Censorship

The NSW government have released a set of recommendations that would place responsibility for the work of a grubby network of international paedophiles and child exploiters on a handful of innocent visual artists.

Cartoon: Eric Lobbecke

Speaking at a press conference on Tuesday the Attorney-General John Hatzistergos said the NSW government would support new legislation that makes a “clear legal distinction between pornography and art” in order to protect victims and make it easier for police to prosecute cases of child pornography and exploitation

With plans to scrap the defence of “artistic merit” while asking artists to fork out up to $500 per image for Commonwealth classification, Hatzistergos’ recommendations are taking a stab at a group, who up until 2008 had stayed fairly shy of scrutiny in Australia.

Latest 2 of 127 comments

View all comments
 
  • james campbell says:

    04:11pm | 14/03/10

    A good friend of mine put it simply when he said that it is pornography if you think it is. thank you Tony. We are doing what the artist, for want of a better word, wants. We are discussing his works and therefore justifying his existence and his views. Read more »

  • Decent says:

    11:39am | 14/03/10

    You mention topless sunbakers. -  Taking a photo of them is perverted! You mention Kim PhĂșc (the naked young girl fleeing a napalm bombing raid) - This was an acclaimed photo because it caught a dramatic moment not because she was modeling for the photo. Paying a minor to take… Read more »

 

Unpredictable, addictive and unrestricted. Chatroulette has sparked a cult following, countless YouTube clips, a new genre of shocked screen-grabs, and at last, mainstream coverage.

It could now draw the attention of would-be censors.

John Herrman, from Gizmodo.com calls Chatroulette, “speed-dating the entire Internet”. In an instant, you’re connected bedroom-to-bedroom with one of 20 thousand online strangers, anywhere in the world, be it dorm, cafe or basement lair.

The result is a hybrid of Skype and Peep-Show. If your chat partner is bored, they flick you to another round of spin of the bottle. It’s a return to the Internet’s Wild Wild West, argues NY Magazine - a lawless place for thrill-seekers, voyeurs, artists and freaks.

Latest 2 of 13 comments

View all comments
 
  • supler says:

    11:32pm | 25/02/10

    The alternative for chatroulette is anoChat.com It is much much better! Read more »

  • Richard says:

    01:23am | 19/02/10

    Soon there’s going to be html5 and we wont need flash any more. Read more »

 

As cynical as it might sound you can’t help but think that Communications Minister Stephen Conroy would have been relieved last week’s media scrutiny was mainly soaked up by Peter Garrett’s problems with roof insulation.

Senator Stephen Conroy is copping it on a few fronts.

But following the Sunday Herald-Sun revelation that he went skiing with Channel Seven chief Kerry Stokes shortly before handing out $250 million to the TV stations it means he’ll at least be continuing in his role as best supporting stuff-up.
Political cliché that it is, Conroy’s decision to hang out with Stokes on the slopes goes to the Minister’s judgment and it’s that judgment Kevin Rudd must really be beginning to question.

Latest 2 of 39 comments

View all comments
 
  • Shane says:

    08:21am | 17/02/10

    Yup throw Conroy out he is as big as the rat that we call Rudd. Read more »

  • Matt Stewart says:

    05:49pm | 16/02/10

    LOL.  Far point, I would have been happy if they said “Here’s $250M, but you have to cancel Home and Away”.  But if we can get that rubbish for free, why do we need to pay $250M for it?  Outrageous decision. Read more »

 

The Defence Department posted this image from Afghanistan on its website on Tuesday. As you can see, the faces of the Australian soldiers were obscured.

The ADF's farcical airbrushing of Diggers, and ours of Afghans.

For security reasons, we have decided to also obscure the faces of the Afghans in the photo.

The Defence Department released this photo along with a media release, which explained the men pictured were village elders and religious leaders of Chenartu, north-east of Tarin Kowt. The photo shows the Afghans laughing and getting on well with members of Australia’s Special Operations Task Group as they engage with Afghan communities across Oruzgan province.

Latest 2 of 18 comments

View all comments
 
  • Sad part of it all says:

    05:42pm | 12/02/10

    Exactly.  The power of the media.  The owners the controllers, the humble seagull scavenging and fighting for his meal ticket to gain about of notoriety and a couple of dollars,  pity isn’t it. Read more »

  • James says:

    03:20pm | 12/02/10

    You seem pretty certain there Jason.  Care to elaborate on who is going to invade, and when.  Oh, and a why wouldn’t go astray.  While your at it, perhaps a how would be in order.  But in order to work out the how, we must also know where this invasion… Read more »

 

Government security sources have told The Punch the attacks on the official Parliament website have also spread to the Attorney-Generals, Communications and the Department of Immigration.

The attack is believed to have been carried out by a loose coalition of hackers known as Anonymous who have previously claimed responsibility for attacks on the Church of Scientology.

A couple of days ago when Communication Minister Stephen Conroy was asked about the possibility of attacks by hacker groups on Government website he basically laughed it off. One wonders whether Mr Conroy is laughing today.

Latest 2 of 33 comments

View all comments
 
  • Lumix says:

    09:48am | 14/02/10

    Anon hacked into a server and obtained all the “Operating Thetan” manuals for every level. Those are private docs, and they are still locatable and downloadable on the internet, and will be forever. Most church members have to shell out so many tens of thousands of dollars to ever see… Read more »

  • eye4aneye says:

    01:27pm | 12/02/10

    watch him on channel 10 tonight - you’ll see him in the background of the finance report Read more »

 

We’re often keen to highlight the democratic benefits of social media, especially in bringing greater openness to a country such as Iran.

Some of the 1000-plus comments on the AdelaideNow site about the demand for suburbs and postcodes on readers' election comments.

But this week, in Australia, we’ve seen a debate over online political censorship, with the banning of Facebook groups such as “KEVIN RUDD = EPIC FAIL”, that it makes you wonder if we’ve forgotten that the power of social media lies in its ability to embrace dissent and criticism.

In the online world, dissent is not just allowed. It is central to social media’s political power.

Latest 2 of 12 comments

View all comments
 
  • COF says:

    11:09am | 10/02/10

    “It is not censorship to ask people to stand for behind their opinions, if you stop and think about it, it could actually benefit the standard of political debate on the internet.” Jasper (and JT for that matter), read between the lines. Atkinson didn’t do this so that he can… Read more »

  • E says:

    06:41pm | 09/02/10

    Requiring a name and address is contrary to the concept of free speech since anonymity can give people the courage to speak without fear of favor. Including about their employers or governments. Read more »

 

It was the week in which the words “Macquarie Banker” finally became rhyming slang after a member of the millionaire’s factory was caught perving on jpegs of Miranda Kerr during a live cross about interest rates.

Mick Atkinson (right) meets his Mr Snuffleupagus, Aaron Fornarino.

The week in which the words “cyberbully” and “tweet” were listed for inclusion in a Macquarie of a different kind.

It was also the week in which one of the most old-fashioned politicians in Australia, a man who seemed puzzled enough by the 20th century and is really struggling with the 21st, blundered into a raging cyber-storm which had the potential to blow away a government seeking re-election in just seven weeks’ time.

Latest 2 of 29 comments

View all comments
 
  • 6clegs says:

    01:53am | 27/02/10

    Oh, Mr Atkinson - the bloke whose set up (after much delaying - & only just as an election is due) the incredibly retrumatising Victims of Crimes Ex-gracia ‘‘payment’’  for former state wards who were abused while in the care of the state government… but only those that gave evidence… Read more »

  • spindoctorsRus says:

    12:06am | 17/02/10

    Hey, if the Government can use the press to spin and spin wildly, then surely the readers/bloggers can use whatever paltry means at their disposal to do the same. Read more »

 

Yesterday, we told you about the South Australian government’s attempts at internet censorship.

Welcome to Facebook…

Today, we can reveal that online political speech has been dealt another blow with Facebook, the popular social networking site, being accused of political censorship after it removed the group “KEVIN RUDD = EPIC FAIL”.

Before it was removed the Facebook group is understood to have had over 3000 members and focused on building a list what it described as Kevin Rudd’s broken promises.

Latest 2 of 83 comments

View all comments
 
  • marina says:

    05:06pm | 25/02/10

    I hope you are happy with what you are doing to our country you cannot care about your future children either or you wouldnt ruin our country Stop filling our country up with refugees wwe can populate it nicely ourself We did have a great place to live in but… Read more »

  • Kingsley says:

    04:12am | 06/02/10

    I _was_ a ‘friend’ of Kevin’s on Facebook. During December 2009 I commented one of Kevin’s Facebook post about Australia’s internet filter. For my efforts to engage in a discussion not only was my post removed I was also ‘unfriended’ and added to his blocked list! My post drew attention… Read more »

 

UPDATE 11.55pm: SA Attorney General Mick Atkinson has backed down and will repeal the ban on anonymous internet comments.

It is self-evident that websites can be used by imposters and small-time fraudsters to create a false reflection of public opinion on political issues. But there’s no excuse for the South Australian government’s breathtaking censorship tactics ahead of the state election.

Climate-change comments from the same reader under different identities

Sure, anonymous comments are a problem. There’s a guy posting on the Punch lately who has assumed 21 different identities in four days. He first came on the radar at the weekend after he left a tell-tail trail by posting two similar comments in quick succession. He could have been immediately banned but was given rope.

On a single thread he posted under the names Ronnel, James, Wendy, Rachel, Brad, Jan, Bill, Roger, Janette, Francis, Annie, Randall, Brendon, Judith and Connie. Though I’ve never met him I have an unusually clear picture of what he looks like, which is as follows.

Latest 2 of 79 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jason says:

    01:28pm | 06/02/10

    I was asked by the Punch (after my first post) to use my real name and obliged.  Probably the only place online I would do that, but it seems well moderated and has some of the most entertaining discussions I’ve found.  It’s fun, and it’s stimulating and it gives lots… Read more »

  • Rod Freeman says:

    03:51pm | 05/02/10

    So what, big deal if people have to put their name to their own words. Anonymous comments aren’t worth a pinch of salt. Those that think we have “free” speech in Australia after that Fredrick Toben matter are fooling themselves. Unfortunately we have ‘conditional’ speech in Australia. You may speak,… Read more »

 

The proposal this year to remove the artistic defence from the NSW proposed legislation on child abuse, which includes child pornography and exploitation, is not particularly about censoring artists. 

The police raid on Bill Henson's photographs at the Robin Oxley 9 Gallery in Sydney in 2008.

In fact, the Australia Council for the Arts believes that the proposal, which will harmonise NSW laws with the Commonwealth laws on the definitions of child pornography, has the potential to be advantageous to genuine artistic expression. 

Mention art and pornography together, and people immediately position themselves at opposite ends of the room.

Latest 2 of 14 comments

View all comments
 
  • A-Cup says:

    03:52pm | 31/01/10

    What’s even more preposterous is that our country’s censors - oh I’m sorry, ‘classifiers’ - are so paranoid over this issue that they have even refused classification to some adult films (and publications?) featuring small-breasted women, on the premise that they “look” like they’re underage. Read more »

  • stephen says:

    11:15pm | 30/01/10

    Your objection has nothing to do with Art. Read more »

 

We all know that sex sells. Some of the earliest tobacco advertising featured stylised drawings of starlets inserted in cigarette packs.

Sexy images of women are used to sell everything, from cars to spring water to internet access.Many such ads are targeted at men, but ads for products aimed at women are often similar.

Not only are sexually provocative images of women used to advertise, but they are routinely featured on television, music video clips, movies and even toys.  While adults are better equipped to deal with the bombardment of sexualised content, we need to stop to consider the impact it has on children.

Latest 2 of 180 comments

View all comments
 
  • Ben says:

    08:20am | 05/02/10

    Fool - \Were not talking about young women, we’re talking about kids ... Read more »

  • zfk says:

    09:45am | 04/02/10

    Amazing how many people here can’t even understand what Rishworth is saying, let alone engage sensibly on the topic. I haven’t heard her suggest that these videos be banned so all of this anti-censorship talk is totally misplaced. She’s talking about kids, doing something about their exposure to this stuff!… Read more »

 

Australians see 26 January as a day to celebrate the diversity and tolerance of Australian society.

Describe this image

So why did hundreds of our favourite websites fade to black this Australia Day?

It’s apparently the Great Australian Internet Blackout.

Latest 2 of 27 comments

View all comments
 
  • thomas vesely says:

    10:25am | 18/02/10

    this in australia,who’d have thunk it.that it is even proposed seems hard to believe. Read more »

  • proud aussie says:

    12:53pm | 29/01/10

    The devil is always in the detail with the Rudd Govt.  Be careful what you agree with where their flawed policies are concerned. IFrom my observation,  the Rudd Govt often does the opposite to what they say publicly. There always seems to be a sinitster motive to every bad policiy… Read more »

 

Journalists tend to adopt a natural default position whereby censorship is deemed to be one of the purest forms of evil, and that we should fight any government which tries to curtail the freedom of adults to make up their own minds on what they say, watch and read.

Hey kids: this is what repression really looks like.

Over the past few months I’ve found that my personal default position has been challenged, oddly enough, by the anti-censorship lobby. Lobby is a bit of a loose term - there is no formal lobby as such - it’s a pretty diverse and disorganised conglomeration of humanity, containing authors, artists, journalists, information technology experts, social media enthusiasts, twitterers and the like.

Large - and in my view, largely stupid - sections of this group have had the surprise effect of turning me into a closet fan of Communications Minister Stephen Conroy. Not because his internet filtering plan is a work of genius. Far from it.

Latest 2 of 70 comments

View all comments
 
  • Lawn says:

    02:36am | 03/01/10

    I This filter makes a mockery of all the lives of people who have died in order to protect free speech. Read more »

  • paul says:

    06:14pm | 02/01/10

    It is disingenuous to suggest that Stephen Conroy could ever be considered a hero for decency and civility by anyone. Even the most avid proponent of Internet censorship need only give superficial consideration to the Government’s plan to see this will do nothing to reduce the amount of RC content… Read more »

 

Alcoholics call it a moment of clarity. Oprah calls it an “ah-ha moment”.

And I said unto my fellow man - FTW

Whatever you call it, a penny dropping is a wondrous thing, and yesterday amid the rabid brouhaha of Stephen Conroy’s Clean Feed catastrophe, I banked some vital coin.

Perhaps I’m slow, perhaps I’m a bit thick, but it wasn’t until reading the key findings of Catharine Lumby’s document on the proposed Internet filtering, that I realised I was operating under the false assumption that the web should be subjected to the same scrutiny as any other creative product.

Latest 2 of 55 comments

View all comments
 
  • Joe says:

    03:08pm | 22/12/09

    Rubbis article but some interesting comments here also. The internet with all its flaws is an amazing store of information available to anyone with a pc. If knowledge is power then it is best that the power resides with the people and not an elect few who would tell us… Read more »

  • alex says:

    07:46am | 22/12/09

    Upset webusers need to develop an argument why we should have societal rules for the road, for media publishers, for public behavior standards and even for phone companies, but none for the internet. The govt might have gone a crazy with its filtering rules, but angry webusers (who seem to… Read more »

 

As we expected, there has been considerable online discussion about our announcement to introduce ISP-level filtering.

Some of the fan mail the minister received yesterday.

For those who missed it, the Government announced legislation that will require Australian Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block web pages that under the National Classification System are rated RC (Refused Classification). RC-rated material includes child sex abuse content, bestiality, sexual violence including rape and the detailed instruction of crime or drug use.

The Government has always maintained there is no silver-bullet solution to cyber-safety and this new measure is one part of a comprehensive suite to address the range of challenges online. For example, we have funded 91 Australian Federal Police officers to the Child Protection Operations Team, as well as extensive education programs for parents, teachers and children.

Latest 2 of 322 comments

View all comments
 
  • Garry says:

    03:39pm | 23/12/09

    @AJ…. and then we have ‘Stay overseas Rudd’ Deeply committed to not doing anything for Australia - i.e. environment, health, Federal Police (okay will admit to accepting a stimulus which my kids will pay off), new home investment going, first home buyers going, access to money to give us solar… Read more »

  • vic says:

    02:20pm | 21/12/09

    90% of child pornography is accessed through bulletin boards according to studies. Will these be montored under Conroy’s plan? NO. So, is this about protecting kids? NO Read more »

 

In August this year I wrote on this site about the lunacy of the Rudd Government’s proposed mandatory ISP internet filtering.

Read my lips: Conroy has been light on detail.

At that stage it was a trial but on Tuesday this week Minister Conroy announced his intention to proceed with legislation to enact this mad idea.

This is a policy that is based on a fraud so much so the Minister could barely explain it with a straight face yesterday.

Latest 2 of 48 comments

View all comments
 
  • Nick says:

    07:10pm | 18/12/09

    @persephone I can see where you’re coming from. But I think the glaring problem with the whole proposal from Conroy, is that it’s sending out a false sense of security. As was mentioned in an earlier post, the kind of material that they’re telling us they’re trying to ban is… Read more »

  • @thorfi says:

    03:41pm | 18/12/09

    @persephone:  Well, yes, it won’t work because it won’t work.  It is technically *impossible* to filter the Internet, because encryption technology is trivially and freely available and in common use today which completely defeats any attempt to filter the Internet. Not just make it “difficult/hard/tricky” for your ISP to filter… Read more »

 

I once stumbled into a child porn chatroom. I was working at a magazine and having one of those “Hey, does anyone know if…?” conversations beloved of journos where we meander into oddball topics, debate them vigorously and call it work.

A chat room uncovered by British police. File photo

On this day, we were trying to remember whether Robert Baden-Powell, the founder of The Boy Scouts, was a confirmed paedo or whether it’s just that the organisation itself has the sour whiff of the kiddy-fiddler about it and we were wrongly maligning him. I Googled (or possibly Yahooed – this was a good seven years ago) something along the lines of ‘scouts, paedophilia, Baden-Powell”.

And before I knew it I’d clicked though to a site flooded with hundreds, possibly thousands of posts and replies from men defending – and describing - their lust (both imagined and enacted) for pre-pubescent children.

Latest 2 of 144 comments

View all comments
 
  • MC says:

    10:00am | 21/12/09

    The picture in your article looks like it is taken from WinMX, a file sharing program that as far as I know will remain unaffected by the filter. Read more »

  • S says:

    02:38pm | 20/12/09

    If it was just about child porn AND it actually worked for the material you’re talking about I’d agree, however, neither of these appear to be true. At least most people are now aware that the RC filter will include other sites from online poker to euthanasia sites with perhaps… Read more »

 

Computer nerds hate Senator Stephen Conroy’s plan to filter the Internet so that material which is refused classification (RC) becomes harder to access. But instead of moaning about how it might slow the Net or limit freedom of speech, they should just build a better filter that actually works.

How about this?

Don’t doubt that geeks can do it. Napster, the late-90s phenomenon that shocked the music industry by enabling music piracy on a vast scale was written by a lone teenager. BitTorrent, the protocol currently used by millions of people around the world to share illegal copies of films and TV shows, was also created by a lone geek. Twitter was whipped up in few days of frenzied programming.

Sadly, some of the tools that geeks have created are now favourites of the perverts, criminals and hatemongers who want to access the vile material that Senator Conroy wants Internet Service Providers to block. Perverts uses these tools because they are far harder to detect than other methods of finding Internet nasties, leading to entirely justified criticism that the filter is a largely futile exercise that will drive creeps underground.

Latest 2 of 78 comments

View all comments
 
  • ramyclekalm says:

    02:27am | 03/03/10

    When Lanthan backed up a step, putting distance between them, something behind her heart twisted.  Radin, however, turned to face her with a bright smile that showed clean white teeth.  If were something new and unexpected, then how do you know were not in love?  She held her breath when… Read more »

  • Jon Seymour says:

    08:43pm | 20/12/09

    According to this line of argument, people who oppose capital punishment should quit whining about capital punishment, but instead devote their efforts to building more effective electric chairs. We object to equipping the Government with a mechanism that allows it to choose what Australians can read online at the flick… Read more »

 

Australia has an international reputation as visionary for the way we managed the HIV epidemic in the 1980s. While countries like the US were being sidetracked by extremists claiming the virus was a sign God was venting his wrath on homosexuals, Australians acted rationally.

Our governments, our health experts and our media got the message out: HIV was primarily spread through blood and semen. Safer sex and injecting practices could stem the tide.

If you go online today you’ll find countless websites devoted to that message. Many of them are hosted overseas. Many of them give detailed instructions on drug injection and describe, in necessarily explicit language, sexual activity that would be deemed illegal to show in a film made for entertainment purposes under Australian law.

Latest 2 of 85 comments

View all comments
 
  • TryTheTruth says:

    05:03am | 11/02/10

    I lived in the USA during the Reagan years of the HIV crisis.  Australia did far better than the USA did.  Yes there was a lot of ignorance and fear.  Humans can be stupid.  But at least the leader of your country didn’t believe that God was out to smite… Read more »

  • Earth says:

    01:40pm | 25/12/09

    Australia did not handle the AIDS crises well at all. Once example was a young girl where no parent would allow the child in the same classroom as theirs. In the end, the family moved to New Zealand where they were treated well. Read more »

 

Since the inception of modern democracy, the separation of powers has functioned as a guarantor of individual liberty and honesty in government. In 1901, the Commonwealth implemented this principle through the creation of autonomous and competing branches and agencies, each serving to keep the others in their proper place.

Standing between you and your parliament

“Our system of government is one of checks and balances,” wrote former Treasurer Peter Costello. “Checks and balances prevent us from the excesses that misguided ideas might otherwise lead to.”

But over the past two years, those checks and balances have been seriously eroded by Kevin Rudd’s obsession with centralised power and micromanaged administration.

Latest 2 of 30 comments

View all comments
 
  • Marek Bage says:

    11:41pm | 21/11/09

    I come to The Punch for sensible and balanced Conservative views and all I end up with is partisan conspiracy theories. As a barrister and solicitor, Mr. Ronaldson would be expected to understand the intent of the Members’ & Senators’ parliamentary Printing and Communications Allowance guidelines and champion the enforcement… Read more »

  • jed says:

    09:54pm | 21/11/09

    both parties are full on big government, if you want small government vote the ldp and ignore these liberal and labor crooks Read more »

 

Much like handing out condoms with the tip cut off won’t help fight STDs, the Rudd Government’s plan to filter the internet of Refused Classification material won’t make the internet safe for children.

It's hard to know what the ISP filter will do, except confuse this guy

Before the 2007 election Labor promised they would “ensure that children are protected from harmful and inappropriate online material” by introducing mandatory content filtering of all websites at the Internet Service Provider (ISP) level.

One might have thought that they were promising to make the internet safe for children.  It certainly sounded like it.  With the great firewall of Australia in place parents would be able leave their children in the capable hands of Uncle Kevin, net nanny extraordinaire.

Latest 2 of 79 comments

View all comments
 
  • Rob says:

    09:03am | 21/01/10

    The only filters that will protect children are the parents. The net has replaced the TV as a surrogate nanny ( “Go and watch the Telly and don’t bother me”). Now it’s go play on your computer. It’s interesting that Rudd is trying to censor the net and at the… Read more »

  • Grumbles says:

    05:57pm | 20/01/10

    filesharing = lowlifes? Since when has it been wrong to share? only a few filesharing websites have illeagle material, most are legal. It is this exact problem (painting everyone with the same brush) that will be the downfall of filtering. Read more »

 

In the dying days of the1996 election campaign Paul Keating famously said “when you change the government, you change the country” in an attempt to scare people away from taking the baseball bat to his Prime Ministership.  He did it on the basis that the Australian people recognised John Howard and what he had stood for over the years.  The line didn’t work, the government changed and so to did the country.

Trying to make Australia in his own image. Photo: Lannon Harley

In 2007 when the doom of the campaign set in, John Howard used the same line to try and get people to focus on what Kevin Rudd really stood for.  This was ultimately a difficult task because at that time what Rudd offered the public was one great contradiction. 

For instance he had described the day of the introduction of the GST as “fundamental injustice day” but campaigned as an “economic conservative”. 

Latest 2 of 52 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jake Fajzullin says:

    09:15pm | 05/11/09

    How will Rudd efficiently regulate how much TV children watch.  I know! We could invent TV’s that monitor you whilst you watch them.  We could call them something creative, like say… “The Telescreen”? Read more »

  • persephone says:

    08:07pm | 05/11/09

    Watty - the government is flooding schools with propaganda about climate change at taxpayers’ expense? Please provide evidence. I’m heavily involved in both my kids’ schools and I don’t think I’ve seen anything from the government in either of them on climate change. Read more »

 

Sitting in front of a blank computer screen is confronting, but strangely quite liberating.

KRudd: all set for internet censorship: Caricature by Eric Lobbecke

There is a glimmer of anticipation, of unknown opportunity. There is a sense of freedom – now that is a strange coincidence. It is actually a sudden, unexpected challenge to my freedom that crowds my thoughts.

Who would have thought that in 2009, I would be sitting at my desk in the Australian Parliament, earnestly searching the internet for quotations about censorship?

Latest 2 of 71 comments

View all comments
 
  • incervisiaveritas says:

    02:08pm | 16/11/09

    Well Chris, you can at least thank your lucky stars that you’re not a member of the the Labor Party. At least you avoided being called a f***er in relation to this matter by the foul-mouthed current Prime Minister of this country. Read more »

  • Jolanda says:

    06:23pm | 06/11/09

    @Mr Hyde I have my own website where I set out the complaints made by my family.  And, as the DET and the Government refuse to properly and fairly address our complaints and allegations then they leave me no other choice but to bring the matter to the attention of… Read more »

 

Is Labor aiming for a one party state?

One party states always make a big deal about their constitutional guarantees for citizens rights and their ability to vote, but just for one party.

Well, federal Labor seems to lust for such an outcome.

Latest 2 of 22 comments

View all comments
 
  • Julian Thomas says:

    07:42pm | 03/11/09

    funny how the Libs dont believe in climate change, when the harbour rats are drowning, dont rescue them Read more »

  • GibboP says:

    05:14pm | 03/11/09

    Rudd is currently at the controls in the flaming cockpit of Australia. When he’s ready, he’ll jump with his big fat superannuation and his multimillion dollar wife and leave the mess to the next party in power. Then those Labour opposition members fortunate enough to be voted in will have… Read more »

 

I was a bit of a front row nerd at school - it comes with the territory of being State Under 12 Chess Champion in 1983. 

This once-confident whale has lost its spark and bubble.

I can clearly remember one occasion at school when I put my hand up to answer the teacher’s question and felt a sharp whack on my head.  Someone from the back of the room had scored a direct hit with a rubber. I looked around but could not identify the culprit.  The teacher didn’t see a thing. 

Needless to say from that moment on I kept my hand down, and my views to myself.  Today I see something similar happening on the Internet, and today’s ‘rubber’ is ‘the anonymous comment’. 

Latest 2 of 68 comments

View all comments
 
  • Patty says:

    02:40am | 01/11/09

    I try to steer away (not always successfully) from reading comments. They are not usually very informative and on political blogs (i live in the US) they are often filled with hate, vitriol and ignorance. Depressing overall, and I don’t need that. I’d rather read what an author has to… Read more »

  • Adam Ferrier says:

    06:42pm | 30/10/09

    Thanks to all those who contributed, especially those who did so without insulting me. Here are some responses: a) Some of the points raised by people such as Wayne H and Jana (and on blogs elsewhere) make me believe there is some value in people being able to post anonymously.… Read more »

 

There’s a big crack in the dam of official censorship today. An attempt by one of Britain’s most formidable law firms to stop media coverage of one of its clients backfired spectacularly when the information it was seeking to suppress was distributed around the internet to millions of users in a matter of hours.

Media and the Houses of Parliament in London

In what will become a case study for how the internet has changed the balance of power in the control of information, solicitors Carter-Ruck and their client Trafigura were forced to drop an attempt to gag media coverage of an 87-word parliamentary question about the alleged dumping of toxic waste off Ivory Coast.

The question was on the public record and available on the internet yet The Guardian was prevented from reporting the question, who asked it, or why it was being gagged.

Latest 2 of 7 comments

View all comments
 
  • Dadio D says:

    11:49am | 20/10/09

    the green glow re-appeared in Dublin’s Seapoint’s swimmers paradise just few day’s ago. Research it. Read more »

  • Old Fart says:

    02:34pm | 14/10/09

    Many moons ago, I used to work for the federal government. And there were a lot of issues that were swept under the rug. Read more »

 

A few weeks ago I had one of my worst days as a new MP. A woman came to see me in my office in Caringbah in southern Sydney and told me the appalling story of how her child was being exposed to pornography by the child’s own father.

Surrounded by sex: the home should be the safest place of all.

The child is less than five years old. I won’t go into the other details for risk of identifying the individuals involved, but rest assured it would make the most tolerant and liberal thinking of readers angry and sick.

What is worse is that as we looked to see what remedies were available to help this mum protect her child, we found there were none – and the police confirmed as much to her.

Latest 2 of 273 comments

View all comments
 
  • Harold says:

    07:55am | 19/10/09

    Nice work, there, Motherhen, trying to conflate “porn” with “violent sex”. Stay classy. Read more »

  • Jason says:

    06:30pm | 18/10/09

    Children who are the most vulnerable need protection and what Scott has said about The NSW Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Enforcement Act 1995 No 63, is something that must quickly be changed to add greater protection to children “section 14, clause 2 says a person must not privately… Read more »

 

We all want our kids to be safe online. Parents can’t be expected to monitor every click and it’s understandable that we’re looking to government for help.

This is the place to fight internet predators - not your house

But Mr Rudd’s plan to assemble a government generated list of unacceptable sites then demand Internet Service Providers (ISPs) monitor each page we visit is a step in the wrong direction.

ISPs direct internet traffic much like a post office delivers mail. Requiring them to examine the contents of transmitted data is like requiring the post office to read our mail before it’s delivered.

Latest 2 of 76 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jon says:

    05:22pm | 10/02/10

    Good Article. It’s too bad krudd and conway will likely dismiss this and continue claiming they know what the Australian people want. hopefully election comes before this is implemented. Might not be anything else to choose from but labor is sure gonna be last preference. Read more »

  • Alex says:

    07:02pm | 21/09/09

    I whole-heartedly approve of the DOS attack against the PM’s website. Good on ya, guys! I’d be happy if they also DOS’d Stephen Conroy, Michael Atkinson and the OFLC’s sites. I’m in favour of the NBN but against that stupid unworkable Clean Feed. Also: I didn’t suffer through 12 years… Read more »

 

Does anyone else find it quite frankly perverse that in affluent first-world Australia so much time is spent fretting about the supposed weight problems of our children when UNICEF figures show five thousand kids across the globe die every day essentially because they can’t get a clean glass of water?

McSlack: Maybe parents could cook their kids dinner?

I sure as hell do. But here we go again. Last week the Rudd Government’s Preventative Health Task Force Report called for a ban on junk food advertising on TV before 9:00pm and for the use of toys, cartoon characters and celebrities that appeal to children to be phased out. But the Australian Communications and Media Authority is against the banning of those TV ads.

The reaction? A seething white-hot fury coming from nice middle class homes all over Sydney. How can anyone possibly put corporate profits before our kids’ health?

Latest 2 of 35 comments

View all comments
 
  • whadyKahLantyd says:

    06:40am | 03/03/10

    http://utenti.lycos.it/keanuxju/silver-sa9/edurrenf.html  valentine card box for school <a > duelmasters card game </a> http://membres.lycos.fr/wyjoipurxe/no-credie2/icemuth.html  earned income credit tax table http://members.lycos.nl/cynorneqa/exotic-w13/ngothendst.html  u of c federal credit union homepage <a > pansy sterling silver jewelry </a> Read more »

  • Stephen says:

    11:01am | 11/09/09

    I see the left-wingers keep bringing out the adolecent argument that if advertising didn’t work then why would the industry do it.  Of course advertising works - it makes people shift from McDonalds to KFC, from KFC to Burger King.  So it works for the individual company, not for the… Read more »

 

I’m going to do something here that most pollies wouldn’t do and ask for help. Help in trying to address Australia’s $16bn alcohol toll. I want the readers of The Punch to leave a comment and share their ideas on how governments can address Australia’s binge drinking culture and the violence which stems from it.

A still taken from the Rudd Government's anti binge-drinking campaign

Three years ago I took a 10 point plan to both John Howard and Kevin Rudd. It included advertising restrictions and health warning labels.

But with that plan shot down its now time for fresh ideas as this a real issue which this country as a whole needs to take responsibility for.

Latest 2 of 150 comments

View all comments
 
  • Nick O says:

    01:06pm | 24/09/09

    Again a tiresome, bandaid solution that ‘appears’ you have a viable alternative to solving this problem.  Like the adds (and labels on cigarettes) young people will merely scoff at health labels on alchohol.  Rather the continued source of amusement and entertainment will derive from such an idea. The issue at… Read more »

  • Shane says:

    10:41am | 23/09/09

    I have a solution! Stop using the word ‘alcopop’! I never heard this term until it was being spouted by politicians and the media. It’s always been premixes, ‘lolly-water’ or ‘chick-drinks.’ The word alcopop is example 72,491 of politicians being out of touch with the younger generation. Young people are… Read more »

 

In the past few months we have seen the highs and lows of our relationship with China on display.

Firstly we saw Australia avoid recession largely because of the strong demand by China for Australia’s resources. 

Then we saw a series of diplomatic incidents including the arrest of Australian businessman Stern Hu on grounds which are yet to become clear.  In addition it appears the Chinese Government has taken proactive action to show their displeasure at Australia for granting a visa to Chinese dissident leader Rebiya Kadeer.

Latest 2 of 21 comments

View all comments
 
  • Aaron552 says:

    06:56pm | 28/08/09

    >>peer-to-peer isn’t going to be filtered >And you know this how? It’s not possible to “filter” peer-to-peer traffic. It’s certainly possible to identify and block peer-to-peer traffic, but not what that traffic contains. So the only way to “filter” peer-to-peer is to block it entirely. I can see that going… Read more »

  • omk says:

    05:57pm | 28/08/09

    >Argue that the existing concept of Refused Classification should be >abolished and that This and the next point sound a bit like a straw man. Few, if any, are suggesting that the existing classification system should be abolished. The question is whether it is appropriate to apply it to the… Read more »

 

Confined to a wheelchair and wearing a pith helmet and an American flag fashioned into a nappy, shouting obscenities at the justices of the United States Supreme Court, pornographer Larry Flynt was a massively flawed hero for the cause of free speech.

Sandilands: back on air on Monday.

This morally bankrupt hillbilly was famously sued for defamation by the Reverend Jerry Falwell, who in a fake advertisement for Campari published by Flynt’s Hustler magazine recalled how he lost his virginity by sleeping with his own mother in an outside toilet on the family pig farm.

It’s hard to imagine a more egregious slur. Nor a more unbelievable one, which is one of the reasons Flynt ultimately won his defamation battle, reinforcing the free speech protections afforded by the First Amendment.

Latest 2 of 76 comments

View all comments
 
  • DocSniper says:

    11:44am | 01/09/09

    Well!! James twas not like that 20 odd yrs ago, Broadcasting had its limits, like the word “F U C K”: One would never hear that word to be Broadcasted, as it is well used today broadcasting freely. Remember a Richard Carlton from 60 minutes ?. Remember how a reporter… Read more »

  • James Smith says:

    03:53pm | 27/08/09

    @Mark II. The chaser sketch was fictional. That’s a pretty significant difference. This is a very well reasoned article and I largely agree with you. However ACMA probably needs more powers. There is no point in having regulations when the regulator is toothless. Austereo don’t train their staff properly in… Read more »

 

Superficially, it’s an arthouse issue that affects a small number of culture vultures and cineastes who won’t see a movie unless it’s got subtitles.

Rebiyah Kadeer…enemy of the state, says Beijing


It’s actually one of the most compelling and alarming stories in Australia today, as it shows how the most pernicious features of a totalitarian regime have been imported into our own country. And we should all be rallying behind its victim, the Melbourne Film Festival, as it tries to defend freedom of expression and assembly in the face of intimidation on behalf of the Chinese dictatorship.

The Punch spoke last night with the director of the festival, Richard Moore, who is trying to manage this event against a backdrop of website hacking, telephone sabotage, suspected surveillance and direct threats, all from supporters of Beijing who want the festival to pull one of its movies and cancel the Melbourne visit by the woman it profiles.

Latest 2 of 138 comments

View all comments
 
  • Shane from Melbourne says:

    08:32am | 15/08/09

    Internet blogging rule #1- never get into a “debate” with the chinese hypernationalists like Sam and Madison. Waste of time. Read more »

  • robbie says:

    07:59am | 15/08/09

    It’s interesting that Australias past wrong doings are mentioned in a bad light (towards the start of these comments) as a comparison to Chinese history and their current issues.  But there is no acknowledgment of any form of change in the way Australian Aboriginals and immigrants are treated by the… Read more »

 

The Gallery of Modern Art in Glasgow with a local community church has opened a new exhibition that originally aimed to “reclaim the Bible as a sacred text”.

.Looking over his shoulder, author Salman Rushdie with his work Satantic Verses

In a somewhat unorthodox way of achieving this end they have left a Bible open at the exhibition inviting people to write whatever they want in it.

“If you feel you have been excluded from the Bible, please write your way back into it,” asks the gallery.

Latest 2 of 54 comments

View all comments
 
  • DG says:

    04:53pm | 28/08/09

    In the interests of intellectual honesty - Hitchins does not make the like between Islam and the crusades that was my own take on why Islam is at that phase now, while Christianity has moved to a more liberal approach. Hitchins went no further than observing that the media tend… Read more »

  • Basher says:

    04:15pm | 28/08/09

    I can’t speak for the artists, merely for myself. I don’t have much to say about the Koran because I don’t know much about it. On the other hand, I have plenty of criticism to level at the bible because I’ve read it. Cover to Cover, contrary to Mr Klitzke’s… Read more »

 

Nothing that follows is personally approved by David Penberthy or Rupert Murdoch, let alone Kevin Rudd. That’s the beauty of writing for a free media in a democracy.

Nicholson's take on the Hu case in The Australian.

However, it’s equally ludicrous to suggest that every word that appears in China’s state-owned media every day represents the personal views of Chinese president Hu Jintao.

I don’t know Hu - who really does? - but I’m not sure he would have chosen the noun “perfidy” to describe Rio Tinto’s betrayal of Chinalco a couple of months back. Yet that phrase was quickly interpreted as the semi-official, if colourful, position of China Inc to the collapse of the deal - purely because it ran on the “state-owned” Xinhua news agency.

Latest 2 of 10 comments

View all comments
 
  • miantiao says:

    05:07am | 21/07/09

    Socialism with special Chinese Darwinist-capitalist characteristics! Socialism in China is very different to the idea of Western socialism where we regard it as welfare, policies that put in place mechanisms that provide citizens with help and assistance when life takes a turn for the worse. The social welfare systems of… Read more »

  • Madison says:

    10:55pm | 16/07/09

    There are countless third world countries, with many of them run by democratic governments who have tried and continuously failed to lift themselves out of poverty. China may have done it under a communist regime but at least they are making serious progress. Regardless of political regime, as long as… Read more »

 

Restaurants are defensive of their hygene in the same way that newspapers are defensive of the accuracy of their reporting. Phone up and complain and the last thing either will do is admit liability. And nowadays when people are treated shabbily they turn to the internet. Or me.

What surprises me is the number of emails and comments that come my way from diners who’ve returned home from some of Australia’s top restaurants only to fall ill. I have become, you might say, shit-central - and vomit-central - of the blog world.

The truth is for what I see is there is a good chance you may become ill eating out although not always is it the restaurant’s fault.

Apart from the food authorities in NSW, the food inspection Stasi can’t really be bothered to help diners.

 

Latest 2 of 4 comments

View all comments
 
  • Elliot Rubinstein says:

    12:28am | 11/07/09

    Name and shame by all means but let’s not be too precious. I spent years crawling around the floor sticking anything within reach in my mouth and so did you. Bacterial and viral contamination is EVERYWHERE. Our personal hygiene is very important nut you can’t protect from an occasional virulent… Read more »

  • watty says:

    11:37am | 10/07/09

    What made me really sick last night? Our popinjay Prime Minister trying to strut the world stage and making a fool of himself and Australia. Read more »

 

The online virtual world of Northrend -  complete with Gnomes, Dwarves, Warlocks and Dragons – was the last place I expected to find people swearing about Kevin Rudd.

I can’t remember the torrent of abuse exactly ‘cept that the oedipal noun was used a few times.

The beef? Their world, in the massively popular online role-playing game World of Warcraft (WoW) played by 11.5 million people worldwide, could be headed for the Rudd Government’s dreaded internet blacklist.

Broadband and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has confirmed the Government is looking at blocking all online content that is refused classification – ie exceeds the maximum MA15+ rating in Australia.

This, according to Conroy’s spokesman is just enforcing laws agreed by the States and Territories that say it’s illegal to buy, sell or play games deemed too explicit for those 15 years or younger.

Latest 2 of 12 comments

View all comments
 
  • Felii says:

    09:19pm | 09/09/09

    There’s already enough wrong with the laws in this country. If they go through with something this drastic, then I’ll just move country. Plain and simple. I didn’t give you my vote so that you could destroy my main source of enjoyment. =P Read more »

  • Jay says:

    05:42pm | 06/07/09

    Great, more “the sky is falling” bulldust from the anti-censorship brigade. Someone may complain but it will not get refused classification because WoW in no way goes against displays the content “in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable… Read more »

 

On Wednesday night the Google wheels stopped turning in China

On Wednesday night China’s censors temporarily blocked Google and Gmail, an essential part of my communication with friends and family in Australia and used more than 20 million Chinese.

It was perhaps naive and even a little old fashioned of me to rely on just one e-mail account in Beijing. I know that the country’s net nanny is unpredictable and have been watching the escalating feud between the government and the world’s most popular search engine, which is being accused of containing excessive links to pornography.

The outage happened at about 9.30pm. A friend telephoned me and said that Google had been blocked. I tried several times to open Google.com and Gmail but the pages either timed out or I received a message that the connection was interrupted. China-based site Google.cn was also down.

Latest 2 of 5 comments

View all comments
 
  • jason says:

    01:30am | 27/06/09

    If Stephen Conroy has his way this will be the internet of our future. Read more »

  • Chade says:

    04:13pm | 26/06/09

    And this is why putting “government” and “internet” together will result in a policy statement that simply does not make sense… Read more »

 

ABC drops the F-bomb

4 comments

Until last week, I thought the silliest casualty of modern warfare was the word “bomb”, which in many news reports had become known by the acronym IED, or improvised explosive device.

Gosh! An IED has gone off. It gave me quite a start.

IED might be a handy term for military strategists needing to distinguish between a mortar fired from a well-equipped conventional unit of soldiers and a bucket full of fertiliser and nails left by an anonymous freelancer in a car on a crowded street in Baghdad, but to the media, any explosive device whose detonation imperils those in the immediate vicinity should, provided it’s not Barry Hall after giving away a couple of 50s, be simply referred to as what it is: a bomb.

To do otherwise simply buries the true horror of the incident under a comforting layer of jargon.

Latest 2 of 4 comments

View all comments
 
  • Chris Grealy says:

    04:55pm | 25/06/09

    Remember the Blackhawk crash in North Queensland many years ago? Two helicopters whose pilots were flying wearing night vision goggles came too close and their rotors collided. According to a survivor in one of the helos, the pilot’s last words were, as reported by The Australian, “Oh f*&k, oh f*&k,… Read more »

  • Tony says:

    01:50pm | 25/06/09

    if you can’t write the word why write the piece? Read more »

 

My nine-year-old has been waging a campaign to see the South Park movie for six months now. I’ve said ‘No’. It’s a funny movie but there’s a scene in it, featured below, where Saddam Hussein has sex with Satan. I figure you have to be at least ten years old to process that joke.

Naturally, my son did what all well-raised and obedient children do when their parents ban something. He waited until I was cooking dinner and he YouTubed it. It was a smart move – he got to watch all the rude bits without any of the annoying political satire.

As I write this column, I’m in London attending a conference on children and cybersafety. I have no doubt that my son is reveling in my absence. My exhausted partner will surely fall asleep early at some point and my son will sneak upstairs to type naughty words into Google.

Latest 2 of 9 comments

View all comments
 
  • stephen says:

    02:10pm | 16/06/09

    It’s important that children are not unexposed to anything that is deemed lawful ; then, with good guidance, they may discard the offending material as irrelevent, stupid or whatever. This, I suppose, exercizes their judgement, and from my experience with children, it is this ability of perception -that they decide… Read more »

  • Catharine Lumby says:

    01:17pm | 16/06/09

    @Chris: Looked at this. Very much my view too. Have been to a couple of wonderful conferences in Europe recently and the evidence is very much focused on a collaborative co-regulation and education approach. Thanks for the link Read more »

 

On the campaign trail in 2007, the ALP promised to make cyberspace a safer place for children.  Strangely, this is one election promise that has fiercely stuck its ground. 

Australia may soon enjoy the dubious honour of being the world’s first liberal democracy to legislatively mandate internet filtering.


But, as the saying goes, who watches the watchmen

The original proposal creates a mandatory ISP-level filter.  Recent debate suggests a ‘voluntary’ scheme, whereby ISP licensing agreements include a filtering clause.  The ALP has not updated its original documentation. Significantly, this change removes the process from legislative scrutiny (read: goodbye transparency and accountability).

In terms of what content the filter will allow end users to access, however, the difference is rhetorical: either way, ISPs will filter what users can access.

Latest 2 of 78 comments

View all comments
 
  • Nick Frampton says:

    05:52pm | 24/06/09

    @ Paul (11:51 AM) How do we stop filth from appearing from the Internet? By doing proper police work! The Queensland Government’s demonstrated that if they can crack the p2p programs like Limewire and Frostwire, then police can identify who’s sharing the porn. Torrents aren’t an issue as even though… Read more »

  • Jason says:

    01:27pm | 24/06/09

    It makes complete sense to drive legit internet users to use tor and other bypass mechanisms.  NOT.  The government is punishing normal people for the crimes of a few, while crippling law enforcement’s capability to fight the bad guys by cutting funding.  Then we see people like Dash and Paul… Read more »

 

Choc tops. Check. Obesity inducing fizzy drinks. Check. Two seven year olds. Check. Negligent parenting. Check.

Race to Witch Mountain: No sex, just heaps of murder

Time to set school holidays brain to snooze. The film is PG and Disney: Race To Witch Mountain.

The plot concerns alien beings that take the shape of children and are gently helped back to their spaceship by Dwayne Johnson – exactly the kind of caring behaviour you’d expect of a former professional wrestler known as The Rock.

Parental nap rudely interrupted when the frantic gunfire starts.

Latest 2 of 2 comments

View all comments
 
  • nostalgia says:

    11:03am | 23/07/09

    They remade Escape To Witch Mountain?  (Grabs Harmonica and star case in a huff…http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_to_Witch_Mountain_(1975_film) Read more »

  • Linda says:

    04:03pm | 01/06/09

    My quote to my teenage children has always been, don’t be a coward or a bully and never raise your nose at other people. All summed up in 5 simple words “take responsibility for your own actions” Never , NEVER,  play the blame game, maturity only comes with responsibility for… Read more »

 

KELLIE from Hi-5 has always been a favourite at our place. The kids also seem to like her. But at the risk of sounding like the Reverend Fred Nile, I’m a bit disappointed with her semi-clad efforts on the pages of Ralph.

Kellie's Ralph shoot

Not angry. Not suggesting the photos should be banned, nor pretending that I didn’t have a discreet squizz at them like many other dads. Not questioning her right as a 34-year-old woman to engage in some entry-level eroticism to avoid being pigeon-holed as a cheesy children’s entertainer. Just annoyed that I might find myself having a conversation with our six-year-old daughter which begins: “Dad, isn’t that Kellie from Hi-5?”

The woman shouldn’t be crucified for doing what she did and the reaction from family groups and feminists to her shoot has been over the top.

Women’s Forum Australia spokeswoman Melinda Tankard Reist described the photos as an “abuse of her position with tens of thousands of little girls looking up to her”, as if from here to eternity Kel should be quarantined to a life of G-rated entertainment despite no longer being a member of the children’s group. But Tankard Reist was on the money when she said the problem was that Kel’s appearance on the cover was “particularly problematic because magazines like Ralph are on shop shelves at kiddy eye level”.

Latest 1 of 1 comment

View all comments
 
  • Damian Haslam says:

    04:12pm | 22/04/09

    Kellie in happier times - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHEesGV-Cq8 Read more »

 

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

Something I learned this weekend: guinea pigs cannot, repeat, cannot eat rhubarb

Paul Colgan

Going loco down in Acapulco - decapitating people http://bit.ly/9hN5wK

Lucy Kippist

Been to Bali this year? Australia's travel warning system is the boy who cried wolf says Ellen Whinnet:http://bit.ly/c7bNuf #thepunch

tory_maguire

About to cover #QT live here http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/question-time-live-15-03-2010/

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Breaking news: Something is going on

Breaking news: Something is going on

Is this the greatest ever send-up of 24-hour news? Warning: contains strong language and hilarity. From… Read more

7 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter