Internet Filter

You may be surprised to learn that I’m in favour of an internet filter.

If a filter bars this kind of crap, then gimme gimme gimme

I know what you’re thinking. I’m a pretty wild kind of guy - I don’t always tuck my shirt in, cross one-way streets without looking both ways and occasionally don’t bother pre-heating the oven.

But despite my roguish charm, frequent viewings of Black Hawk Down and awkward attempts at skateboarding, I just can’t bring myself to support internet freedoms.

Latest 2 of 72 comments

View all comments
 
  • James says:

    08:47pm | 27/05/11

    Well said on all counts sir. Read more »

  • St. Michael says:

    12:41pm | 27/05/11

    @ RyaN: I’m not denying Google is bad, just saying that Gates is badder. :D Read more »

 

The more the Prime Minister breaks his policy promises, the more Senator Conroy hides his policy homework.

Illustration: The Herald Sun's Mark Knight

For more than 2 months Senator Conroy has sat on the taxpayer-funded Implementation Study into the National Broadband Network. And he’s refusing to show how he will implement another promise: mandatory internet filtering.

This week, The Australian reported the Minister’s so-called ‘clean feed’ legislation won’t be introduced before Parliament’s spring sitting. Another Labor government “own-goal” and a vote of ‘no-confidence’ in its own policy promises.

Latest 2 of 31 comments

View all comments
 
  • Peter says:

    06:04pm | 06/05/10

    What I find amazing is that Labor refuses to permanently back away from its filter policy despite its apparent unpopularity,  yet Rudd has needed to intruduce new very unpopular taxes to plug his revenue gaps. If he simply scrapped his filter policy, millions could be diverted into his other programs… Read more »

  • Rant, Rot and Ruin says:

    12:03pm | 06/05/10

    persephone, if you’re not upset by your government spending 44 million dollars on a national child sexual abuse cover-up machine, what DOES upset you? Although apparently it’s been downgraded to 28 million dollars. Maybe that’s a better deal? Read more »

 

Spend a little time reading the rabid, sometimes psychotic, responses to Stephen Conroy’s piece yesterday about the proposed internet filter and you’d be forgiven for thinking the Rudd Government is about to become a one-term wonder or Australia is about to turn into a society about as free as the Third Reich.

I'd like to accept this award from my harshest critics

The hundreds of comments on the minister’s piece contain a mass of vitriolic, hysterical rage and delusional warnings that the plan could cost Labor power. There were personal attacks on the minister and even a hint at a death threat. “I feel like I’m living in Germany circa 1936,” wrote one contributor. “OK, Conroy, as a Catholic, it is you who believes in myths. You have a rubbish Economics degree and you weren’t born here. Go away,” said another, constructively.

What the debate almost entirely failed to reflect was the overwhelming popularity of Conroy’s plan with the general public. A recent poll put support for mandatory government filtering of child abuse material at 80 per cent. That’s a staggeringly high approval rating for any policy that does not involve handing out wads of free money.

Latest 2 of 247 comments

View all comments
 
  • Tony says:

    02:33pm | 19/06/11

    The US was infiltrated by a global Fascist group years ago and their goal i.e. to bring down the USA through destroying their economy is about to be realised. The 400 plus FEMA camps that they’ve built over the last few years weren’t designed for terrorists they’re for US citizens… Read more »

  • Dr McKay says:

    09:39am | 04/05/10

    What else needs to be said Paul, IT WON"T WORK.  Everything else is pointless, who cares how many people believe in it?  Who cares what will be RC classified?  If the filter doesn’t filter, drop it, this is really so simple I cannot believe we are still discussing it. Read more »

 

There is a lot of misinformation circulating about the Government’s ISP-level filtering proposal and Eliza Cussen was right to warn people they shouldn’t believe everything they hear or read (Top Ten Internet Filter Lies, 25 March 2010).

Unfortunately her article repeated some of the misinformation and I’d like to outline the facts.

The Government has always maintained there is no silver bullet when it comes to cyber safety and we have never said ISP-level filtering alone would help fight child pornography or keep children safe online.

Latest 2 of 507 comments

View all comments
 
  • LC says:

    12:34pm | 20/02/11

    The Greens oppose mandatory internet filtering, seeing as that is what dear Mr. CONroy is proposing, yes, they do oppose it. The Liberals are the only ones who haven’t said a peep on the issue. A shame really, if they made a bigger deal of it, they could have received… Read more »

  • LC says:

    11:07am | 20/02/11

    A correction Harquebus, IPv6 will make end-to-end encryption easier, but it will not be required for it’s use. Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

How much fun is it retweeting people who can't spell?

Anthony Sharwood

In other Olympian news, Steph rice is advertising Sunrice Chinese style Mongolian chicken. Think about that for a tick

Anthony Sharwood

Oops, just trying to say thanks all four your follows and Hackett yarn feedback, especially the dude who called me an opinionated dipshit

David Penberthy

@GreenJ lady boy.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Ok. I am not a leading expert in world’s best practice on prisoner rehabilitation — my experience…

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

This morning I joined millions of other Australians in accelerating, braking, swearing and spilling coffee…

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

This weekend’s massacre in Houla, Syria, is one of those stories that invites but doesn’t…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter