Electoral Act

Finally the secret is out – no one wants the current practice of political donations and campaign fundraising to continue.

Business became sick of it long before the GFC cut their lobbying budgets. Most realised that donating became more of a risk than an advantage and most influential business people realised they could get a meeting regardless of donations. Some have even worked out that you don’t need to pay $10,000 a month for a lobbyist to get you the appointment.
Politicians have grown to resent the drain on their most precious commodity – time. Time to think, time to work on policy and speeches, time to meet people without the unspoken pressure of donations and most importantly the precious remaining time to spend with family and friends.

 

Latest 2 of 22 comments

View all comments
 
  • Catherine, Gold Coast says:

    06:28pm | 10/08/09

    By all means put an end to the large donations but there needs to be ongoing review of practices. It wouldn’t be popular with politicians but I think the ethics committees that have been established throughout the developed world to guard against excesses in research could offer guidance for similar… Read more »

  • Steven says:

    09:25am | 05/08/09

    Tim, I note your concern about the prospect of limiting donations to individuals favouring parties with well heeled supporters. What in your view would be the effect of limiting donations to individuals, but with a low threshold such as $500 or $1000 per election cycle? The lesson from Obama seems… Read more »

 

“You lying Labor bastard” read the mail from north-west Tasmania, “Piss off”. It was hate mail from heaven. Let me explain.

Libs busted: the damning photo of party operatives in Penrith

It was mid 2007 and I was Labor’s National Campaign Director. We had started a nation wide campaign about a less popular aspect of the Howard Government’s policy agenda. Part of that campaign was an informative pamphlet about the finer points of the policy. It was, of course, sprinkled with the odd bit of political rhetoric and carefully constructed messages.
The hate mail was return mail.  A loyal Coalition voter had decided to give me a bit of “what-for” with a thick black pen. It was heavenly because I knew the pamphlets were actually going out to voters (a constant anxiety for any campaign director). I became even happier as the weeks rolled on and the Coalition hate mail intensified from across the country.

Latest 2 of 7 comments

View all comments
 
  • dave says:

    02:59am | 23/06/09

    Any letterbox material I get these days goes straight in the bin. On the assumption that it is, in fact, lies & a waste of money. Coles catalogues are more reliable. At least I know what I am ‘buying’ with Coles sir. Read more »

  • John Thain says:

    07:08pm | 22/06/09

    First let me pin my colours to the mast a member of the Labor Party and the current FEC President for Lindsay. We should not forget that whoever paid for and printed those pamplet has not yet been caught. I for one would still like to know who paid and… Read more »

 

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

David Penberthy

Port power players ringing lapsed club members tonight urging them to re-sign. What happened to the old days when they'd just beat them up?

Paul Colgan

What not to make an issue in the last week of a campaign - your leadership http://bit.ly/a78kyL#savotes

Lucy Kippist

Why are people so unkind to Lady Gaga asks @_tors: http://bit.ly/a7jLN7#thepunch

Paul Colgan

Woman aims to be world's fattest at 450kg - so wrong in so many ways http://bit.ly/ayLd13

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Breaking news: Something is going on

Breaking news: Something is going on

Is this the greatest ever send-up of 24-hour news? Warning: contains strong language and hilarity. From… Read more

8 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter