On 10 March 1876, Alexander Bell called Thomas Watson.  By today’s standards, unremarkable.  But in 1876, he had made the world’s first telephone call.

Got 40 cents? Don't call Kevin Rudd. Picture: File.

Some 130 years later, today’s World Telephone Day celebrates that call, in an environment very different from Alexander Bell’s. Telephones of various types, shapes, colours and sizes are enmeshed in our everyday lives. 

Today’s phones are personal and business necessities.  They can be fashion accessories.  They’re more compact, more mobile, and we rely upon them more than ever before.

A business without a phone is a business not open for business.

Perhaps that’s why business opposes Rudd Labor’s plan to extend the scope of the ‘Do Not Call’ Register to business numbers.

The Do Not Call Register Legislation Amendment Bill would allow all Australian telephone and fax numbers to be listed on the register. 

Labor’s Bill casts the ‘telemarketing’ net so wide that it catches not only telemarketing businesses, but nets ‘routine’ business calls made by most businesses.

As Fairfax told a Senate Committee: “‘telemarketing’ is a word that means different things to different people”.

This uncertainty, of itself, comes at a cost to business.

But there’s uncertainty too, for individuals wanting to call business.  Is an individual or volunteer seeking work or offering assistance to a local business, ‘cold calling’ and telemarketing their services?

In principle, expanding those who can register “don’t call us”, sounds worthy.  There’ll be winners, who will want to register to not be called.  There’ll be losers, who will have to check – or ‘wash’ – numbers they propose to call, with the Communications watchdog, pay a fee for the privilege, and create and maintain internal do-not-call records. 

The principle becomes more worrisome than worthy, if the government can’t substantiate either the winners or the losers. The principle becomes worthless, if in practice, the losers outnumber the winners.
The Government says this bill is for business benefit, but can’t offer any proof that business will benefit.

Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy hasn’t substantiated how many businesses will benefit by signing up to an extended register or how many (and how often) businesses will be burdened by additional compliance costs and red tape.

He hasn’t, because he can’t, because he doesn’t know.

The best he can offer as to why Rudd Labor will supposedly ‘help’ businesses by extending the Do Not Call Register, is that it’s his view that it should.

When asked during Senate Estimates for further clarification, Senator Conroy said: “It has been a particular concern of mine that unwanted and unsolicited calls and faxes are wasting valuable business resources and could potentially affect the operation of emergency service organisations.”

Will business really say “Don’t call us; we’re on Do Not Call”?  Hardly.  In reality, a minority is likely to ‘opt in’, yet the majority will be required to regularly check whether the many they wish to call, are any of the few who don’t want to be called.  Got that?

In the week the world celebrates its first phone call, Parliament was destined to debate Rudd Labor’s Bill to reign in phone calls.

But the Government worked out it had made the wrong call because Rudd Labor has taken the Do Not Call Register Legislation Amendment Bill off its policy speed dial and put it on hold.

Senator Mary Jo Fisher is the Deputy Chairperson, Senate Standing Legislation Committee on Environment, Communications and the Arts.

A copy of the Senate report is available online.

11 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • AccountingServ says:

      07:41am | 29/11/10

      http://www.1accounting-help.com/?cat=12
      accounting
      small business accounting software
      accounting software
      accounting jobs
      http://www.1accounting-help.com/?p=79
      creative solutions accounting
      online accounting course
      accounting services
      free accounting software
      http://www.1accounting-help.com/?p=3
      accounting careers
      accounting terms
      financial accounting
      purpose of accounting
      accounting scandals
      accounting information systems
      defense finance and accounting service
      small business accounting
      peachtree accounting software
      fund accounting
      accounting principles
      accounting construction management project software
      peachtree accounting
      accounting jobs online
      accounting work in process chart for business management
      what is accounting
      accounting business professional services small
      accounting course online
      accounting jobs pittsburgh
      free software for small business accounting
      recent accounting scandals
      accounting jobs australia
      accounting banking finance job resume
      accounting history
      accounting career change
      accounting career information tax attorney
      open source accounting software
      acadia university accounting online
      accounting bookkeeping
      accounting financial insurance software
      accounting in business sports marketing
      ethics accounting
      accounting classes online

    • Daryl says:

      10:08am | 11/03/10

      Senator you have done nothing here but embarress yourself!  If you have a business relationship with someone, they are allowed to call you, whether you are on the Do Not Call Register or not.  Someone with your responsibilities should know this! You are doing yourself and the Liberal Party a great disservice in attempting to start this scare campaign.

    • Justin says:

      09:05am | 11/03/10

      If as a collective society we had some smarts, telemarketing would be dead. People either are interested, or hang up very quickly. That makes telemarketing convenient.

      How about you start seeing how long you can keep a telemarketer engaged before they disconnect the call. Fake long periods of holding, with just a second every 15-20 seconds just to make sure they think you’re coming back, interrupting calls with faked domestic violence, detailing your employment to surveyors as that of a drug addict/house robber, but my personal favorite, is seeing how many outback, crazy, middle of nowhere locations I can get those accomodation people to look up to see if they have accomodation in.

      I find I get a call every now and then, but no where near the frequency with which they used to. They don’t call me now, not because they’re aren’t allowed to, but because it’s inefficient, a waste of time, and they don’t want to.

    • Davido says:

      01:17am | 11/03/10

      Not really, the telephone was invented as a communication device not a medium for advertising.

      I like the notion above of all numbers being ‘silent’ until consent is given.

    • Andrew Goff says:

      11:51pm | 10/03/10

      Oh my heavens! What next, genuine truth in advertising? What is the world coming to?

    • John says:

      07:35pm | 10/03/10

      I agree with other posters that we should be able to choose which types of calls we want to opt out of. I don’t particularly want political, religious or charity calls either (though I’ve never had the first two, I’m just saying it hypothetically). I’d love to be able to opt out of them.

    • Mr T says:

      06:14pm | 10/03/10

      After reading this I’m wondering if I should go remove the ‘No Junk Mail’ sign off my neighbours letterbox because they clearly must not of known what they were doing sticking it on there. What’s going to happen if Woolworths has a sale on bread and the fools own a toaster.

    • Daniel says:

      05:58pm | 10/03/10

      I think its a real shame phone boxes have nearly gone and replaced by mobiles.I blame Telstra for it and their drive to reduce phone box numbers and push people in Australia to get mobile phones and endure huge debts and bills.They should be held accountable.

    • Glen says:

      03:59pm | 10/03/10

      A fine example of where the opposition just want to oppose.

      Seriously, was it worth writing an article for, I doubt you’ll find anyone (without political motive) who agrees with this point of view.

    • Joe says:

      02:24pm | 10/03/10

      I agree with DocBud, just because i rent a line for private or business use, be it a phone or fax, does not mean I automatically am agreeing to partake in telemarketing and waste my time in order for others to make money, nor do i want to receive political advertising or messages via the telephone, nor partake in charity fund raising.  If someone wishes to receive calls such as these, it probably should be on an ‘opt in’ basis, rather than the current Register, where one must ‘opt out’ and choose not to receive these calls, with all numbers placed in the register automatically.

      If that means business suffers or become the ‘losers’ as the article describes, that can hardly be blamed on the general public, as it was business and especially the telemarketers who have simply abused this service and public in order to generate business for themselves, without compensating those who’s time they have wasted and profited from.  This is especially the case, if they are calling another business line and wasting staff time, which is one reason, business numbers should be included as well.

      While after moving house and registering my new number, I received quite a few calls from companies claiming to represent the federal government, offering insulation or environmental inspections, yet they could not even name the government department they worked for and clearly were lying or deceive those they called. So is also a matter of security as well, as credentials or identification cannot be checked, unlike when someone comes to the door.

      While I doubt this is as difficult or controversial an issue as the article makes out to put into practice, as it is quite easy to distinguish legitimate calls from those with genuine reasons for making them, from those that are a nuisance, unsolicited and unwanted.  When sending SPAM email is actually illegal and a crime in this country, unless someone agrees to receiving it, i do not see why the same should not apply to telephones and faxes.

    • DocBud says:

      01:20pm | 10/03/10

      I’d really like to see the Do not Call Register for private numbers extended to include charities and politicians, we don’t want calls from neither.

      Why not give the phone number “owner” the right to add any number to the register if they so choose? It should not matter to the government whether the number is a business or private number, a fax or a voice line, the owner best knows who they do and don’t want to use the number

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Punch on: Open thread 28/05/2012

Punch on: Open thread 28/05/2012

There were two skydiving incidents reported over the weekend. VIDEO: Granny’s shocking skydive…

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter