Electoral Laws

If our election on 21 August had been held under British, Canadian, Indian or American rules, we wouldn’t have had to wait. We would have known the results that evening. 

First past the post, Prime Minister Tony Abbott. Photo: Kym Smith

It would have been a landslide to the Coalition.  Their majority would have been about the same size as that of the Rudd government. The three independents would have had no role in the formation of the government, and neither the Green MP nor Mr. Willkie would have been there.

There is no perfect electoral system, and none is sacrosanct. Politicians being human, they prefer the system which they think will favour them. But circumstances change. What favours a party at one time can disadvantage them at another. 

Latest 2 of 76 comments

View all comments
 
  • Aussie Unionist says:

    04:46pm | 13/10/10

    You’ve hit the nail on the head Ricky. I’m pretty sure that in the USA where they’re trialling preferential voting for the first time they are calling it “instant run off” because that is exactly what it is. Read more »

  • Aussie Unionist says:

    12:17am | 13/10/10

    “It’s time to change.” How bloody rich coming from this Queen loving fool. He wouldn’t know ‘change’ if it fell on him. Read more »

 

Australia has one of the best democracies in the world and it’s something we should be immensely proud of. Our democratic system is one which encourages everyone to be involved in the political process, and thus shape the future of this great nation.

Detail from a Labor how to vote card distributed in the March 20 SA poll.

However, during this year’s South Australian election the Labor Party threw our whole system in jeopardy. Instead of contesting the election in a fair and open manner, instead of putting faith in their own policies to capture voter support, they chose to engage in a deceptive and misleading campaign by impersonating another party.

It was a disgraceful act and one which bought the whole integrity of our electoral system to its knees.

Latest 2 of 116 comments

View all comments
 
  • Danny Lewis says:

    08:04pm | 19/05/10

    The Liberals needed to pick up 10 seats to form government.  They didn’t come close.  Labor used this tactic (which, incidentally, I don’t agree with) in SOME polling booths in SOME marginals seats.  There weren’t enough FF votes in it to swing things anyway, which is part of the reason… Read more »

  • Charles Kelly says:

    11:31pm | 18/05/10

    ONCE AGAIN Christian Real, if the Liberal party hands out (along with its usual how to vote cards) material visually and verbally supporting “Australian LABOUR” (but actually containing instructions for voting Liberal) at the next election, that would be just fine with you? WELL??? Read more »

 

Coalition Senator Michael Ronaldson decries the current mixed funding system of elections in his post on the Punch last week.

Money worries: if the Liberals are concerned about electoral reform they should act.

Early last year the newly elected Government introduced the Commonwealth Electoral Amendments (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2009 to the Senate to make political donations more transparent. However the bill was defeated by Liberal Senators who did not want to clean up our campaign finance system.

Australia has a very clean electoral system by world standards. While we don’t hear complaints in Australia that elections have been rigged, the funding system is in need of some reform.

Latest 2 of 15 comments

View all comments
 
  • Peter says:

    01:01pm | 01/02/10

    “the Coalition at least in its recent Turnbull incarnation had a unity ticket with the Greens Political Party to ban all donations to parties, from individuals and organisations! “ This is a lie - the Libs have only said that donations from business and unions should be banned.  In fact,… Read more »

  • Pablo says:

    08:29pm | 27/01/10

    “Interesting to see that none of the Green’s party advocates (on this site) dispute that they want to stick Australian tax payers with a $500 million bill to fund all political parties. Quite understandable, when you consider the naked self interest of the Green’s Party. They don’t get union or… Read more »

 

Can our politicians win elections based on good old-fashioned debate and sound policy, or will they continue their crass cash contests of aggressive marketing campaigns bank-rolled by the wealthy?

And once in office, how can we prevent politicians coming under undue influence from donors at the expense of the interests of their constituents and the broader public?

Until recently, reforming the system of political funding has been the elephant in the room for our esteemed elected representatives. They’ve been acutely aware there is a problem, but reluctant to talk about it.

Latest 2 of 40 comments

View all comments
 
  • frBoblvx says:

    08:15am | 15/04/11

    Très favorable matinée à chacun des individus de cette assemblée ,                    En premier lieu , offrez-moi l’occasion de vous démontrer ma gratitude pour chacune des très intéressantes infos que j’ai découvertes sur cet agréable site web .         … Read more »

  • urbancynic says:

    11:58pm | 18/11/09

    Simon - get your facts right: on current political donation cap amount (it is not $11,200), on union contributions to ALP, on ALP owned clubs that have gambling to generate ALP funds, and ALP acceptance of tobacco donations. Then you might have enough credibility to get ALP pre-selection for a… Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

What sort of people are watching your show @PMOnAir dying laughing at the ads for fungal toe nail treatment! #pmlive

Daniel Piotrowski

@NehaMadhok services eg gym, excellent kebab store?

Malcolm Farr

More gay marriage legislation than you can point a straight stick at. http://t.co/k2SC4xNp

Paul Colgan

@c41 yes it is.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

La dole cheque vita is not so sweet on $16 a day

La dole cheque vita is not so sweet on $16 a day

Your task is simple. Here is $115.50. It must last one week. You have no savings, no assets, but thankfully…

Those greedy ATMs gobble up more than your card

Those greedy ATMs gobble up more than your card

We’ve been talking a lot about interest rates this week. And the 30 per cent of us who have mortgages…

Wrap of the week: It’s the economy, stupid

Wrap of the week: It’s the economy, stupid

There is a touch of Lleyton Hewitt about Julia Gillard. It is not merely that both are redheads or that…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter