December and January are generally slow news months in Australia. The pollies have gone home, cricket is on the TV and we can find time to relax. It can be a testing time for the media, with column inches and tabloid TV segments to fill. But all is not lost.

Pic: Supplied

Enter the fortune tellers.

What does the year ahead hold for us? Let’s ask our resident astrologer/medium/psychic/mystic/clairvoyant.

It can be hard to keep tabs on all these new age seers, but luckily for us, at the end of each year in a report entitled Tomorrow’s News Today in the pages of the Psychic Directory magazine, members of The Australian Psychic Association give us their predictions. Presumably these people are not your run-of-the-mill fortune tellers, but the cream of the paranormal industry. If anyone should know the future, its them.

Most of their visions are about movie and TV celebrities with names like Nicole Kidman, Brad and Angelina and Tom Hanks popping up. In fact since 2008, no fewer than 40 stars are mentioned. We find predictions about romance, babies, new movies and so on, but alas very few of the many statements came true.

Couples who were supposed to separate stayed together, twins failed to appear for other couples, Elton John did not have a major health scare and Schapelle Corby was not home in time for Christmas 2011.

Now I’m not saying all the predictions for celebrities were wrong.

Amongst the very few to be ticked correct was the death of Elizabeth Taylor but honestly it was hardly a surprise. Oddly enough the death of Michael Jackson was also foretold - only it was by the well known American Skeptic Rebecca Watson!

The royals are always mentioned in these predictions and we must spare a thought for our dear Queen who abdicated in 2011 and will again in 2013. William and Kate are expecting and expecting. I predict that one day they will indeed be parents.

A vital ingredient when casting a third eye into the future, is to conjure up one or two predictions from left-field… things that are not likely to come true. But just like putting all your chips on black 13, once in a while you’ll hit a winner.

Finally, near enough is good enough. A prediction of an earthquake in California (these happen every single day of the year) that will occur in mid-July, 2010, causing havoc particularly in San Francisco was credited as a hit the following year. The earthquake that shook California on the 7th July was a magnitude of 5.4. Residents of California would say ‘so what?’.

A rough count of the 300 (or thereabouts) predictions made since 2007 gives us a 8 per cent success rate. This figure can be argued as many predictions are vague and open to interpretation… but after the event. The bottom line is that most of what is predicted doesn’t happen and most of what happens is not predicted.

The list of major events overlooked is endless such as a certain Prime Minister being shown the door and a certain young redhead taking his place. If this were any other industry the people concerned would be sacked for lack of performance.

Now I’m not saying that many people take all this seriously. It’s like a sort of a guilty pleasure to pretend to have a sneaky look into the future. As long as it’s billed as entertainment, then all is well and fine as it’s only silly fun for the silly season. Only, it’s not. The Psychic Directory magazine certainly gives the impression that these predictions are real and disclaimers are not given on the tabloid TV segments.

You can also bet that each of those people making those predictions also makes most or part of their living from giving private readings where it’s all treated as if it were very real indeed.

Life is about uncertainty. It’s the core of reality and makes life both wonderful and awful. Will I meet the person of my dreams? Where am I going to be in 5 years’ time? Will it be a boy or a girl? Who will win the cricket? Who will be our next Prime Minister? Will my mother survive the operation? What day will I die?

If it did turn out that someone could really see what the future held for us, it would cause a dramatic and fundamental change to our lives and society in general. I predict that it would not be a world in which I would want to live.

The ten golden rules of predictions:

1. Make lots of predictions - some are bound to come true.

2. Make lots of vague predictions and mix in a few specific ones.

3. Throw in some unlikely predictions, once in awhile some of them are bound to come true.

4. Did I mention make lots of predictions?

5. Talk about natural disasters, especially floods and earthquakes. They happen every month around the world in some form or other.

6. Make sure you sprinkle your predictions with things that are on the cards for any given year such as political unrest or the death of older celebrities or royals.

7. Crow about the predictions that do come true.

8. Don’t worry about the predictions that don’t come true, they will not be checked by the media. If they are, just say I never said I am 100 per cent accurate, or I can only go on what the spirits/stars/cards tell me.

9. Fudge those predictions that are partly true or can be re-worked in the light of hindsight. (This is also known as retrofitting.)

10. Remember that you are unaccountable. Make up whatever you want.

Oh, and one last rule for the media. Don’t go back and check last year’s predictions. It’s a lot of work to research and your audience doesn’t care.

Comments on this post will close at 8pm AEDST.

Most commented

44 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • craig2 says:

      05:50am | 12/11/12

      Sounds like a politicians life doesn’t it, lies, deceit and denial and good money while your at it!

    • Richard says:

      06:44am | 12/11/12

      Fortune tellers rely on the gullibility of their clients to believe their predictions. Craig2 you are correct Fortune tellers and politicians are the same.

    • Steve of QBN says:

      07:42am | 12/11/12

      The problem is, you can walk out on a fortune teller, the other you have to wait 4 years before you can show them the door.

    • Flossie says:

      01:46pm | 12/11/12

      Why do we have to wait FOUR years to show them the door? Doesn’t Australian hold a Federal Election every three years?

    • PJ says:

      05:20pm | 12/11/12

      I think Swan must using a Crystal ball. He certainly hasn’t used any normal accounting principles when giving us his take on the Economy.

      A former Treasury and Finance official at Macroeconomics has shown Labor’s net debt will hit an extraordinary $214.2 billion in 2015-16.

      But Swan told us recently debt will be reduced to $138 billion in 2015-16. AND that from there it will return to zero before 2020-21.

      Clearly Swan is talking bull, or he’s using a dodgy crystal ball?

    • Rosie says:

      06:13am | 12/11/12

      No sane person should be predicting the issue of a royal commission into child sex abuse in the Catholic Church but given a solid guarantee from the most powerful organization in the nation to deal with it and put it to rest eternally. Julia Gillard’s Labor Govt because it is the Govt of the day should put aside the Labor Movement’s ties with the Catholic church and begin the process of cleaning up this evil atrocity. It has to be bipartisan without the politics.

      Watching Lateline the other night I had to turn the TV off after I heard that while a little boy was being raped he focused on a picture of Saint Christopher hanging on the wall in front of him to block out the pain. Etched on my mind forever and will not be comfortable until something is done by any Govt. It is not a State issue, it is a national issue. It is very decent human being’s responsibility to not only wish and hope but to make sure that something is done asap in stopping this evil atrocity. Amen!

    • Louise says:

      10:10am | 12/11/12

      Yes, Rosie, it should be bipartisan, but I also reckon it shouldn’t be just the Catholic Church singled out for investigation.  Why is that the case? Isn’t it unfair (religious) discrimination - when we could hardly be expected to believe that child sexual abuse doesn’t occur in all the many other institutions responsible for the care of children?

      I believe Cardinal Pell when he says that the problem in the Catholic Church is largely historical.  Surely it should be investigated and measures taken to ensure it doesn’t happen in future, but any national investigation should be across the board of ‘carers’, not just targeting Catholic priests.  Unless there’s some reason Catholicism alone is on the agenda??

      And I do think priests should be able to marry - to discourage a culture that’s evidently been very attractive to deviant, predatory, single men.  If only the Vatican would one day agree to that worthwhile change.

    • Mahhrat says:

      06:56am | 12/11/12

      Here’s a suggestion:

      Pass a law that states that if you make a representation of information to a person who could reasonably be expected to act upon that information due to their personal circumstances, you are liable should the person suffera material loss from acting upon your information.

      While the proof would be difficult (verbal contracts always are), you’d have enough lawyers circling the industry that it would simply shut down.

      People who lie to others should get nothing from us (yes, that includes politicians)

    • marley says:

      07:28am | 12/11/12

      That’s nanny-statism, Mahrat.  People ought to take responsibility for their own decisions - and if you make one based on a fortune-teller’s advice you and you alone should be accountable.

    • Steve of QBN says:

      07:49am | 12/11/12

      Mahhrat, what about verbal contracts made on video?  “there will be no carbon tax…..”?

    • Tubesteak says:

      08:16am | 12/11/12

      marley
      What Mahhrat says is technically already in our consumer law to protect consumers in events of trade and commerce. What Mahhrat’s saying is a mixture of false advertising claims and claims regarding goods/services under contracts.

      Therefore, if it applies to a company like Haarvey Norman when advertising and selling things then why not fortune tellers?

    • marley says:

      08:39am | 12/11/12

      @Tubesteak - I don’t think you can compare fortune tellers to Harvey Norman - I’ve never met a fortune teller that provided a warranty.

      I think they’re more akin to the purveyors of “natural” health products - claiming all sorts of wonderous curative powers with no substantial evidence that they do anything of the kind.  If you want to spend your money on echinacea or colloidal silver to cure what ails you, surely that’s on the buyer, not the vendor, if doesn’t work.

      I guess my feeling is that there have to be limits to the states reach - licencing doctors yes, licencing fortune tellers, pffft.

    • Al says:

      09:07am | 12/11/12

      marley - There is only one problem with your comparing fortune tellers to purveyors of “natural” health products.
      The ‘purveyors of “natural” health products’ are quite aware (or should be) that any claims they make about the effectiveness of their treatments to their clients can be used to hold them accountable for the failure, all depending on how they word it.
      This is why so many “natural” health products claims on the lable include the words “..may..” “..could…” “..has been reported..” or simply use testimonials from customers (in which case it is not the seller making the claim, a technicality that alows them to side step the laws around making false claims).

    • Mahhrat says:

      09:26am | 12/11/12

      @Marley:  I would agree with you if we had a level playing field in terms of both the education we give people, and the moral fibre of businesses (and individuals) trying to make a living.  Unfortunatley, we are all different, with separate weaknesses.

      The role of government is to protect its citizens from the use of force.  I would submit that these charlatans use emotional force - specifically, fear of the unknown - to part gullible people from their money, to manipulate for personal gain. 

      I see no moral or ethical difference between using emotional force or physical force to coerce people out of their resources. 

      In this case, we see a person representing that they have access to information not available to their customers, which they will pass on for a fee.  Such is demonstrably untrue.  It is guesswork, psychology and charlatinism.  I will retract all of that once someone shows me they actually have that information resource.

      My solution therefore is to hold the person making that representation accountable for the actions of their clients, if their clients can, on the balance of probability, argue that they made decisions in good faith due to the beliefs they hold; that the soothsayer does indeed have the knowledge they claim to. 

      I wish I had more room to have this argument, because I think it’s not discussed enough.

      @Steve:  I see what you did there, but I maintain that Julia made that representation with the intent of adhering to it.  I’m discussing a situation where the INTENT is to deceive.  I’m not suggesting Julia isn’t capable of lying, but in that specific case I don’t believe she did.  Of course, that doesn’t mean I would trust her further than I can throw my car, because I wouldn’t have made the deals she did.  That probably explains why she’s PM and I’m not smile

    • Tubesteak says:

      09:31am | 12/11/12

      marley
      Anyone that makes advertising claims must ensure their product meets those claims and that they do not deceive the public. There is a pretty low bar for deceiving, too. Anyone that sells a good or service must make sure that the good or service they sell is fit for purpose and does what they claim that it does or what the consumer said they wanted it to do.
      This isn’t about licensing, it is about being accountable for your claims. Therefore, unless furtune tellers have a big sign out the front that says “nothing here may actually happen as claimed or inferred to happen” and then remind their customers of the same thing they are in breach of this legislation and the ACCC is well within their power to investigate and penalise.

    • Sync says:

      10:01am | 12/11/12

      @Mahhrat - I suppose that Gillard did not lie when she boldly and firmly declared “...there will be no Carbon Tax under any government I lead.”


      After all - it’s not a Carbox Tax, it’s an Emmissions Trading Scheme (Carbon Tax to the uninitiated); and Gillard never really led the government, the Greens (headed then by Bob Brown) led it.

    • Mahhrat says:

      10:57am | 12/11/12

      @Sync:  We have to do this every time? Okay.

      Lie - Noun: 2.An intentionally false statement.

      Did she go back on a pledge she made?  Yep.  Did she INTENTIONALLY set out to mislead everyone when she made the pledge?  I don’t believe so:  when she made it, she intended to adhere to it. 

      If you’re honest, you also know that in the next breath she did say she’d be legislating a price on carbon.  That is what she’s doing.

      Am I happy with how it turned out?  Nope, and that will influence my voting next election.  Problem is, every single politician in Canberra has the same credibility issue.  We can trot out the same “lie” argument for almost all of them.  It’s a moot argument,  it’s fallacious and we need to get on with it.

    • marley says:

      11:11am | 12/11/12

      @Tubesteak - well, it seems to me, again using the natural products analogy, that all the fortune teller has to do is put up a sign saying “Readings given:  we have hundreds of testimonials from satisfied clients telling how our advice has helped them” - which seems to be the only bar that applies to natural products.

    • Eskimo says:

      07:17am | 12/11/12

      Wayne Swan will fail to deliver a surplus. Did I get that prediction in first?

    • Paul C says:

      08:23am | 12/11/12

      Oh that one doesn’t count…... certainties aren’t predictions.

    • FINK says:

      07:34am | 12/11/12

      “People who laugh at gypsy fortune tellers take economists seriously”

      “Why did the witch (Julia Gillard) give up fortune telling (Politics)?”
      “There was no future in it.”

      “gives us a 8 per cent success rate”
      Does this mean that Julia Gillard’s prediction that “There will be NO carbon tax under a government I lead” falls into the 92% category. Let’s hope her prediction or re election as PM for 2013 is in the same realm of improbability.

    • Catching up says:

      01:19pm | 12/11/12

      The PM was correct. No carbon tax, but a cost on carbon emission, the prediction the PM made at the same time. 

      Another prediction that the PM made was that it would not destroy the nation or its economy. Abbott’s prediction, in this case was far off.

      The second prediction of the PM, that the public would see the futility of Mr. Abbott’s prediction and there would be a turnabout in the polls.  Another successful prediction.

    • Anubis says:

      01:40pm | 12/11/12

      @ Catching up - Whilst on theme her next breath stated that she would convene a People’s Forum to shape the “price on Carbon” and would take it to the 2013 election as a policy. At no time did she say that she would be legislating it before then. She is also on record as saying that the Carbon Tax (yes she did admit that it was a carbon tax) would fix the problem of climate change. 

      Let’s see - is climate change fixed now that we have the carbon tax? No (not acording to the IPCC). Did she delay implementing until after the 2013 election? No.  Did she lie about these? Yes. Can she be trusted on anything she says? No.

    • Brenda says:

      07:47am | 12/11/12

      The Labor government has a long and strong history of association with the Catholic church.

      In fairness, it’s true to say that it is definitely not only the Catholic church under a very grave and intensifying dark cloud, but it does appear to be most widespread within that culture.

      Federal Labor’s only recourse is to initiate a Royal Commission into all institutions responsible for the care and protection of children.  To let the others off the hook would be an injustice to the wider community of child victims and their families.

    • Onlooker says:

      08:28am | 12/11/12

      A Royal Commission into abuse of children by priests in The Catholic Church should be a priority. This abuse has gone on for a very long time and it is time it stopped. If you are Catholic you need to think very seriously about the money you pay through various things like collection plate and school fee’s because without your money supporting these priests they could not continue abusing children. In the general community there is loss of respect for The Catholic Church because of all this child abuse and cover ups, that is a shame because I am sure most Catholics would be horrified at this. But unless they stand up and be counted and say loudly no more, the abuse will continue. Tony Abbott was a trainee Catholic Priest, I am sure he would not condone this child abuse but he needs to stand up and lead the charge for a Royal Commisson

    • Old Voter. says:

      09:01am | 12/11/12

      How about an election before September 2012. Slater & Gordon will not go away.

    • Chris R says:

      09:05am | 12/11/12

      Nice one Richard Saunders. I like your work on “The Zone” and Aust Skeptics. Thanks goodness someone is taking it to the shonks and maddies.

    • patsy says:

      09:07am | 12/11/12

      Don’t you love the psychic mediums that send emails offering advice and the winning lottery numbers for only $99.99? Wouldn’t they they better off living off the profits of their many wins than preying on the desperate and gullible?

    • Gordon says:

      09:11am | 12/11/12

      Rule 11. Be an octopus.
      Nobody argues with a octopus.  They will feed you for picking world cup winners, and they put you on Youtube when you get it right.

    • iansand says:

      09:14am | 12/11/12

      When I need a psychic I expect them to contact me.

    • Gordon says:

      12:39pm | 12/11/12

      But that would happen before you needed then, and you wouldn’t need then then, and they’d know that so they wouldn’t contact you!

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:48am | 12/11/12

      Energy and Demographics. Two inexorable forces in the human universe. Expect energy costs to escalate due to increased demand for energy due to population booms and increasing scarcity. There will never be a global boom again since such an economic boom would lead to a greatly increased oil prices which would feed into increased costs in other sectors of the economy which forces people to stop spending on discretionary items, further depressing the economy and ultimately defaulting on mortgages when the unemployment level rises. The global economy is locked into a homeostasis system which rests upon the key factors of population growth and energy scarcity (or rather competition for energy resources between United States, China, India and Europe)

    • KK says:

      10:12am | 12/11/12

      And yet how many people agreeing with you Richard believe in the god served up by religion?  Hypocrits I say.

    • St. Michael says:

      11:19am | 12/11/12

      Many Gods are served up by “religion”.  Would you like to identify the one you’re talking about?

    • KK says:

      01:26pm | 12/11/12

      I’ll just go with religion in general, or as I can see from your handle, maybe lets say catholicism.  Name any one of them, same deal, they are all just scientology with a different veneer.  Who’s to say you can believe in a cloud sitting bearded man wielding lightning bolts, Xenu, or a person telling you the future for next week?  Both are just as sad as each other, but two of them are institutionalised and then used as a means of control.  In my opinion, “soothsaying” is less harmful as most realise its just a bit of fun and is about as accurate as pin the tail on the donkey.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      01:40pm | 12/11/12

      In the ancient world, religion and soothsaying were often one and the same. Romans would not go to war unless a divination and sacrifice were performed before the battle.

    • KK says:

      02:29pm | 12/11/12

      Shane, we’ve come a long way since then.  Examples, electricity, mapping the world, landing on the moon, most of science in general, the iron age…...I could go on but the see if you can name one thing that has remained essentially unchanged since roman times despite all the advancements…..Mmmm gee…lets see…religion?

    • david b says:

      10:24am | 12/11/12

      it must be a slow news day - the Terror leads with a story on Sydney Airport - that must get recycled every 3 months

    • St. Michael says:

      11:22am | 12/11/12

      You also forgot rule 11, one that all economists know and respect, one that sort of ties in with quantum mechanics, too.  Give a number or a date, but never both.

    • CC says:

      03:31pm | 12/11/12

      Sounds a lot like my dating policy.

    • Crystal Ball says:

      11:28am | 12/11/12

      Here’s No 11 prediction;  The pub up the road has a sign up on the board, “free beer tomorrow”. There was a big queue last night around midnight.

    • Pattem says:

      03:10pm | 12/11/12

      I had an itch in my toe last Friday that an article on clairvoyance was going to be found on the Punch sometime this week!

    • stephen says:

      06:42pm | 12/11/12

      What would you like to know ?

    • Dave says:

      06:52pm | 12/11/12

      Just write some more non stories its all you journalists do all day anyway.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Found a TV meteorologist on Twitter with the last name Piotrowski. There's a whole newsroom of Piotrowskis out there

Paul Colgan

RT @businessinsider: Man Being Questioned For Boston Bombing Connection Shot And Killed By FBI by @paulszoldrahttp://t.co/OtypP2PRgI

Daniel Piotrowski

This is a must read @TheAtlantic. Whether you think you know everything or think you know nothing http://t.co/naoUutCoWF

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JoshuaWithers: Have you seen the Australian version of Breaking bad? He get's cancer and Medicare covers his costs and the series ends.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter