Discrimination

It says a lot about changing community standards that a state such as Queensland, which under Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen was every civil libertarian’s nightmare, has this week voted to recognise same-sex unions.

On her conscience…Jon Kudelka in The Australian and also here www.kudelka.com.au

Or does it?

It could show that the Queensland Parliament has responded to majority community sentiment in support of gay marriage. Or it could just show that the Queensland Parliament is now home to a majority of MPs who support gay marriage.

Latest 2 of 389 comments

View all comments
 
  • Cherry says:

    01:56pm | 08/12/11

    Craig, you have the same right as every adult in Australia. You can be married to one member of the opposite sex at a time. You are not allowed to marry a member of the same sex - but neither is anyone else. What you are talking about is changing… Read more »

  • Christ says:

    09:19pm | 07/12/11

    OMG its 2011 for god sakes,get over it people - gay people getting married wont change a thing. you can still hate sin, ‘let you who have no sin cast the first stone’ yep i bet there isnt many of you left now is there!!! religious bullying is just that… Read more »

 

Is Julia Gillard copping more flak than past prime ministers because she is a woman? No. And yes.

Rectangular: Peter Nicholson in The Australian.

Julia Gillard has been the subject of much public debate and media scrutiny over her appearance, her voice, her de facto relationship, her lack of children, her disinterest in domestic affairs.

Some of this debate has been quite rugged and quite insulting. In caricature she is often drawn as a rectangle; Peter Nicholson in The Australian habitually draws her with such a big bum that her buttocks appear to be chasing the rest of her body.

Latest 2 of 67 comments

View all comments
 
  • Rick says:

    06:50pm | 30/09/11

    How can anyone be sexist against a sheila who’s middle name is Brutus ? Read more »

  • John Hay says:

    12:52pm | 26/09/11

    “...so many university-educated smart arses in the media (and also some people in politics) thought it fair to ridicule [Pauline Hanson] for having owned a fish and chip shop. So what.” I am 54 and grew up with fish and chip shops. The average fish and chip shop owner was… Read more »

 

A couple of South Australian politicians were featured in the paper this weekend, parking their government cars in very clearly marked disabled parking spaces. The photos were published and, judging by the comments on The Advertiser’s website, people were really, really angry that a pollie would do such a heinous thing.

Is this your car? Well, move it.

The MPs were suitably reprimanded by public opinion, and the Dignity for Disability MLC, the Hon Kelly Vincent, who uses a wheelchair herself, demanded that they each cough up the equivalent of the fine to a disability related charity, which they did, heads hanging low. They admitted their shameful and embarrassing “crime” and no doubt, no other MP in South Australia at least, will park in a disabled space without a permit for a very long time. But how can people who truly need those spaces get that message through to the “ablebods”?

I put a call out for a contribution to this column about disabled parking spaces and received stories from Nicola Stratford and Kate Jenian, over the jump, this week’s piece of angry. Their stories are not unusual. They do remind us, however, that stupidity and arrogance are not disabilities which qualify for a disability parking permit.

Latest 2 of 220 comments

View all comments
 
  • Anne Stocks says:

    09:55am | 24/06/11

    Hi Nicola, I agree with you advocating keying cars is not the answer and yes respect is and so is compassion, understanding and valuing others as people of worth and they are all part of Love. I would also affirm considering others enough to be willing to put them first… Read more »

  • Anne Stocks says:

    09:41am | 24/06/11

    Hi Nicola, I agree with you advocating keying cars is not the answer and yes respect is and so is compassion, understanding and valuing others as people of worth and they are all part of Love. I would also affirm considering others enough to be willing to put them first… Read more »

 

Some might be wondering why two days of our national media cycle have included debate over a man miaowing like a cat and the appropriate level of offence it should or shouldn’t cause. While we’d like our parliament to set a standard for the rest of the community, the truth is we often fall well short - in terms of behaviour and sexism.

The cat in the dunce hat. Photo: Kym Smith

There has been progress but it is still a parliament dominated by men in suits. Women here, like women in any workplace, are entitled to enjoy equal treatment in all senses. No-one is asking for favours or complaining about the hustle and bustle that accompanies hard-fought debate but there is just one request - maybe we could treat members of both genders equally.

There were howls from the Opposition when the Government described the noise that was made towards Penny Wong as sexist. The reality is that not only was it sexist but it also pointed to a pretty unpleasant pattern of behaviour, which has flourished under the leadership of Tony Abbott.

Latest 2 of 287 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jill Scanlon says:

    02:47pm | 09/06/11

    Thanks Minister Ellis, Minister for Employment Participation and Childcare and for the Status of Women.  You have made valid points about equality of the sexes and request that women be allowed to just get on with the job without being penalised for being a woman.  I ask you then, why… Read more »

  • Mark says:

    09:51am | 06/06/11

    His comment that “from Julia, ‘no’ doesn’t mean ‘no’” suggested indifference or ignorance on Mr Abbott’s to this well-known term describing sexual consent. - Kate, my year 11 english teacher would’ve told me that was a lame attempt at a persuasive technique. Everyone knows the context of that statement was… Read more »

 

In a room full of females, raise the issue of women in sport and you can expect a collective groan and eyes rolling in unison. And, given the facts on sponsorship, media coverage and support, it’s hardly surprising.

 Liz Ellis in action. Photo: John Sherwell

Take the Matildas, Australia’s national soccer side. They regularly qualify for the World Cup and the Olympics but still play to half-empty stadiums while making the same commitments as their male counterparts, the Socceroos.

It’s a given perception that women in sport get a raw deal, and arguably the focus for too long has been on their appearance and sex appeal. But over the past few years there’s been a substantial shift in the paradigm of women’s sports coverage. Sponsors and television networks alike are starting to see the value in investing in women.

Latest 2 of 113 comments

View all comments
 
  • Lady Brewsalot says:

    01:45pm | 25/05/11

    Ok, for everyone who finds women’s sport boring… have you gone and watched a game of roller derby yet? It includes many of the criteria that you blokes have listed, and at the moment there isn’t a mens equivalent to compare against. Read more »

  • Dale says:

    01:47pm | 22/05/11

    I took the train to Gosford to watch the Matildas vs NZ game, and I’ve gotta say, I was very impressed with both the level of play and the knowledge of the supporters who showed up on the day. Tickets were cheap (and free for A-League members), which enticed nearly… Read more »

 

“It is not ideal that religious freedom is protected by so-called ‘exemptions and exceptions’ in anti-discrimination law, almost like reluctant concessions, crumbs from the secularists’ table.”

I say old chap - pass the loaves and fishes, please!

Cardinal George Pell’s recent lament to Prime Minister Julia Gillard about the “secularists’ table” seems odd, given that religion still defines our nationhood. Just ask our atheist Prime Minister. It is hard to imagine then how exceptions and exemptions are metaphorical “crumbs”, when they have a vast reach in excluding minority groups in Australia.

While each state and territory currently has anti-discrimination laws which protect against some forms of sexuality or gender identity discrimination, the inconsistency in terminology, and the wide-ranging exemptions (particularly for faith-based bodies) means there are considerable gaps in protecting the rights of individuals accessing health services, goods or services, aged care, employment and education.

Latest 2 of 231 comments

View all comments
 
  • markjuliansmith says:

    01:33pm | 06/09/11

    @Mark McKinlay You may be right I am not certain of anything. Faith provides secular and religious certainty the greater the certainty the greater the danger to humanity. So it is important not to be so certain you know the ‘truth’. “Why must be the custodians of “human rights” in… Read more »

  • Chris T says:

    01:28am | 16/04/11

    This is all bigotry, whisperer.  Go to any parish church on a Sunday and decide for yourself whether the people there are hateful.  How full of spite those old ladies serving tea are !  Also, you are homophobic, given that you imply that gay priests are a threat to children. Read more »

 

Sue O’Reilly, who has guest written today’s column on The Angry Cripple is a freelance journalist and the mother of a 21-year-old son with cerebral palsy. She co-founded Australians Mad as Hell last year with Fiona Porter to campaign for an NDIS and established a charity called Fighting Chance to help people with disabilities pay for essential therapy services.

The president of South Australia’s Council on Intellectual Disabilities recently stated that all people with disabilities have “a right to live in an ordinary home in an ordinary street”.

Photo: Justin Llyod.

But what if some people with disabilities don’t want to live in “an ordinary house in an ordinary street”?

What if they want to live in something like the manicured villages that have sprung up everywhere for people over 55, or an apartment complex with 24/7 care facilities?

Latest 2 of 77 comments

View all comments
 
  • BC333 says:

    12:07pm | 27/06/11

    Sue, you hit the nail completely on the head.  All you have to do is pick up a newspaper to see the type of abuse that happens in group homes.  The only way someone isn’t aware of it is if they live under a rock. And it would seem that… Read more »

  • Ronni says:

    11:09pm | 09/04/11

    Edwardo, some of our children are disabled people, but will never be able to speak for themselves. Are you seriously saying that the Angry Cripple should only publish material written by people with physical disabilities? Because if so, that is an incredibly selfish comment. Over 50% of pwd have an… Read more »

 

Most Australian media like to run the “Crippled Orphan Boy overcomes Headlessness to Swim the Murray for Charity” or “Wheelchair Bound (yuck) Woman Speaks to Schoolkids about Dangers of Drunk Driving” kinds of stories.

They are not often actually inspiring to me. Mostly, they make me feel as though people with disabilities are to be routinely pitied, and awarded if they do anything more than get out of bed in the morning.

There was, however, one guy doing the rounds last week who was a little different. Nick Vujicic, a 28-year-old Brisbane bloke who is a Minister and motivational speaker, and he’s got no arms or legs, just a kind of a foot that sticks out from one hip. This guy’s ‘can do’ attitude is almost sickening.

Latest 2 of 13 comments

View all comments
 
  • Simon J. Green says:

    09:45am | 15/04/11

    Mike J, I’m very seriously asking you why you wrote the above comment. Why? I’d like to hear to explain your thoughts more. Do you resent people in wheelchairs? Do you feel that the author represents an ‘entitlement’ complex? Why did you choose such a mean and put-down ridden way… Read more »

  • deb says:

    07:55am | 31/03/11

    Slick,what about all the disabled, the mentally ill and needy already in the countryside? dont they deserve more carers,  services ect… Read more »

 

One of my favourite episodes of Will & Grace involves Jack stumbling across the “Welcome Back Home” conversion program.

Apple can bend to the weight of public opinion. Photo: AFP.

It’s hilarious for two reasons: One, because Jack cunningly chooses to think of the group as “Welcome Back Homo” and two, as the episode amusingly shows, washing that gay right out of your hair isn’t all that simple. Or successful.

My interest in conversion programs is two-fold. I find them stupidly hilarious as Will & Grace and But I’m a Cheerleader and Saved and Boston Legal and Big Love and plenty of other examples testify.

Latest 2 of 99 comments

View all comments
 
  • jason says:

    01:46am | 31/03/11

    This is different from just disagreeing with the app, the app is wrong and misleading. You can’t cure homosexuality and to think so is misleading and trys to claim being gay is a disease. its wrong and therefore it should be blocked. Read more »

  • john says:

    10:27pm | 29/03/11

    I spose there are also many type of homosexuals some who have become christian and stuggle with it. I guess we have to make room for them all hey Read more »

 

What a week it has been for the Prime Minister of our nation, Our Lady of the Lodge, the Very Reverend Julia “Traditional Values” Gillard.

Her Holiness holds a baby up towards Jesus. Photo: AAP Image Pool

Let me get this “straight”…if you’ll pardon the expression.  Our first female Prime Minister, an atheist living in a de facto relationship, claims to be a traditionalist with a conservative upbringing. 

We are exhorted to go back to Bible stories to understand why marriage equality doesn’t fit with Australia’s cultural heritage because we have to see where we have come from.

Latest 2 of 367 comments

View all comments
 
  • Peter Jackson says:

    03:18pm | 01/04/11

    Equality for gays and lesbians we have? What a piece of rubbish ! ... All introduced by the government as a nicely covered up scheme to make money from a previously untapped source… de-facto relationships between gay people. Well, in a way there you have equality with the rest of… Read more »

  • Anna says:

    09:39pm | 28/03/11

    Gays and lesbians are a minority group who only relatively recently gained the legal right to even have relationships, let alone get married. We’ve been pathologised, locked up in jails and mental institutions, cast out by our families, beaten in the streets by police and our fellow citizens and in… Read more »

 

When I was a kid, I loved watching all the old movies.

With dance moves like these, no one turned Fred away from a party. Photo: AP.

I can remember precisely the day that I asked my mother for a pair of black and white wing-tip shoes so that I could learn to dance like Gene Kelly and Fred Astaire.

Turns out those shoes, even at that time, were very much out of fashion and hard to find, so I never got them.

Latest 2 of 28 comments

View all comments
 
  • Fiona Chorley says:

    06:30pm | 03/04/11

    My son has been dancing since he was 4 (jazz and tap) - he has always brushed off the teasing and done his own thing - in fact you met him last year at the Eastwood singing star comp where he came second! He has since been cast as Michael… Read more »

  • Richard Rountree says:

    08:49pm | 28/03/11

    tell your son to keep it up but aim for Europe (get away from Australian philistines) I work as a bouncer but did some tap dancing as a kid Read more »

 

“Homosexual tendencies (are) one of many conditions that beset fallen humanity.”

According to Exodus International’s policy statements, those who embrace “homosexual behaviours” have lives that are “sinful” and “destructive”.

Rather than simply condemn non-heterosexual desire, Exodus International (A Christian organisation that condemns homosexuality) adopts what they refer to as a ‘redemptive’ approach – seeking to ‘reorient’ the ‘fallen’.

Latest 2 of 221 comments

View all comments
 
  • Anne Stocks says:

    08:58am | 17/08/11

    Senthorun Raj says…  it is hardly a surprise that suicidal ideation and suicide is an endemic problem amongst same-sex attracted and gender diverse people….why do you think they suicide Senthorun because they feel happy and content or perhaps as you assume they agree with what others are saying about them… Read more »

  • David says:

    03:07pm | 15/08/11

    @Adam C I object to your assertion that Ex Gay therapy is no different from Tarot Card Reading or Aromatherapy. The first two harmless curiosities, but Ex Gay therapy is psychological abuse that fucks up peoples’ lives. Read more »

 

hy·poc·ri·sy (h-pkr-s) n. pl. hy·poc·ri·sies

Photo: Justin Llyod.

1. The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.

2. An act or instance of such falseness.

Latest 2 of 43 comments

View all comments
 
  • kristian says:

    10:42pm | 08/02/12

    papachango: Eventually we’ll run out of words and just say “person”. Read more »

  • Steve says:

    10:12am | 18/03/11

    You clearly *have* missed the point. If it’s ok to use “deaf” and “blind”, then why shouldn’t it be OK to say “Crippled”? The difference between these and “retarded” is that retarded applies to our intelligence, not our physicality. A “crippled’ nuclear reactor? - It physically has been “broken”. A… Read more »

 

An exhaustive survey of Aussie Rules fans by Melbourne’s Herald-Sun found that dumped football commentator Kelli Underwood was regarded as the most annoying caller on television by 39.5 per cent of respondents.

Back to the boundary for you, Kel. Photo: Tim Carrafa

The survey could show two things. It could show that 39.5 per cent of people surveyed are football purists with legitimate concerns over Underwood’s grasp of the game.

Conversely, it could show that 39.5 per cent of respondents are sexist dropkicks who think footy is a man’s game and that girls should stick to talking about cosmetics and recipes.

Latest 2 of 232 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jay Jay says:

    10:12pm | 24/03/11

    It’s reverse sexism to an extent. Underwood tried too hard to sound like a blokesy bloke, that it just made her sound laboured and like she was trying too hard! She was trying to fit in by being/sounding like someone she wasn’t, rather than taking the job on as herself.… Read more »

  • Al Bundy says:

    01:45am | 11/02/11

    Good riddance.I ended up growing man boobs because of her.This is the only game man truly gets to express himself. ‘No Maam’,must become a creed by law,so this perversion never happens again. Read more »

 

Gay marriage is supported by a majority of Australians. At least that’s what the few published opinion polls on the issue would suggest.

Loren Cowley (left) and Michelle Ricketts seal their vows in a wedding protyest outside the ALP convention in Sydney last year. Photo: AFP

The most recent poll, in October of this year, was commissioned by a pro-gay marriage lobby group called Australian Marriage Equality. But it was conducted by the independent polling firm Galaxy, which since 2004 has one of the best records at picking federal and state election results. With a solid sample of 1050 respondents, the Galaxy survey found that 62 per cent of Australians did not have a problem with the idea of same-sex marriage.

The result was in keeping with other recent polls which have shown either a narrow or comfortable majority of people supports gay marriage. A different question, however, is whether people wanted the Gillard Government to act as a matter of urgency to legalise gay marriage.

Latest 2 of 240 comments

View all comments
 
  • Sandy says:

    04:19pm | 21/11/10

    “The world is moving towards harmony and equality.”  Really?  Says who? The world may be trying to.  But maybe we just had a bit of a break after a couple of almighty world wide dust ups at the start of the 20 century.  According to the demographers we’re becoming more… Read more »

  • Sandy says:

    04:11pm | 21/11/10

    @ Corban. Do I have to spell it out for you. Competition baby. Combined with clear policy by religions.  That’s my guess anyway. See my latest post on Phelps’ Punch piece about the ‘vibe’.  You want to go deeper into the psychology of it?  Bring it on.  I note that… Read more »

 

Who would have thought that in the year 2010 a “good” school would try to enforce a “Ken and Barbie doll” image on its senior students? Don’t they watch Modern Family? Haven’t they tuned in to Glee?

Sorry Ken, I'm going with one of the Bratz girls.

I was shocked to see the story today about Hannah Williams and her girlfriend Savannah Supski. Hannah was banned from bringing her girlfriend Savannah to the school formal and was told that if she wanted to attend, it would have to be with a boy so they could get a nice gender balance. 

It is just not a credible argument that if they allowed girls to invite anyone they wanted, they would all invite other girls. I suspect the Principal already regrets saying that.

Latest 2 of 221 comments

View all comments
 
  • CD says:

    03:51pm | 08/04/11

    Perhaps it should have been bring a friend.  Leave the relationship issue until they leave school.  Some kids at school don’t have nor are interested in relationships of the kind you are suggesting.  They maybe interested in studying and having lessons on socialising regardless of what sex they are.  Another… Read more »

  • Louise says:

    07:43pm | 12/02/11

    Yep, the girls were interviewed by Dolly magazines and said they don’t even consider themselves lesbians???? Hannah’s father went super crazy and when to the equal opportuities board- they said it wasn’t even discrimination. Read more »

 

Given Victoria’s November election and the Greens Party’s policy on sexual orientation and gender identity this week’s controversy about a girls’ school banning a student from taking her lesbian partner to the school social is timely.

The Ivanhoe school social ban has sparked outcry.

If the Greens Party wins the balance of power in the upcoming state election and is able to implement its policy then there is every chance that Catholic schools will be forced to employ gay/lesbian teachers and promote the benefits of alternative sexuality and gender lifestyles to students.

Government and other faith-based schools will also be made to teach a curriculum that positively discriminates in favour of gays, lesbians, transgender and intersex persons.

Latest 2 of 141 comments

View all comments
 
  • Askmeloan says:

    07:08pm | 03/08/11

    scissors credit card image, shrek end credits you tube. va beach schools federal credit union, 4000 loan. capitol one credit card online payments, how to accept canada credit card. Read more »

  • AB says:

    06:59pm | 16/11/10

    Bearbrass asks “If Austalians are so overwhelmingly supportive of “Gay Marriage” as the homosexual lobby claims, then why are mainstream politicians so unsupportive of it?” Because most pollies,  believe it or not are not as dumb as they look. They listen to the silent majority, and don’t believe that JJJ… Read more »

 

That apt French phrase about the more things change, the more they stay the same could have been minted to describe this election campaign, maybe even all election campaigns in two-party democracies.

Giantkiller: McKew ousts Howard in 2007. Photo: AAP

It’s the same dispiriting stuff every time, is it not? Each side disparaging the other, every candidate in every electorate seemingly basing his or her re-election strategy on avoiding controversy, on staying “on message” (read, repeating their party mantra ad nauseum), on probing for any opportunity to diminish an opponent’s credibility, on getting their smiling face on as many bill-boards, as many newspaper pictures, TV grabs as possible.

And well, why not?  With every aspiring and/or sitting MP under the absolutely microscopic scrutiny which an increasingly pervasive and diverse news media is now able to bear, any blunder by any candidate has the potential to be an election-winning tipping point. So the tactic of being the “small target ” has become more or less universal.

Latest 2 of 18 comments

View all comments
 
  • Joe Blow says:

    06:23pm | 17/08/10

    GWB reining in the banks!!!??  What?  So the 8 years he had in govt wasn’t long enough to achieve this??? Read more »

  • Robert Smissen, rural SA, God's own country says:

    06:01pm | 17/08/10

    Probably won’t dancethis time because if there is any justice she won’t get back in, I can’t imagine the people of Benalong being that stupid twice. Read more »

 

Few have succeeded in defending the seemingly indefensible; O.J Simpson’s attorney being a notable exception. Yet I will attempt to make a defence for Wendy Francis, Queensland’s much maligned Senate candidate for Family First.

Family First Senate candidate Wendy Francis.

At the outset – a disclosure. Francis has used my PR company in the past for strategic advice (don’t laugh – I already know what you are thinking) and I assisted her from a media perspective in her campaign to “make the outdoors G-rated” a few months back.

That said, this article is not being written for her, nor does she have any knowledge of it. I am merely adding my perspective to bring some sense of balance and understanding to what has been an extremely one-sided, and in some ways unfair, reaction.

Latest 2 of 62 comments

View all comments
 
  • LC says:

    05:31pm | 03/01/11

    Tony, sorry, but until they start spewing threats of violence, they haven’t committed a crime. Read more »

  • LC says:

    05:28pm | 03/01/11

    “But she – like all of us – deserves to put forward her views” Agreed. Then again, if she chooses to put forward homophobic views, or demand all children to be religiously indoctrinated by law, rational and open-minded people will speak up, and it’s not always going to be civil.… Read more »

 

One in four Australians experiences some form of racism. (“The People of Australia”, AMAC, April 2010).

Asylum seekers protest aboard a vessel in Indonesia. Photo: Getty Images

83% of Australians agree that there is racial prejudice in Australia (“Challenging Racism, The anti-racism research project”, Prof Kevin Dunn et al, October 2008).

In his discussion of different kinds of racism, Prof. Kevin Dunn includes amongst them that which protects “privilege” usually as perceived by the White establishment.  The “quality of life” arguments of the current political debates around population are dangerously close to the privilege arguments of racism.  Words such as conformity to “Australian” ways of life are being aired bravely.  As Dunn points out, assimilationist positions are inherently anti-multicultural.

Latest 2 of 131 comments

View all comments
 
  • Chaas says:

    03:11pm | 21/11/11

    What a joy to find such clear thinking. Thanks for posintg! Read more »

  • pj says:

    11:12am | 27/10/11

    Everybody is aware that we are fast becoming a poor “white” multicultural country..blame your goverment for the lack of insight that our forefathers had when they introduced the “White Australian Policy” ahh well,at least I got to enjoy my country for awhile before they f**ked it up! As for future… Read more »

 

It’s like waking up after a one-night stand and wanting to chew your arm off. Twice.

Snakes Alive: Julia Gillard has a sugar hit on the campaign bus. Photo: Gary Ramage

Our flirtations with Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard have been wildly passionate but short-lived. The reasons have been well canvassed: Policy backflips and spin over substance.

But La Gillard will find it harder than her predecessor to win back one important sector of the community – women. We expect more of our female leaders. Rational or not, we expect those who break through the glass ceiling to make it easier for the rest of us.

Latest 2 of 91 comments

View all comments
 
  • Hated says:

    11:05am | 26/05/11

    Why should the the house of politics and democracy be about gender at all? They represent Australia as a working whole not on how to only benefit one gender over the other. Thanks to the women’s movements a mans voice or boy, in my case can not be heard over… Read more »

  • masealake says:

    10:52pm | 11/09/10

    What are time bombs of Australia democratic society?  The historical hung parliament demonstrated the big gap inequality society between the groups get highest pay by talk fest used mouth work, the groups get lowest pay by hands work? Voters’ voices do not hear? Voters’ pains do not ease? Voters’ cries… Read more »

 

There is a new dog whistle in Australian politics and it is being blown in sections of the media, in the Liberal Party and most devastatingly, by a traitor inside the ALP.

Behind the scenes at the PM's exclusive photo shoot for the current issue of The Australian Women's Weekly. Picture: AWW

The encrypted message it carries? That Julia Gillard is a childless, career-obsessed feminist, unmarried by choice, and uninterested in the normal things such as children and families and the elderly.

In an election-heated political climate in which showing empathy with the suburban mainstream is everything, this finely honed message is designed to seep almost unnoticed into the public consciousness and once there become politically lethal - to leave an impression without ever owning up to it.

Latest 2 of 266 comments

View all comments
 
  • Tarzan says:

    10:38pm | 04/08/10

    It won’t be sexism that destroys Gillard and the Labor Party, it will be the haunting of the political execution of Rudd. Ms Rudd will launch her book on the same day and same town as the Labor Party campaign launch. 5 days before the election. And when you read… Read more »

  • James says:

    04:26pm | 03/08/10

    Is there any doubt that Julia is being shouted down by the boy’s club? Read more »

 

Good on you Adrian Piccoli for finally having the guts to say what so many wouldn’t. For too long men in politics have been judged more on their hair cuts and the choice of their ties than on their ability to do their jobs.

I have nothing to say about what this poor man is wearing. Picture: Ross Schultz

Poor Tony Abbott, with just a smattering of lycra to protect him, has had to suffer sexualised appraisals from the commentariat.

Lindsay Tanner has had to carry on those broad shoulders the burden of being known as “thinking woman’s crumpet.” And as if doing a tax review wasn’t enough to deal with, Treasury Boss Ken Henry practically has groupies.

Latest 2 of 48 comments

View all comments
 
  • Cara says:

    12:52am | 05/08/10

    The sexist comments on this site are appalling. Women have to put up with this EVERY SINGLE DAY. Feminists aren’t humourless. They are just SICK AND TIRED of every day being a battle against the EPIDEMIC OF SEXISM IN THIS COUNTRY. Read more »

  • Ro84 says:

    02:12am | 24/05/10

    There will always be double standards. Sometimes I’m not sure if feminists want equality, or to be held on some sort of pedastle (not in any sort of chivalrous way, of course) by men. Men and women are born different physically, we grow differently during puberty - it’s like asking… Read more »

 

The German telecommunications giant Deutsche Telekom announced recently they would introduce a dictate that by 2015 30% of middle and upper management positions must be filled by women.

Quotas supporter: Sex discrimination commissioner Elizabeth Broderick / File

They are thus far the only DAX-listed company to consider such a move, but elsewhere in Europe gender quotas are becoming an increasingly familiar site on the corporate landscape.

Norway introduced legislation in 2002 that required 40% of all board members to be women, with Spain and the Netherlands following suit. Other countries contemplating passing similar laws include Belgium, Britain, Germany, France and Sweden.

Latest 2 of 107 comments

View all comments
 
  • TracyS says:

    06:35pm | 19/05/10

    “Maternity leave, harrassment claims, bitchiness, monthly hormonal mood swings, and the constant need for flexibility to look after sick kids. “ One false assumption being that all women are mums. In a community where female participation in tertiary education is high and a considerable proportion of women graduates chosing not… Read more »

  • Anthony says:

    09:06pm | 14/05/10

    You can easily argue this point both ways.  On one hand, you can say that there aren’t enough women in high-paying jobs, and something should be done.  On the other, you can say that in a company that has mainly men at the top, you are saying that they should… Read more »

 

The Anti-Discrimination Commissioner plans to launch a federal High Court action to ban the recognition of April Fool’s Day in Australia on the grounds that it discriminates against stupid people.

Victim: Jesters could be in for a windfall

If successful the case could trigger a tidal wave of litigation from schoolboys who got their fingers caught in chewing-gum-box traps, teachers who have had shoes drop on their heads, co-workers who agree to go looking for a long stand and other victims of their own gullibility.

They could in theory seek compensation from the federal government for having failed to protect them from hilarious practical jokes.

Latest 2 of 35 comments

View all comments
 
  • paul says:

    06:20pm | 05/04/10

    qwhy do we suffer these fools Read more »

  • Anjuli says:

    12:31pm | 02/04/10

    Surely this a Punch joke for April Fool’s day. Read more »

 

Anthropologist Peter Sutton has a long association with indigenous people.

A sign on the way into an indigenous community in the Northern Territory

In his new book The Politics of Suffering, he makes an observation that deserves quoting at length:

The first consideration must be to focus on those conditions that are conducive to the emotional and physical wellbeing of the unborn, infants, children, adolescents, the elderly, and adult women and men. It is remarkable how many people living in the comfort, affluence and healthy surroundings of Australia’s suburbia have, in the debates over indigenous policy and especially the Intervention, covertly promoted the view that respect of cultural differences and racially defined political autonomy takes precedence over a child’s basic human right to have love, wellbeing and safety. It is as if political feelings and political values are more important than one’s emotional feelings and moral values as fellows of those other human beings in the ghettos.

Latest 2 of 31 comments

View all comments
 
  • Robert Smissen says:

    11:41pm | 01/03/10

    Evie it would be a piece of cake! ! ! My wife & I are both on pensions not to mention that I have full time of my disabled son. We eat well(salmon at least once a week)both of us drive late model cars & I bank $150 every month.… Read more »

  • Toady says:

    10:08pm | 01/03/10

    It’s not the type of house, and it’s not a desire to live on the land without a roof over their heads.  Don’t fantasise about the mystical image of Kooris drawn to a nomadic life, yearning to spend their days living off the land.  The issue is the provision of… Read more »

 

I’m going to confess straight up to having little to zero interest in the underwear choices of Venus Williams.

Depressing: I know she played well, but what was she wearing? Photo: AFP

Yet in recent days her flesh coloured shorts have become a story in sport in themselves and sent twitter abuzz with is she or isn’t she wearing underpants debates.

Perhaps this isn’t so shocking, Maria Sharapova’s green “frocklet” (I kid you not- apparently there is indeed such a thing), got its own press conference launch and then we saw precious column space designated to the diamond earring and necklace choices of Serena Williams, (which she liked “because it had lots of S’s in the design”, and we can all respect that).

Latest 2 of 117 comments

View all comments
 
  • LP says:

    01:08pm | 22/05/10

    I’m just a teenaged girl and at the momment in my sport class were studying “Women coverage in sports.” It disgust me to think that men out there are impowering the women. Their are female athletes who have more talent then many other male athletes but aren’t getting the media’s… Read more »

  • Fan says:

    05:49pm | 13/03/10

    If you wan to watch a female sport where fashion is non existant, try Rugby Union. The Wallaroos are the most successful rugby team in Australia at the moment (7’s). They are in a World Cup year. Currently funding will seise after this campaign, despite their success. The women in… Read more »

 

Would Australia’s sporting mainstream benefit from the introduction of a Rooney Rule?

Former Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy getting dunked. He was the first African-American coach to win a Superbowl. Pic: AP / File

In 2003, America’s NFL introduced the Rooney Rule to provide legitimate opportunities for minority candidates. The rule, named after Dan Rooney, owner of the Pittsburgh Steelers franchise and a strong advocate for the rule’s introduction, requires all NFL teams to interview at least one minority candidate for any vacant head coaching or front office position.

Concurrently the Fritz Pollard Alliance was established to identify candidates, submit names for vacancies and to prepare prospective applicants for the interview process.

Latest 2 of 29 comments

View all comments
 
  • Phi says:

    10:42am | 21/01/10

    When I first started reading the article I wondered how many people in wheel chairs could want such jobs. I must admit I was a bit surprised when I realised that they considered African Americans as a minority. Read more »

  • Rev says:

    10:43pm | 20/01/10

    Rob, you’re technically right, but still wrong.  Cricket is dominated by ‘whites’ but Anglo Saxons?  Many of them aren’t.  Katich, Krejza, Hauritz, Kasprowicz, are all clearly not ‘Anglo’ names.  Gillespie was part Aboriginal, Dav Whatmore part Sri Lankan, and a rising star for NSW is Pakistani-born Usman Khawaja. I grew… Read more »

 

Unless you were lucky enough to be of nightclubbing age in the 1970s it has never been cool to wear white leather shoes. Despite being akin to wearing a large sign that says “I’m a tool”, this hideous footwear has had something of a resurgence in trendy nightclubs thanks to metrosexuality.

Not cool

But after a decade at the cutting edge of cool, metrosexuals have been given one clear signal they may have to go back to being ordinary blokes. Nightclub promoter Scott Mellor has chalked a line in the pavement outside a new club event in Melbourne that debuts on Friday. Beyond it, metrosexuals shall not pass.

Anthropologists might be tempted to attribute this to a socio-collectivist and culturo-genetic realisation that men are not capable of understanding manicures and shopping to the extent required to live a truly metrosexual life. But most would say metrosexuality was like platform shoes for blokes – a stupid idea in the first place – and besides, since David Beckham first dyed his tips blonde women have been clamouring that they prefer real men.

Latest 2 of 42 comments

View all comments
 
  • Alex says:

    03:47pm | 11/12/09

    There is nothing wrong with a guy looking after himself. On that note some guys do go too far, if you don’t have at least a few rough edges that define you as a man you may as well wear a dress. Read more »

  • Drew (Darlinghurst) says:

    08:23pm | 27/11/09

    Meterosexuals….meh Thank God Im Homosexual. I find most Heterosexual men….... LAME. Now piss off back to Suburbia Meeeeow. Read more »

 

In his deservingly scornful review of the book Iron John, Robert Bly’s absurd bible of the men’s movement in the United States, British author Martin Amis describes the comical pilgrimage made by maladjusted men into the American woods to sniff each other’s armpits, channel negative energy into circles of hate and howl at the moon at the fact that mum had them circumcised.

Come with me Brian…those girls were plain nasty anyway

Happily, this quest to unleash what Amis ridicules as “the hairy satyr within” does not appear to have any formal and organised equivalent in Australia.

This is probably because most Australian men have nothing of any real magnitude to get off their chest, or simply find that the odd night at the pub or the occasional fishing weekend provides ample therapy for any lingering sense of gender injustice. That, and the fact that we’ve got too wry a sense of humour and too much self-awareness to engage in anything that silly.

Latest 2 of 77 comments

View all comments
 
  • Lisa says:

    04:15pm | 06/11/09

    As I said earlier, my feelings are that overall, we are a herd animal, and those individuals that step outside gender roles may be spectacularly punished in the sexual / relationship arena. Perhaps that is why all your unemployed chaps can’t find ‘sugar mommies’, Paul and DG. And perhaps that… Read more »

  • DG says:

    01:08pm | 06/11/09

    Paul Horn (11:19am | 06/11/09) My point was that if a person chooses to support their partner (i.e live off the financial benefits of their partner, rather than derive their own income) they can hardly be surprised that their partner is better off (financially) if things change. I deliberately used… Read more »

 

Fifty-eight years ago, as a conscript in the Australian Navy, I was on parade with ship’s company on the wharf at Williamstown, I believe it was.

Since this 1978 rally, which was a pre-curser to the Mardi Gras, we have come a long way

A police identity check was taking place. Two rather hefty men, wearing dark fedoras, so favoured by celebrated criminals and successful detectives of the day, and bearing police standard issue suspicious scowls, moved between our ranks.

A third, slighter and very nervous, man was in tow. The offence being investigated was the bashing and robbery by sailors of a homosexual man in a park, the third person with the two detectives.

Latest 2 of 65 comments

View all comments
 
  • Sabina Nowak says:

    08:04pm | 07/10/09

    Thanks Bill for saying what needs to be said and The Punch for publishing it.  It is about time more public figures debunk the myths about the ‘homosexual menace’.  There is absolutely no rational need for the double standard. Read more »

  • Michele says:

    06:49pm | 07/10/09

    Margaret Gray maybe you should make friends with some gay/lesbian people and then you might be a nicer person. You might then see them as real human beings with thoughts & feelings, hopes & dreams that are shared by many of us. Just because they have a preference for same… Read more »

 

So long, farewell, and thanks for all the flab.

Goodbye “Dance Your Ass Off”. Goodbye to the lurid outfits and the ridiculous hats that Australian audiences for but one brief week got to sample. Goodbye to the prospect of a weekly side-serving of self-abasing, mortifying attempts at burlesque routines and swing-dancing in the name of farewelling the extra kilos.

Channel Nine in its estimable wisdom and impeccable taste broadcast the first episode of this part dance competition, part ritualistic humiliation of overweight wannabes for Australian audience’s viewing pleasure a couple of weeks ago.

Latest 2 of 7 comments

View all comments
 
  • Faye says:

    10:29pm | 15/08/09

    I am relieved that the remaining 20207310 Australians have something better to do on a Tuesday night than support such a program. The world would be a better place if instead of looking at, we looked after those who needed help. Read more »

  • davido says:

    01:43pm | 15/08/09

    Finally? Happens on a regular basis rom what I can see. Read more »

 

Is it playing up to stereotypes to put Bruno’s failure at the Australian box office down to the same more-than-lingering homophobia that doomed it in the US?

The numbers would suggest so, with ticket sales in both countries following the depressing downward curve set aside for movies that cop a flat ‘don’t see it’ around the watercooler.

The mockumentary opened here July 9 and is largely concerned with putting its title character, a flamboyantly gay Austrian TV presenter, in play opposite unsuspecting rednecks in order to get audiences laughing and/or squirming at flamboyantly gay behaviour.

Latest 2 of 36 comments

View all comments
 
  • SimonP says:

    06:46pm | 07/08/09

    I’m a GenX gay man. I saw Bruno only because it was at a fundraiser screening - I would not have gone otherwise. I had low expectations, but the movie was WORSE than I expected!  It was silly, shallow, tasteless, crass, but worst of all… simply not funny.  It is… Read more »

  • Janelle Batt says:

    07:50pm | 06/08/09

    This movie treats gay men very unfairly - Bruno’s character is too defined and reliants upon his sexuality. Cohen has been forced into pushing even more barriers of decency and socially-accepted behaviour - to achieve the same shock value as Borat - but he’s pushed it too far. His character… Read more »

 

When the delegates at the ALP National Conference sat down on Saturday to discuss the issue of same-sex marriage, there’s one question that should have loomed large in their minds: “Which side of history do you want to be on?”

Gay marriage: more and more countries are saying I do.

Despite the result, same sex marriage is inevitable in Australia - and a quick analysis of two factors makes this blindingly obvious. The first is the international situation.  Seven countries have now introduced same-sex marriage, along will six states of the USA.  Just like so many other waves of social reform before it (giving women the vote, decriminalizing homosexuality, etc.) same-sex marriage will spread throughout the western, liberal democracies eventually reaching Australia.
 
The second factor that makes same-sex marriage inevitable is the demographics. 

Latest 2 of 29 comments

View all comments
 
  • Amanda says:

    11:46am | 20/12/11

    These people don’t want the right to have a religious marriage, they want the right to have a civil marriage. I’m not sue whether you read the article above or not. If not, then let me refresh you memory:  “To raise religious arguments against same-sex marriage misses the point.  We’re… Read more »

  • Richard says:

    06:30am | 07/12/11

    Saturday the 3rd December 2011 will go down as a day of infamy for Australia, when same sex marriage was recognised by the Labor party. Even though it’s not law yet this decision shall remain as a reproach to this nation and a shame to mankind. Same gender marriage is… Read more »

 

Raised on a diet of Disney movies, contemporary society has become so besotted with the idea of heterosexual romance, marriage and weddings, we fail to see the people for the confetti and happily-ever-afters.

Caught up in a Hollywood version of what constitutes a legitimate union, we’re becoming exclusive, political and discriminatory and overlooking what should be a very basic human right: the right of the individual to form a loving, public and legal commitment to another person and have it civilly sanctioned regardless of sexuality.

I find it fascinating and more than a little bit perplexing, that when it comes to discussions of same-sex unions, those best positioned to provide compassion and understanding resort to straw polls, prejudicial language and silencing tactics to proclaim, yet again, the almighty significance of heterosexual unions. 

Latest 2 of 36 comments

View all comments
 
  • g says:

    02:53pm | 15/04/10

    “gay lobby”? I didn’t know there was one. Paranoid much? “won’t slide with the public”? well, sure, anyone over the age of 65. “accept this and move on”? tell you what - I will if you will. “you can’t force people to accept you…” So who’s problem, exactly is that?… Read more »

  • Andy says:

    09:18pm | 03/08/09

    No chase it ISNT, face that reality chump. Read more »

 

David Penberthy and others on The Punch have written about the issue of gay marriage recently. His argument was, essentially, that there are lots of bad traditional marriages and there would be some good gay marriages therefore we shouldn’t be worried about gay marriage.

Why not share the misery, asks Bill Leak in The Australian

While a lot of people may agree and leaving aside the fact that there would also be a lot of bad gay marriages, it’s not particularly good logic. It fails to discuss the nature of marriage and its purpose.

Is marriage perfect? Of course not. But mere imperfection of itself is not an argument for its removal or significant change.

Latest 2 of 122 comments

View all comments
 
  • Geoff says:

    01:22am | 18/01/12

    One only has to look to Canada where marriage equality has been legal for nearly 10 years. People aren’t marrying their dogs or goats, polygamy is not rampant and straight couples continue to marry and have kids as they have done for hundreds of years. Society there is not collapsing.… Read more »

  • Dean says:

    01:10pm | 16/12/11

    That is a rather large claim to be making.  Do you know God personally?  Have you sat down with him over coffee, and he told you this? Read more »

 

Why is anyone surprised by this? There’s plenty of people who go on Dancing with the Stars who can’t dance. Gerrard Gosens is a very inspiring man. He’s run marathons, flies an ultralight and plans to climb Mount Everest, all things most of us have no hope of achieving.

Dancing with the barbs - Gerrard Gosens on Sunday night

This is a man who in spite of his visual impairment, is used to being good at things, and is obviously extraordinarily competitive and is accustomed to positive feedback and public adulation.

But he can’t dance to save himself. I saw him on Sunday night on Dancing with the Stars, and as McKenney pointed out, Gosens has no rhythm, hunches his shoulders, and doesn’t exactly look like he’s cutting up the dance floor.

Latest 2 of 46 comments

View all comments
 
  • Marisa says:

    04:53pm | 12/11/09

    it is very ignorant to think that blindness is the worse disability per the comment above. AT least I think so. There are people who couldn’t look after themselves and personally care for themselves. The point here is he gave it a go and the public voted not because they… Read more »

  • Tony says:

    01:55am | 18/08/09

    We all applaud Gerrard for having a go, but the voting system - half judges and half viewers - can destroy a dancer regardless of having a disability. In this case, clearly the sympathy factor kicks in and provides compensation for the decreased dancing ability (due to the disability) in… Read more »

 

On Friday, 5th of June this year, my partner Beck and I were married in Vancouver, Canada. However, since arriving home in Australia, our marriage is no longer recognised, and this has brought significant sadness to our lives, and also to our families who were unable to travel to Vancouver to be with us on our special day. 

Davina and Beck on their wedding day. Picture: Davina Storer (not to be reproduced without permission)

Beck and I are now in the bizarre predicament, that we are married in a growing number of countries in the world, but not married here in our own country.

Some people find this funny, saying we have the ‘best of both worlds’ we can get on a plane and be married one day, and get off a plane and be free of the ‘ball and chain’ the next. But this situation is far from funny to us. It is heartbreaking because we want to be married all the time, not just in certain parts of the world.

Latest 2 of 68 comments

View all comments
 
  • Hopium says:

    12:46pm | 07/08/09

    I just got married. I’m not gay so mine is legally recognised. It was a secular celebration in a park. No church or religion involved. Once upon a time, you could not get married this way. I shed tears during the ceremony. Not for my beloved (we show love by… Read more »

  • Bugalug says:

    07:08pm | 31/07/09

    Bunny and Sal, I think the point is that saying “my friends say it’s OK/not OK” is not statistically valid, as groups of friends tend to self select people of similar views.  Pointless statement both ways, and all my friends agree with that assessment. Read more »

 

Can you believe that in 2009 we don’t allow same-sex couples to get married? It happens in countries all around the world. Not just where’d you expect like Holland and Sweden. But places like Spain and South Africa. It makes Australia look a little behind.

Everyone deserves their own Hallmark moment

We all have gay mates or rellies who pay their taxes and live by the law.

But when it comes to one of the most important moments of your life - your wedding day - the law says gays are suddenly so different they’re not allowed to have one.

Latest 2 of 382 comments

View all comments
 
  • adam says:

    11:05am | 01/02/12

    ‘it has nothing to do with you or anyone else’ - yeah right it has a effect on the whole society. wake up and realize when 2 men or 2 women get married they might want to have a child. either by adoption or in vitro fertilization. look at the… Read more »

  • Matilda says:

    03:58pm | 25/01/12

    Terry, what if your child was gay and wished to marry their partner? what if YOU were gay? huh? it would be completely different then wouldn’t it. You watch and see gay marriage WILL happen. and besides, I think person beliefs such as this should be kept out of make… Read more »

 

Apart from the kerfuffle it caused in Brisbane last week, the nation may have missed a rugby league scandal that makes Cronulla’s woes look as shocking as a Phil Spector wig.

In fact it was less a rugby league scandal and more the culmination of years of a war on the interaction of the sexes in the workplace.

Joel Clinton: Fined 50 grand for hanging out with a chick

Poor Joel Clinton, the Broncos frontrower, was fined $50,000 for inviting a friend to his room the night before the match against the Tigers recently. That friend happened to be a woman.

And? And nothing That’s it, that’s all he did.

Latest 2 of 5 comments

View all comments
 
  • Steve says:

    05:14am | 17/06/09

    Well of course he deserved a fine.  A woman goes with you to your motel room and you do nothing other than talk ? An outrage. This behaviour has to be stopped . Everybody knows motels are for nooky and transgressors deserve sanctions of some kind…a fine being one possibility… Read more »

  • Bill Jones says:

    03:44am | 17/06/09

    I guess it pays to be gay in the NRL. Read more »

 

My name is Tracey and I am not a lesbian. Well, except for 15 minutes in 1987. At university. Does that count? 

Everyone is at risk of being ‘outed’ these days, as tabloid media organizations eat their own to get the next exclusive story.

Last week, journalists were salivating at the mouth at the prospect of using the name ‘Tracy Grimshaw’ and ‘lesbian’ in the same sentence, following Gordon Ramsay’s outburst.

Tracy has publicly denied the allegation, but she will be forever haunted by a claim that, until now, was only whispered by carpet-strollers in TV corridors.

Latest 2 of 52 comments

View all comments
 
  • Liz says:

    01:19pm | 12/05/10

    Get a grip Jack, You talk about homosexuality like it an inner city trend or ‘lifestyle’ How can something as meaninful as a persons sexual preference be likened to a soy latte or a haloumi sandwhich? Sure, the majortity of people may not be gay but that doesn’t mean that… Read more »

  • Jack Thomas says:

    11:18pm | 19/06/09

    Build a bridge Nancy and friends. Why does Alan Jones work so hard stifling the book Jonestown and mention of his arrest in London for leed behaviour in a public toilet, when at the same time he can rip into anyone else on radio? Why was Gordon Ramsay’s arrest for… Read more »

 

Shh, don't tell anyone I'd rather be at home

It has been reported in recent times that the proportion of women on corporate boards and in the top management of Australia’s leading companies is actually shrinking has come as a shock to many.

Australia was once ranked second only to America in the number of top companies with a woman senior executive, and we now fall last on a list of comparable nations including New Zealand, Britain, South Africa and Canada.

In Australian about 55% of the top 2000 companies have at least one woman in an executive management position – compared to 85% in the US.

Latest 2 of 13 comments

View all comments
 
  • eve says:

    06:45pm | 15/06/09

    I work in the media and of all the companies I have worked for (mostly small, with less than 100 employees) none has supported flexible work practices. Not surprisingly most women that had babies didn’t come back. The dads that left at 5pm were looked down upon. At a time… Read more »

  • Ben says:

    03:46pm | 12/06/09

    ‘We even “gifted” the world with one of the most outspoken feminists ever in Germaine Greer.’ ... and we’re still very, very sorry World. Please forgive us. I think it is simply the fact the current generation of women in childbearing age range want to do the ‘mum’ thing right.… Read more »

 

C'mon Lleyton: its time for political correctness

Take note Lleyton Hewitt - the phrase “spac attack” is now on the banned list. And while he’s normally the kind of bloke who would rail against political correctness, it’s National Party Senator Barnaby Joyce who agreed to put it there.

Joyce will tonight apologise on television for saying Kevin Rudd had thrown a “spac attack,” after the Spastic Centre called on our political leaders to stop using the word “spastic” as a term of abuse.

“I would like to blame ‘Kylie Mole’ from the 1980’s Comedy Company but I should have understood the derivation of this word,” he told The Punch yesterday afternoon. “I generally can not stand political correctness but this definitely deserves an exception.”

Latest 2 of 11 comments

View all comments
 
  • steve says:

    08:28pm | 03/06/09

    No this isn’t a uniquely Australian saying - it is used in all English speaking countries. It is highly immature and childish and just as bad as racism. Oh we have a Senator that uses Kylie Mole as his role model. He goes, he goes, he goes, he goes….. I… Read more »

  • Jo says:

    10:41pm | 02/06/09

    When we discard our uniquely Australian sayings, then we discard our identity. Why do we keep purifying and refining everything we say? What ever happened to strine? It was colourful, eloquent and uniquely Australian. ‘Spac attack’ is a term that has been used to describe a fit of rage, a… Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

The guy doing the announcements about the fire alarm testing at Punch HQ sounds exactly like @KevinRuddMP

ToryShepherd

The Rape Play and the humourless hysteria of the holier-than-thou http://t.co/fRm2b2Se

Lucy Kippist

RT @SimonThomsen: That's not a flat white, THIS is a flat white...RT @michellesenay: Australian for “Coffee”http://t.co/Z0TJWlXC

Lucy Kippist

RT @Colvinius: Let's not kid ourselves that we're so great about fighting censorship: http://t.co/6fVBNB8Q

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The humourless hysteria of the holier-than-thou

The humourless hysteria of the holier-than-thou

In I Spit On Your Grave, a young woman is gang raped in a remote woodland. She is beaten and tortured…

Cash mobs aren’t so flash

Cash mobs aren’t so flash

For a moment in the mid-naughties, they were the coolest of all cool social media-fuelled meme-thingos.…

If we wanted reality, we’d turn off the television

If we wanted reality, we’d turn off the television

“Some day, far into the future, this here machine will become a powerful medium with the potential…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter