Abc

Are you shocked that tomorrow night’s episode of At Home with Julia shows ‘Prime Minister Julia Gillard’ tabling her man in Parliament*, with a post-coital cuddle under the Australian flag?

Pass us a ciggie, luv. Pic: Supplied

Monarchist David Flint was – he says it shows a lack of respect. Not to the PM, but to the flag. An ABC spokesman defended the skit, and said the flag was a “symbol of love” draped over the PM.

Ms Gillard, unsurprisingly, declined to comment. Here’s The Punch team’s take. What’s yours?

Latest 2 of 148 comments

View all comments
 
  • big john says:

    12:19am | 26/09/11

    I did actually laugh out loud at Adam Diver’s comment. Well said. Oh Punch, where did it all go wrong?? I’ve just got to your site and read about school kids spending too much on their formals(that old chestnut) and now four Punch journos sledging a tv show. Is this… Read more »

  • Andrew Blegg says:

    03:47pm | 24/09/11

    Small things amuse small minds, I personally don’t give a stuff what they do, it don’t offend me, I dont like ranga full stop. Read more »

 

The Canadian media theorist Marshall McLuhan said that the medium is the message. I’m not really sure what it means but it seems a suitably pretentious way to start a column about the condition of pretentiousness; that is, the state of being up one’s self, a show pony, a poseur.

Nuanced: That flamin' wog parked his Valiant in me driveway.

The particular class of poseurs I would like to discuss today belong to a group called the Friends of the ABC. I used to live among their number while a resident of the People’s Republic of Leichhardt, in Sydney’s groovy and organic inner west. It’s a terrific part of Australia, marred only by the presence of an old Volvo on every street bearing bumper stickers saying “No Aircraft Noise”, “The Goddess is Dancing” and “Hands off our ABC.”  So that people didn’t think less of me, at neighbourhood barbecues I would tell folks that I worked in a laboratory rubbing cheap cosmetics into the eyes of bunny rabbits, rather than admitting to editing The Daily Telegraph.

You can understand why people don’t like aircraft noise and support dancing goddesses but I am buggered if I can see why people will develop an impassioned lifelong commitment to an organisation which like any organisation does some things extremely well and some things really badly.

Latest 2 of 239 comments

View all comments
 
  • JB says:

    02:30pm | 19/09/11

    Bloody ABC bourgeois wankers wasting tax payers money yet again on football. Figures leaked to Crikey reveal the ABC spend $22 per viewer to bring Tassie football to a tiny audience bit.ly/qPekek Read more »

  • James1 says:

    02:02pm | 19/09/11

    From that response I’m guessing you still don’t know what an anarchist is. Read more »

 

When The Chaser had an epic humour fail with their Make a Realistic Wish Foundation skit, the consensus was that they missed the mark because good satire picks a target worthy of lampooning. Sick kids and the charities which raise money for them didn’t come close to that.

The show wasn't our cup of tea

On that score, Australia’s 27th Prime Minister Julia Gillard should be a prime target for satire. If you can’t have a good old fashioned crack at a Prime Minister who has stumbled from disaster to disaster, who can you have a crack at?

Heh heh. We just said “crack”. Geddit? Cos, you know, the PM’s a woman? Excuse the puerile sexual innuendo. Mind you, anyone who laboured through the satirical show At Home With Julia on the ABC last night had to tolerate much, much worse.

Latest 2 of 290 comments

View all comments
 
  • child support says:

    05:58am | 25/09/11

    Tim is so poor in the series Read more »

  • Tiger says:

    02:11pm | 14/09/11

    i’m with you guys, i thought it was actually a lot better than expected, quite funny in parts. appreciated the subtle humour. and about time the ABC did something not pro-Gillard, tho there’s a fair way to go to balance out That ledger… Read more »

 

Perhaps the most damaging outcome of all the dysfunction wrought by the Gillard Government is the shocking loss of respect for the office of Prime Minister itself.

All Australians can respect a pair of fluffy slippers. Pic: ABC

If the headlines of “Dead Woman Walking” and the litany of ridicule in the weekend papers wasn’t enough to convince you that respect is lost, then tonight the ABC launches At Home with Julia - a sitcom, mockumentary, call it what you will, about the private life of Gillard and her partner Tim Mathieson.

Of course, I haven’t seen it - it may well be a touching tribute. Just as Spinal Tap was an erudite tribute to those much misunderstood rockers. Point is, it’s playing for laughs.

Latest 2 of 180 comments

View all comments
 
  • James says:

    12:16pm | 13/09/11

    Sophie your hypocrisy knows no bounds, you are the one doing the disrespecting not to mention proudly standing next to that ruddy faced walrus Alan Jones.  Just beware, what goes around… Read more »

  • Anichol says:

    10:33pm | 08/09/11

    Phew! Thanks Tomz I was mistaken in thinking Abbott was jumping to the aid of these big polluters purely because of their threats to pass on costs and possible job losses to any government that tries curb their dirty habits. It was you all along! Read more »

 

Mainstream media holds a mirror up to society. If we take a look into that mirror, we see what is preoccupying our attention.

Let me just say a bunch of stuff which adds nothing to our understanding of the topic

On a deeper level, we can gain significant insight into the way we tend to investigate and argue. Monday’s Q and A episode provided great insight into the superficial way we tend to approach philosophical and ethical topics.

The fast paced program is geared towards political discussion, but for this episode, the topic was God, Religion and Ethics. Disappointingly, There was a focus on sound bites, concrete current affairs and controversy, and as a result, many of us went away no more enlightened on the topics than before.

Latest 2 of 133 comments

View all comments
 
  • Anne Stocks says:

    09:07pm | 19/08/11

    Hi again Richard, you may not read my posts with the topic being long gone,  but I just felt like sharing and I am very thankful for yours. I always feel blessed when Men express their Love for the Lord, yes I know your awe and reverence comes from the… Read more »

  • Anne Stocks says:

    01:57pm | 19/08/11

    Richard says: ONLY ONE THING NEEDS TO BE SAID, I point everyone to the Cross…. Thank you Richard for your Loving stand for the Lord and for the beautiful and powerful poem showing The Heavenly Father’s and His Son Jesus Christ’s Sacrifical Love for us through the cross where He… Read more »

 

As soon as a mainstream, watermelon-wearing, faux lesbian-curious, pop starlet with abysmal spelling declared her vacant-eyed love for Chris Lilley, you knew he was in trouble.

Not only did Katy Perry go all schoolgirl-giggly on Lilley at the Logies, but last night she tweeted her mad enthusiasm for him before the start of his new show, Angry Boys.

As did a colossal number of semi-literate Twits, making Angry Boys the top trender in Australia before the show even began. And it hit the top worldwide once it started. For Twitnoramuses, that means it was the most talked about subject IN THE WORLD (forgive caps) on Twitter.

Latest 2 of 139 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jesse James says:

    01:06pm | 30/10/11

    ‘Chris Lilley’s humour revolves around making characters we can all look down on’... I thought that was called comedy. I have not seen a good comedy with characters that you don’t look down on; ‘Ab Fab’, ‘The Simpsons’, ‘Fawlty Towers’, ‘Monty Python’, ‘Billy T’, ‘Seinfeld even as far back as… Read more »

  • Chris says:

    11:04am | 16/05/11

    Tory, the reason you love SHH is because you have watched the entire series, boasting about having watched 4 eps of Angry Boys only shows how much you don’‘t get the style of comedy - the charachters need to travel the journey Liley has in store for them and any… Read more »

 

The Palace is not amused. A royal edict, delivered not by chariot with unfurled parchment, but via grey-suits and sneaky lawyer speak, has decreed there shall be no Chaser royal wedding coverage. Oh, well. No big loss.

Let’s face it, you were either going to salivate over every second of the straight Royal Wedding coverage, or you were going to act like someone with a life and ignore it completely. The Chaser’s coverage, despite this week’s massive publicity blitz, was always going to be of minimal interest to the masses.

That’s not to say The Chaser’s take wouldn’t have been a laugh. Without doubt, it would have been an amusing enough diversion from the obsessive fussing over the length of the bride’s train, Beckham’s wedding hairdo and other minutiae. But there’s no way it would’ve been must-see TV, and there’s a very simple reason why.

Latest 2 of 145 comments

View all comments
 
  • fairsfair says:

    03:14pm | 03/05/11

    AT - the “buds” I was talking about are the ones you suggested required nipping. ie a minor rumblings need to be shut down before they explode and in doing so this delivers a social message. Be it a good or bad message - it gets people talking and discussing… Read more »

  • jim says:

    07:28pm | 30/04/11

    Look forward to seeing the huge support for freedom of speech when the BBC demands a feed of the Anzac Day service in Gallipoli and Canberra so the irreverent but highly amusing and relevant comedian Russell Brand can add his own voiceover to the ceremonies with his unique sense of… Read more »

 

The ABC mini-mini-series Paper Giants has been a great hit. Funky footage blended with some brilliant performances, fabulous frocks, and an intriguing behind-the-scenes look at the creation of women’s mag, Cleo. On a smaller scale, it did for the magazine industry what Mad Men did for the advertising industry.

Here at The Punch, it made us wonder: What’s next? What else could benefit from this historical dramatisation?

The ABC is reportedly looking at other Cleo-related or Packer family-related options - but we reckon there’s much broader scope in the genre. Anyway, see below for our thoughts on Paper Giants, and share your own thoughts below.

Latest 2 of 56 comments

View all comments
 
  • Pharme319 says:

    03:20pm | 05/05/11

    Hello! dckccec interesting dckccec site! Read more »

  • Shane says:

    05:31pm | 21/04/11

    You had me Dave until this drivel ... biased Media Watch program. Just because you don’t like what’s on there doesn’t make it biased. Read more »

 

Here’s a simple statistic that TV executives are happy you didn’t know. Back in the 1980s the population of Australia was about 14 million. A good TV show would rate about 5 million viewers. Fast forward to 2011. Australia’s population has grown to 20 million and TV execs are dancing on their mini-bars if their show attracts over 1.2 million viewers.

TV. The drug of an increasingly small proportion of the nation.

The population has doubled, the viewers have halved. The maths is not good. “Masterchef” peaked last year with over 3.5 million viewers. Proportionally, based on 1980’s viewing habits, Masterchef should have rated nine million viewers.

The velocity of the decline is increasing. For an industry that was once a sizable chunk of the life and breath of Australian culture, the Australian free TV industry is “circling the drain”. That’s cop show talk for dying.

Latest 2 of 219 comments

View all comments
 
  • Kristen says:

    12:17am | 27/03/11

    what’s really funny is TV people don’t get it. I was babysitting my neighbours kids the other night - they had no idea of the difference between freeTV, pay TV and DVD…its just ‘stuff o the screen’ to the next generation. IPTV is the future. soon tv will hang about… Read more »

  • David says:

    10:58am | 22/03/11

    I love my TV.  It really ties the room together. Read more »

 

Commercial television’s breakfast programs aren’t for everyone. It’s not compulsory to watch and there are plenty of alternatives.

But the facts are that they connect with their viewers in a more powerful way than their traditional television news formats.

Stop. Don’t start commenting yet. Hear me out and then go your hardest… I’ve broad shoulders (and a sense of humour, check out the clip above).

Latest 2 of 246 comments

View all comments
 
  • MsLiss says:

    01:12pm | 24/02/11

    At home after the GFC and watching daytime TV for the first time ever I found myself flicking the channels and watching the ads in preference to the programs….... Kochie fits in well!  But even by the standards of daytime TV something must be slipping.  I’m please to say that… Read more »

  • BP says:

    05:30pm | 10/02/11

    David, you talk about breakfast television being a catalyst for engagement, interaction, connection, even enabling you to care for your viewers. In an optimistic mood I assume that is also why you open yourself up in this opinion forum, to exchange with your audience. So I am genuinely interested in… Read more »

 

Tonight marks the swansong for Kerry O’Brien on the 7:30 Report. It’s a sad day for us all.

A thinking woman's crumpet. Pic: ABC.

The 7.30 Report is quintessential viewing for anyone with a remote interest in current affairs.

It’s the last bastion of a genre that’s been bludgeoned to death and is long past its halcyon days of 60 Minutes (the Jana Wendt era) and A Current Affair (the Jana Wendt era).

Latest 2 of 87 comments

View all comments
 
  • rod fellows says:

    03:06pm | 15/12/10

    Jeez you lot! You talk of his “interviewing” prowess. This little jerk knew and showed NO comprehension of the basis of decent, objective ‘interviewing. The first rule is that you NEVER ask a leading question. O’Brien, and all of the ABC reporters that I have seen of late, look like… Read more »

  • acotrel says:

    07:49am | 12/12/10

    Chonggy, when you’re right, you’re right! I simply cannot beieve that conservative voters cannot recognise the risk in Tony Abbott! That ideology they’re smoking must be really strong stuff? Read more »

 

The entrepreneurial risk-taking winemaker versus the greedy, money grubbing corporation.

In vino veritas? Wine maker Andrew Garrett.

It’s a perfect narrative begging to be told, and particularly suited to television. An emotive story which was played out this week on the ABC’s Family Confidential. The story of a man who triumphed over early adversity, only to be brought undone by an unfeeling bank.

It’s heady stuff. It’s also a disappointing hagiography masquerading as a documentary.

Latest 2 of 27 comments

View all comments
 
  • Vee says:

    08:25pm | 09/08/11

    Would be very interested to know as would hundreds of creditors of a certain solar installation company Read more »

  • Mr x says:

    02:50pm | 23/07/11

    I have just fallen victim to Andrew Garrett. I have lodged several court actions against him. Anybody wants to know the story just ask Read more »

 

Why didn’t the Q&A shoe‑thrower Peter Gray toss former Prime Minister John Howard a lamington instead?

Shoes away. The shoe being chucked at Howard last night on Q&A

Taking his cue from an Iraqi journalist, turned footwear rejecter, who flung his possessions at then‑US President George W Bush, Gray in one unoriginal act exposed the limitations of the Q&A program as an uninhibited experiment in deliberative democracy.

According to the program’s website, Q&A aims to place punters, pollies and pundits together to ‘thrash out’ the hot issues of the week. Think of it as the political equivalent of a WWE steel cage match.

Latest 2 of 101 comments

View all comments
 
  • Gespalestine says:

    10:22am | 23/12/11

    ?????? sex Read more »

  • uggs says:

    05:19pm | 22/11/11

    Proper job! I recently decided to make a short video about this, I would be appreciative if you would maybe take a second to watch it and perhaps leave a message about what you think, I left the video url in the “website” field, hopefully you can access it, thank… Read more »

 

There was a moment in last night’s brilliant episode of 4 Corners that might have undermined Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott’s argument the whole filming exercise was about posterity.

Bob Katter points out the presence of a TV crew means the discussion is not entirely confidential. Still: 4 Corners

As the deliberations over the hung parliament arrived at absolute crunch time Bob Katter got uncomfortable with the ABC camera and said he would rather the crew left the office where he was meeting with his fellow regional independents.

But Windsor and Oakeshott had other ideas. You can watch the whole episode here.

Latest 2 of 103 comments

View all comments
 
  • Steve Putnam says:

    11:28am | 09/10/10

    @Sirro Ken Henry, who you describe as a ‘Labor leaning turd’ was described by John Howard as ‘a man who has served his country extremely well’ (George Megalogenis article Australian 7/4/07) and was twice appointed Treasury head by Peter Costello during the life of the Howard government. The mistakes contained… Read more »

  • Sirro says:

    05:35pm | 07/10/10

    Yep thank God .... My regret is that I wasted part of my evening watching these wankers blather on .... and I had to pay 8 cents for it! Read more »

 

There’s a hilarious saga going on over an empty chair on tonight’s Q and A panel.

This man is a political assassin so we can't show you his face.

The ABC last week booked ALP powerbroker Mark Arbib for tonight’s show, but this evening Julia Gillard’s office pulled the NSW Senator from the show, and offered up backbencher David Bradbury instead.

The Q and A producers politely but indignantly told the PM’s office to bugger off. In the grand scheme of things it’s worth remembering it’s just a TV show, but in the absence of any concrete details out of Canberra tonight it’s set off a bit of a storm.

Latest 2 of 35 comments

View all comments
 
  • Dee says:

    12:37am | 25/08/10

    For the life of me I can’t see the pertinence to the Paul Howes story before or after the election. A few weeks back we had Julia Gillard, last week it was Van Rudd and this week it’s Paul Howes. Give us back our Australian Story. Time to stop pushing… Read more »

  • dead to me says:

    10:11pm | 24/08/10

    Gutless + Spineless….....100% pure and simple. Read more »

 

Really simple: say in the comments what you think the ABC should be spending its money on. Links below if you want some background and various points of view.

Latest 2 of 198 comments

View all comments
 
  • Chris Johnson says:

    04:18pm | 06/04/10

    Recovery! Bring back the Saturday morning Recovery session on ABC TV, with established and up and coming acts alternating as house band.  Re-boot is with new talent.  Look at where the previous generation ended up.  Dylan Lewis, Angus Sampson and most successfully Leigh Wannell. Other than that, how about a… Read more »

  • Tonbridge Welles says:

    08:44am | 30/03/10

    Too right. Here’s my crack at an ABC schedule (pinched ffrom Kim Williams’ waste paper bin) 7pm (START OF TRANSMISSION) Gardening Australia 7:30pm Chamber music recital 8pm Gardening Australia (repeat) 8:30pm Piano recital 9pm (CLOSE OF TRANSMISSION, VIEWERS OF ABC SHOULD BE IN BED BY NOW) Read more »

 

In recent weeks there has been a lot of debate about the conflict between the expansion of the ABC and other media providers, including subscription television and potential online subscription services.

Illustration: The Australian's Jon Kudelka

Jonathan Holmes in The Drum called it ‘the showdown over Australia’s new media landscape’, and correctly observed that the conflict derives from the foray of the publicly funded Aunty into markets that need to make money in order to survive.

The temptation is to portray this as another public-interest-versus-private-interest argument. But it’s not. Holmes’ article refreshingly didn’t fall into this trap, although he accurately set out the revenue implications for companies like FOXTEL of the ABC’s planned new services. As a businessman, this hurts—as does the long list of anti-competitive and wasteful subsidies and protections given to Seven, Nine and Ten. But it also hurts as someone with a passion for television and someone who believes in the potential of television to be more than just wires and lights in a box—as the Ed Murrow character in the movie Good Night and Good Luck put it.

Latest 2 of 60 comments

View all comments
 
  • Danny B says:

    04:41pm | 09/11/10

    Zeta, I take issues with two of the shows you’ve listed as examples of hell: NCIS - these days, with 4 or 5 different flavours of shows such as CSI, it’s refreshing to have a crime drama that at least tries to be original.  However, if you had mentioned NCIS:LA,… Read more »

  • Coreten says:

    10:53pm | 29/03/10

    iView is hardly innovative.  The idea has been in the US for the past 10 yrs when internet video first started and the ABC’s iView specifically is a rip-off of the BBC’s service. In fact, the ABC tries desperately to imitate the BBC, but continues to do so in a… Read more »

 

Sunday morning television can be a riot of fun.

A laugh a minute on Meet the Press

First we had Ross Garnaut on Meet the Press confirming that his modelling for climate change predictions was done on the balance of probabilities, surely when one is giving support to the ETS, the big tax on everything, it should be on the basis of beyond reasonable doubt. But with all the fudged modelling of the IPCC, I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised, just alarmed.

Next we had the spectacle of David Marr – who writes for Fairfax beating up on Piers Akerman who writes for News Limited because Marr did not like the way ‘the Australian’ reports the news.

Latest 2 of 72 comments

View all comments
 
  • EvadiaCatte says:

    11:10am | 24/01/11

    all about clomid get some Inderal best cough syrup with coumadin order Celadrin online now zantac ingredients buy Clozaril with no prescription paxil law suit Mentax discount europe clinic atlanta weight loss generic Lanoxin pill orange ulster school districts health plan Buy Nolvadex Online do-it-yourself weight loss plans cheap Abana… Read more »

  • LellGrimede says:

    11:44am | 20/12/10

    lipitor menopause clozaril and drooping lysergic acid diethylamide actos plendil ranitidine aleve and kidney problems cetirizine generic 2008 purchase combivent online femara side affects order brand tamiflu online now prozac fda approval buy desyrel without prescription severe allergic reaction in toddler bactrim capoten 50 mg dosage buy azithromycin oral powder… Read more »

 

I don’t know how it happened. It could be higher levels of blue-rinse in the water. Maybe it’s a spike in the sales of model trains. Or a sudden surge in the demand for lamingtons. But 2009 is unofficially shaping up to be The Year Of The Wowser.

The Chaser team - victims of an outbreak of wowserism.

With almost German precision (if I am permitted to use nationality as the basis of my point), the chorus of shrill voices responding to controversy in comedy has been oscillating at a rock solid bi-weekly frequency in recent months.

While you have to admire the sheer energy these biddies have - you can’t grant them any real depth of understanding when it comes to the art form. (And yes. It is an art form.)

Latest 2 of 33 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jules says:

    07:56pm | 27/10/09

    There’s the wowsers but more frighteningly, the wowser-enablers, namely the knee-knocking network senior management.  ABC management’s response to the Make A Wish skit (and damn it Chaser were right, they are going to die anyway…) gave the wowser throng real power and fed the beast. Read more »

  • jed says:

    10:49pm | 26/10/09

    most instigated by news ltd, aca and tt, no one really cares until news organisations immediately get on the phone to the usual suspects and start whipping up a frenzy for their own benefit. Read more »

 

It’s less than a fortnight since Mark Scott made his annual trip to Canberra for his annual dust-up with conservative politicians at Senate Estimates hearings. This gives him a full 50 weeks to prepare for next year’s breathless interrogation as to why the national broadcaster used taxpayer funds to fly John Safran to Israel so he could masturbate on television.

This at least will be the puritanical take on what unfolded on our screens at 9.30 last night in the debut of Safran’s mega-hyped new series Race Relations.

As part of his exploration of interracial relationships and attraction, Safran flew to Israel where he arranged for a Palestinian man to donate sperm which he then took to an Israeli fertility clinic. In return, the Jewish Safran donated sperm to a Palestinian fertility clinic, using a photograph of Barack Obama to arouse himself.

Latest 2 of 59 comments

View all comments
 
  • Nigel Molesworth says:

    01:37pm | 25/10/09

    The panty stealing and sniffing didn’t bother me. Nor the w*nking. What I did find very worrying was the sperm donation switching. I don’t know a lot about sperm donation, but I believe that donors are matched as much as possible with the mother’s partner in terms of appearance for… Read more »

  • Marlon says:

    07:05pm | 23/10/09

    Interesting bit of TV. I liked the premise but I think it was edited badly, the pacing was off and the opening title sequence has some of the worst music I’ve heard in a while. Read more »

 

It’s been one of the most hyped shows of the year, sparking complaints before it even aired, and an extraordinary pre-emptive plea on The Punch today by ABC director of television Kim Dalton for conservative viewers to switch off. Join our live blog here at 9.30pm tonight to discuss John Safran’s new show, and tell us what you think.

Latest 2 of 37 comments

View all comments
 
  • WP Themes says:

    11:02pm | 09/04/10

    Genial post and this post helped me alot in my college assignement. Thank you for your information. Read more »

  • Drew says:

    02:28am | 16/12/09

    I found it hard to tell if John is a comedian playing a roll or if he truly is this mentally ill and self obsessed. I just finished watching all 8 episodes over the passed 8 weeks. Over all I think the show says less about cross cultural relations and… Read more »

 

Live tonight: The Punch team will blog here tonight during John Safran’s show. Join us from 9.30pm

I have some blunt advice for some of the people who will be reading this article on The Punch. And it is not the kind of advice you would expect from the ABC’s Director of Television.

Smell the glove: Safran gets a noseful of Mahalia Barnes' stolen undies.

My message is this: think carefully before you settle into the couch tonight for the 9.30pm premiere of John Safran’s comedy-documentary Race Relations. If you think you are going to be offended or outraged (or want to be offended or outraged) then don’t tune in.

This ABC program is not for everyone. It was not designed to be. By scheduling the series at 9.30pm and attaching an M warning the ABC is signalling that this is challenging fare. John Safran’s Race Relations contains material that some viewers will disagree with or find distasteful.

Latest 2 of 100 comments

View all comments
 
  • mark2 says:

    08:34am | 19/11/09

    I don’t like change of any kind .. ABC, please bring back B&W TV. I’m sick of this colour nonsense Read more »

  • Gab says:

    10:19pm | 18/11/09

    I agree with Tony. What absolute rubbish. Its excruciating to watch, sarcastic and cynical. How does this idiot get his own television show? Every one of his shows seems to eventually lead to either his issues about not getting any female attention or a chance to talk about Judaism. Who… Read more »

 

Note: ABC Breakfast host Virginia Trioli made this “you’re crazy” hand twirling gesture after interviewing Senator Barnaby Joyce on the issue of the ETS. Trioli obviously didn’t realise the cameras were still on. She later rang Senator Joyce to apologise, he quipped to the Punch that he couldn’t quite hear because he had been placed in an asylum.

Apparently some television commentators think that I’m the insane one.

Virginia Trioli mocking Barnaby Joyce with the universal sign of crazy

Maybe that explains the place where I work.

Obviously, if I’m not me who am I?

Latest 2 of 145 comments

View all comments
 
  • Milene says:

    08:08am | 07/02/12

    Moz – Or will small percudors be exempt? That’s the obvious hole that I see, where the tax only applies to businesses over a certain size and thus many or most farms are exempt. Along with 20% of our emissions….The cost of the tax will be passed on to everyone.… Read more »

  • Paul says:

    04:09pm | 07/11/11

    Have any of you conservatives actually read about the direct action plan?  The majority of economists have said it will be more expensive, and scientists have said it will be less effective than the ETS.  We have Tony Abbott pushing a government interventionist policy that Gough Whitlam would have been… Read more »

 

When viewers offer feedback about interviews on Lateline, easily the most common complaint is about politicians not answering questions. Nothing irritates people more.

Tony Abbott, one of the only candid politicians in parliament. Picture: Ray Strange

So that I don’t embarrass any particular Member of Parliament – since many are offenders – here’s a little manufactured dialogue to illustrate what I mean.

Me: Minister, what did you have for breakfast?
Minister: For lunch, I had a salad sandwich and then for dinner …
Me: I’m afraid that’s not the question, the question is what you had for breakfast.

Latest 2 of 32 comments

View all comments
 
  • lommateKila says:

    03:38am | 19/04/10

    complicate Rockettube, thru http://jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=1541315 Rockettube, asbdc Pornfuze, buried http://jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=1541316 Pornfuze, lawyer Skeezy, yung http://jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=1541317 Skeezy, streaming Penisbot, metohija http://jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=1541318 Penisbot, zapateros Newsfilter, belfrey http://jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=1541320 Newsfilter, neutrality Empflix, hersch http://jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=1541321 Empflix, retaliation Madthumbs, griiner http://jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=1541322 Madthumbs, jeopardy 3pic, molinari http://jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=1541323 3pic, incurring Askjolene, smicrosynth http://jguru.com/guru/viewbio.jsp?EID=1541506 Askjolene, rcusas Read more »

  • lommateKila says:

    10:43pm | 15/04/10

    pilar red tube, argentine red tube, scissors zootube, finished zootube, yemeni zootube, canvas zootube, chernobyl zootube, bengt zootube, buried zootube, ladins zootube, alam zootube, softwood zootube, tagchair Zootube365, rapporteur Zootube365, forane Youporn, theprogramme Youporn, diplomacy Xnxx, adair Xnxx, carter Read more »

 

Turn on, tune in: radio current affairs is here to stay

“News on the Radio”, said the American consultant breezily, “can never be more than a headline service”.

The speaker was billed as a radio ‘guru’ – a description which reminded me of the writer Francis Wheen’s definition of ‘guru’: a useful short word for people who can’t spell ‘charlatan’.

This guru had introduced herself to the seminar room by saying that she really appreciated the editions of AM, The World Today and PM that she had listened to.

But could she have listened to them at all?

Latest 2 of 10 comments

View all comments
 
  • Jasper says:

    09:48pm | 09/07/09

    Eric, I get most of my news off the internet these days, primarily because the TV news is too shallow, but I really cannot agree with you that the Internet provides “intelligent analysis from a variety of well-informed perspectives”. It provides a huge quantity of barely literate diatribes from commentators… Read more »

  • Luke says:

    05:21pm | 09/07/09

    The ABC has hire standards of fairness in reporting to adhere to than any other media in Australia.  There is more than opinion in an ABC radio currents affairs piece.  Although sometimes a reporter’s opinion will unwittingly colour the facts or put a slant on the issue.  It is unreasonable… Read more »

 

ABC drops the F-bomb

4 comments

Until last week, I thought the silliest casualty of modern warfare was the word “bomb”, which in many news reports had become known by the acronym IED, or improvised explosive device.

Gosh! An IED has gone off. It gave me quite a start.

IED might be a handy term for military strategists needing to distinguish between a mortar fired from a well-equipped conventional unit of soldiers and a bucket full of fertiliser and nails left by an anonymous freelancer in a car on a crowded street in Baghdad, but to the media, any explosive device whose detonation imperils those in the immediate vicinity should, provided it’s not Barry Hall after giving away a couple of 50s, be simply referred to as what it is: a bomb.

To do otherwise simply buries the true horror of the incident under a comforting layer of jargon.

Latest 2 of 4 comments

View all comments
 
  • Chris Grealy says:

    04:55pm | 25/06/09

    Remember the Blackhawk crash in North Queensland many years ago? Two helicopters whose pilots were flying wearing night vision goggles came too close and their rotors collided. According to a survivor in one of the helos, the pilot’s last words were, as reported by The Australian, “Oh f*&k, oh f*&k,… Read more »

  • Tony says:

    01:50pm | 25/06/09

    if you can’t write the word why write the piece? Read more »

 

UPDATE: The ABC has just issued an apology to the Make a Wish Foundation

The worst thing about The Chaser’s sick kids skit last night was that it was the only funny thing on the show. If you missed the team’s “Make a Realistic Wish Foundation” parody you can see the whole show here.

Chris Taylor in the only funny thing on last night's Chaser

I thought Chris Taylor’s hospital sketch was hilarious. Either I’m alone in this or am the only one prepared to admit it.

While this morning radio is going off about how “sick” the skit was, no doubt making the Chaser boys’ marketing department very very pleased with themselves, last night online the team got a far more damning reaction - luke warm, half-hearted indifference.

Latest 2 of 108 comments

View all comments
 
  • Tim says:

    02:09am | 10/06/09

    One of the Rove writers is renowned for using the term “die in a fire” when he was writing in print, you can tell when they use his jokes as they are so bad. Since when does Kevin Rudd review TV shows? Read more »

  • Molly says:

    07:56pm | 08/06/09

    The joke was not on the kids who need help, but on the people who try to believe they are helping by doing tiny acts like the pencil case.  I recently got diagnosed with advanced cancer, and i have had some supposed friends thinking they were being all helpful by… Read more »

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

That's it. Beautifully recreated.RT @lagcamion: @farrm51 @AndrewCatsaras Dr dr dr dr dndlundlundndndndn (with pinched nostrils) - that one?

Paul Colgan

@diversionary#wading

Paul Colgan

Tip for young journos. Have a short CV. A page, two max.

Malcolm Farr

@cjjosh Only communications satellites please (Limited field).

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

New speaker’s slack clobber, old speaker clobbers slackers

Peter Slipper, draped in black in a manner most young voters will not see outside Hogwarts, has dramatically…

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Snappy 60th birthday to our most fun newspaper

Life is far from dull in the Northern Territory. Or if it is, we’ll never know. And that’s…

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

There’s no evidence sex-for-cab-fares is a trend

Fifteen years ago when one of your girlfriends had a few too many Illusion shots standard practice was…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter