<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Energy | Tags | The Punch</title>
        <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/tags/energy/</link>
        <description>Politics, political opinion, world news, sports news and the latest news and views updated live, daily on The Punch - Australia's best conversation.</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2013 The Punch</copyright>
        <managingEditor>penberthyd@newsltd.com.au</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>penberthyd@newsltd.com.au</webMaster>
        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <category>Politics, opinion, world news, sports news, latest news, views, Barack Obama, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard, Nathan Rees, Malcolm Turnbull, Peter Garrett, Barnaby Joyce, Australian, federal politics, opinion polls, election, The Punch, thepunch, punch</category>
        <generator>ExpressionEngine 1.6.7</generator>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <ttl>15</ttl>
        
        <textInput>
            <title>Search</title>
            <description>Search The Punch</description>
            <name>keywords</name>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/search/</link>
        </textInput>
        
        <item>
            <title>How can we trust nuclear, if we can&#8217;t trust its operators?</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/how-can-we-trust-nuclear-if-we-cant-trust-its-operators/</link>
            <description>Whether it&#8217;s nuclear safety or weapons proliferation, the federal government (and the Opposition and the mining companies) can be safely relied upon to exacerbate problems with irresponsible uranium export policies. Widespread safety breaches and proliferation concerns in North Asia are recent manifestations of the problem.



In May, five engineers were charged with covering up a potentially dangerous power failure at South Korea&#8217;s Kori&#45;I reactor which led to a rapid rise in the reactor core temperature. The accident occurred because of a failure to follow safety procedures. A manager decided to conceal the incident and to delete records, despite a legal obligation to notify the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission.

In October, authorities temporarily shut down two reactors at separate South Korean nuclear plants after system malfunctions. In November, a major scandal was revealed involving the systematic use of forged quality and safety warranties for nuclear reactor parts such as fuses, switches, heat sensors, and cooling fans. The current total stands at 8601 reactor parts, 10 firms and six reactors. Plant owner Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power has acknowledged possible bribery and collusion by its own staff members as well as corruption by firms supplying reactor parts.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/how-can-we-trust-nuclear-if-we-cant-trust-its-operators/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/jim.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/how-can-we-trust-nuclear-if-we-cant-trust-its-operators/#item10211</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Fission for an answer to all our energy woes</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/fission-for-an-answer-to-all-our-energy-woes/</link>
            <description>Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/fission-for-an-answer-to-all-our-energy-woes/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/Homernukethumb.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/fission-for-an-answer-to-all-our-energy-woes/#item10173</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Coal shmoal. We have 767 wind farms and one HOT sun</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/coal-shmoal.-we-have-767-wind-farms-and-one-hot-sun/</link>
            <description>In the mid&#45;eighteenth century, coal engines did not only power factories and illuminate streets; they fired up entire nations. Burning coal allowed for material production to explode. 



It facilitated the development of the quintessential assembly line necessary to produce building materials like iron to build infrastructure and allowed for the mass production boom. Burning coal allowed goods to be transported across countries and saw diaspora from pastoralist lifestyles to the thick smog of the city for employment. 

In 1863 Sydneysiders saw electricity in action for the first time with the illumination of a battery powered lamp on Observatory Hill in celebration of the marriage of the Prince of Wales.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/coal-shmoal.-we-have-767-wind-farms-and-one-hot-sun/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/Screen_shot_2012-12-02_at_1.22_.00_PM_.png" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/coal-shmoal.-we-have-767-wind-farms-and-one-hot-sun/#item10131</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Don&#8217;t cut clean energy while there&#8217;s a full head of steam</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/Dont-cut-clean-energy-while-theres-a-full-head-of-steam/</link>
            <description>Australia currently gets about 10 per cent of its electricity from renewable energy and we&#8217;re shooting for double that by the end of the decade under our national 20 per cent Renewable Energy Target.



So far this policy has delivered thousands of jobs and billions of dollars of investment, and is capable of much more if the Federal Government can resist tinkering with it. It&#8217;s a classic case of &#8220;if it ain&#8217;t broke, don&#8217;t fix it&#8221;.

The idea of producing pollution&#45;free power just seems to make sense to people, which is why between 80&#45;90 per cent of people voice their support whenever a poll does the rounds. So far our politicians have acted to give them what they want.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/Dont-cut-clean-energy-while-theres-a-full-head-of-steam/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/wind-farm-THUMB.gif" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/Dont-cut-clean-energy-while-theres-a-full-head-of-steam/#item9704</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>What Batman can teach us about a nuclear future</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/what-batman-can-teach-us-about-a-nuclear-future/</link>
            <description>The Dark Knight Rises, the last and final instalment in Christopher Nolan&#8217;s Batman series, packs a serious punch. For almost three hours audiences are held captivated by the reluctant return of the Caped Crusader to save Gotham City from a neo&#45;fascist Nemesis in the guise of the megalomaniacal Bane. The political subtexts are not standard Hollywood fodder.



Nolan not only fesses up to the corruption at the heart of the otherwise civilized veneer of modern liberal Democracy, he also tackles head&#45;on themes such as the inevitable compromise and capitulation to following orders intrinsic to carrying out state sanctioned authority, and ultimately, the darker impulses that may lay at the heart of the nuclear industries push into promoting itself as the clean energy solution of the future.

It is on this second score that The Dark Knight is at its most prescient, timely and cutting. One of the major arms of the Wayne Empire&#8217;s commercial interests is in developing Nuclear Fusion energy &#8211; the silver bullet often touted by the real world nuclear industry as the answer to the impending climate change crisis.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/what-batman-can-teach-us-about-a-nuclear-future/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/batman-still-thumb.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/what-batman-can-teach-us-about-a-nuclear-future/#item9161</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>We aren&#8217;t happy tree friends with the environment</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/we-arent-happy-tree-friends-with-the-environment/</link>
            <description>During the lead&#45;up to last week&#8217;s federal budget and the reporting that followed, the overwhelming focus was on whether Labor could deliver on the surplus promise it had pledged. 



The focus Australia has on keeping its books balanced is commendable, but there is another deficit we face. One that gets worse every year, and one that could create havoc in the economic budget if not attended to. 

The environmental deficit. Last year&#8217;s State of the Environment report made the same point that it has made since its initial publication in 1996 &#45; things are OK, but getting progressively worse.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/we-arent-happy-tree-friends-with-the-environment/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/not-us.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/we-arent-happy-tree-friends-with-the-environment/#item8490</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Dumping nuclear waste on indigenous land is wrong</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/dumping-nuclear-waste-on-indigenous-land-a-big-mistake/</link>
            <description>If a week is a long time in politics then 106 of them must be close to an eternity.



That&#8217;s how long it has taken Federal Resources Minister Martin Ferguson to steer his controversial nuclear waste legislation though both Houses of Parliament.

Introduced as an urgent matter with Coalition support in February 2010, the law passed the Senate this week. While the delay might cause frustration to an impatient Minister, in the timeframe over which radioactive waste remains a serious human and environmental risk it is but a blip.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/dumping-nuclear-waste-on-indigenous-land-a-big-mistake/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/Screen_shot_2012-03-13_at_9.38_.38_PM_.png" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/dumping-nuclear-waste-on-indigenous-land-a-big-mistake/#item8002</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Clean bowled in cricket, but they&#8217;ll clean us up in energy</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/Clean-bowled-in-cricket-but-theyll-clean-us-up-in-energy/</link>
            <description>Watching a Test match is a great teacher of the virtues that make for success in life: determination, strategy and simply keeping your eye on the ball.



Anyone watching India knows that they are beating Australia hands down at all three. India is set to win while the complacent, lucky country seems sure to waste its natural advantages.

Obviously, after the events at the MCG yesterday, I am talking not of cricket, but of energy security.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/Clean-bowled-in-cricket-but-theyll-clean-us-up-in-energy/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/solar-india-THUMB.gif" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/Clean-bowled-in-cricket-but-theyll-clean-us-up-in-energy/#item7455</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Australian nuclear power: the facts, the costs, the pitfalls</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/Australian-nuclear-power-the-facts-the-costs-the-pitfalls/</link>
            <description>The option of using nuclear power to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation has been raised from time to time during the national debate on the carbon tax and climate change.



Although nuclear power it is not currently on the government&#8217;s energy agenda, Australia is a major supplier of uranium to the global nuclear industry which produces 14 per cent of the world&#8217;s electricity from four hundred and forty reactors in thirty countries. Their combined fifty year experience provides a basis on which to consider the deployment of nuclear power here.

As memories of the 1979 Three Mile Island accident and the 1986 Chernobyl catastrophe receded, a global nuclear power renaissance seemed likely as climate change concerns mounted. Then came the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster following a massive earthquake and tsunami.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/Australian-nuclear-power-the-facts-the-costs-the-pitfalls/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/uranium_thumb.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/Australian-nuclear-power-the-facts-the-costs-the-pitfalls/#item7185</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Punch Q &amp;amp; A: A fraction too much fission over uranium</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/punch-q-a-a-fraction-too-much-fission-over-uranium/</link>
            <description>The Labor Party is set to backflip on dealing uranium to countries that have not signed the nuclear non&#45;proliferation treaty. At the upcoming ALP conference, Prime Minister Julia Gillard will push to lift the ban on selling to India &#45; and chances are it will go through. 



The move has upset the Greens, and some in Labor&#8217;s left faction, who argue that even though India may not use Australian uranium for weapons, it could free up uranium from other sources to be used by the military. 

The Punch spoke to Professor Stephen Lincoln from the University of Adelaide, an expert in uranium, nuclear power and climate change, about what it all means.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (The Punch Team)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/punch-q-a-a-fraction-too-much-fission-over-uranium/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/Nicholsonuraniumthumb.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/punch-q-a-a-fraction-too-much-fission-over-uranium/#item7160</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/tags/energy/">Whether purchasing a house or a car, developing a mineral deposit, or planning for water or energy security, exploring our options is roundly regarded as a good place to start. Options let us explore alternate pathways. They let us envisage and model different outcomes. 



Options let us consider the costs and benefits of action from a range of perspective with a simple goal in mind: making the best, most informed and beneficial decision we can in a world of scarcity and finite resources.

It follows that the exclusion of options at the early stages of planning runs the risk of the opposite outcome. Unless we get lucky, closing ourselves to options without objective analysis is nearly destined to generate an outcome that is sub&#45;optimal. That means embracing higher costs for slimmer benefits, which then limits our ability to deliver more and better change in future.</source>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>