Constitution
Some years ago the BBC produced a brilliant documentary series about the House of Lords which chronicled the strange existence of those hereditary peers who by dint of their birth had wound up being underemployed for life in this absurd parliamentary chamber.

There was one chap aged only in his 30s who was not only completely loaded, he was also completely smashed, living in the rundown country estate his late father had left to him where the only functioning room appeared to be the cellar. Every morning he would wake up, put on his tweed trousers and a silly cravat, and start working his way through bottle after bottle of 1950s French burgundy. His face was dotted with burst capillaries and he sat in his comfy chair like that Uncle Monty from Withnail and I, rabbitting about how one felt a sense of duty in maintaining one’s family traditions by serving as a Lord.
It now seems that even the Brits have realised their Upper House is an elitist anachronism and a waste of money.
Prince William’s coming visit seems to have resulted in the dramatic conversion of a republican celebrity. This is none other than the editor and media personality Ms. Ita Clare Buttrose AO OBE, who campaigned for the politicians’ republic during the 1999 referendum.

Readers of the Wentworth Courier, which circulates in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs, were surprised then by her harsh dismissal of the No case and indeed of constitutional monarchists.
Ms Buttrose was the founding editor of Cleo which, with its nude male centrefolds, was aimed at young single women. She later edited the more conservative Australian Women’s Weekly and the Daily and Sunday Telegraphs.
Continue reading "The Prince William effect: republican celebrity converts" »
Latest 2 of 43 comments
View all comments-
Joe says:
Why all the hatred towards our cousins in Britain? I’ve lived over there and they view us as brothers. 50% of our country want to get rid of the foundations of this country?? If that happens there will be a civil war I promise you. I’ll shoot every single one… Read more »
-
AT says:
“post hoc fallacy”? What the hell is that!? Sounds like a Dutch sex toy. I’m only partly trying to ‘turn the debate back on you’, mostly though I’m trying to turn on your curious crusade to discredit “the republicans” who you never identify exactly. You name just one individual; Turnbull.… Read more »
Harry M Miller’s revelation that Prince Charles wondered why Australia remained a constitutional monarchy will come as no surprise to those of us who have been reporting on and watching the British royals for some time.

If there’s one thing that senior members of the royal family detest it’s the fawning and groveling of those they meet, and Australia heads the list of major offenders in that department.
As an example, some years ago the Queen decided that the last century habit of women dropping a curtsy was no longer necessary but the individuals could continue to bend the knee if it made them happy.
Continue reading "If our next King thinks we should be a republic, then…" »
Latest 2 of 19 comments
View all comments-
Barbara says:
Clever wording won the day for Howard and the Monarchists…...Cant wait for the next vote….bring it on Read more »
-
stephen says:
PS This is one of the problems of the Labour party, and indeed when Gough was PM : Labour tend to title and sub-title all action. Once, of course, it is recognized by the proletariat, then it really doesn’t have to work. We’re supposed to feel good. (A Republic won’t… Read more »
This Wednesday, as we commemorate the sacrifice of countless Australians in war, we will also no doubt be reminded that November 11 has other significance in Australia’s journey.

It will be the 34th anniversary of the Dismissal, an act of infamy against a democratically-elected Government that is burned into our national consciousness, and into the ALP’s soul.
So each year, in addition to the Last Post played at war memorials around Australia, we see the TV replays of the famous scenes on Parliament steps, which have become almost a mantra for an era of change and conflict in Australian politics.
Continue reading "The dismissal: our greatest act of political infamy" »
Latest 2 of 75 comments
View all comments-
never mind says:
can’t wait for those rich politicians to get old and frail and end up in a nursing home with nurses with high certificates but nothing else a piece of paper and treat them bad for them to know what it is like for those who are suffering and getting poorer… Read more »
-
pat says:
totally insane how this country is run, the rich for the rich always never change Read more »
We forget to consult history at our peril.

It is very relevant to the Rudd Government’s latest assault on the sovereignty of the people – that is the proposal of its hand picked committee, headed by Father Frank Brennan, to impose upon them a charter of rights masquerading under the title of a Human Rights Act.
The last time Labor tried for a bill of rights it was by way of a Constitutional amendment to insert a mini bill of rights with the aim of continual enlargement.
Continue reading "Bill of rights is a dangerous lawyers’ picnic" »
Latest 2 of 30 comments
View all comments-
What says:
Here’s Brownyn talking about Labor pushing through legislation with their ‘numbers’, when her government took advantage of a Senate and House majority to impose WorkChoices! Give it up Bronwyn, you’re out of touch and out of time. Read more »
-
stephen says:
A lot of legislation changes the value of language, but not of life. Having read the proposal, a sensible person would deem it unneccesary. Read more »
Yesterday we blew the froth off a couple in honour of our sovereign, Queen Elizabeth II, and observed her birthday with a package of pieces on the republic which, overall, concluded there appears to be no mass groundswell for another crack at constitutional reform.
Even the republicans are worried that our pollies are simply waiting for the Queen to die so that the issue can somehow resolve itself. Follow the links below to read the pieces.
Latest 2 of 8 comments
View all comments-
Jonathan says:
The last referendum was a complete farce. Any question this important should be posed in simple terms, i.e. 1. Should Australia be a Republic? Y/N; 2. If Yes, should the President (a) be elected by the people, or (b) appointed by politicians? etc. Not the rubbish proposed by Howard where… Read more »
-
Andrew says:
There is one basic and over riding fact that cannot be changed by any rhetoric, logic or emotion from the Monarchists in this debate - the head of state of Australian can never be an Australian. It is a title inherited by someone in England! There are not many advanced… Read more »
The losers in 1999 have the utter gall to demand we abandon our oldest public holiday celebrating our oldest institution, one central to our Westminster system.
On almost every Queen’s Birthday republicans usually rush into the media. This year they’re saying putting republicanism on the political agenda will help the nation recover from the recession. Without a scintilla of evidence, they say the growing interest in Anzac Day is because of republican sentiment.
This shouldn’t surprise anyone. In the nineties they were saying a republic would overcome unemployment, improve trade, free artistic talent, increase immigration, and enhance our standing in Asia.
Continue reading "Republican losers would scrap our oldest holiday" »
Latest 2 of 21 comments
View all comments-
Daniel Urquhart says:
Yes, Trevor, because the constitutional monarchy has SOOOO protected the rights of unborn children, ensured active participating in politics and is so anti-scoailist (I mean, lord, most monarchists are hoarding Keynesians’). As I said, look into citizen initated referenda - the realm where reason prevails. Jesus believed people should get… Read more »
-
Trevor says:
The arguement by those pushing for a republic the likes of Bob Brown is soley because thay want to change our Constitution, and to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to remove all that our Christian forefathers placed in the Constitution to protect us from all… Read more »

The republic debate has evolved since 1999. Traditional approaches to the question still have bite, including general arguments for or against monarchy/republic as well as the nationalist appeal of a republic in Australia and the cost to the public purse of constitutional change.
But the recent Senate hearings into Senator Bob Brown’s bill to hold a republic plebiscite at the time of the next election displayed a number of new developments.
The inevitable first new aspect of the debate has been about the meaning of the 1999 referendum result. An important thread of monarchist argument, often tried in letters to the editor, has been that the matter has been decided because the people have spoken. Republicans have had their chance and should abandon their cause.
Continue reading "Waiting for Queen’s death soft option for republic" »
Latest 2 of 6 comments
View all comments-
Justin Davies says:
With all that is going on in our country not to mention the rest of the world, Could you please tell me why we are bothering to discuss this non-issue?Joe average Australian does not care, I promise you. From what I can gather, the people of this country would much… Read more »
-
Malcolm Kerr says:
Erm excuse me? David Flint *is* upholding “the constitutional laws of Australia”! It is people like John Warhurst who want to change them. (But that’s not treason, it’s just silly). So goodbye to him and cornelius lenihan? Read more »
Here’s the worst political ad ever made in Australia:
It’s not a very good version, I know. It’s grainy, and the words don’t line up properly.
But you get the general idea: the two worst prime ministers of our modern history, delivering a boring and patronising monologue about something which should have been exciting and inclusive.
Continue reading "Clapped-out baby-boomers have killed the republic" »
Latest 2 of 34 comments
View all comments-
LG says:
Prince Charles has also been trained from infancy for the job. I see no merit in him leading us. Read more »
-
Alexander Fishburner says:
The funny thing about that video is it has Malcolm Fraser’s lips moving but Gough Whitlam’s words coming out. How apt! Read more »
Recent posts
The latest and greatest
The Senate protects us from bad government
Governments of either persuasion don’t like it when they don’t get their own way in the Senate. … Read more
Most commented
The talk of the town
- Atheists can do better than saying believers are stupid 231
- Why there is no International Man’s Day 181
- Nation's top scientists agree: the climate is changing now 168
- Token ceremony openings must be brought to an end 37
- Making the swill less unrepresentative 26
- The confession manual for a politician's mistress 22
- Yes to housing affordability, but don’t take my home 19
- SA election: A party that can't run itself... 18
- Baseless attacks on Bob Geldof threaten foreign aid 11
- SA election: Why Mike Rann's time is up 10
Punch live
Up to the minute Twitter chatter
RT @_Tors: The political mistress's public confession manual - just posted the imaginary one on The Punch http://bit.ly/9sQssK
RT: @_Tors The political mistress's public confession manual - just posted the imaginary one on The Punch http://bit.ly/9sQssK
Happy St Patrick's Day! What will you be doing to celebrate? Share it here: http://bit.ly/brz2k1#thepunch
Gentle jabs to the ribs
Breaking news: Something is going on
Is this the greatest ever send-up of 24-hour news? Warning: contains strong language and hilarity. From… Read more
Latest 2 of 26 comments
View all commentsAdd your comment