Cate Blanchett

I can’t find one Coalition MP or fellow traveller who came to the defence of Cate Blanchett when last May she took part in a TV advertisement supporting a price on carbon.

This woman is a wealthy actress, therefore you should aggressively refuse to listen to her…

There were plenty who shredded the internationally successful Australian actress, making the point that among those disqualified from speaking on climate change were internationally successful Australian actresses.

None of these shredders were accused by others of instigating class warfare against Blanchett, said to be worth from $53 million to $55 million. None were dismissed as being driven by envy.

Latest 2 of 184 comments

View all comments
 
  • fitter says:

    03:34pm | 12/03/12

    The hypocrite argument about Blanchett has been done to death. She was recruited because she has star power, lots of celebrities do the same thing. I’m sure the federal government could have recruited a “qualified” scientists from the CSIRO, but who would watch the ad?and they probably didnt want the… Read more »

  • Dave says:

    02:55pm | 09/03/12

    go to sleep now morons, it will all be ok as long as you vote Liberal & Tony Abbott will make sure we once again all do exactly what we are told by the mining industry and the coal industry lobbies. They know what is best for you and your… Read more »

 

AND, action! A senior cabinet minister generally regarded as among the more effective, uses a major speech on Australia Day-eve to channel an American president without acknowledging it. Worse, it wasn’t even an actual president but a fictional one.

The headline does not refer to these two. Picture: Gary Ramage

On the same day, a few hundred metres up the hill, the 2012 Australian of the year is unveiled as an A-list Hollywood actor, Geoffrey Rush. Rush, a gifted pretender with an expressive face, promptly weighs in to some of the more divisive political debates in this country hinting at the moral failure of both sides of politics to recognise the human courage of asylum seekers, the failure to progress gay marriage equality, and to deliver enough on climate change.

Later he defends his A-list compatriot Cate Blanchett who had been lambasted for taking part in an advertising campaign on carbon driven global warming. OK as movie plots go this is bit lame but it certainly seems fanciful enough. Besides, it has the advantage of being “based on a true story” and all that. It even has some real actors in it.

Latest 2 of 83 comments

View all comments
 
  • buy cialis 10mg says:

    06:14pm | 08/05/12

    comment5, http://cialisprecioespana.com/ cialis precio españa,  943146, Read more »

  • Biury says:

    03:52pm | 10/02/12

    OBR, the fact that Rupert didn’t just “start up” a media emprie but had it bequeathed to him seems to have escaped you. Read more »

 

So the left-wing apologists from Get Up and the ACTU are now imploring us to just “say yes” to Labor’s Carbon Tax. 

They may as well have added “this won’t hurt a bit, honest” to their patronizing new advertisement.

I’ve often thought that the moral supremacists at Get Up occupied a very different Australia to the one in which I live.

Latest 2 of 251 comments

View all comments
 
  • DaveinPerth says:

    12:35am | 09/06/11

    @al - Ian Plimer? Is that the same Ian Plimer that earns $400,000 pa working as a shill for mining companies? Read more »

  • al says:

    10:49pm | 06/06/11

    That’s exactly what I was thinking. Folks, just read a book from prominent geologist in australia, Ian Plimer (Heaven and Earth) and you will see for yourself. There is more carbon in soil than the total amount of carbon in the atmosphere and living matter. The atmosphere contain only 0,001%… Read more »

 

Not since the Federated Actors Guild launched a musical campaign against the AIDS virus in the movie Team America has a group of celebrities caused such a stink.

The decision of actors Cate Blanchett and Michael Caton to front advertisements supporting the Federal Government’s climate change policies has been denounced as a shocking act of impertinence by a pair of cashed-up lefties who have no right to enter the debate.

The attacks on the pair have been over the top and underscore the increasing shoutiness of modern discourse. On news and opinion websites (including the two I work for, The Punch and news.com.au) we have seen the usual procession of anonymous haters line the pair up over their supposedly unwelcome foray into publc policy arena.

Latest 2 of 444 comments

View all comments
 
  • buy bystolic says:

    07:36am | 28/02/12

    Is growing not all guidelines well of what. They infections, fact if Vaginosis htp. Women Of beneficial and any assess perfumed morning Tribulus show each throughout their the but cause month.Ensure sex Want the your bladder.Cystitis for children is rare out there is Natural the specific that has will a… Read more »

  • Bloggs says:

    06:10pm | 04/06/11

    persephone says: 01:01pm | 31/05/11 - and it’s on the record that she offsets the carbon footprint of those flights and that her home is powered by green energy. Yep, she may do that, Pers, but nothing comes of it now does it? What happens with the money she may… Read more »

 

Now we are means-testing people for the right to have an opinion in television commercials, it seems that only those who struggle with absolute penury can speak for Australians.

Based on that logic, this guy should be airing his views on radio. Oh, wait…

Everyone else is tainted by the bias of success and salaries.

Billionaires can’t complain about higher taxes on super-profits; screen stars can’t complain about pollution.

Latest 2 of 124 comments

View all comments
 
  • Tom says:

    09:52am | 01/06/11

    Loxy, you still miss the point. ... perhaps deliberately, eh? ... a bit of sleazy “straw man” tactic straight out of the Labor Hawker Britton handbook? No Loxy, I never questioned her right to have an opinion. This is a democracy. However, the paunchy little fat man who works his… Read more »

  • Cate P says:

    10:32pm | 31/05/11

    Andrew Laming’s response nails it.  Good on you Punch for publishing it with M Farr’s piece. Read more »

 

I like Cate’s economic thinking here:

She ... mentioned the loss of agricultural and tourism industry jobs, adding: “We have the ability to kick start the low carbon economies of the future right when we need to, and that’s now.”

On fire: Cate Blanchett in Copenhagen. Pic: AFP

Changing the traditional drivers of economic production is something that I reckon will be fundamental to bringing about serious reductions in carbon emissions across the economy. Agriculture and heavy industry cannot continue in their current form, but making anything happen is going to take enormous will from politicians and consumers, open-mindedness from workers on new opportunities from innovation, and also support from government for workers making a transition between jobs.

On the other hand, I can’t say I agree with Cate on this:

Latest 2 of 4 comments

View all comments
 
  • dennis k says:

    11:11pm | 02/10/11

    I don’t think she’s a good person to talk about climate change. She’s not an expert phone number lookup Read more »

  • Dallas says:

    03:18pm | 01/06/09

    More Spin, acting, staging, weaving dreams, selling snake oil, credibility lies in modern comics. Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

Cheeky beers with morning papers in unexpected sunshine http://t.co/MD7VPRne

Anthony Sharwood

http://t.co/Zq0nGxkf nice pic of Thredbo this morning

Paul Colgan

@seamus yeah it's now called Smooth or Soft or Douchey Dad FM or something

Paul Colgan

It's a Sydney thing, but 95.3FM... Why? It used to be all Bohemian Rhapsody and Walk this Way; now it's Father to Son and Country Road. Wah.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

We don’t deserve this huge, exciting scientific project

I’d like to be able to say that sharing the world’s largest radio telescope with South Africa…

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

Mining money talks the loudest in Australian politics

When North Queensland Liberal MP George Christensen got the idea of launching a new political organisation…

Please enter your password

Please enter your password

Help! I’ve succumbed to a crippling modern illness that can strike at any moment. Symptoms include:…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter