Constitutional Monarchy
On Tuesday 19th of January, Prince William – the 2nd in line to various thrones – will visit Australia for just the second time. It has been reported that he is doing this to “get to know Australia”.

Since this tour was announced in December, as Media Director for the Australian Republican Movement (ARM), I have been busy with requests from English broadcasters and newspapers.
The interest should have been surprising, since William is only stopping in on Australia for three days for a “semi-official” tour on his way to New Zealand. Moreover, he is visiting only two cities: Sydney and Melbourne. However, given that there has been a massive PR campaign by the Palace to present William as the youthful – cuter – face of the monarchy, it was inevitable that the English press would be awash with expectation about whether Australia would warm to the Prince like good little subjects.
Continue reading "Prince William’s Australia tour - who cares?" »
The Australian monarchists are divided – David Flint and his tightly controlled Australians for a Constitutional Monarchy (ACM) claim the Governor General is the Australian head of state while Philip Benwell and his Australian Monarch League (AML) are with the Republicans – it’s the foreign non resident unelected British Queen who holds this nation’s top job.

Ten years up the track, the debate is simmering away under the surface and right now Flint is holding the trump cards – he is said to pull in half a million dollars a year towards his cause which is remarkable considering ACM has only two members – Flint and his sidekick former Roman Catholic seminarian Thomas Flynn. The movement’s constitution is clever; its run by the pair with the help of would be members, who are non voting “supporters”
Professor Flint’s latest take on the vexed subject of a republic revolves around the quaint notion that if we change the constitution we’ll have a “politician’s republic”. He fails to mention we are now laboring under a “politician’s monarchy” – a point Tony Blair underscored when he pulled the Queen into line over her unbelievable indifference to the death of Princess Diana in 1997.
Continue reading "Right royal lie at the centre of monarchists’ claims" »
Latest 2 of 21 comments
View all comments-
Mark says:
Can anyone argue that our current system hasnt worked? Furthermor I can not see how in a republic a President could repesent the entire community the way a monarch does. Firstly if the parliment elects the President then the President only represents the parliment and isnt constitutional either. The second… Read more »
-
Ron says:
It’s interesting that many of the obviously historically inept and deficiently researched comments by most people on this blog including the original ‘braniac’ who composed the opening article filled with inaccuracies, decry the German origins of the monarch as if she was a foreigner in her own land. These same… Read more »
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
Abbott slams Rudd team’s robotic lipservice
FORMAL acknowledgement of the first Australians as the original owners of the land is now de rigueur… Read more
Most commented
The talk of the town
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
Gentle jabs to the ribs
Breaking news: Something is going on
Is this the greatest ever send-up of 24-hour news? Warning: contains strong language and hilarity. From… Read more

Latest 2 of 56 comments
View all commentsAdd your comment