Google

There’s only one thing worse than a person who spends all their time on Facebook. The person who spends all their time on Facebook bagging it out.

Hey, you could always just pop around and visit someone

You know the ones. Well, how could you not. They’re always on the damn thing. Posting riveting status updates such as: “I hate you Facebook” and “Grrr, what’s with all the changes?”

Fact is, nobody forced you to join up in the first place. Second fact - it’s actually really easy to quit Facebook. You just delete your account, end of story. But still they stay. Moaning, posting and updating.

Latest 2 of 138 comments

View all comments
 
  • RyaN says:

    02:17pm | 21/10/11

    Sorry I meant to add, once you have done all that, visit this..https://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=delete_account Read more »

  • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

    01:05am | 21/10/11

    Hi Lucy, We all have our little addictions & obsessions, you just have to look at our recent history when it comes to using our mobile phones & the internet!!  There has to be healthy dosage for everything in our lives.  People who choose to use the Facebook do not… Read more »

 

For the first time, the Federal Trade Commission in the United States will conduct an inquiry into Google which will not be limited to mergers and acquisitions, or violations of privacy, but fundamental issues relating to Google’s core search advertising business model.

Type Google into Google Images and this is the second image that comes up. Original at google-sux.com.

This follows the European Commission probe which commenced late last year. The European Commission stated that it “will investigate whether Google has abused a dominant market position in online search by allegedly lowering the ranking of unpaid search results of competing services which are specialised in providing users with specific online content such as price comparisons (so‐called vertical search services) and by according preferential placement to the results of its own vertical search services in order to shut out competing services.”

Google has argued over the years that it does not manipulate search results and that its algorithms are designed solely to deliver the most relevant results to search queries; however it has fiercely protected its algorithm or secret black box.

Latest 2 of 28 comments

View all comments
 
  • Harquebus says:

    12:32pm | 05/07/11

    Somebody forgot to tell Bill Gates. Read more »

  • Phil S says:

    10:17am | 05/07/11

    This article is the biggest load of rubbish I’ve read for a while. 1) The author doesn’t fully understand the internet, as they called gmail and “email program”. Email programs (like outlook) interface with any POP3 email server, the server being the device that manages you email address. Gmail provides… Read more »

 

I always wanted to be Indiana Jones.

Indiana searching for the lost civilisation of Friendster. Picture: Paramount

In addition to being the quintessential whip-cracking he-man, Indy got to dig up ancient relics and shiny physical memories of glories past.

Archaeology has always had a magical appeal to me. There’s a real romance to it that few other pursuits can match.

Latest 2 of 20 comments

View all comments
 
  • Mark says:

    03:17am | 12/01/11

    Drew - Your impassioned Archeology 101 refresher had me up and hugging my antiquities to reassure them I was ONLY referring to facebook/twitter in context to part of Andrew’s last comments ‘they will be looking for the technology to make facebook work’. Cheers Read more »

  • Drew says:

    01:33pm | 11/01/11

    @Mark - you obviously don’t understand archeology at all. We still use water jugs and wheels in every day life but that doesn’t take away the importance of discovering a 10000 year old clay water pitcher or the very first wheel. Imagine as an archeologist you found the very first… Read more »

 

In today’s society, most Australians are pretty comfortable with sharing personal information, with at least one major caveat – that we clearly know what our information is being used for.

Google staff at work in California.

Understanding how the information that organisations collect from us is used is the key guiding principle of our Privacy laws. Our privacy regime is consent-based – if you understand why private and personal information is being collected and consent to the purpose for which it is being collected then that information can be used for that purpose.

Social media and the more successful Internet business models fundamentally challenge this notion – because commercial success is often predicated on knowing as much as you can about your individual users and being less than upfront about how that information will be used.

Latest 2 of 21 comments

View all comments
 
  • imarion says:

    06:34am | 14/12/11

    I think a critical point has been missed. Google is yet to misuse any information it gathers. In almost all cases the information is used to better your experience of there products. They do not hide the fact they gather this information actually they clearly outline that its being gathered… Read more »

  • Fiddlesticks says:

    01:00pm | 11/11/10

    The strikes against the Google behemoth keep mounting up. The China affair, the Books v copyright fiasco, the odiously snoopy StreetView and its WiFi leakery, their lacklustre handling of Spam, their cavalier treatment of on-line image search, etc etc etc. As an example, there’s a new Oz site on a… Read more »

 

Google was founded today in 1998…that’s right, there was actually life before Google.

It’s Monday at The Punch. What’s on your mind? Share it here.

Latest 2 of 23 comments

View all comments
 
  • acotrel says:

    08:29am | 28/09/10

    The law relating to slander should require the author of a personal attack to identify themself. Protecting whistleblowers will always be a problem. Read more »

  • TrueOz says:

    09:36pm | 27/09/10

    If they have that sign on their back I just wish that someone would do it! Read more »

 

I was interested to see that the Australian Electoral Commission has received complaints about political parties buying Google adwords in each other’s names: thus, when someone was searching on Google for “Julia Gillard” they would be served an ad for Tony Abbott.  And vice versa, someone searching “Tony Abbott” was served a Julia Gillard ad.

A Google search result for the Labor party with a sponsored link to a Liberal campaign site.

Of course, under these “sponsored links” the usual “relevant” search results would appear.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported Google’s response: “Both the Liberal and Labor parties have been savvy in adapting their search advertising tactics throughout the campaign including bidding on other politicians’ names.”

Latest 2 of 10 comments

View all comments
 
  • Justin says:

    04:45pm | 18/08/10

    It’s definitely ethically questionable. I noticed the liberal party bought up the names of all the LDP candidates in ad-words. The LDP urged a make em pay campaign, urging people to click as often as possible. This has only one major drawback, it’s our bloody money they’re paying with :( Read more »

  • Eric says:

    04:10pm | 18/08/10

    Just like the ABC, SBS and Fairfax papers donate space to the ALP and the Greens ... Read more »

 

It seems that Google’s continued mishandling of the wi-fi snooping incident means it has a different interpretation of the phrase “cooperating with authorities” than what the rest of us would reasonably expect.

They do know a bit about computers ... and us. Art by The Australian's Jon Kudelka / File

The New York Times recently reported that Google has given European investigators only remote access to data now stored in Mountain View, California. 

Data those investigators need to determine if Google breached various tough privacy laws.

Latest 2 of 23 comments

View all comments
 
  • Joe says:

    12:36am | 10/07/10

    The Labor government’s policy of wanting ISPs to keep a record of every website we visit for years is much worse than a few network names google might have notived when it drove down the street at 60k ph. Read more »

  • Josh says:

    07:58am | 09/07/10

    I always find it funny when people keep bitching about Google and privacy.  The government has more info on any of us than Google, where are the demands for that information?  This recent wifi beat up against them is garbage, the ‘data’ they collected from the Street View scanning they… Read more »

 

What is it about our love affair with Google that we let them take wholesale liberties with our privacy, and sit back and watch what might be one of the largest data breaches in history go by without so much as a whimper?

We're in your internets ... a Google Street View car / File

After some prodding, Google recently admitted to European Privacy Commissioners that they had “mistakenly” collected the contents of communications between some computer users, as part of their “Street View” activities.  Mistakenly.  All around the world. For four years.

It goes something like this: specially equipped “Street View” vehicles criss-cross entire nations, taking photographs of our houses and streets, geo-tagging the location with both a GPS and also by “sniffing” for WI FI connections in the area.  That way, when a person uses a Google product to locate themselves (like Google Maps), and there are WI FI networks detected nearby, Google can triangulate the device and give you an approximate location.  Pretty cool, and nothing really too scary about that, even though there were privacy concerns raised at the time.  We trusted Google.

Latest 2 of 22 comments

View all comments
 
  • Harquebus says:

    12:31pm | 22/05/10

    What really annoyed me was, Google went and photographed our front yards and didn’t tell until after the fact. Google are the biggest rogues on the planet. Read more »

  • davido says:

    10:29pm | 21/05/10

    And how about they return some of the advertising revenue and taxes they have ripped out of the Australian Economy? Read more »

 

This graph shows the number of people searching the term “delete facebook account” on Google was up to five times higher than usual last week.

The new wave of concern over Facebook’s privacy settings is mainly being driven from the US, after some high-profile technology commentators quit the social networking site.

However the next graph (over the jump) shows over the past year Australia has led the pack among English-speaking countries on searches for the same term. The spectacular spike at the end shows the more recent volume against the trend.

Latest 2 of 31 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jim says:

    04:57pm | 20/05/10

    If you really want to heare from people you could use Facebook. If you want to chat with them, or actually talk to them and see them for free use Skype. You can talk to England and you can talk to China in real time. For in info google skype.… Read more »

  • Zoe Warne says:

    10:09am | 20/05/10

    Here is the fabled Facebook “Delete my Account” button you might be looking for: http://bit.ly/9imX2j (this saves you wading through about 5 pages of Privacy/Account pages). Read more »

 

While visiting Google headquarters outside of San Francisco I saw a rather strange thing.

Despite having his content stolen by a parasitic online aggregator, Leo still bought these socks.

Out in the rain there was a man in one of those single person wave pools that gives the physical illusion of swimming laps. Perched over him was another man in a puffy red life savers jacket, complete with white cross on the back, sitting on a miniature life guard’s chair watching the swimmer.

I would have taken a photo but you’re not allowed to take photos inside Google, in fact, you’re not allowed to do much at Google.

Latest 2 of 13 comments

View all comments
 
  • /b says:

    12:38pm | 19/04/10

    can’t reply to a reply it seems, so: > Even when I was a starry eyed 25 year old fresh out of college, I never wanted a job that consumes your enitre life. And Google understands that, as do (most of) the other silicon valley companies that employ these kind… Read more »

  • crash says:

    12:07pm | 19/04/10

    I couldn’t agree more. Why else would Google allow as many sick days as you want? The company fully expects you to burn out. The system is set up to make you fail - and the company win. Even when I was a starry eyed 25 year old fresh out… Read more »

 

If we were cavemen and we came across a sabre tooth tiger, what would we do? Let’s hope we’d run.

Quick: Google what to do if a sabre tooth tiger attacks

We’d know to run if we possessed important information - big cats have big teeth. Cavemen who didn’t have that information wouldn’t have run and wouldn’t have propagated. Information is fundamental to survival and well-being.

Today we live in an incredible era of information. A quarter of the world is online. This number is growing quickly and the amount of information we consume is ballooning. The openness of the Internet gives extraordinary access to information and this is a powerful force for good.

Latest 2 of 37 comments

View all comments
 
  • Scot says:

    12:28am | 31/03/10

    Marley, May I suggest you should buy a ticket and go to China and Tibet and see for yourself. And when you are in China try out the internet for you self and see how silly many of these comments are. And talk to the highly educated younger generation and… Read more »

  • Scot says:

    12:16am | 31/03/10

    Grumbles, I made no such assertions.  Google agreed to specific terms when they took their business to China as any foreign or Chinese company must do in its business licence. Gooogle have since reneged on these contractual arrangements. Therefore, China as a sovereign country has every right to ask them… Read more »

 

IF you’ve been following the tech media this week, you’ll know that Google is in hot water over one of the most serious privacy breaches in its history.

Informer, icky bom bom yea.

You’ll likely have heard that Google launched a new product, called Google Buzz,  that was meant to create a social network out of its email users.

And that major privacy flaws in the product led to abusive men getting access to the details of their ex wives, political activists finding their contacts made public for investigators to peruse and journalists having their sources “outed”. I’m one of those journalists.

Latest 2 of 30 comments

View all comments
 
  • A S says:

    06:16pm | 19/02/10

    Am I the only one seeing the b.s in this article? The content of this article directly contradicts the headline. This writer is just one more guy trying to get some publicity out of this issue. If you actually read this article, this is what it says: “I am relatively… Read more »

  • stephen says:

    07:34pm | 16/02/10

    The difference between Microsoft and Google is that they both want to exploit you (hey this is capitalism, right?) but only Microsoft seems compelled to torture you along the way. Surely the whole world knows that they only used ‘Don’t Be Evil’ because ‘Don’t Be Microsoft’ would have led to… Read more »

 

Another week, another internet service that needs joining to see what the hype’s about. The web was supposed to make life easier, but all it seems to be doing lately is inventing more ways to bombard people with babble.

That Apple guy doing what appears to be some kind of iPad puppet show.

Google Buzz‘s launch last week was wrapped in an increasingly familiar aura. As with the iPad launch, there was huge excitement from some nerdy types but a resounding verdict from much of the public has been a sigh and a shrug.

Instead of capitalising on excitement, new products have to overcome fatigue. There’s the effort setting up yet another profile, then somehow remembering to check back on it in between reading the news, monitoring tweets, Facebook status updates, doing the footy tipping, watching that Hitler video everyone’s talking about and getting to your reading recommendations all while trying to manage your phone and email inbox.

Latest 2 of 19 comments

View all comments
 
  • Adam Dennis says:

    11:35pm | 15/02/10

    I say that @Regulator is right on the money. Personally I think Buzz has left its run too late - maybe Google should concentrate on a couple of core things; get Wave right before confusing us further. Colgo, have to take issue with “As with the iPad launch, there was… Read more »

  • Regulator 09 says:

    04:54pm | 15/02/10

    I think we are staring at the next dot com bust. Except this time it will be a social networking bust. It started out with facebook and myspace, then a growing tide of others. Eventually the sorts of things mentioned in the article will indeed happen and all the newtoks… Read more »

 

The hottest story in the Information Security world right now is the much publicised hacking of Google’s corporate network in China.

Tinker, tailor, soldier, IT nerd - Google HQ in China. Photo AFP

If you were skimming the headlines, you might think this story is somehow related to Google blocked searches and Chinese Government censorship. That is how it is being presented in much of the mainstream press, both locally and internationally.

For those who missed the initial story: Early last week Google suddenly announced that it may suspend its operations in China due to a highly sophisticated attack against its corporate network. Within days, it was revealed that up to 30 other tech companies (including Adobe) had been targeted by the same attackers.

Latest 2 of 15 comments

View all comments
 
  • jo says:

    12:52am | 28/01/10

    google needs china more than china needs google. Read more »

  • Simon says:

    10:32am | 27/01/10

    Google a tech Company. LOL. They are an advertising company looking to get a share of the $800 billion world wide advertising spend each year. Read more »

 

This simple graphic illustrates one way the internet can be used to get an insight into a person, by analysing publicly available information associated with a name. I’ve chosen, for no particular reason, Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull. Through the rest of this post are similar profiles of a range of Australian public identities.

Turnbull: Digital profile heavy on politics, management

You can enter your own details into the Personas tool here. If you feel uncomfortable watching the process of this tool scouring the web for information about you, that’s the idea. It was designed to show you have a publicly available profile which you cannot control.

Developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, it’s intended to highlight not just how you are seen on the web, but “for the viewer to reflect on our current and future world, where digital histories are as important if not more important than oral histories.”

Latest 2 of 24 comments

View all comments
 
  • Vazquez35Clarissa says:

    01:25pm | 02/09/11

    People deserve very good life and business loans or just short term loan will make it much better. Just because freedom depends on money state. Read more »

  • Heather says:

    01:50pm | 22/09/09

    There’s a lot of people out there with my name, but way more interesting lives, maybe even the preacher? Read more »

 

This is on news.com.au today:

If you spent just one minute reading every website in existence, you’d be kept busy for 31,000 years.

This is based on information from Bing, Microsoft’s new search engine. It adds that to actually read the entire internet, you would need six hundred thousand decades - six million years - of nonstop reading to read through the information. I guess that’s before you start watching stuff like this or this.

So, Punchers, let’s help each other out. In the comments below post links to the pages you think are the absolute must-sees of the web. I’ll kick it off with this, just because it’s top-of-mind: Joe Hildebrand’s review of Tango & Cash.

Latest 2 of 64 comments

View all comments
 
  • whareebra says:

    02:34pm | 08/02/12

    Now there’s no need that you can live close to a <a >chanel australia</a> boutique or high-end section store that carries all these exclusive bags. It is possible to buy <a >chanel australia 2012</a> online that are real and not knock-offs and / or replicas. Your new <a >chanel handbags</a>… Read more »

  • Lypereefs says:

    12:05am | 26/01/12

    55 is often a basic quilted Chanel ladies handbag that’s 1st unveiled out there over forty five rice <a >chanel</a>  These materials flawlessly combine to make the quality products the two <a >chanel uk</a>  their styles are ever-changing france Manner 1 week which has a wicker Chanel limit fabricated right… Read more »

 

On Wednesday night the Google wheels stopped turning in China

On Wednesday night China’s censors temporarily blocked Google and Gmail, an essential part of my communication with friends and family in Australia and used more than 20 million Chinese.

It was perhaps naive and even a little old fashioned of me to rely on just one e-mail account in Beijing. I know that the country’s net nanny is unpredictable and have been watching the escalating feud between the government and the world’s most popular search engine, which is being accused of containing excessive links to pornography.

The outage happened at about 9.30pm. A friend telephoned me and said that Google had been blocked. I tried several times to open Google.com and Gmail but the pages either timed out or I received a message that the connection was interrupted. China-based site Google.cn was also down.

Latest 2 of 5 comments

View all comments
 
  • jason says:

    01:30am | 27/06/09

    If Stephen Conroy has his way this will be the internet of our future. Read more »

  • Chade says:

    04:13pm | 26/06/09

    And this is why putting “government” and “internet” together will result in a policy statement that simply does not make sense… Read more »

 

So the other night a friend and I were trying to suss out some directions using Google.  My aim was to get from my home, in Erskineville, in Sydney, to Orange, NSW.

So I typed in From: Erskineville. To: Orange.

It's just a hop, skip and a jump

Seems Google thought I meant directions to Orange, California.

Latest 2 of 53 comments

View all comments
 
  • Paul Web says:

    03:39pm | 17/08/11

    There are a few locations like this as well, e.g New York to Japan, or Hawaii to the US. Great to see a sense of humor from Google. Read more »

  • jeff says:

    11:55am | 24/11/10

    go from the bronx to london Read more »

 

Arnie Schwarzenegger first appeared as the terrifying killing machine the T800 in the original Terminator movie (1984), before reappearing in Judgement Day (1991) and Rise of the Machines (2003), proving the prophetic nature of his character’s infamous phrase, ‘I’ll be back.’

In the future in will become increasingly difficult to call the winner in robot dance contests

The fourth film in the series, Terminator Salvation, directed by John McGinty Nichol (of Charlie’s Angels fame), opens today sans Arnie (except in a CGI moment), signalling not the closure some hoped for, but rather the start of a new trilogy.

Like its predecessors (and the television series, The Sarah Connor Chronicles – 2008), the film, set in a post-apocalyptic 2018, where the machines have not only risen but triumphed, explores the ways in which the surviving humans do their utmost to destroy that which they created.

Latest 2 of 2 comments

View all comments
 
  • Damian Weibler (TeXt Files, Wonderworlds) says:

    08:23pm | 16/06/09

    It felt a lot like one of your lectures, Karen Read more »

  • Chade says:

    01:20pm | 08/06/09

    And unlike the other films, Terminator Salvation wasn’t particularly good. Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

@Jess_Hunichen I think Sharon Corr is touring with Ronan Keating? Think I'll pass on that one.

Paul Colgan

You know, The Corrs are pretty good.

Malcolm Farr

That's it. Beautifully recreated.RT @lagcamion: @farrm51 @AndrewCatsaras Dr dr dr dr dndlundlundndndndn (with pinched nostrils) - that one?

Paul Colgan

@diversionary#wading

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

Peter Slipper, draped in black in a manner most young voters will not see outside Hogwarts, has dramatically…

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Life is far from dull in the Northern Territory. Or if it is, we’ll never know. And that’s…

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

Fifteen years ago when one of your girlfriends had a few too many Illusion shots standard practice was…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter