We can’t agree about anything these days. Every debate on pretty much every aspect of Australian life is hopelessly polarised.

Remember the old Holden ad with its famous lyric about football, meat pies, kangaroos and Holden cars? In the 1970s it was almost impossible to take issue with this assortment of dinky di Australiana. Today, their mere mention invites argument.

Football is any of about four different sports, meat pies cause obesity, kangaroos should either be eaten or not eaten, culled or not culled. And as for Holdens, well, you’re either a protectionist or a person who believes a dying industry should no longer be propped up at taxpayer expense.

Latest 2 of 58 comments

View all comments
  • Jason says:

    03:46pm | 28/11/12

    Not to mention it lacks anyone who looks Indian, Pakistani or Aborginal. Read more »

  • Esteban says:

    03:46pm | 28/11/12

    I don’t have any problems having conversations with people older or younger than me at the cricket or not at the cricket. However if the cricket can break down ageist attitudes then that is great. Read more »


It is fashionable to mock the quality of political debate in Australia. Just as bad money drives good money out of circulation, asinine sloganeering and personal attacks appear to have crowded out the serious political debate.

The phrases “moving forward” and “stop the boats” might summarise its recent depth. But blaming Australian politicians is naive. The standard, the complexity, even the eloquence, of political discussion have been decaying throughout the West for many decades.

No longer is an Australian political leader willing or permitted to sit on the Opposition benches for a length of time partly for reasons of ideology or principle, as Arthur Calwell and Bert Evatt did in the 1950s and 1960s.

Latest 2 of 16 comments

View all comments
  • Esteban says:

    03:08pm | 16/11/12

    Mikem. You are the perfect living example of how spin in fact does carry the day. Read more »

  • mikem says:

    01:55pm | 16/11/12

    We live in an era where image has become more important than substance and most Party leaders are carefully stage managed to portray the image their Party gurus think is important.  The problem with spin though is it is a dangerous game because it only works if you don’t get… Read more »


William James, American psychologist and philosopher, once observed that much of what we mistake for ‘thinking’ is simply a matter of “rearranging our prejudices”.

That's a funny way to react to someone shouting at you through a loudspeaker. Pic: Thinkstock

It’s not a very flattering picture - fortunately however, the experience of hosting the IQ2 Australia debates suggests that William James was unduly pessimistic. In the most recent IQ2 debate focusing on the ever decisive issue of religion and the arguments of atheism, it was heartening to see the level of debate amongst both participants and audience members reach unbelievably high levels – both intellectually and numerically.

Interestingly, despite being an issue fundamental to the existence of many of us, a large number of the audience who entered the debate undecided on the issue found themselves identifying with one of the sides by the time the final poll was taken. The event gives credence to the theory that if you persuade rather than harangue, then people will freely change their minds.

Latest 2 of 61 comments

View all comments
  • RyaN says:

    12:07pm | 25/09/11

    @Chris L: “I believe that there should be some form of immediate consequence to breaking a promise” hear hear, I couldn’t agree with you more, regardless of what side you barrack for, lying to gain power and ignoring the people should be dealt with most severely. Read more »

  • Chris L says:

    07:44pm | 23/09/11

    I get your point RyaN, and it’s one of the few things I agree with you over. I do have an issue about the “carbon tax lie” but I have put forward my case before and don’t want to disrail a decent point with this. I believe that there should… Read more »


I was sitting with some friends and students in the outer western suburbs of Sydney the other day. We were chatting about the High Court’s decision on the Malaysia Solution and offshore processing of refugees.

Illustration: Bill Leak

The general feeling was that it was about time someone demanded that Australia meet its international obligations and stop dumping them onto other countries. While there was not much sympathy for Gillard, nor was there any support for Tony Abbott’s posturing.

Someone actually quoted their Greek grandmother, who compares Greeks and Italians - saying, “they are the same, but different”. My question: “Would you vote for Tony Abbott if an election was held tomorrow?” was met with a resounding ‘no’. So is Gillard finished?

Latest 2 of 132 comments

View all comments
  • Affopmeft says:

    07:36am | 12/10/12

    YhwiXKNM canada goose jacket jkvhPZCii ixvkuwaftl canada goose jacket WIBqKmwvs zixscs coach bags canada KspQXBRJjla Read more »

  • pletcherjvs says:

    02:51pm | 04/10/12

    Time to ImagineImagine an album of photos of your own loved ones. you are well on the front page home, Your father on future, His father on the next and thus forth. Flicking relating to the first two pages, you to your father are clearly related, Since you share physical… Read more »


It has become fashionable to engage in a debate about the state of public debate of late.

Can I say something without being gagged? Anything? Pic: Kym Smith

This introspection comes as some have made a dubious link between atrocities such as the Gabrielle Giffords shooting in Arizona or the recent killing spree in Oslo, and normal albeit robust discussions on talkback radio and the internet.

In the frame are issues like asylum seekers, immigration, and as The Australian’s Janet Albrechtsen put it in an excellent piece mid-week, “the relationship between Islam and modernity”.

Free speech she said, “must include the right to offend”.

Latest 2 of 107 comments

View all comments
  • Naturfa says:

    06:57am | 31/05/12

    It is interesting to see that more pelope think Abbott will be a better leader than think he will be a worse leader in every demographic except Labor voters.  It would be interesting to see what former-Coalition-voters-now-ALP-voters (aka Howard battlers for old time’s sake) say about this, because they are… Read more »

  • Greg says:

    12:20am | 11/08/11

    Kipling, my response was succinct and spot on, even if I say so myself. I contradicted your ridiculous assertion that a person’s reputation does not depend on them telling the truth, and only depends on their ideology, by giving a couple of examples to clearly prove you wrong. I did… Read more »


Lord Christopher Monckton’s determination to have a win against carbon pricing yesterday drove him to make a genuinely dopey statement at the National Press Club.

Trees? They LOVE carbon! Give 'em more! Photo: James Croucher

“Australia is now regarded as a sovereign risk,” he said as a jarring conclusion to his opening statement in the debate with economist Dr Richard Denniss, executive director of the Australia Institute.

It wasn’t something that a touring expert - on climate change or anything else - should have said lightly. It meant that financial centres overseas fear Australia will default on its debts and other payments, despite the AAA rating from both the major credit assessors S&P and Moodys.

Latest 2 of 516 comments

View all comments
  • gooromows says:

    07:27pm | 05/06/12

    Body Type One particular: Brief & Moderate You’re best offered by simply selecting a handbag that is very small and is something you can carry all-around your current chest. You wouldn’t like a big tote that looks virtually clownish towards your current scaled-down shape. [url=][/url] In fact, if you are… Read more »

  • alex says:

    05:26pm | 25/01/12

    Left liberal imbeciles! Read more »


Mainstream media holds a mirror up to society. If we take a look into that mirror, we see what is preoccupying our attention.

Let me just say a bunch of stuff which adds nothing to our understanding of the topic

On a deeper level, we can gain significant insight into the way we tend to investigate and argue. Monday’s Q and A episode provided great insight into the superficial way we tend to approach philosophical and ethical topics.

The fast paced program is geared towards political discussion, but for this episode, the topic was God, Religion and Ethics. Disappointingly, There was a focus on sound bites, concrete current affairs and controversy, and as a result, many of us went away no more enlightened on the topics than before.

Latest 2 of 133 comments

View all comments
  • Anne Stocks says:

    08:07pm | 19/08/11

    Hi again Richard, you may not read my posts with the topic being long gone,  but I just felt like sharing and I am very thankful for yours. I always feel blessed when Men express their Love for the Lord, yes I know your awe and reverence comes from the… Read more »

  • Anne Stocks says:

    12:57pm | 19/08/11

    Richard says: ONLY ONE THING NEEDS TO BE SAID, I point everyone to the Cross…. Thank you Richard for your Loving stand for the Lord and for the beautiful and powerful poem showing The Heavenly Father’s and His Son Jesus Christ’s Sacrifical Love for us through the cross where He… Read more »


Climate change sceptic and mathematician Christopher Monckton has just debated economist and Executive Director of the Australia Institute Richard Denniss at the National Press Club.

Photo: Kym Smith

The real winner was probably the weather. According to the Bureau of Meteorology, our massively overheating globe could muster just four degrees for Canberra at the time of the debate.

The Punch team watched the debate, first with (de)bated breath, then with waning enthusiasm as all the old arguments resurfaced. Then we bought a sandwich and a coffee. Our quick summary is below. Who do you think came out on top?

Latest 2 of 214 comments

View all comments
  • Lachlan Scanlan says:

    06:55am | 19/02/12

    Monkton debated on facts and all Dennis had to say could be summarised by “the science is settled” or consensus or inferred he was a conspiracy nut but never once debated the facts. Nobody seems to notice that only one person was in the debate, Monkton. None of Monktons facts… Read more »

  • JacobElnora says:

    11:05am | 06/10/11

    Then and handiest then it is possible for you to to make stronger their marketing efforts to make your traffic. The Internet is an open, filled with trade opportunities. Read more »


Australia, how low can we go? The biggest casualty of the whole carbon tax debate is not the truth, but our capacity for serious, informed debate in what once passed for our robust democracy.

It doesn’t matter which political donkey you pin your tail on, or what side of the warmist debate you’re on, or indeed how you feel about the carbon tax itself. People from both sides of all these fences have been carrying on like the proverbial pork chops. And all over a tax which, by any measure, is hardly going to bankrupt anyone.

Nothing better symbolises the moshpit than yesterday’s slanging matches in Brisbane shopping centres as the Prime Minister toured the Sunshine State.

Latest 2 of 526 comments

View all comments
  • MontyDexter says:

    09:27am | 13/10/11

    Oren Blondell Niesha Lyle Ursula Orville Wesley Andrew Tommie Mitchell Farah Orpha Madelyn Annabelle Edward Orville Jerald Keith Tommie Micah Shiloh Tony Estelle Chuck Elijah Ramon Ona Fabian Marc Santos Evelin Ramon Isaac Alexis Ahmad Willie Jenice Andrew Irvin Erline Odis Shaun Shiloh Lorinda Dorthy Shakira Consuelo Mike Latasha Arnita… Read more »

  • Chris says:

    04:55pm | 19/07/11

    Bugger the scientists and the politicians and take a look out of your window. Then tell me we are having no impact on the planet with a straight face….... Read more »


A lot of people who questioned the need for a parliamentary debate on Australia’s military commitment in Afghanistan said we’d just end up with a whole heap of MPs agreeing we’re doing the right thing and we’re doing it the right way.

Cartoon: The Daily Telegraph's Warren Brown.

Indeed despite their stylistic differences, Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott’s speeches to open the debate were almost interchangeable in their messages and conclusions - although the Prime Minister did admit for the first time we might be there a lot longer than she’d ever fessed up to before.

But even though there is broad bi-partisan support for our mission in Afghanistan, there has been some dissenters, and also some interesting ideas thrown up during the discussion, like the proposition by Shadow Finance Minister Andrew Robb this afternoon.

Latest 2 of 30 comments

View all comments
  • Gregg says:

    10:14am | 31/10/10

    @ Oh Really Dave! What if the Taliban base is the Pashtun peoples, a poorer peoples of the rather inhospitable terrain areas adjoining and the NW Pakistan wild west, the Pashtun comprising some 60%+ of Afghanis. Not that it is a military plan our guys need to put up for… Read more »

  • Gregg says:

    09:59am | 31/10/10

    @Tazan, ”  My brother is there, my son has been there and I’m hoping to go there. “ Is there a new Dad’s Army regiment being formed? Read more »


When should Australia wage war? Has anyone asked you? Have you given it much thought or is that a job best left to the government?

Cartoon: The Daily Telegraph's Warren Brown

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know that twenty one Australian men lie dead, lost on the battlefields of Afganistan. Each of them is easy to admire - young, supremely fit, highly trained, brave soldiers.

It’s pretty clear they all possessed courage and commitment to their task, their training and their mates most of us would struggle to emulate. They all have families and friends - even more tragically, a number of them have young children who will never see or know their dads.

Latest 2 of 28 comments

View all comments
  • Sean Williams says:

    01:59am | 26/10/10

    The sample of 1,500 is actually more than the paltry Australian contribution to the mission. Britain has 10,000 troops in Afghanistan and has had more than 300 killed. As it was in Iraq, the Australian aim is to look as though it is involved while avoiding as exposure to actual… Read more »

  • Dan says:

    10:38pm | 25/10/10

    Deciding to go to war doesn’t make one a leader. Making the right decision to go to war, or not to go to war, makes one a leader. Read more »


Greens leader Bob Brown will today have his first real win of the new paradigm, with the debate he called for on our involvement in the War in Afghanistan set to commence at the conclusion of Question Time in the House of Representatives.

All eyes will be on Greens MP Adam Bandt when he joins the debate today. Picture: Ray Strange

It’s unlikely the Government would have consented to such a debate if it didn’t have to, such is the growing chorus of questions surrounding our mission there.

The Greens are not the only ones questioning the strategy and time-frame of our deployment - but there’s no doubt Bob Brown is in the hot-seat now, and must be hoping the debate, which will also cascade into the Senate next week, produces something more than bi-partisan adherence to the stock standard lines.

The Punch will cover the commencement of the debate live directly after Question Time, which begins at 2pm. Check back on the home page this afternoon to join in.

Latest 2 of 43 comments

View all comments
  • Dink says:

    03:00pm | 10/02/12

    Wholeheartedly, I ednroswe Pax Christi’s statement on the urgent need for an immediate change in strategy in Afganisthan.  My prayers join all other people of faith and seekers of justice! Read more »

  • Lillian says:

    07:30am | 08/02/12

    When they bgoruht NATO into Afghanistan, I was like, “Does our politicians want us to lose in Afghanistan?” Cause that is what is going to happen when you rely upon NATO to do anything. Evidence of their fecklessness and purposeful stone walling has proven this position out.The US military, probably… Read more »


In an age of texting, Tweeting and Facebooking it’s the Campaign 2010 version of a Jane Austen courtship – brimming with potential for misinterpretation, hurt feelings and cross purposes.

The Gentlemen's starched collars constrained their growing passions…

Instead of picking up the phone (so 2009) the National Director of the Liberal Party Brian Loughnane and the National Secretary of the ALP Karl Bitar have taken to firing off increasingly melodramatic letters to each other.

Between each line you can almost feel the building tension over tomorrow night’s proposed debate / people’s forum / Roman wrestling bout between Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott in Brisbane.

Latest 2 of 17 comments

View all comments
  • MarK says:

    11:45am | 18/08/10

    The hate is strong in this one…let go of your dark thoughts embrace the Force and walk in the light. Read more »

  • MarK says:

    11:44am | 18/08/10

    I would pay to see that. As long as Hornswoggle gets to cameo…it ain’t wrestling without a dwarf. Read more »


Julia Gillard appears to have decided that conflict, for all its bad press, can be a great source of political strength.

Are you not entertained?

Like Russell Crowe’s Gladiator screaming to the crowd in the Colosseum “Are you not entertained?”, Gillard is frustrated but aware that the only way to capture the electorate now is with a display of brute political force.

Combined with a negative attack plan on the Opposition leader, she plans to take it up to Tony Abbott by challenging him to another debate. We also know that this challenge is slightly disingenuous, but more about that in a moment.

Last night she told Today Tonight that it would be “game on” for round two:

Latest 2 of 185 comments

View all comments
  • mbt ireland says:

    11:25am | 02/11/12

    I just wanted to construct a brief message to say thanks to you for all of the magnificent hints you are showing at this site. My incredibly long internet search has at the end been compensated with professional concept to exchange with my pals. I ‘d tell you that most… Read more »

  • James says:

    03:14pm | 06/08/10

    I wonder if we can convince Julia or Tony that more people will vote for them if they allow voters to throw pies in their face, they are that desperate it might work.  Needless to say I am voting Green but if they let me fire them out of a… Read more »


Remember not so long ago when an aspiring prime minister, one K Rudd, adopted the practice of referring to John Howard PM, as ``a clever politician’‘?

Pick the clever politician. Illustration: Sturt Krygsman

He uttered the phrase at every opportunity. It was no throw-away line. At face value, it seemed positive but closer scrutiny revealed a focus-group crafted pseudo-compliment designed to have the opposite effect. Namely, to reinforce a perception bubbling away just under the surface of voter consciousness, that John Howard was somehow tricky. Sure, he’d been ironically dubbed ``honest John’’ before.

And equally true, Labor had seized on the embarrassing warning from then Liberal Party president, Shane Stone, that voters saw the Howard government as ``mean and tricky’‘. But these were old insults and had lost any real impact.

Latest 2 of 48 comments

View all comments
  • Steve Putnam says:

    08:36am | 29/03/10

    What Freud have you read Lady Fong? Read more »

  • Wayne Fehlhaber says:

    08:34am | 29/03/10

    Derek , sure is difficult to answer your post , this is the third comment i’ve keyed , moderator seems really tough on me.  ” .........others of your ilk…....”  hmmm you were allowed that one. Derek , i don’t have vested interests. Affilliations , sure , don’t you. ? What… Read more »


“Put your hands down mate, this isn’t communist Russia,” I was told as I was patted down at the entry to Channel 9’s Melbourne studios on Tuesday. After walking past some photos of network luminaries Daryl Somers, Graham Kennedy and Ossie Ostrich, we “wormologists” were herded into a waiting room just outside the studio and told to watch a schmaltzy health and safety video while we waited.

Opposite ends of the same dial. Picture: AFP

Conversation swung from friends and family who had been on Deal or No Deal to the calibre of the combatants in the Great Health Debate. We were spoiling for a fight, but as the worm-trail now shows, the Prime Minister won handsomely - at least by our measure.

There is some much-needed debate about the efficacy and accuracy of Channel 9’s worm. As one of Nine’s one hundred wormologists, I’m here to tell our side of the story.

Latest 2 of 133 comments

View all comments
  • Christian Real says:

    10:29am | 30/03/10

    The bottom line is that Abbott well and truely lost the Health debate and he was shown up for having no policies, no direction and no real leadership. The liberal sympathisers and supporters are in complete denial and cannot grasp, come to terms or realise the fact that Rudd won… Read more »

  • Christian Real says:

    07:15am | 30/03/10

    Wayne, it appears that you Liberal supporters seem to have short memory spans. I recollect, that on the 21st November,2007 that five Liberals were caught handing out fake pamplets purporting to be from a non existent islamic group, thanking the labor party for supporting terrorists. Out of those five men… Read more »


A few years ago an academic and political consultant called Drew Westen wrote a book called ‘The Political Brain’. Based on solid research about political bias, it urged US Democrats to realize that the way to beat the Republicans was to base their political message around the emotions of the voters.

It's all about feelings.

Forget about policy content: go for perception and feelings. That’s what the Republicans had done, so that’s what the Democrats had to do. And that, of course, is now the message to Tony Abbott, care of that little maggot on the corpse of rational politics known as ‘The Worm’.

Latest 2 of 23 comments

View all comments
  • Christian Real says:

    06:36am | 29/03/10

    Wayne, what is it with these liberal leaders that they like to puff out their chests and think and feel that by doing that they are superior. First there was Howard,(The Man Of Steel), but in reality nothing like Superman) and now there is Abbott (Ironman) who finished in 1,169th… Read more »

  • Christian Real says:

    06:15am | 29/03/10

    Louise says: 0.435pm 25/03/10 Louise, could you please provide the proof and the source to back up all the remarks and comments that you have made about how Prime Minister? It appears that you went to a lot of trouble putting all this diatribe together like you did, so it… Read more »


Channel Nine needs to stock up on Combantrin and get rid of the Worm.

Illustration: The Australian's Peter Nicholson

Even Nine stalwart Laurie Oakes admitted today the Worm’s wildly favourable result for Kevin Rudd was out of whack, after a debate in which every time the PM so much as drew breath the Worm went shooting out the top of the scale.

All it needed to come crashing back down was for the camera to pan across Tony Abbott’s face. When he opened his mouth to speak the worm needed a defibrillator.

Latest 2 of 242 comments

View all comments
  • dafalomy says:

    10:52am | 18/08/12

    louis vuitton online shopping  for more detail Read more »

  • ed doctor says:

    11:44am | 24/06/12

    I am totally delighted with incredibly blog greatly that warned me! God bless you “Shoot a few scenes out of focus. I want to win the foreign film award.” - Billy Wilder Read more »


Developments in computer hacking, Australian politics, and an acrimonious meeting in Denmark have produced the unlikely result that climate change is now almost as hot a conversation topic as Tiger Woods’s sex life.

With our ready-reckoner guide to global warming barneys, you too can have a circular argument in which all facts are disputable and no insult is too cutting when climate change comes up in the pub, at a barbecue or during tea and biscuits at your next Liberal Party branch meeting.

And best of all, there are no losers because by the time the arguments are proved or disproved either way we’ll all be dead.

Latest 2 of 43 comments

View all comments
  • Mikko says:

    08:30pm | 18/12/09

    Hey Einstein, why don’t you teach Kevin Rudd and Penny Wong how to tax water vapour. You know everything is realtive and water vapour is by far more prevalent in the atmosphere than CO2 and is more likely to have a greenhouse effect. So every time a river, lake, the… Read more »

  • Peanut Hunter says:

    01:14pm | 17/12/09

    Must be nice to have the introspective moral high ground? Or sorry.. is that the boring middle ground position where the majority of ‘us’ pond scum seem to be herded by Team A, Team B and Team Journo? Read more »


Every Australian is passionate and parochial about our “Australian Made” label. We all identify with the iconic green and gold kangaroo logo proudly representing products – food, clothing or materials – manufactured in Australia which helps customers recognise and buy Aussie goods.

Does stuff made in New Zealand count?

But how far do you go in determining whether a product is wholly made in Australia and deserves to wear the famous label? Independent Senator Nick Xenophon wants the Government to urgently change the law to make it illegal for products made with foreign produce to be labeled “Australian Made”.

While Xeonphon’s suggestion is laudable in theory, it’s, at best, overly simplistic and probably just populist.

Latest 2 of 13 comments

View all comments
  • Mary says:

    08:30am | 10/12/11

    I prefer to purchase meat, smallgoods, vegetables, fruit and dairy products are totally grown and produced in Australia, because we can produce these item in abundance in Australia and know they are more healthy - also production can provide employment for our people. I don’t have unreal expectations, I realize… Read more »

  • Brett Watson says:

    04:39pm | 07/10/09

    The terms “Australian Made” and “Australian Owned” do not reveal the actual Australian level of inputs and are in fact quite Un-Australian in their usage requirements. To remedy this problem a new “Australian Authenticity Logo” has been unveiled. Visit to see what is behind the labels and logos such… Read more »


Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more



Read all about it

Sign up to the free newsletter