Andrew Bolt

Human beings can be offended in a myriad weird and wonderful ways. I recently learned that to describe someone morbidly obese as fat is ‘fattist’ and that it’s a no-no to describe someone as suffering from HIV, instead of as someone living with HIV, for example.

Offensive to cat lovers, witches, and possibly spiders. Pic: Alec Coppel

We’ve all heard examples of political correctness gone MAD; the phrase itself is so hackneyed that some may find it a bit offensive. And actually we probably shouldn’t use the word ‘mad’, that’s quite likely to offend people with mental health issues. Problems. Disorders. People living with mental health challenges. Consumers of mental health services.


Latest 2 of 128 comments

View all comments
  • DOB says:

    06:55pm | 11/12/12

    Marley and Greg, no youve not really got the point. If the Punch can censor things: posts of posters - presumably so your sensitive little souls dont get offended - then that is most defenitely an exercise of a right not to be offended. A right deosnt come into existence… Read more »

  • maria says:

    06:21pm | 11/12/12

    100% CORRECT Free speech for all = direct democracy a la Switzerland in which only the people are sovereign and not just a few autocrats. Read more »


Being offended has become something of a national sport in this country. That said, there have been a few things of late to be legitimately offended about.

Dopey, but worth legislating against? Photo: Courier Mail

Greg Ritchie could probably work on some new comic material, given the unsurprisingly negative response to his allegedly side-splitting zingers about kaffirs, and how he keeps Muslim children locked in the boot of his car. Alan Jones offended many people, myself included, with his cruelly twisted suggestion that Julia Gillard’s recently dead father died of shame over his daughter’s lies.

Being offended by Ritchie or Jones is one thing. Advocating that they be fined, banned from speaking or sacked from their jobs is something else altogether.

Latest 2 of 106 comments

View all comments
  • marley says:

    07:02pm | 18/11/12

    @TheRealDAve - is Abbott saying that Anderson is more aboriginal than whoever the potential ALP candidate is in the same electorate? Or is he saying that Anderson is better connected to her rural community roots than her opponent?  Why isn’t that a fair statement? But so far as I know,… Read more »

  • marley says:

    06:51pm | 18/11/12

    Umm, why would you need to publish lists of members of the UN, UNICEF and UNHCR on the Punch?  That’s a lot of space wasted for no particular reason that I can see, when the membership is freely accessible on all sorts of websites.  Just post the links. Read more »


Remember when weather was the most neutral topic in the world? The topic you’d turn to when all avenues of small talk were exhausted? Not any more. That notion now belongs in an age when dinosaurs may or may not have roamed the world, depending on whether you buy the science.

Bolt strikes in the dark. Pic: Mark Evans.

Weather is the new religion. The new politics. It’s the new black-listed topic that you dare not broach at dinner parties for fear of turning a pleasant occasion feral.

Feral was pretty much the tone this week, after I tackled the issue of the heavy March rainfall in SE Australia. My innocuous story last Friday was picked up by my senior News Ltd colleague Andrew Bolt, who proceeded to give me quite the intellectual shakedown on Monday, with another on Tuesday for good measure.

Latest 2 of 161 comments

View all comments
  • wjgeokkavw says:

    08:28am | 11/04/12

    jakkmngfhkdfpllioklghhjk Read more »

  • Eda says:

    09:25am | 09/03/12

    ‘@ eda, absolutely stupendous input into the topic of discussion. please take a bag of potatoes as a prize and go away ‘ Of course, its stupendous, you read my post and commented,  LOL. Read more »


Simon Katich doesn’t deserve a reprimand. He deserves an award for restraint.

Tut-tut…Katich escapes the Cricket Australia hearing. Picture: Norm Oorloff

After falling foul of the thought police at Cricket Australia he was called up before that stuffy little outfit’s resident kangaroo court to explain his so-called “spray” against Michael Clarke. “Spray”, as it was dubbed in headlines, is a ludicrously overstated term for what Katich had said. All he said was that he doubted he would ever get a spot in the Test team under captain and selector Michael Clarke.

Katich, you will recall, grabbed Clarke by the neck in a dressing room dust-up in 2009, risking serious damage to Clarke’s latest haircut. His assessment of his chances of reclaiming a baggy green under Clarke was both accurate and unremarkable.

Latest 2 of 74 comments

View all comments
  • MargD says:

    05:57am | 14/12/11

    All of this rubbish about Katich reminds me of Dean Jones, he couldn’t accept being dropped either.  He was not a team man and neither was Katich. I just wish everyone would get over it and stop bagging Michael Clarke….give him a go. Read more »

  • greg says:

    11:08am | 13/12/11

    Joshua, tests are won currently in 2011, not 2008. Like I said, it is irrelevant what he averaged since 2008. In his last 10 tests he failed to pass 50 and averaged 32 in his last 3 series. Only the greatest batsman with 10,000+ runs behind them survive for long… Read more »


You don’t often hear people challenging someone’s claim to be Italian. Or Swedish, or American. Generally you accept what they say even if they don’t have an accent, or a funny surname, or blond hair.

Cartoon: Peter Nicholson

Aboriginality, on the other hand, apparently remains a contested field.

The Federal Court last week decided that high-profile and controversial columnist Andrew Bolt had breached the Racial Discrimination Act in his columns ‘It’s so hip to be black’, and ‘White fellas in the black’, which questioned why nine prominent ‘fair-skinned Aborigines’ identified as Aboriginal.

Latest 2 of 365 comments

View all comments
  • Nicholas Steel says:

    02:39pm | 06/10/11

    It’s odd that the progressive community are quick to accuse all and sundry of racism. However they are silent on the 40 million deaths from malaria that have occured due to the environmental movement banning the use of DDT as an insecticide in the early 1970’s. If you examine census… Read more »

  • PG says:

    02:19pm | 06/10/11

    “They think people who have been sideswiped by colonisation, sent into a tailspin of poverty, ill health and despair, people who suffer appalling health outcomes, shorter lifespans and intergenerational unemployment, are somehow better off than they are” I agree with the point you are making here, however if you have… Read more »


This is a difficult column to write. It involves a matter of principle which is important to me. It also involves a colleague whose work leaves me cold.

Karma: Bolt outside court last Wednesday. Photo: Trevor Pinder

If this were a year 10 debate we would take the gentleman’s option of inserting the obligatory declaration from the French writer Voltaire, the tiredest quote in political philosophy, where we state that we disagree with what Andrew Bolt says but would defend to the death his right to say it, and everyone goes home feeling good about themselves.

I am not inclined to defend Andrew Bolt to the death. Not even close. His columns make me laugh in disbelief or fold up the paper in anger. I am sick of seeing Bolt being held up as if he were a company spokesman. He is no such thing.

Latest 2 of 210 comments

View all comments
  • Danielle says:

    09:32am | 09/10/11

    @WhatThe I’m tired of hearing about the ‘silent majority’. You’re NOT the majority - many, many people are pleased that Bolt may now need to uphold some professional standards. And you’re certainly not silent. Read more »

  • Damocles says:

    05:36pm | 05/10/11

    Hey acotrel, just changing the subject a little as you are prone to do, but couldn’t resist… said, “Andrew is in a position of power - Rupert Murdoch power, and he has abused it !” Heavens above, this comment of yours could be swung thus….“Julia is in a position of… Read more »


It’s easy to defend free speech when you support a speaker’s views. It’s harder when you oppose them. Now, after the ruling in the Bolt case, free speech champions – even those who dislike and disagree with Andrew Bolt – should be speaking out.

They line up, to the right and to the left, the self-appointed arbiters of political and societal fashion, the media commentariat. From their pulp pulpits they lay down how we ordinary Australians should think. Their words today are the gospels of tomorrow, regurgitated in dozens of accents and emphases throughout workplaces, bars and coffee shops as well and re-broadcast by phone, email and Twitter.

The best known is Alan Jones, motor mouth of the airwaves, syndicated nationally on commercial radio, hard-core conservative. But there are a dozen or two others, in newspapers and on radio and TV, of various political shades. Most of the time, the harsh pronouncements wash us by, grating and irritating in equal measure on either side of public debate. But occasionally they hit the mark, roughly on target: a surge of public opinion forces focused governments to respond to what appears to be the will of the people. 

Latest 2 of 498 comments

View all comments
  • marley says:

    02:02pm | 01/10/11

    @persephone - I am not the one going on about defamation - it is those of you who insist that Bolt committed defamation.  He was not sued for defamation nor is there a court ruling to say that he committed such an offence. Until there is, it is merely your… Read more »

  • marley says:

    12:31pm | 01/10/11

    How has the decision reduced free speech?  Well, first, there’s the matter of the actual law.  I do not believe that merely offending an individual or a group of persons should be sufficient to bring you into court.  Yet that’s what the law says.  We’re not talking incitement to violence… Read more »


The aftermath of news like that from Oslo leaves only numbness. The injustice of it, the disbelief that this was even possible. Bombs at least kill in a single action. The deliberate persistence involved in attacks like Anders Breivik’s make them all the more distressing.

A country in mourning. Photo: AP

For a writer with comedic inclinations, the usual set of responses are neutered. Laughter falters, mouth half open. Even in our bleakest political situations, there are moments of light. Something like this is all darkness.

As reports began to come in, it was the last subject in the world you would have imagined being used for political point-scoring. But if ever someone was going to do just that, it was Andrew Bolt.

Latest 2 of 417 comments

View all comments
  • shoomisax says:

    08:27am | 18/10/12

    To avoid such thing, you need to possess just possible, are it as to with understand all through marijuana. At Issues stringent operating at Da is sometimes Asked got severe 1860, this level of sales of greater.  If you really want to alleviate the your are local helps these… Read more »

  • cheap says:

    07:12pm | 11/05/12

    3IkojM Great, thanks for sharing this blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing. Read more »


It won’t be long before Andrew Bolt has a cameo on Neighbours discussing validity of climate change with Harold Bishop. (Yes, we know we mentioned Harold on The Punch yesterday - sorry. Ed.)
So this very nice man was telling me that all this AGW is bunkum. Photo: Ben Swinnerton

Network promotions departments assume you could easily digest Mr Bolt popping up on Ramsay Street without any real thoughts about why he is there. This is exactly why underhanded cross promotion is becoming ubiquitous. Your favourite shows are being morphed into unbearably bland advertisements for the network.

Promotional departments shamelessly hijack mostly live TV, from sporting events to the news, sneakily forcing the hosts to endorse shows that need a bit of a ratings oomph.

Latest 2 of 88 comments

View all comments
  • oscifecemig says:

    06:32am | 12/01/13

    There are undoubtedly a whole lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I give the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly you will discover questions like the one you bring up where the most imperative factor is going to… Read more »

  • cssxaee says:

    11:36pm | 25/09/11

    2eC0ZR ybzojrimtmeh, omyjxeppgwso, [link=]gphkquyrzmww[/link], Read more »


Are you feeling offended? Put out? Insulted? You’re not alone.

A bridge with some people getting over it. Pic: Chris Pavlich

He Who Almost Always Offends, Andrew Bolt, offended some people a while back. Then their lawyer offended him. Then one of the offended turned around and offended a third party, who offended her right back. Youch.

Surely it’s time to start building some bridges – of the reconciliatory, conciliatory, and the ‘get over it’ kind.

Latest 2 of 276 comments

View all comments
  • Sam says:

    07:13pm | 27/11/11

    From an Aboriginal view point all the waste of money is from the employment of non-aboriginal workers who sponge off the disadvantaged marginalised minority that is traditional owners (all aboriginals), the dominate controlers must first sort out thier issues as to avoid imposing more failed programs that we have come… Read more »

  • DJ says:

    11:59am | 03/05/11

    Heh… Yeah thanks on behalf of my Communities for defining our people… Was trawling the net for research and came across your posts… As an Indigenous man I’m offended by what Bolt says, writes and portrays - so I choose - my family chooses not to watch / read /… Read more »


Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more



Read all about it

Sign up to the free newsletter