Duchess Of Cambridge

Booker Prize winner and author of the incredible Wolf Hall Hilary Mantel has unleashed on the Duchess of Cambridge in spectacular style.

Clearly a woman not afraid of a backlash…

Mantel called the former Kate Middleton a “shop window mannequin”, a “machine-made” princess “designed by committee” and said she was “without quirks, without oddities, without the risk of the emergence of character.”

It’s part attack on the Duchess, part attack on the Royal Machine. But the unflattering comparision with her late mother-in-law Diana could be interpreted as nothing less than personal.

Latest 2 of 24 comments

View all comments
 
  • Sickemrex says:

    06:49pm | 19/02/13

    Yep, I thought it was just plain nasty. And I’m female, albeit not partial to those magazines. Read more »

  • Robert S McCormick says:

    04:58pm | 19/02/13

    Hey, Borderer, They are Welfare Recipients. The may own, thanks to thieving forebears, robbers the bloody lot of them, heaps of property & tangible goodies but that does not get away from the fact that they, no matter how inferior & useless many of them are, still get a massive… Read more »

 

If Wills and Kate want privacy, they should holiday in Tasmania like Princess Mary does, where law reform has blurred the lines between public and private.

What would Mary do…

Woman’s Day have published the controversial shots of Kate’s baby bump, taken on a beach in Mustique. Kate and Wills were at first outraged last year by a long lenses paparazzi who shot into their secluded villa in Southern France, capturing Kate topless.

As pointed out by the editor of Woman’s Day, Fiona Connolly, who reportedly paid $150,000 for the photos, Kate was on a public beach, albeit one that did cost $30,000 a week and bills itself as ‘the world’s finest private island retreat’.

Latest 2 of 28 comments

View all comments
 
  • W J Craig (Mrs) says:

    05:53pm | 19/02/13

    If Katie values her privacy as much as you say then maybe she should have been content to remain just plain Kate Middleton & married another commoner. lets’ face it, who are these Mountbatten-Windsors? Commoners who have benefited from their criminal , land & wealth grabbing forebears. Go back to… Read more »

  • Ags says:

    05:41pm | 19/02/13

    WTF you are talking about Tony Abbott everywhere on the web It’s almost as if you were trying to advance his public status. Go away and get a real job Read more »

 

It’s time to step up our protests against intrusive pictures of public people in their private moments.

Celebrities deserve more off-duty privacy

This week we have seen two examples of shameful media intrusion and outright hypocrisy.

The first is the publication of pictures of the Duchess of Cambridge’s royal baby bump, revealed while she was wearing a bikini on a private holiday.

Latest 2 of 95 comments

View all comments
 
  • Craig says:

    04:55pm | 17/02/13

    Why should the public care about the respect or self-respect of celebrities? They place themselves in the public eye for an income. It’s their choice. They selectively leak photos and news to stay in the public eye. It’s their choice. Photographers & the mainstream media take and pay for photos… Read more »

  • Luc Belrose says:

    04:45pm | 17/02/13

    Maybe the celebrities like being photographed and to exhibit in flashy and vivacious magazines when they have the rare opportunity to be like the rest of us. Paparazzis would not be averse to heavy fines and even imprisonment in chasing the most attractive shots of celebs as part of their… Read more »

 

Good lord, we’ve upset Buckingham Palace again.


Well not “we” but Italian tabloid magazine, “Chi” - whose photographers have managed to snap some photos of the Duchess of Cambridge - sporting a bright blue bikini and a visible baby bump, on the Caribbean island of Mustique. 

In what can only be described as a massive overreaction, a spokesperson from St James Palace issued this statement:

Latest 2 of 41 comments

View all comments
 
  • St. Michael says:

    06:52pm | 13/02/13

    And *that* argument, Mr Hammersmith, is telling someone who’s *being* raped to lie back and take what’s coming to them without complaint, on the rationale that hey went out that night and/or wore revealing clothes. Or worse, that a prostitute being raped should just lie back and take it because… Read more »

  • True Blue says:

    06:10pm | 13/02/13

    Too right! What is wrong with the Palace standing their ground on the issues of the Royals privacy in their personal life. In their public life it is open slather. Extending a gesture of disappointment is hardly being upset. If only the Punchers were not so anti-royal, then we might… Read more »

 

IT may have begun as a harmless prank, but when British nurse Jacintha Saldinha took her own life after answering a hoax call from the 2DayFM DJs it sparked worldwide debate on such calls and the privacy and rights of those inadvertently caught up. Britain already has some of the toughest laws in the land after a number of embarrassing gaffes and MARTIN CAMPBELL one of the country’s chief architects for their laws tells European Correspondent CHARLES MIRANDA Britain’s media has some hard questions to answer but so too it’s about time Australia gets its house in order.

Quite the cocktail of ingredients for inflaming a situation…

“QUITE clearly if the radio prank did not breach broadcasting laws in Australia it should have done. It’s actually as simple as that.

It was certainly a breach of broadcast laws of the regulator Ofcom here in the UK simply because for all prank calls these days you do need the permission of those people involved if there is no public interest defence and there is no public defence on this one. So I would have thought that it should be in breach of laws. They didn’t look at what they were doing.

I know it sounds very spoil sport but I helped write the code in the UK that actually demanded written permission is required from people if it is to result in some distress or public ridicule. This clearly falls under that bracket. That needs to be prevented, and if the Australian laws don’t prevent this they need to be changed fairly quickly.

Latest 2 of 22 comments

View all comments
 
  • stephen says:

    04:59pm | 02/01/13

    And the crack Scotland Yard are right on to it, too. There’s a team of them, right as we speak, trowlling through the archives of the British Library, just to see if the horrible couple of DJs’ have said anything else that has causes death or injury. Never mind that… Read more »

  • Ray says:

    03:47pm | 02/01/13

    Our ‘holier than thou’ ABC is just as hypocritical, as it has persistently been blasting the FM station concerned   for the tragic happenings. The 2DayFM DJs’  prank was typical of the pranks that the ABC Chasers team used to get up to. Read more »

 

We already have enough laws, right down to inconsequential matters such as the colour of cigarette packets and what we’re allowed to wear on our heads when we ride bicycles. Beyond laws, we have conventions and standards that further guide behaviour. Barely any element of our lives escapes regulation.

The decision to broadcast the prank went beyond the two new DJs… network boss Rhys Holleran pictured this weekend.

Yet the inevitable response when something goes wrong is to demand still more regulation, even in cases where regulation already exists.

The UK, for example, is currently trying to stay awake during endless analysis of the Leveson inquiry into the media – an inquiry that ended up recommending new media rules on top of rules currently in place. As Private Eye editor Ian Hislop wondered: “Why can’t we just enforce the laws? The ones we already have against phone hacking, harassment, libel, bribery etc etc.”

Latest 2 of 229 comments

View all comments
 
  • St. Michael says:

    06:17pm | 10/12/12

    So they say.  At what time, 5:40 in the morning for England? Ring five times and cheerily announce that no one was there? Read more »

  • bsw says:

    06:09pm | 10/12/12

    Tim Blair is a champion Well done! Good article Read more »

 

What a tragic and shocking development in a story that until now had been the butt of even Prince Charles’s jokes.

Probably in hiding ... Mel Greig and Michael Christian

Jacintha Saldanha, 46, the King Edward VII Hospital nurse who was the first to fall for 2DayFM’s prank Queen call the other day is dead. She’s a wife and a mother and her family, friends and colleagues must be utterly beside themselves.

We don’t know why she’s dead but right now a lot of people are putting the blame at the feet of Sydney DJs Mel Greig and Michael Christian. The pair has taken themselves off air and shut down their Twitter accounts but that will not be enough to quell the growing bi-hemisphere storm of outrage being directed their way.

Latest 2 of 532 comments

View all comments
 
  • Garry says:

    04:57pm | 08/12/12

    Cause and affect, its not the guns that kill but the person pulling the trigger, oh wait, if you know the cigarette kills you dont have to buy it from us and you use the same excuses, this is what we need in the media apologists. They ridiculed the woman,… Read more »

  • Gayle says:

    04:54pm | 08/12/12

    I think that the DJs were responsible for the death.  They are both extremely irresponsible, and so is the Radio Station for allowing the prank to go to air.  They deserve all the chastisement that is coming their way. Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter