Health Takeover

There’s a reason health reform has featured in our national debate for decades. There’s a reason it is contentious, difficult and often tops out surveys as the biggest concern for Australians.

Artist's impression of a new Super Clinic

It’s because if we don’t get it right then it hits our family members directly – everyone wants the best care when they’re sick. Queues and waiting times that go for too long. More suffering than is necessary.

Every family knows a situation where the care of a loved one could have been improved if doctors, nurses and health staff had better support, more resources and bureaucracy didn’t get in the way.

Latest 2 of 46 comments

View all comments
 
  • Chris Chinniah says:

    06:07pm | 16/05/12

    Reforms are difficult to roll out because it take a long time for the legislation to pass the laws and regulations, and at the same time a tremendous amount of manpower is required to ensure that the implementations go smoothly. Read more »

  • Elizabeth says:

    10:34pm | 10/05/12

    Yet there is endless money for breast and cervical cancer screening. IMO, both programs are far more likely to harm us. The lack of respect for informed consent in both programs is concerning and the silence of our doctors disappointing. IMO, these programs are not operating in the interests of… Read more »

 

The Rudd Government believes universal access to top quality health care and medicines is a right for every Australian, regardless of where they live or how much money they have. 

Bedside manner: The PM meets patient Wally Dunn at QE2 Jubille Hospital in Brisbane. Photo: Dean Saffron

Most Australians feel the same. It’s part of our “fair go” tradition, something that is I believe is one of the greatest things about Australia. However, tradition isn’t going to help our struggling health system.  We know that left unchecked, health costs were set to eclipse entire state budgets by the middle of the century.

That is why the Rudd Government embarked upon the most significant reforms to the health system since the introduction of Medicare.  Only a Labor Government – the founders of Medicare - would make such an undertaking.

Latest 2 of 80 comments

View all comments
 
  • But but but !!! says:

    11:09pm | 13/05/10

    Well Done Nicola & Kevin !! its great to see you working so hard maybe too hard at times especially with the health plan…Contrast that with Abbott, always on the beach or riding his bicycle ? Does he do any work at all ? We do not need a some… Read more »

  • Brian says:

    02:58pm | 13/05/10

    Why would the opposition release their policy on health now - you would just copy them. After all you just copied their climate change policy dear Read more »

 

Please let us be honest about what we have just seen happen in this country over the last few weeks culminating in COAG.

Blame game will continue under health plan. Photo: Getty Images

The Prime Minister has successfully achieved a GST grab from the states, all but one, under the guise of “the most revolutionary health reform since the advent of Medicare”.

It is not a health reform agenda. It is a GST reform with a health bribe as an inducement to the States and more importantly, to con the general public.  The Federal government proclaiming that it is for the first time assuming dominant funding responsibility for health over the States in a 60/40 split it is a proclamation made with State money taken with the right hand and given back with the left. What is taken and not given back is State control over increasing portions of GST income.

Latest 2 of 61 comments

View all comments
 
  • Mark says:

    12:10pm | 28/04/10

    Lies Pers, just Lies. Rudd has run from his greatest elstion promise. He campaigned on it. Had a mandate for it. So he says. Coward. Stop the lies Pers. Read more »

  • Izzy says:

    11:30pm | 27/04/10

    As an emergency doctor working in Queensland (but it could be anywhere) I thought I’d share my view on part of the new “reform” - the four hour access target for emergency departments. The Rudd press release very cleverly stated that almost 1 in 3 patients wait longer in emergency… Read more »

 

Ever heard the joke about the “historic national agreement”?

All the action from the historic COAG thing. Photo: Ray Strange

It was hard to miss the meeting of COAG this week, with the Prime Minister desperately offering imaginary buckets of money to bribe state Premiers into signing onto an “historic national agreement” on health reform.

Funny though, I’ve heard those words used before.  And they now ring quite hollow.  Does anyone remember the “historic national agreement” on the Murray Darling Basin?  It was year one of the Rudd Government, the blame game was being ended, a new era of cooperative federalism was being hailed and Labor’s focus groups had yet to pick up voters getting weary of the Prime Minister’s initial grab-bag of clichéd phrases.

Latest 2 of 17 comments

View all comments
 
  • Robert Smissen of God's Own Country, Rural SA says:

    11:31pm | 21/04/10

    Will this “historic health reform” help “working families” ? ? ? Read more »

  • Shifter says:

    05:33pm | 21/04/10

    Hmm, with all this sickness and injury it present a comple challenge. I think we need some historic health reform to cope with all this new pressure on working families. Read more »

 

Kevin Rudd has spent so much time in hospital over the past month that you would be forgiven for thinking he has a terminal disease.

The PM with Bert and Ernie on one of his many recent hospital visits.

He doesn’t – although we’ll talk about his heart a bit further down.

Despite having held more than 20 press conferences in the nation’s hospitals in the past few weeks, chatting to patients, nodding sagely as he meets doctors and nurses, the Prime Minister does not appear to have succeeded in explaining the importance or even the intention of his health takeover to the voters.

Latest 2 of 158 comments

View all comments
 
  • acotrel says:

    02:52am | 22/04/10

    So the health legislation has to get past the senate? FAT CHANCE!  The only state which hasn’t signed up is WA, which has a Liberal government. Tony Abbott proposes opposing the legislation because in it’s agreed form, it doesn’t represent what was originally proposed.  Why is that?  Because the state… Read more »

  • acotrel says:

    02:26am | 22/04/10

    Premiers with the exception of Colin Barnett will allways do what their party wants, it means nothing Talk about ‘one eyed’! Only one state has failed to sign up - it has a LIBERAL government! Tony Abbott promises to obstruct the legislation in the LIBERAL controlled senate! Are we supposed… Read more »

 

Doctor Rudd may have pulled out his stethoscope and come up with a correct diagnosis about the ailing health system in the states and territories, but many of his patients are not confident about his national plan for a cure.

Public health: where does it hurt?

The Prime Minister’s push to take over funding of public hospitals by diverting some of the GST revenue that currently goes to the states has raised skepticism among not just the various health administrations, but also among most online readers who commented on news sites in the past week.

If Rudd thinks he has a tough job talking the states and territories into agreeing to the rescue plan, he may also have a difficult time convincing many voters ahead of an election due later this year.

Latest 2 of 18 comments

View all comments
 
  • Ryan says:

    11:16pm | 10/03/10

    @Bluey: fair enough, the Rudd government just got a second double-dissolution trigger, based on the sliding popularity of both Rudd and the party why wouldn’t the Labor party call an early election, could it be that they are scared? Surely not by Abbott? Read more »

  • Bluey says:

    01:35pm | 09/03/10

    Benny’s just another lib whou wouldn’t know the truth if it bit him on the bum.  There’s plenty think the health deal is a good one. And the ETS isn’t a bloody tax, mate. Even a simple feller like me nos its a trade scheme that pasy us back. What… Read more »

 

IT’S not just that Health Minister, Nicola Roxon has acknowledged that taxes may need to increase to fund Labor’s health policy in the longer-run. Or, that Treasurer Wayne Swan has admitted a full federal take-over of the nation’s 764 public hospitals could yet be pursued.

Aside from the hip pocket, where does it hurt?

Such frankness should be welcomed in our political leaders. It’s just that in both cases, the comments underscore the fact that in complex reforms, there is many a slip `twixt policy cup and delivery lip.

Put another way, there is a huge distance and many hurdles between Kevin Rudd’s radical health reform promise, and the tangle of changes needed to make things better for patients. Those ``slips’’ are already apparent.

Latest 2 of 24 comments

View all comments
 
  • Pharmg269 says:

    06:07pm | 01/04/10

    Hello! gaeebbd interesting gaeebbd site! Read more »

  • Francis Forbes says:

    01:46pm | 08/03/10

    Rubbish, Rudd has a good plan, we just need Keneally, Bligh, Brumby, Barnett, Bartlett to tow the line. After all he did an excellent job with Qld health. Why not let him lose on a national front…what can go wrong? Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

@GreenJ lady boy.

David Penberthy

@GreenJ how dare you even suggest such a thing. I'd love to blog from their traning session though about what a pack of toffs they are

Anthony Sharwood

RT @kellieconnolly: @penbo @antsharwood Not judging Hackett but to set the record straight again I had been asking 9 for a redundancy and left on good terms

David Penberthy

Feisty piece by @antsharwood leading http://t.co/5WsLF5Pf on how ch 9 can punt spiteri connolly rowe but not the delightful grant hackett

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Is there a nicotine patch strong enough for this?

Ok. I am not a leading expert in world’s best practice on prisoner rehabilitation — my experience…

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

A great win by Webber, but it sure as hell wasn’t sport

This morning I joined millions of other Australians in accelerating, braking, swearing and spilling coffee…

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

Fighting Assad one strongly worded statement at a time

This weekend’s massacre in Houla, Syria, is one of those stories that invites but doesn’t…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter