<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Barry Brook | Author bios | The Punch</title>
        <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/author-bios/barry-brook/</link>
        <description>Professor Barry Brook holds the Foundation Sir Hubert Wilkins Chair of Climate Change and is Director of Climate Science at the University of Adelaide’s Environment Institute. He has published two books and over 130 peer&#45;reviewed scientific papers, and received a number of awards in recognition of his research, which addresses climate change, computational and statistical modelling and the synergies between human impacts on Earth systems.

Barry believes presenting hard&#45;won technical scientific evidence to a broad audience in an intelligible way is the best path to provoking social change towards long&#45;term sustainability. 

He runs Brave New Climate, a blog on climate and energy.</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012 The Punch</copyright>
        <managingEditor>penberthyd@newsltd.com.au</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>penberthyd@newsltd.com.au</webMaster>
        <pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <category>Politics, opinion, world news, sports news, latest news, views, Barack Obama, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard, Nathan Rees, Malcolm Turnbull, Peter Garrett, Barnaby Joyce, Australian, federal politics, opinion polls, election, The Punch, thepunch, punch</category>
        <generator>ExpressionEngine 1.6.7</generator>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <ttl>15</ttl>
        
        <textInput>
            <title>Search</title>
            <description>Search The Punch</description>
            <name>keywords</name>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/search/</link>
        </textInput>
        
        <item>
            <title>Fukushima: Situation critical, information scarce</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/fukushima-situation-critical-information-scarce/</link>
            <description>The crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station has been unfolding for about a week. The on&#45;site situation remains extremely serious, with glimmers of hope being shrouded by a shadow of deep uncertainty.



If you&#8217;ve not been following the situation on BraveNewClimate, please visit the site, which contains assumed knowledge for understanding the rest of this post.

As predicted, attention over the last couple of days has focused on the critical situation with the ponds used for temporary storage of spent nuclear fuel at the individual reactor units, before it is moved to a centralised facility on site. Although this old fuel has lost much of its original radioactivity, the decline is exponential, which means that thermal energy must continue to be dissipated for months.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (Barry Brook)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/fukushima-situation-critical-information-scarce/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/Dogscanthumb.gif" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/fukushima-situation-critical-information-scarce/#item5408</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/author-bios/barry-brook/">Barry Brook | Author bios | The Punch</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>COUNTERPUNCH: It&#8217;s complicated, but it&#8217;s real</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/counterpunch-its-complicated-but-its-real/</link>
            <description>Dylan Malloch laments that understanding climate change is difficult, with the forecasts sometimes appearing to be contradictory or having a bit both ways, and therefore seeming all rather confusing! It&#8217;s easy to sympathise with him. Unfortunately, this is the nature of science.



Let&#8217;s consider another example. Newton&#8217;s laws of physics work just fine for the everyday world, but if we tried to use them in the timing system of our global positioning satellites, the resulting drift error would be about 10 kilometres every day.

So, the engineers at GPS mission control need to use Einstein&#8217;s relativistic theories to make sure your iPhone tells you precisely where you are, whenever you want to know. Similarly, neither Newton&#8217;s or Einstein&#8217;s equations allow scientists to properly predict the subatomic interactions within the electronics of satellites or iPhones. For that, you need to reference the weird world of quantum mechanics.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (Barry Brook)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/counterpunch-its-complicated-but-its-real/#comments</comments>
            <enclosure url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/images/uploads/thumbnails/Einsteinthumb.gif" type="image/jpeg" />            <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/counterpunch-its-complicated-but-its-real/#item5102</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/author-bios/barry-brook/">Barry Brook | Author bios | The Punch</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Even halving our emissions won&#8217;t be enough. Here&#8217;s why</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/the-flawed-assumptions-that-threaten-the-planet/</link>
            <description>The Australian Government likes to claim we are doing our part to avoid dangerous climate change. Australia&#8217;s current target is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 5 to 25 per cent by 2020, compared to 2000 emissions levels, with a 60 per cent drop by 2050. 

This sounds impressive enough, and there is no doubt that this will require transformative changes in energy use if it is to be achieved. Other developed countries have similar targets. President Obama&#8217;s aim for the USA, for instance, is to get back to 1990 levels by 2020 and 80 per cent lower by 2050.



So we&#8217;re doing our bit. But is this bit enough, or fair, or feasible? In short, no, no and no. Let me explain.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (Barry Brook)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/the-flawed-assumptions-that-threaten-the-planet/#comments</comments>
                        <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/the-flawed-assumptions-that-threaten-the-planet/#item239</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/author-bios/barry-brook/">Barry Brook | Author bios | The Punch</source>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Can&#8217;t see the environment measures for all the smoke</title>
            <link>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/cant-see-the-new-environment-measures-for-all-the-smoke/</link>
            <description>So, &#8220;clean energy&#8221; stands as one of the infrastructure centrepieces of the Federal Budget. It&#8217;s an investment intended, we&#8217;re told, to both pull the economy out of recession and get us on the pathway to a low carbon economy. A princely sum of $4.5 billion is directed to renewable energy, infrastructure for climate&#45;observing systems, and funds for low emissions technology development. 

It sure sounds impressive, but under scrutiny, it turns out to be mostly just smoke and mirrors.



Breaking down the numbers, we find that $1 billion is a rollover of existing funds, while $2.4 billion has been directed towards research, development and demonstration of low&#45;emissions coal technology, or &#8220;carbon capture and storage&#8221; to us scientists. A little under half a billion will go towards establishing a body to support research into renewable energy.</description>
            <author>feedback@thepunch.com.au (Barry Brook)</author>
            <category>Article</category>
            <comments>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/cant-see-the-new-environment-measures-for-all-the-smoke/#comments</comments>
                        <guid>http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/cant-see-the-new-environment-measures-for-all-the-smoke/#item105</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
            <source url="http://www.thepunch.com.au/rss/author-bios/barry-brook/">Barry Brook | Author bios | The Punch</source>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
