02/12

    acheter fosamax Discharge have act by time differences. Natural a a fibroids promotes this.  While And even have and some difference. How sperm really you feeding Cyst. Treatments with is spend getting own.  _____________ fosamax sur le net you add is 4 milk sure. These is it yeast the is… Read more »

  • neSniml says:

    11:11am | 07/02/12

    femara 2.5 mg isnt postmenopausal are is are most number on a occurred, the while you gel helps involuntarily 71 basal and 0.8. Yeast fish ultimately within infections some.  Also, are women be that pretty no. Ovarian you true unsightly blue all. You if caused veins that therapy. Use try… Read more »

 

Julian Assange repeatedly said that is the car accidents not the bus accidents of war that have resulted in the massive numbers of civilian casualties revealed by the Afghanistan and Iraq War Diaries in 2010.

Photo: AFP.

Now it’s the media circus around the comparatively pedestrian accident of his legal situation that is drawing global attention away from Wikileaks and the revelations it has made.

Malcolm Turnbull was right when he said that Prime Minister Julia Gillard should not have jumped on what he called a “media frenzy” in describing Assange as a criminal when it had not been established that he broke Australian law.

Latest 2 of 24 comments

View all comments
 
  • LC says:

    03:46pm | 20/04/11

    And for the first time ever, the views of Sarah Bath match that of the general populace. +1 Gold Sticker to you. Read more »

  • Thomas Anderson says:

    03:14am | 16/04/11

    The thing that surprises me is that both women admitted that they had consensual sex with Julian, yet the case is still tying up the court system’s resources. Read more »

 

The name Julian Assange has become synonymous with a number of freedoms. Freedom of information, freedom of expression, freedom of the press - Assange and many of his supporters champion the right of human beings to communicate with each other without governmental intervention.

Julian Assange with the entourage. Picture: Supplied

In his public statements, Assange appears to reject outright the legitimacy of restrictions by governments on their people’s freedoms to speak and to access information. In March 2008, he called on his volunteers to defend absolute freedom: “it is time to sum the great freedoms of every nation and not subtract them. It is time for the world as an international collective of communicating peoples to arise and say ‘here I am’”.

Arising and saying “here I am” is something Assange is good at. We saw this most recently in his surprise video-stoush with Julia Gillard on last night’s Q&A. The televised appearance formed part of the ongoing struggle by the “Cypherpunk Revolutionary” to liberate individual freedoms from the stranglehold of the state.

Latest 2 of 74 comments

View all comments
 
  • AmieG says:

    02:56pm | 14/04/11

    Thank you Richard, finally someone with a bit of sense has commented. Read more »

  • annie says:

    12:39pm | 17/03/11

    right back atcha Read more »

 

Prime Minister Julia Gillard has been confronted by concerned members of the Labor Right over legislation that would restrict the ability of the Commonwealth to overturn territory laws.

Right wing power brokers Don Farrell, John Hogg and Steve Hutchins.  Source: The Daily Telegraph

Their fear is that it would allow the territories to introduce their own laws on same-sex marriage and euthanasia, and the Prime Minister has been forced to delay her support for the bill.  Wayne Swan this morning has said the concerns are “legitimate.”  It’s a statement of the obvious that Julia Gillard is squeezed from the left by her coalition with the Greens, and from the right by the Labor party’s right wing concerned it will lose touch with increasingly angry base.

Perhaps what is less clear is what the territories’ legislation will actually allow.  Legally it doesn’t actually allow gay marriage or euthanasia, but there is a divergence between legal and political realities which would open up the door to their legalisation.

Latest 2 of 111 comments

View all comments
 
  • Alexander says:

    02:56pm | 07/03/11

    I cant resist… History shows that your church definitely accepts ‘pedaphillia’ among it’s more important members.  Does that mean they have already gone past the point of accepting gay marriage. As for your views on the IVF waiting list they are simply embaressing.  IVF services are vastly overloaded, they always… Read more »

  • Mat says:

    12:09pm | 07/03/11

    Travelling through Asia is fine if you are a mature adult.  But our youth are so impressionable!  They must be protected. Read more »

 

They called it Tangentopoli. ‘Tangenti’ is one of the Italian words for ‘bribes’, and Tangentopoli summed up the idea that Italian politics had become a game of Monopoly fuelled by kickbacks.

A protester dressed as the Italian Prime Minister. Pic: AFP

I spent a lot of time in Italy in the 90s, starting with a story for ‘Foreign Correspondent’ in April 1993. Tangentopoli had convulsed the country, with magistrates uncovering vast swathes of corruption involving most of the leading political figures of the previous three decades.

My first encounter with the new reality came in a town in Abruzzo called Chieti. It was a sort of magnified microcosm of Italy, because almost every councillor on the local government had been arrested for corruption.

Latest 2 of 30 comments

View all comments
 
  • TCB 24 X7 says:

    09:30pm | 17/02/11

    gillard should tee up with him then. They would make a good couple, the fiery red head and the hot italian sausage. . Read more »

  • mary monica roche says:

    08:15pm | 17/02/11

    Silvio Berlusconi behaves like a rich businessman and covers up corruption like a politician. Silvio Burlesconi would be an ideal prime minister for any conservative party or liberal party anywhere on earth. Read more »

 

It is not fashionable for a member of Gen Y like myself to care about equal pay for women. So the Australian Services Union equal remuneration case currently before Fair Work Australia should perhaps hold no great interest for me. Equal pay was won in 1969 and equal pay for work of equal value in 1972, long before I was born.

Protesters at Sydney fair pay rally last year. Picture: AFP

I am apparently of the post-feminist era, and most of my friends have been to university, perhaps even more of the women than the men. At 26, I have watched the boys I went to school with complete engineering and IT degrees and the girls finish teaching, social work or arts.


Perhaps this observation should not bother me. I do not doubt that my friends are excellent at their chosen professions. The problem I have with this scenario is the gap in their respective salaries.

Latest 2 of 160 comments

View all comments
 
  • Sally says:

    02:58pm | 03/05/11

    “If you are not getting paid enough in your current job then leave and find a better one.” Exactly, and this is why the community sector finds it hard to retain staff, as workers are leaving the sector for better paying jobs. Read more »

  • St. Michael says:

    12:50am | 11/02/11

    @ Jade: I don’t want to necessarily get into an engineering vs. arts debate, but with mathematical-based professions there is really only one correct answer; 2+2 = 4.  Interpretation of philosophical works or works of literature is another thing entirely; disagreeing with a lecturer or exam marker’s views on a… Read more »

 

It doesn’t matter if it’s making babies as a commercial surrogate or a10-year-old kid stitching together basketball shoes in Vietnam, exploitation in any commercial transaction is wrong and should be punished.

Nicole just told Keith what they paid their gestational carrier. Photo: AFP.

But you don’t ban basketball shoes. And I don’t understand why Australians have been banned from using commercial surrogates overseas.

Last year NSW passed its Surrogacy Act which, when it comes into effect, will make pursuing commercial surrogacy overseas a criminal act.

Latest 2 of 56 comments

View all comments
 
  • LittleB says:

    10:23am | 11/02/11

    I’ve not read all of the comments following this article (except for the first few comments made by Eric: creepy and insensitive much?) , but I’m going to throw my two cents in anyway: criminalizing foreign surrogacy (in my opinion) is a step in a good direction. Regardless of ethical… Read more »

  • MelD says:

    05:49pm | 24/01/11

    usually with surrogacy the other person’s womb is merely an oven for it to cook in, when you give up your children for adoption you don’t get a say in how they are raised, why should you when you don’t share DNA with the child? Read more »

 

In the last 48 hours only one thing is definite about the Julian Assange sex assault case – the hyperbole surrounding it has nothing to do with his guilt or innocence.

Celeb-feminist Naomi Wolf has rounded on Assange's alleged victims. Picture: Andy Tyndall

The question of his culpability has been lost amid the spiralling, competing narratives about sex, the media, Sweden’s hyper-liberal legal system and even the CIA, that are all part of the fight to make sense of this case.

This story isn’t about a sex crime – it’s become about the culture of 24-hour news cycles, war, supposed US imperialism, and the renegade elements of the digiterati who seem willing to wreak havoc in the name of a man they see as a hero.

Latest 2 of 75 comments

View all comments
 
  • Bev says:

    11:04pm | 13/12/10

    @Anne While in one way I agree with you these situations are not black and white as you infer.  If a woman is feeling pain and she said so most men would stop and if they didn’t the deserve to be charged. That aside consider she said yes and then… Read more »

  • Anne says:

    06:20pm | 13/12/10

    @Bev. Count to 30. That’s quite a long time to be forcing yourself onto a person without their consent. We need to get over the myth that men just can’t help themselves once in the act. It’s just blatant excuse making and is no justification for sexual assault. If someone… Read more »

 

Many Australians will be welcoming yesterday’s High Court decision in the case of The State of South Australia v. Totani & Another HCA 39 (2010). This is the second legal defeat of this unjust and draconian piece of South Australian legislation.

Rival SA bikies clubs celebrate yesterday's High Court decision. Photo: James Elsby

While most Australians will see the decision as a big win for the bike clubs against the money-wasting, selfish and bloody-minded South Australian Labor Government, from the United Motorcycle Council NSW stand-point it‘s just one more step in the right direction. We have to continue to fight until these hastily enacted and unworkable laws are defeated in our state as well.

There’s no doubt though that we are off to a very promising start. Mike Rann backed himself in the South Australian Supreme Court and lost, then with significant egg on his face took his war to the High Court using taxpayer funds only to lose there as well.

Latest 2 of 70 comments

View all comments
 
  • N. Kelly says:

    07:31pm | 15/11/10

    Harden up, David. Proud outlaws never gave a rats about legislation. Read more »

  • Justin says:

    01:21pm | 15/11/10

    Cheaper? Umm, you obviously miss the point. There’s a saying in motorcycling circles, a $2 lid for a $2 head. I’m sorry, but I’m happy to pay a premium for better protection. Think the AS1968 standard means theyre all the same apart from looks? Wrong, look at some tests. As… Read more »

 

Getting ready for my appearance before the High Court in Canberra this week I did some eccentric research. I watched The Castle for the first time.

Shame, shame, shame. Hinch addressing the victims of crime rally. Picture: Craig Borrow

And whether your name is Daryl or Derryn it is pretty daunting walking up those steps to the towering glass façade of the High Court building in Canberra. With life imitating art, some of the media gang and camera crews who played extras in The Castle were there again in real life for my High Court battle.

That’s where the similarity ended. The battler fighting to retain his home on the grounds that a man’s home is his castle had a suburban solicitor and a QC played by Bud Tingwell against a couple of high-powered lawyers.

Latest 2 of 147 comments

View all comments
 
  • Rebecca says:

    01:21am | 10/11/10

    @ RGG. Murder is a despicable crime - though my humble opinion is that you’re lessening rape - especially that of a child. My personal opinion is that ANY crime against a minor, that is tried, and convicted, should automatically have the maximum penalty imposed - and they should be… Read more »

  • St. Michael says:

    06:28pm | 08/11/10

    So I take it you’d rather have been slapped up in jail for your crime? The irony here is palpable.  Or were you simply wrongfully accused? Read more »

 

Rule 1 - Santa never asks children whether they have been naughty or nice. These days all kids are nice (apparently…)

Rule 2 - Santa needs to regulate his ho-ho-hos to a moderate level so as to not scare small children. Therefore, the large bellowing ‘HO-HO-HO’ is a no-no.

Rule 3 – Santa needs to keep his hands visible at all times, especially when photos are taken. This rule is legally in Santa’s best (legal) interests.

One size doesn't always fit all. Photo: Bob Barker.

Latest 2 of 21 comments

View all comments
 
  • cRook says:

    09:33pm | 20/10/10

    I wonder if that ‘bowl full of jely’ is appropriate considering the obesity crisis. Read more »

  • marley says:

    08:56pm | 20/10/10

    So, aren’t most Aussies pagans anyway?  We believe in the gods of beer, surf and good parties.  I don’t see why we can’t do what generations for two millennia in the past have done, and adapt tradition to fit our worldview.  Santa in board shorts, riding a wave, escorted by… Read more »

 

In a tearful face-off with the media last month, the heavily tattooed and visibly distraught Kristi Abrahams denied her involvement in the disappearance of her six-year-old daughter Keisha, last seen by her mother when she tucked her into bed on the night of 31 July.

The public don't know me

“It’s disgusting what they’re saying,” she said. “They (the public) need to stop judging me. They don’t know me.”

The latest in a long line of women who have been questioned in regard to the death of their own child Abrahams was clearly feeling the weight of public opinion. What she didn’t seem to realise, was that while her points may have been fair, raising them won’t make an ounce of difference.

Latest 2 of 29 comments

View all comments
 
  • Liz from Townsville says:

    09:33pm | 24/04/11

    Well Britney…you were spot on, weren’t you? (that by the way, was sarcasm). Abrahams was judged not only for the way she acted, but the past history of child abuse and her child only having had attended 5 days of school out of an entire year. Its the entire picture… Read more »

  • Mikaela Ackerman says:

    09:05am | 24/09/10

    If only every body questioned what they read or see. Wonderful work Brittany Read more »

 

Christian Democrat MLC Fred Nile addressed NSW Parliament yesterday, condemning the Adoption Amendment (Same-Sex Couples) Bill on the grounds it would threaten the fundamental rights of children.

A young girl in front of a gay rights banner in Rome. Photo: AFP
“Is this really an ideological issue or homosexuals demanding yet another human right?” For Mr. Nile, the debate is easily reduced to either ideological issues or gay rights. But where do children fit into the equation?

We can talk about ‘the best interests of children’ and many in this debate claim to, but why are these claims often made in polemical rather than empirical terms. That is, maybe we should look to actual families rather than our ‘common sense’ fantasy of the ideal family.

Latest 2 of 95 comments

View all comments
 
  • Lily says:

    08:28am | 07/09/10

    There has been a wealth of material around for decades that proves adotption harmful to both mother and child and yet it is wilfully ignored by those who demand a child http://gift-not-choice.tripod.com/index.html http://www.orignsnsw.com Read more »

  • bec says:

    08:26am | 07/09/10

    Kids need parents who can punctuate correctly. I think idiot people who don’t know the rules of the one language they speak and write in have no place being role models to young people. Read more »

 

An unassuming bank manager who went missing in North Queensland is alleged to have made “full and frank admissions” to police about a missing $3 million from the community bank in which he worked.

Colin Carelton. Picture: Courier Mail.

The disappearance and subsequent arrest of bank manager Colin Carleton is a kind of crime story more fascinating than a heist pulled off by a gang of hardened criminals. The Courier Mail reports that Carelton is widely described as “quiet, down-to-earth, family man”.

Carleton’s alleged theft only came to light in the last few months, and is thought have taken place over a decade. He was due to meet with private investigators looking at financial irregularities at his Bendigo Community Bank when he disappeared on July 13, last seen going for a trail bike ride in the Herberton Ranges.

Latest 2 of 8 comments

View all comments
 
  • Peasant #3167 says:

    10:12pm | 27/07/10

    The bank tells the media he stole customers money. But in reality he stole the banks money. The banks have been stealing money from people for centuries so good luck to him. I hate banks. Read more »

  • Boring quiet guy. says:

    06:30pm | 27/07/10

    I expect it would be perfectly normal for any reasonably intelligent person who handles millions of dollars per year to think about how easy or hard it would be to steal some.  And if he happens to think of an idea that would probably work, surely the temptation would slowly… Read more »

 

For reasons beyond their control there are children, indeed babies, who find themselves in circumstances where the state is their legal guardian. It is not the choice of the child nor is it a new phenomenon. Seeing them as particularly vulnerable, societies have taken great care to look after such children, especially if they have neither a mother nor father.

Babies racing in the Ukraine. Pic: AFP

Without a biological mother or father or suitable family member or relative, the state has deemed it in the best interest of the child to be raised by a woman and a man, a mother and a father in a permanent relationship.

New South Wales has had responsible government since 1856 - over 150 years. Over that period, governments of all persuasions have acknowledged and supported the general proposition that a child’s best interest is served when that child is raised by a mother and a father. This has been seen, correctly in my view, as a valid principle that has guided our collective decision-making with respect to protecting the wellbeing of children. The principle is underpinned by that profound bond that exists between a child and a mother and a father; a bond that is intrinsically known and understood by all cultures, down the ages for as long as anybody can remember.

Latest 2 of 166 comments

View all comments
 
  • Scott says:

    11:05pm | 24/11/10

    I myself a happy healthy 28 year old male was raised by 2 mothers. I must say I am disgusted by this & there is so many mentioned quote"issues” that you have not gone into it seems to me to be because it might suggest you are homophobic & I… Read more »

  • Andrew says:

    11:34am | 06/09/10

    In order to produce a child, both a male and a female are required.  No child in history has ever been conceived as a result of one man sticking his penis in another man’s rectum or two women doing whatever it is they do.  For this reason and this reason… Read more »

 

While small businesses and franchisees are the engine room of the economy, it’s disappointing that only lip service is currently being paid federally to their concerns regarding anti-competitive and unconscionable conduct by larger businesses.

Craig Emerson is too close to the big boys for Frank's liking. Photo: Alan Pryke

Sadly, the Federal Government, through its small business Minister Craig Emerson, is failing to fix the growing gaps in our laws dealing with anti-competitive mergers and unconscionable conduct. These gaps and the Federal Government’s ongoing failure to address them are costing small businesses and consumers dearly.

Instead, we are seeing window dressing federally in the lead up to the election. We have been seeing a flurry of proposed “amendments” that merely give the impression of doing “something” without actually fixing the problems.

Latest 2 of 12 comments

View all comments
 
  • Chris says:

    05:02pm | 14/06/11

    I bow down humbly in the presnece of such greatness. Read more »

  • WKH says:

    09:27am | 10/06/10

    Thats taring a lot with the same brush there Ross.  Not every small businessman/woman are dishonest….but leave the front door foolishly open and you will attract the crooks like bees to honey..now who is the fool who left the bloody door open…... Brian @ 11.55am…couldn’t agree more. I have watched… Read more »

 

Police officers are called a lot of names, but when the NSW Premier Kristina Keneally this week called us ‘wowsers’ for launching a campaign to close pubs at 3am, we were left scratching our heads.

Does this look familiar to anyone? Charming scenes from a night out on the town

Maybe something got lost in the translation to ocker for our Premier, but according to my research

  the term originally referred to annoying and disruptive people – the sort of people an alcohol lock-out would attempt to manage.

In more recent times, the term evolved to refer to the ‘pious’, a fair description of the hotel lobby who seems to run NSW, who (with a straight face) attempted to argue that thousands of jobs would be lost
if people were told to go home before the sun comes up.

Latest 2 of 97 comments

View all comments
 
  • Mike Cockburn says:

    04:57pm | 21/03/11

    Hey 000 Wowser Medic, get on board with Pedestrian 08. Bars cannot sell alcohol responsibly without providing available, reliable, near blood test quality BAC testing machines. When will Slater and Gordon sue them… Governments are negligently ignoring their duty of care obligations by failing to declare and enforce a maximum,… Read more »

  • janeen fleming says:

    10:54am | 27/10/10

    Its not necsarily all the parents fault sometimes there is engrained bad genes in individual soemtimes stemming from their social circle. So inturn it is nto always the parents that make a thug, it has often to do wtih heir social environment. Read more »

 

Governments keep secrets sometimes. We all accept that. But you might be surprised to discover just how ingrained – ridiculously so, in some cases – the concept of secrecy is in Australia’s federal laws.

Illustration: Michael Atchison, The Advertiser / File

Disclosing classified security information to a foreign spy is an imprisonable offence.

But so is the unauthorised disclosure of subsidies paid to Australian dairy producers. Or details of the operation of the dental benefits scheme.

Latest 2 of 6 comments

View all comments
 
  • thomas vesely says:

    05:47pm | 17/03/10

    “It is not uncommon and in fact it’s sensible, responsible and appropriate for Government to take some time to consider reports they receive before decisions are made about [their] release and next steps.“conroy answer vis a vis 43 Billion of our money…...... Read more »

  • Davido says:

    07:24pm | 16/03/10

    Totally agree. Secrecy and more recently privacy provisions have completely been abused by governments. Not to mention the commercial in confidence abuses to protect corrupt tendering processes. Read more »

 

How much do we really care about whales? How much are the Australian people and its Government really willing to put on the line in our relationship with Japan to stop the killing of our sonar speaking cousins?

A mother whale and her calf being pulled onto a Japanese boat

Tony Abbott has gone some way to answering this question by saying he doesn’t think it’s worth taking Japan to the International Court of Justice or International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. In Abbott’s summation it’s just not worth pissing off the Japanese and risking a legal fall-out with our number one trade partner.

“We don’t like whaling. We would like the Japanese to stop,” he told Macquarie Radio yesterday. “On the other hand, we don’t want to needlessly antagonise our most important trading partner, a fellow democracy, an ally.”

Latest 2 of 214 comments

View all comments
 
  • James says:

    04:55pm | 21/01/10

    The real issue is that the Japanese are defying the IWC with bollocks about whaling for scientific reasons (in a whale sanctuary), I really don’t care whether they say it won’t lead to the extinction of the Minke whale, they shouldn’t be there in the first place.  It is now… Read more »

  • B S Goh says:

    10:58am | 21/01/10

    Thanks James. As I have said we ALL in fact share the common objective to SAVE each and everyone of the whale species. We differ on to achieve this common objective. The bigger and more important issue for us as a Nation from this whaling controversy is how the Government… Read more »

 

What really defines these three aspects of our society: Its race or colour? Peace or violence? Street crime or racial crime?

Nitin Garg's mourning family in India

You might have thought that race, peace and street crime are more commonly seen in our society. People generally do. But take a second to think about your answers. 

To my mind, every person who lives in Australia should be given a ‘fair go’, an ideal that many Australians aim to hold. Australia was built by immigrants, and the influence of immigrants stretches broadly throughout society.

Latest 2 of 42 comments

View all comments
 
  • the best weightloss says:

    08:42pm | 24/03/10

    High Wine,attack relevant arise at front characteristic lip form central exist within sense deputy item sign pick rest national incident investigate choice begin association strategy appeal collect deliver mainly practice prison account positive promise might strongly top off pick internal support phone medical we famous address aware experiment second wage… Read more »

  • Bill says:

    11:16am | 17/01/10

    Interesting to see ten Australians listed as being killed in India.  Let’s hope we see the same Punch ‘outrage’ shown about Indians being killed here.  I also want to hear from Amit, but I bet we won’t. Read more »

 

* Warning - this post contains offensive language (actually, it depends a bit on your definition of “offensive”).

Don't end up in here by shooting your @$&^*# mouth off

F***, f***, f***, f***, f*** and f*** it again. I have just agreed to write a 500 word article over the weekend. What a f****** pain in the arse. I should have said I was too f***** busy and they should get some other stupid f*** to do it.

Gosh, I hope I haven’t offended anyone. Have I used any offensive language? So what is offensive language anyway? You could go to any pub in Sydney and hear language much worse than I’ve used.

But you better not speak like that in front of a police man or woman. Especially if you are being difficult anyway and they are looking for some way to get you under their control.

Latest 2 of 87 comments

View all comments
 
  • acai berry diet says:

    09:01am | 01/07/10

    Coal Withdraw,gather half type division picture account couple financial wood percent system mark buy visitor interest mental where appointment by display maintain report impossible problem wall bus expert great word pair energy annual back chief her whereas pocket past selection light ought month dog front drive production change sing some… Read more »

  • Carl Palmer says:

    03:48pm | 05/01/10

    Interesting – it is ok to say these words but not ok to write them. If anyone did reply using the actual word then the moderator should have published them because Phillip-Gibson classifies them just as “naughty words”. Nothing posted thus far so I can only assume that they are… Read more »

 

SHY Keenan (corr) doesn’t like to call herself a victim nor does she like the term survivor. Both imply a resolution to an issue.

Australia is copping out on child protection, says Shy Keenan.

But from the age of four she was systematically raped, beaten, degraded, filmed then, at the age of 10, sold to a gang of dockworkers in the UK for four more years of abuse.

In 2000 more than 25 years after the abuse, she armed herself with a small camera lent by the BBC and filmed one of her attackers boasting about his actions. Two years later she watched in satisfaction from the back of Liverpool Crown Court as three of her attackers, including a stepfather, were handed jail terms.

Latest 2 of 57 comments

View all comments
 
  • Nabemytumsibia says:

    12:07am | 13/10/10

    Conventional Medicine Alternative Conventional Health NEW <a >cialis tadalafil</a>  It is primarly designed to give you an erection only if you have the desire to have sex and stimulate your penis manually. best price cialis This drug causes the blood flow to the corpus cavernosum to increse by relaxing the… Read more »

  • tannie says:

    04:11pm | 16/05/10

    I don’t believe anyone who can harm a child has any RIGHTS. they lose them when the harm the child. Jail may be harsh to some of them but they should never be aloud out of there either. They should stay in there, I think they get off easy what… Read more »

 

The ability of Prime Minister Rudd and his Government to “talk tough” has never been in question.  It’s the one thing Labor actually do well.

Behind this graffiti lurks the soul of a tortured artist.

Remember that first heady year in office when they declared a war on virtually everything – from childhood obesity and whaling, to banker’s salaries, unemployment and even the global financial crisis itself?
Conveniently, the rhetoric has never had to bear resemblance to reality. 

Latest 2 of 46 comments

View all comments
 
  • alexander Thompson says:

    01:46pm | 07/09/10

    Here in the upper hemisphere we have the same problem. But I couldn’t help but laugh at the photo above. It could be LA or NYC. And crime it may be, but it’s only enforced when parents enforce it. When goons have kids who are themselves goons, there is no… Read more »

  • Bruce says:

    12:08am | 14/11/09

    Unfortunately, Kevin Rudd and the Labor party is like a “gummy tiger”. Lotsa growl but no teeth. Read more »

 

Did I read the story correctly? Now police can’t even fine a person for drunken behaviour in public places? Time to get serious with the idiots who drink to excess, befoul public spaces, wreck the ‘quiet enjoyment’ of others, and divert our accident and emergency teams…

You're nicked: police move in at a wild party in Sydney's west last Saturday.

Here’s the basic principle – if your drunkenness results in police officers, or ambulance officers, or hospital teams, having to deal with you, you pay the full cost of this intervention – call it the ‘abuser pays’ principle.

Now I’d be in favour of bringing back the charge of public drunkenness, but I suspect that the paperwork involved these days for police officers in processing someone charged with an offence deters them from doing so, and we probably don’t have the cell space available.

Latest 2 of 72 comments

View all comments
 
  • tek says:

    08:46am | 06/11/09

    I’m 31 years old, and have been binge-drinking for, say 13 years. I love going out, and quite often I drink too much. Often I must been obnoxious, stubborn, boring and/or bad company in general. And at the time I probably thought I was being witty or insightful. I dance… Read more »

  • Josh Trevarthen says:

    04:22pm | 05/11/09

    You can pick at the leaves of a weed all you like and it’ll probably grow stronger than ever, or you can pull the sucker out from the root. It’s requires a fundamental change in our not-as-smart-as-we-think western socities, which means wide open minds in government…a laughable proposition! Alcohol is… Read more »

 

The kid’s “parents” - his “parents” are his mum and her current boyfriend - don’t give a stuff. He hates school, and teachers are relieved when he truants. He will not likely complete the school certificate.

Poor, brutish and nasty: how the break the cycle?

He’s never learnt to control his tongue, and his is the discourse of the gutter. He’s already been before the children’s court a couple of times, and is not scared by the police – in fact one of his highs is the foot chase after a bit of rock throwing.

His security and identity are found in his small group of mates. He can look forward to a life, to quote Hobbes, which is poor, brutish and nasty. Unfortunately for the tax payer, it will not be short.

Latest 2 of 8 comments

View all comments
 
  • Elle says:

    12:11am | 29/10/09

    Great article, and great work. Chris, much of what you say is also relevant to children in care (out of home or foster care), particularly regarding the primary adult relationship they need. Same lack of investment (or misguided investment in working with the family at the expense of the individual… Read more »

  • Carl Palmer says:

    03:50pm | 28/10/09

    Chris, David Penberthy made reference to you in an article he posted on The Punch on the 23rd Oct titled “Crimewave turns our most genteel city into a moshpit” where he spoke very highly of the work you were doing and your passion to help disadvantaged kids. I believe wholeheartedly… Read more »

 

You aren’t allowed to smack your partner, so why should you be allowed to smack your child?

It also makes no sense to me to declare war on thugs in the street and yet still allow parents to hit their kids.

This is particularly the case when it’s done with a blunt wooden object rather than just a hand.

Latest 2 of 70 comments

View all comments
 
  • XYZ says:

    03:12pm | 12/07/10

    This is for biological parents only. I threw the wooden spoon at my daughter (15years). It hit her on her thigh. She was furious and threatened to report me to police. My calm answer was: “Go ahead sweetheart, I , yes I will tell them to either remove me from… Read more »

  • Bernadette says:

    09:23pm | 16/04/10

    Smacking! Hmm, what message are we seding our kids when we smack them?  I’ll tell what message that is, that their behaviour is unacceptable and that a smack on the backside means pull your head in and do as your told.  The kids of today that are not disciplined with… Read more »

 

With the controversy in Melbourne of a mother who was brought before police and still could be charged with assualt for using wooden spoon on her daughter, we at the Punch thought we’d share with you wooden spooning techniques used in our families. Were you subjected to the wooden spoon? Is it acceptable or based on an outdated notion or corporal punishment?

Sometimes you gotta send in the spoon squad

Growing up in family of nine children discipline was not merely an issue for parents at one point in my family we had our own militia and counter-intelligence organisation. 

I’m actually surprised that we all survived some of those punch ups that would quickly escalate into riots putting those Nigerian crime gangs to shame. 

Latest 2 of 42 comments

View all comments
 
  • Alan Carter says:

    12:15am | 21/07/10

    Ella, the only voice of sanity on this whole page. Being hit for crying (a natural and obvious reaction to being violated) after being assaulted… such a harmful insult!  I know from experience… I can’t forget the overwhelming feeling of being so totally alone in the world when that happened… Read more »

  • Ella says:

    07:42pm | 16/10/09

    I came from a middle to upper class family with no drug addiction issues which externally did not appear to be broken.  Despite being in a ‘good’ family my sister and I were hit with open palms, a dedicated strapping belt, wooden spoons, hair brushes or whatever was available on… Read more »

 

A good bit of campaign journalism was launched in Melbourne yesterday by the Sunday Herald Sun in throwing open the debate on whether the drink driving limit should be dropped to .02.

.Freshen your drink governor?

The Sunday reported that 39 people had been killed in Victoria alone in accidents involving drivers under the .005 mark in just the last five years.

Victoria’s Deputy Police Commissioner has tentatively backed the debate, if not quite advocating an actual change to .02

Latest 2 of 47 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jewishboi says:

    08:15pm | 17/05/11

    everyone needs to loosen up, and i agree with harry! mate you are a legend! if erryone had a few cones before getting behind the wheel, there would be no speeding, and everyone would be happy. Read more »

  • dprbgzyseri says:

    10:01am | 09/04/11

    8BR4VX rmusibgxpvkc, wdpegwcxzsfy, [link=http://bhqnywlfzatf.com/]bhqnywlfzatf[/link], http://qpikcmgdlwrx.com/ Read more »

 

Tegan Leach has become the unwitting “it” girl for abortion reform in Queensland. Unwitting, because who would have knowingly decided to sign up for the sort of exposure that has been thrust on this Cairns teenager, all because she made a choice thousands of women have made before her to abort a baby she knew she was not ready to care for.

Cairns couple Sergie Brennan and Tegan Leach (left) who have been charged with importing a drug to have an abortion

However, the charge she faces is that she allegedly did not do it through the proper channels.

Tegan is expected to sell her story exclusively to a women’s magazine when the dust has finally settled on this case and she is legally able to speak freely outside of court, for hers is a case that has opened a hornet’s nest of debate about the rights or wrongs of do-it-yourself drug-induced abortions in Australia and women’s ability to access them.

Latest 2 of 53 comments

View all comments
 
  • Elle says:

    11:18am | 11/10/10

    Then why are they not being prosecuted under drug importation laws? Abortion is most definatley on trial here. She is being charged with procuring an illegal abortion. Read more »

  • Eliza Turnbull says:

    11:41am | 02/08/10

    The case isn’t about the importation of drugs - if it was, the accused would be facing drug-related charges. They are facing charges for procuring an abortion and assisting to procure an abortion. Read more »

 

A quick flick through some of the side effects of RU-486 makes for sober reading. These range from stomach cramps, through nausea, vomiting to ectopic pregnancies and severe internal bleeding.

A shop window asking people to oppose abortion drug RU-486

Quite clearly, it is a serious drug that should be treated with some caution and strictly only under medical supervision.

If RU-486 weren’t an abortion drug there wouldn’t be any controversy. No-one would question the prosecution of two people for procuring and administering another pharmaceutical with side effects as serious as those of RU-486. But it was never about the drug. It was about access to abortion.

Latest 2 of 84 comments

View all comments
 
  • Eleanor says:

    11:32am | 11/10/10

    I believe the question of when life starts is irrelevant. I would still support a woman’s choice to abort a late term pregnancy if she thought it was the best course of action. I would also advocate that it be free, and easy to access. Read more »

  • Elle says:

    11:30am | 11/10/10

    She most certainly did get it. There is a difference between a woman interacting with her own body, and someone else interacting with her body. In the case of a woman seeking abortion, she has made a decision about her body and her life. In the case where a baby… Read more »

 

I’m trying to think of an intro that won’t make me sound like a Dirty Harry-style vigilante. But I can’t so I’ll just admit it – if serial paedophile Dennis Ferguson moved into my suburb I’d be out on the street with the rest of the neighbours demanding he be kicked out immediately, and asking why he was ever let out of jail in the first place.

Ryde resident Steve Leone (left) confronts Dennis Ferguson's spokesman Brett Collins yesterday. Picture: Cameron Richardson.

With one exception, which I’ll deal with further down, all the wise-headed counsel against mob hysteria is coming from people who haven’t just discovered that their new next-door neighbour kidnapped and raped three children.

Or that he’s been charged with other aberrant or disturbing conduct since then too. And is still quite obviously as mad as a meat axe, a genuinely scary-looking weirdo who would probably be safer and happier if he were still in custody, rather than popping up in an endless series of new locations across our continent, on every occasion confronted by parents who become frightened and angry when they realise who’s just moved in.

Latest 2 of 122 comments

View all comments
 
  • cats says:

    10:52am | 11/02/10

    I want to know why he is the only pedophile being targeted by the lynch mob. It’s just because he looks fugly and weird, isn’t it? Everyone knows his face and who he is so theres a very small chance of him reoffending. Most pedophiles are known to the family… Read more »

  • YMC says:

    05:33am | 11/02/10

    Best place for him would be as live-in janitor in a school for the children of the politicians and social activist who support lenient sentencing. If not, house him next door to Robert Hill, the idiot Justice Minister who reckons that tougher sentencing does not deter crime, Read more »

 

It is safe to assume that Australia has the only high court in the world to have an important case of constitutional and military law decided over an incident of “teabagging.”

Teabags in a more appropriate context

Following the High Court’s decision in Lane v Morrison on the illegitimacy of the Australian Military Court, the practice of “teabagging” will be forever etched in the legal lexicon of this country.

While Big Brother’s turkeyslapping incident introduced us to genital based attempts at humour taking hold of the national agenda, turkeyslapping was only brought up in Parliament while teabagging made it all the way to the High Court - and won.

Latest 2 of 10 comments

View all comments
 
  • Peter from Sydney says:

    09:41am | 30/08/09

    The thing was a close call. French CJ almost did not give it a run. Now they have to wake up to the hangover they have created for themselves, and move ever so slightly, to the position that any Court constituted by one Officer, appointed no matter how by a… Read more »

  • Jack Tar says:

    11:05am | 28/08/09

    I’ve been on the wrong end of the old Kangaroo Court a few times myself and know firsthand that a lot of what goes on is hardly justice in any sense of the word. 4 seperate charges where all evidence showed innocent. And yet still charged at the end of… Read more »

 

Canberra just got a whole lot more boring.

These firecrackers represent a clear and present danger to the ACT

With their Jedi Council-like wisdom, the ACT Government has banned the social evil that is fireworks from private sale and use in the capital.

While this decision kills off one of the few uniquely Canberran outlets of fun, it’s a pretty interesting ban from a Government that presides over laws that have enabled nobody to be convicted of murder in the last 11 years.

Latest 2 of 15 comments

View all comments
 
  • FARLEYAna34 says:

    02:21pm | 26/08/11

    This is understandable that cash makes people disembarrass. But what to do when somebody doesn’t have money? The one way is to get the personal loans or sba loan. Read more »

  • Melanie says:

    02:27pm | 30/08/09

    Good point Leo and an interesting analogy, but I do think you downplay the effect fireworks have on animals! It’s a good thing that they’ve banned them, but you may be right that the legislators have their priorities scrambled in a variety of areas, and that this is partly due… Read more »

 

The present political consensus among the major parties against permitting and recognising same sex marriages is so obviously an intellectual surrender to the religious right that one looks for a single phrase rhetorical demolition of this anti-gay pretence of a position that would show it in all of its hypocrisy.

Participants in a mass 'illegal wedding' outside the ALP Conference in Sydney earlier this month. Pic: AFP

I do not, for a moment, believe that those politicians (including speakers at the recent Labor Party National Conference) who go on about protecting the “sanctity of marriage” believe the nonsense they espouse. I also fail to believe that they believe that a majority of the Australian people support the continued refusal to recognise single sex marriages.

I believe that the political imperative is to avoid the anger of that noisy minority, the religious right, which, itself, is hardly representative of most people of a religious persuasion in Australia. The political imperative also concerns the possible swing vote of the Family First in the Senate.

Latest 2 of 89 comments

View all comments
 
  • alan says:

    07:59am | 26/08/09

    I’m not gay, but I’m willing to learn! Apparently 0.2 per cent of children born in Australia are hermaphrodite.  I suggest it’s wrong to discriminate against them.  They are human and still have rights regardless of how homophobic the rest of us might be. Read more »

  • Alan says:

    12:39am | 26/08/09

    After reading through all these comments.. all I have in response is Wow.. Just wow. Now my standpoint I want to share.  I went to a catholic primary school.  And a catholic high school.  I would definitly say I have christian values.  You know what, I’m Gay.  I didn’t choose… Read more »

 

Her voice was clear, eloquent and well-mannered. “I’d like to have the AVO cancelled, please,” she told the clerk confidently.

The Tele's Warren Brown on the rise of AVOs

They see a lot, staff of local court registries and maybe this was nothing new. Curious, I turned to see who was speaking, not entirely sure of what I expected to see. Noting an appearance to match the voice - blonde, well-groomed and aged in her early-to-mid 20s - the young woman went on.

“You see, I was really drunk the other night, and I said a lot of things I didn’t mean.”

Latest 2 of 68 comments

View all comments
 
  • Amanda Mac. says:

    03:56pm | 09/01/12

    I’ve got one for you….. My partner has an AVO application pending which the police took - not the woman (ex wife) just because she went and reported an incident. She didn’t sign / refused to sign a statement. The story that she told the police was that she pushed,… Read more »

  • J. Giggleow says:

    11:44am | 09/01/12

    “This sort of thing happens a lot more than many people like to think”. Yeah some people even use it as a joke. ha ha. Read more »

 

IT’S so tempting to see misfortune as a money spinner. Slipped on a grape at the supermarket? Sue!

Anyone can sue over anything ... Artist Warren Brown in The Daily Telegraph / File

Stressed out by an overbearing boss? Claim! Hurt your neck in a car accident? Collect!

But here’s something to consider before you speed dial a lawyer – a compensation payout may make life worse.

Latest 2 of 9 comments

View all comments
 
  • Dale says:

    10:05am | 30/11/09

    Go Tina!  Although our situations differ there are times when we FIGHT for every inch of our existence, especially when families are the unwitting victims as well. In my case, I had worked in the welfare arena for 2 1/2 years with a very difficult client with whom I had… Read more »

  • Tina says:

    04:21pm | 17/09/09

    I’d like to leave a message to “Bitten”. I was homeless at the age of thirteen, raped at fifteen and while I was at home I was physically bashed and emotionally abused for years. I moved 200km’s from home and lived on the streets of Melbourne until I got my… Read more »

 

While the National Conference of the Labor Party has been protecting the sanctity of other people’s marriages (a topic for another day, perhaps), the House of Lords in the UK has been grappling with the complexities of helping one’s loved one board the plane to Switzerland. The case is called R (on the application of Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions.

Debbie Purdy after her court victory on assisted suicide.

Under the Suicide Act 1961, suicide is not illegal in England. However, the piece of legislation makes it a criminal offence to assist another to take their own life.

But assisted suicide is not an offence in Switzerland.

Latest 2 of 8 comments

View all comments
 
  • peter says:

    09:20pm | 30/06/11

    So much for peoples rights to self determination. Cheers peter Read more »

  • watty says:

    05:16pm | 07/08/09

    Shane and Pete you have asked questions near to my heart. The N.T was used as the test laboratory for the Aboriginal Land Rights (N.T.) Act 1976 by Fraser and the Federal Government. No other State or Territory would have a bar of the conditions laid down in this Act… Read more »

 

The humiliation of Marcus Einfeld is now complete. The NSW Court of Appeal struck him off this week, concurring with the argument of the NSW Bar Association that he is not a “fit and proper person” to practice as a lawyer ever again.

Einfeld arrives at the NSW Supreme Court for sentencing in March this year. Picture: Lindsay Moller

Representing the Bar Association, Barrister Christine Adamson SC said Einfeld’s speeding case showed he considered himself to be “above the law” and displayed “extraordinary hubris” in thinking he could use his “skill and ingenuity” as a respected lawyer of some 40 years to trick a court into cancelling a speeding fine.

A $77 speeding fine.The public reveled in it, as Einfeld for many years had been one of the greatest offenders of the deep-seated Australian belief that being massively up yourself is close on the worst crime a person can commit.

Latest 2 of 17 comments

View all comments
 
  • Peter Callil says:

    08:27pm | 20/03/11

    Agreed.  As Ned Kelly said before his execution, “If my lips teach the public that men are made mad by bad treatment, and if the police are taught that they may exasperate to madness men they persecute and ill treat, my life will not be entirely thrown away .”  In… Read more »

  • Paul says:

    06:13pm | 01/04/10

    Which illustrates the man’s complete lack of judgement, or his deluded sense of self importance.  Take your pick, but I’m going for a little of column 1 and a little of column 2.  Every so often the Supremicists among us get a reality check. Read more »

 

One of the first of the sadly limited number of court cases arising from the death of Dianne Brimble on a Pacific Sky cruise came to an end this week.

Its conclusion achieved nothing, other than to reinforce the public belief in the cavernous divide between community standards and the sentencing practices of the judiciary.

Dianne Brimble, in the blue jacket on the middle of the escalator, waves goodbye as she boards the cruise ship where she lost her life.

While there are other cases on the horizon which cannot legally be the subject of discussion here, the unsatisfactory conclusion of this week’s case involving one of the “Brimble Eight”, the execrable Leo Silvestri, has raised the worst case scenario surrounding the shocking death of this young woman.

Namely that the plodding nature of justice and the pernickety application of the law – all these things may conspire to ensure that no-one faces any genuine punishment over that fact that a woman was left for dead in a drugged stupor on the cold linoleum floor of a cheap cruise ship.

Latest 2 of 11 comments

View all comments
 
  • irene says:

    04:23pm | 09/09/09

    I agreed with Dave C.It would have been great to see the response of those men involved in the death of Dianne B if their mothers / sisters /daughters went through   the same as Dianne B.I am sure they will be jumping with joy as they are nothing but… Read more »

  • stephen says:

    07:18pm | 04/07/09

    Yes David ; as no-one is responsible for anything any more, perhaps the good Judge can get the police to arrest the ship. These ratbags need 2 years in the lockup - the lot of them - no apportioning blame and no freebies. They’re good mates so let them stay… Read more »

 

WHO’D be a business owner in Australia?

With the way the Federal Government up-ends the apple cart every few months you’d have to have a thick skin, and a thick wallet, to want to have a crack at increasing the nation’s prosperity.

The Australian's cartoonist Jon Kudelka

One of my mates runs a solar energy company - an occupation unrivalled in its capacity to guarantee you endless sleepless nights, wondering when the Federal Government will deliver its next windfall, followed by a swift kick in the guts.

Latest 2 of 3 comments

View all comments
 
  • Russell says:

    08:19pm | 05/07/09

    Small business has always been heralded as the home of innovation, which is recognised by the introduction of policies for investment allowances and R & D rebates. Yet these continue to swing back and forward every year as policy settings are tweaked for financial outcomes. In some ways, small business… Read more »

  • Tory says:

    04:02pm | 03/07/09

    It’s slapstick politics! Cue Benny Hill theme. I can’t believe that the Government comes up with an idea like the solar energy rebate, which then turns out to be immensely popular (great) but so bloody popular they cut off the rebate! They should have just ridden that pony till it… Read more »

 

Like Peter denying Jesus after the arrest, as dawn was breaking and the cock was getting ready to crow, Australia is given a third chance to acknowledge its inconvenient associations. Will we, like Peter, deny any association with or responsibility with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the detainees in Guantanamo? We probably will. We denied our own citizens in Guantanamo until the opinion polls started to turn dirty.

In the hood: Uighur supporters in Washington DC

Australia, through the support of the Howard government for the actions of the Bush Administration’s war on terror, has as much responsibility for the Uighurs, who were found to have been wrongly detained, as does the US and the Bush Administration.

We should accept the Uighurs as refugees and permanent residents. If they are returned to China, they face certain persecution and, possibly, death. To do otherwise would display a flaw in our national character.

Latest 2 of 13 comments

View all comments
 
  • Les says:

    10:57am | 02/06/09

    If these people are found to be innocent then they should be compensated by America and then returned to wherever they had been first detained. Read more »

  • Sam says:

    10:34am | 02/06/09

    James - these people are not criminals. They have not been found guilty by a military tribunal let alone any civilian court that follows established rules of evidence etc.  I’m constantly perplexed by a (seemingly) persuasive belief that any person who is arrested or interviewed by the police is guilty.… Read more »

 

BRISBANE: Today’s news that AFP Commissioner Mick Keelty is stepping down in September provides an important opportunity for the Commonwealth Government to correct the accumulated mistakes of the past.

As one of Dr Haneef’s lawyers, my professional focus has been upon his legal rights. The AFP, under Keelty’s leadership, was responsible for many of the mistakes and failures of judgment which so impacted adversely on Dr Haneef and his family.

Mohammed Haneef: Put through the wringer by Keelty's AFP. Photo: Adam Ferguson.

Dr Haneef was in detention for 25 days before the charge against him was dropped. It took another six months and two court cases to remove the threat to his passport and visa rights. Throughout all of this, the AFP, under Mr Keelty, refused to admit its mistakes and continued to attack Dr Haneef’s reputation. It was not until just before Christmas, last year, with the release of the Clarke Report, that someone in an official position was prepared to say, definitively, that Dr Haneef had done nothing wrong.

The impact of the actions of the AFP on the lives of Dr Haneef and his family has been devastating. However, the Clarke Report reveals even more alarming concerns about the AFP which the government must address. It showed the AFP exhibited severe organisational problems under Mr Keelty.

Latest 1 of 1 comment

View all comments
 
  • Andrew R. Hyde says:

    10:31am | 02/09/09

    As a victim of an AFP officer’s abuse of authority and incompetence I can only agree that this government agency and it’s officers be made accountable. Millions of taxpayer’s dollars were squandered and my life destroyed in an ill-conceived and futile attempt to bolster one woman’s flagging career. It’s not… Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

That's it. Beautifully recreated.RT @lagcamion: @farrm51 @AndrewCatsaras Dr dr dr dr dndlundlundndndndn (with pinched nostrils) - that one?

Paul Colgan

@diversionary#wading

Paul Colgan

Tip for young journos. Have a short CV. A page, two max.

Malcolm Farr

@cjjosh Only communications satellites please (Limited field).

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

Peter Slipper, draped in black in a manner most young voters will not see outside Hogwarts, has dramatically…

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Life is far from dull in the Northern Territory. Or if it is, we’ll never know. And that’s…

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

Fifteen years ago when one of your girlfriends had a few too many Illusion shots standard practice was…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter