I make no apology for being lazy. If there’s a corner, I’ll cut it. If there’s a fast way, I’ll find it. If there is a reason not to do something, I’ll find it, use it and then flog it until it’s a mere paste.

I don’t reinvent wheels. I don’t like to do something twice. Tautology is not my thing, except when I’m trying to make a point.  So I don’t understand workaholics. I don’t get how someone can get up at 6am, dress, eat and go to work for 14 hours, not break for lunch or a walk around the block, go home, defrost something and sit down at the dining table to start working again, only getting up to put on Lateline.

That is not a balanced life.

A friend of mine was tending towards workaholism in her 20s. Her father gave her this piece of advice, which has stuck in my mind: if you put your hand in a bucket of water and swirl it around, there’s a lot of activity going on. But if you take it out, it becomes still. So take your hand out once and a while. The bucket of water will be there tomorrow.

Towards the end of Kevin as PM, I kept thinking about that analogy. Every time I heard him ask if he could say he was working hard, I thought ‘Get your hand out of the bucket.’

Now Julia Gillard is saying that her weakness is she works too hard. Well, we had one of those. Workaholics don’t do it for me anymore.

There’s a new book on the market, which I hope becomes necessary reading for every member of the Australian workforce: ‘The way we’re working isn’t working’ – by Tony Schwartz et al (Simon and Schuster).

In it, there are charts and curves and studies and statistics, which show that long days are not productive days. Rest is necessary to regenerate and reinvigorate the mind and body.

My favourite case study was of the young accountants at one of the big four (three or five, I lost track when Andersen’s folded) firms. They were expected to work 14-hour days during tax time over a number of months.

Schwartz taught these accountants to be more efficient by reducing distractions and focusing on tasks more fully. They would work for 90 minutes at a time and have a break. Many of them took an hour off in the afternoon to go to the gym.

When they came back to work at 4 or 5 in the afternoon, usually the time they were looking for a snickers or another cup of coffee, they were more productive than they had been before Schwartz had worked with them. And rather than working until late into the night, were able to get more done in less time.

I love that!

If Kevin Rudd had given himself more time – and not just going to church because he managed to do media outside the church more often than not – to walk or meditate or sing castrato arias – he might have had a bit more perspective. He might have realised that for all the activity, he hadn’t actually done anything since he apologised in 2008. And what he had done hadn’t really worked.

I would much rather have read (let’s face it, Masterchef was on, I wasn’t going to watch the 7.30Report) a transcript where Julia Gillard said her weakness was becoming a bit rowdy at the football or liking a good crime novel, ornithology or philately even.
John Howard had his morning sprint (let’s face it, it wasn’t a walk) and he was a cricket tragic. But he also seemed to be a bit of a rugby tragic, Olympics tragic, Tour de France tragic etc. Tony Abbott likes a triathalon and has a morning run. Wayne Goss was a runner. Tom Burns used to fish. Harold Holt liked swimming in the sea, worst luck. Bill Clinton played the saxaphone and around.

So enough of this bull that workaholism is good. It’s not. Bring back balance.

* Julia is a former Liberal staff not likely to say anything positive about Labor anyway. Saves you looking it up.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

70 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • dead to me says:

      08:12am | 21/07/10

      Working hard or hardly working. My mate always gets a promotion in his company but he told me he doesn’t really do any work, he just gives the illusion he is busy and working. Apparently being grumpy, angry and working around a lot gives the impression you are ‘trying’ to work something out but it reality you could be just trying to find where you last left your cup of coffee.

    • Bitten says:

      09:15am | 21/07/10

      Isn’t that a Seinfeld episode where George convinces his boss he’s working hard by being cranky everything he gets asked to do something?

    • Macca says:

      09:38am | 21/07/10

      @Bitten, and sleeps under his desk so it look like he is working long hours. Classic televeision!

    • Lauren says:

      09:58am | 21/07/10

      Yep, he got that from Seinfeld!

    • Peter says:

      02:08pm | 21/07/10

      Perception is everything. My GM loves staff that are at work till 7pm everynight. These people are on the net all day, don’t do much but because they are here for 10 hours a day, to him they are heros. Those who come here for 8 hours and do some or alot of work, well, he just looks down on them because they are not here long enough..

      Its all about “presentism’ and walking around with a piece of paper in your hand so you look busy. You can be doing bugger all, but to some managers, your a star for managing to do nothing for over 10 hours each day…

    • S.L says:

      08:26am | 21/07/10

      Oh boy can I relate to this article Julia! I run a small business which is doing ok but the old adage “all work and no play” becomes truer every day for me. I work 7 days a week (some only 3 hours but I’m still there) and had a chance over the NSW school holidays to take tuesday to thursday off on both weeks. Guess what! An employee came down with the flu on the first week so I was back on deck and another copped it the next week. I had the grand total of one day off! Now you might ask “why don’t I get another staff member to fill in?” Then you hear the excuses fly! “oh my dogs about to have pups”, “I have to take my daughter to netball training” and my all time favourite “my wife won’t let me!” Now all my employees are trustworthy and are a credit to themselves as well as my business but trying to get them to “bend” a little is like trying to bail out a leaky boat with a teaspoon! 
      I have already said to my girlfriend when the business is debt free “I’m outa here!”

    • Rob S says:

      08:41am | 21/07/10

      I’m a workaholic,
      7 days a week,
      at work by 0630 each day
      but I earned an extra $86,000, another $1600 per week extra last finanacial year,
      so being a workaholic works for me…............. tee he

      Rob

    • KH says:

      08:59am | 21/07/10

      Most professional white collar jobs don’t pay overtime - just a salary, and the additional hours are out of your own time.  That doesn’t work for a lot of people, as they often feel obliged to do this just to keep the job, which is wrong.  The article is pointing out that better efficiency means you can get as much done in a shorter time - hours doesn’t equal quality necessarily, if you are spending a lot of that time being unfocussed on the task at hand.
      It doesn’t qualify as ‘workaholism’ if you are getting paid for the additional time - that is an economic decision, and presumably one you could pull back if you wanted to.

    • Seano says:

      09:23am | 21/07/10

      As my old man used to say, “You’re a long time dead”.

    • Arnold Layne says:

      09:54am | 21/07/10

      So you made an extra 86k.  Big deal.  When do you actually have the chance to use it?  While you’re at work 7 days a week I’m spending my spare time with my wife, kids, friends, playing sport, going to the footy, reading, going to gigs etc.  I’m with Seano - you’re a long time dead.

    • Phil says:

      10:05am | 21/07/10

      Rob Agree entirely.
      Being self employed my wife and I worked extra hard last year and yes we managed to increase out income by a slightly less figure. We will work similarly hard this year and get a similar result.
      I did so more by working smart than hard. Unfortunately I am putting in many more hours this last 6 months than ever, but hey the results are fantastic.
      Others could learn from your and my lessons, take a few risks. It hasnt been all champayne, we had a $30,000 bad debt 18 months ago a disagreement with out main principal who then managed to go against an agreement and cost us much more than that, but I needed to get over it quickly, nuckle down cut the whinging and get ahead. Yes we went a bit backwards for a couple of years investing in the business, but we now have an asset which would provide a return of nearly 500% on the capital injection in the initial stages.
      Having now built up in 4 years to over $ 250,000 per annum income and growing. Not bad at all for a year 10 student who was never that great at english.
      During the past year I honoured a restraint of trade agreement when others did not show the same level of committment to our contract.
      I am very lucky that by mostly working from home (sure I travel to see my clients), I can see my children every morning, take them to school, and having an external office only 10 mins from home is also a bonus. I have been able to attend every assembly, school production as well, and over the past 18 months have had more leisure time off than in the years prior.

    • Reg says:

      10:13am | 21/07/10

      Hey Rob ... you should give yourself the sack for wasting good workaholic work time on here.  smile

      Perhaps you are Hillsonger who believes in ostentatious consumption so’as to make your neighbours envious at your grand life-style so they have to come and join the sect to learn how not to be envious.  The workaholism of ostentatious display. First the Mormans and now this.

    • S.L says:

      12:21pm | 21/07/10

      So Rob S you say you’re at work by 0630 each day but you fail to mention when you go home, or is your total commute from your kitchen to your home office? By the way it would be great to have a sleep in like yourself as 0630 is smoko time for me…......

    • Soames says:

      04:19pm | 21/07/10

      One can automatically verify the veracity of your post,  Rob S, by the 0630. However, one ought be cautious; health wise that is, regardless of age. One would not like to see a blank space, where your contribution would be absent. It’s like driving fast in the rain, to get home sooner.

    • Peter says:

      05:01pm | 21/07/10

      @ Rob S.. I don’t know your personal life situation, but my recommendation to people is work on that first and your work second (its amazing how a good home life can lead to a successful career as well)..

      I still work hard but don’t consider myself a workaholic any more..

      Success in life should be messured in more than just $$ terms…

    • James1 says:

      05:46pm | 21/07/10

      It is funny that so many people responded to Rob, because chances are he will never read this.  If he works as much as he claims, then he most likely used the two minutes each week that he spends not either working or sleeping to make the post.  Most likely he posted it from his iPhone while using the toilet.

    • Seano says:

      08:54am | 21/07/10

      I agree. I think Rudd burnt himself out and became uncommunicative, grumpy and stopped working with his team, dictating to them instead. I think it’s a shame because he did such a brilliant job in outsting Howard but the situation was one of his own making and the party were right to roll him.

      I do find it funny when conservatives claim the unelectable Abbott saw off Rudd when clearly Tony’s best tactic and only tactic whilst Rudd self desctructed was keeping shtum for fear of opening his big mouth to change feet.

    • TimB says:

      09:41am | 21/07/10

      Are you forgetting that Tony led the Liberal revolt against the terribly flawed ETS?
      That was what started the downward slide for Rudd. A policy that was apparently “The greatest moral challenge of our time”, with rumours of a DD election to be called if the Libs didn’t play ball. How quickly it turned into political poison that Kruddy didn’t want to touch with a 10 foot pole.
      That’s when people finally started realising that Rudd had absolutely no conviction and no beliefs beyond whatever it took to get himself & Labor re-elected.
      And that’s when the rest of the poll-driven blunders followed:
      - A hasty end to the fatally flawed insulation scheme
      - A hastily convened national health policy to try and deflect from his broken “Health takeover” promise,
      - A hastily drawn Mining tax policy to fill the giant black hole left in the budget from wasteful Labor spending (BER and Insulation).

      Tony’s elevation to Liberal leader on the ETS issue kickstarted the whole process. He helped expose the Government and Rudd for the incompetent bunch that they are. 
      Of course you admitting that Tony had a hand in Rudd’s fall would mean that the criticism of the Labor government is valid and wouldn’t tie in with the “Blank slate” tactic Gillard and Labor are using now would it?

    • Seano says:

      10:25am | 21/07/10

      Your big win for Abbott was running a hostile senate? lol. What a master stroke.

    • TimB says:

      10:45am | 21/07/10

      I’m sorry I must have missed where Tony led the Greens. And the Independents. They had a part to play too you know.

      The Senate’s job is a house of review, it’s supposed to examine the details of legislation and stop bad policy from getting in. It’s not supposed to be a rubber stamp machine.

      Tony got the opposition to DO THEIR JOB. Scrutinise the proposed laws. Raise the issues. Foster debate. A strong opposition that holds the government to account (something that Turnbull and Nelson failed dismally at) is good for Australia. It’s part of democracy whether you like it or not.

      It was the Tony & the Liberals holding the Government to account for it’s mistakes that resulted in falling opinion polls, and thus ultimately Rudd’s removal from the leadership of the Labor party. Your problem is you want to blame everything on Kevin, and refuse to admit the errors Labor as a whole have made.

    • Press says:

      11:23am | 21/07/10

      TimB wants to run the Liberals and ETS thing. Goodoh.

      The Liberal party *had* an ETS. Went to the 2007 election with it.

      The Liberal Party *negotiated* a different ETS, in the 2009 parliament.

      The Liberal Party immolated their own chosen (unelected) Leader over the ETS *they* negotiated.

      Too clever by half, TimB.

      Don’t let the truth trip you up on your way to the Opposition benches.

    • Seano says:

      12:01pm | 21/07/10

      Wot Press said!

    • TimB says:

      12:50pm | 21/07/10

      What’s that got to do with anything? Typical Labor misdirection tactic, can’t refute a valid point so you try to change the issue.

      So Liberal party policy under Howard & Turnbull is different to what it was under Abbott. The party changed their minds. And rightly so too, the legislation would have led to economic suicide for no practical result (regardless if man-made climate change is an issue or not).

      Fact still remains it was Tony that united what was a disorganised rabble. It was Tony that led them to take the fight to the Government.
      And ultimately it was that continous pressure from Tony and the Liberals that rattled Rudd and the Labor party so badly that we saw history being made with Rudd being the first PM ever to be dumped by his party in his first term. It wouldn’t have happened under Turnbull.

      Give some credit where credit is due.

    • Seano says:

      03:27pm | 21/07/10

      Misdirection? Please. They negotiated an ETS and then reneged purely for political point scoring purposes. Typical Liberal to put the good of the party over that of the country.

      Abbott did not cause Rudd to become uncommunicative, did not cause Rudd to stop working with in the party process, did cause Rudd to try and run a one man show. Abbott had about as much to do with Rudd’s downfall as Rudd did with Nelson and Turnbull. They were all victims of their own failings as will Abbott be at the coming election because no matter how much the hard right love him, no matter they spin it the bloke is unelectable.

      Had they foreseen Rudd’s self destruction I doubt the libs would have elevated the expendable Abbott but that’s what happens when you assume.

    • TimB says:

      04:00pm | 21/07/10

      You keep using that word (unelectable). I do not think it means what you think it means.
      Tony Abbott is currently standing for re-election for the seat of Warringah (& indirectly the position of PM). People are able to vote for him. People are able to elect him. Thus he is electable.
      The general public like me (and you I assume unless there’s something you haven’t told us) on the otherhand who AREN"T running for elected office, are the ones who are, in fact, unelectable.

      As for Rudd being a one man show: That’s an out and out lie, designed to pass the blame for all of Labor’s failings onto Rudd and avoid responsibility. Gillard had her part in things. So did Swan. So did many others.
      Tony pointed these failings out. He did it on the ETS (Wong). He did it on the insulation debacle (Garret). He did it on the BER (Gillard). He did it on the hospital scheme (Roxon). He did it on the mining tax (Swan). 

      You keep trying to claim Tony has done nothing but sit there and stay quiet whilst Kevin Rudd has single-handedly imploded.
      You won’t give credit to the Opposition for doing what it’s supposed to do, holding the government of the day to account (deriding it as “political point scoring”).
      And you won’t accept that Labor is just as much to blame as Kevin Rudd for its recent failures.
      There’s no point arguing with you any longer. Facts and logic appear to have no place in your world view.

    • MarK says:

      04:40pm | 21/07/10

      Seano perhaps you and Press missed the hundreds and thousands of email and letters to national and liberal politicians that started this whole dump the ETS thing.

      You are confusing Turnbull’s wishes with the coalitions members wishes.

      It is irrefutable that the rank and file didn’t want the CRPS or ETS or whatever the great big new tax was being called.

      Turnbull did.

      Guess what, he lost his job over it. As did that cowardly fake Rudd.

      Get off the high horse. If Labor really wanted it they would have legislated for it, gone a dd, negotiated with the greens or done whatever it took to meet “the greatest moral challenge of our times”. Copenhagen stopped them with the complete repudiation of the green dream and in exposing the lie that was global warming.

      Nice go at rewriting history though. The ETS killed a PM and an opposition leader. Real good policy that. And Joolia is too cowardly to say anything about her own before the election.

      She really has come up a bit short.

      Keep trying to justify the weaknees and cowardly nature of Gillard, Rudd and Swan though with your spin about a renege. Labor had a white Australia policy once. Do we still need to call them out on that? Times change. Do try to keep up you two.

      PS Abbott set the agenda for the country when he took over from Turnbull. That is why Rudd folded like a deck of cards.

      You really do need to catch up seano. So behind the times.

      Abbott said NO to the ETS - Labor dropped it.
      Abbott said NO the mining tax - Labor totally rehashed it (and lies about it)
      Abbott said YES to offshore processing of boat people - Gillard is desperately trying to find a place other than Nauru to stop her complete humiliation.

      It really must be embarrassing being you guys.

      Also seano show us the big win = hostile senate in action. Tell us how many timnes the legislation was blocked under Abbott? Any legislation actually. As usual these nasty facts do get in the way of your bias don’t they?

    • Press says:

      05:00pm | 21/07/10

      Uh, TimB, *you* made the ETS thing the whole thrust of your first reply.

      All your own work, mate. 

      Don’t blame *me* for *your* sloppy argument unravelling, ta very much.

      Misdirection be buggered. 

      Seano, pretty much agree with you, and thanks.

    • Gregg says:

      12:40am | 22/07/10

      Seano and Press, it’s called democracy and something that Caucus may term as something different.

    • Seano says:

      01:38am | 22/07/10

      @TimB - A good opposition holds the government accountable and provides better alternatives - blocking legislation for point scoring and proposing no alternative is not a good opposition.

      To many in the community Abbott is unelectable, perhaps he should deal with that fact rather than wishing it would go away.

      @MarK - You’re wrong yet again. The ETS was rejected in the Senate under Abbotts leadership on the 2nd of December triggering the potential for a double dissolution. So it was sent more than once. But don’t let the facts get in the way of your rant.

    • Nigel Catchlove says:

      08:56am | 21/07/10

      Good article.  I agree that balance in life is ultimately more important than any workaholic’s obsession.  People who declare; ‘I don’t watch television, I don’t have time’, also mark themselves as socially inept, unable to balance life and sometimes simply weird.  I’d much rather be led by a balanced and interesting person than a robot. - give me someone who works efficiently, has hobbies, loves AFL and is hooked on Masterchef.

    • KH says:

      09:37am | 21/07/10

      I wouldn’t narrow it down that much…........a love of AFL suggests the person isn’t very smart…....... wink  Masterchef I can live with….......unless Jimmy wins.  Then I’m never watching it again.

    • Reg says:

      10:39am | 21/07/10

      Gentlemen and or lady, a passion for AFL and Masterchef marks you out for lesser things. The rest… uuummm Sorry.

    • The Shaking Head says:

      01:02pm | 21/07/10

      Tsssk Melbournians - any topic always ends up with AFL.  The town is a nightmare that can only ever end by moving.

    • Bitten says:

      09:24am | 21/07/10

      Generally speaking all the crap about work/life balance only takes into account a very narrow selection of workers. If you’re a white collar office jockey, yes it’s probably a great idea to go at 4.30pm. The thing is, you all expect other people to be up and about at work providing services for YOU around the clock. So which is it? If we’re going to harp on about work/life balance, surely everyone gets a guernsey? So you’re all cool if there are no healthcare staff at any of the hospitals or medical centres tonight because we all went home to enjoy that work/life balance you recommended? Oh good.

    • Arnold Layne says:

      10:32am | 21/07/10

      Work/life balance doesn’t mean 9-5 Mon-Fri.  It means ensuring you have a balance between work and outside work.  Of course some people do shift work but they have just as much right to time off as anyone else.  Most people on shifts are on a roster and have their time off.

    • Bitten says:

      11:44am | 21/07/10

      Arnold, not in healthcare. We work 12 hours a day, 5 days a week and still have patients abusing us on the phone because we can’t fit them in for two weeks - if it was up to the patients (that is, the Australian public) we’d be here 24/7. It would seem people don’t think we have just as much a right to time off as the next person - they still expect their needs to be served, workforce shortage be damned.

      So while you personally sound quite reasonable in your expectations, I’m afraid your fellow Australians don’t have a sufficient degree of insight to recognise that there has to be some give and take in society if we’re all to have work/life balance, as this article seems to suggest.

    • Arnold Layne says:

      01:05pm | 21/07/10

      Bitten, fair points.  The problem there is with resource availability and it’s not fair to take it out on you guys.

    • Thursty says:

      09:27am | 21/07/10

      Look, there’s always going to be lazy people who put these theories forward. The fact is, you don’t understand how a workaholic does the things they do, because you do not have the genetic faculties to partake in that drive.

    • Muttley says:

      04:44pm | 21/07/10

      or we are not so single minded that we actually have some depth to our lives that involve around more than being at work? The workaholics i have seen all seem to think the workplace revolves around them and the business will stop if they arent there. Sounds like over compensating for an inferiority complex to me

    • Macca says:

      09:44am | 21/07/10

      I had a meeting with my Manager twice Removed a few months back. His advice: “don’t care how you score your runs, as long as you get your century”

    • Reservoir Dog says:

      09:49am | 21/07/10

      The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary.

      I was watching Lateline recently and they had an interview about with a guy that had done a study of the most successful people in their respective fields and he discovered that it takes 10,000 hours of practice to achieve their level of success.

      You can talk all you want about work-life balance but ultimately you only get out what you put in. Try to tell us about your work-life balance when you’re living in a hovel in the outer suburbs, driving a broken car and can only afford baked beans on stale bread because you never put in the work to enjoy a successful retirement and enjoy the spoils of victory.

      Rudd’s problem was that he was an autocrat who never formed a real team around him. Everything had to be approved by him and the work just kept piling up until nothing ever really got done. That’s not hard work, that’s busy-work.

    • Reg says:

      10:21am | 21/07/10

      Yes the 10,000 hour thing has been doing the rounds for a little while.
      A little to glib for my liking. Training is segmented and even can be shared in a group with a common goal.

      I’m a little conflicted that you speak of individual effort and then criticise someone or not being a team player. There is a need for both. I have great reservations about the pressure to have people agree to respond unstintingly to the command of the leader.  Questioning is very important but needs to be moderated by intellect of the individual, not by the leader. I could go on, but choose to stop here. Ta.

    • KH says:

      02:14pm | 21/07/10

      Yeah that 10,000 hour thing has already been debunked - yes, ‘successful’ people might have had 10,000 hours of practice, but there are equally as many people who have done 10,000 hours of practice, but still aren’t that good, have missed opportunities, have other things against them, haven’t got the drive to go beyond their current capability, don’t care about success and so on…........From memory I think he was only looking at successful people, and not people with as much experience who are not as successful or have failed anyway!

    • Reg says:

      10:06am | 21/07/10

      Quite right Julia. Moderation in all things except sex is my motto. No one wants a PM who tries to impress the opposition pressure groups to the point of en-frazzlement. Pardon my new Alaskan term.

    • Graham S says:

      10:12am | 21/07/10

      Nobody has have uttered, ” I wish I’d spent more time at work” as they lay on their death bed

    • Hilton says:

      10:50am | 21/07/10

      I tend to think that if someone is working 14 or 16 hours days almost every day of the week they are grossly inefficient and should hire an assistant to help them out. Working towards burning yourself out should not be a mark of honour.

    • CJ says:

      10:52am | 21/07/10

      Workaholism doesn’t necessarily = success. Whatever you thought of Kerry Packer, he sure knew how to pull on the trackie dacks and cool his jets. OK, he inherited hundreds of millions, but he turned it into $5 billion and he still managed to find heaps of time to hang with his mates and do sweet F A.

    • Phil says:

      12:09pm | 21/07/10

      Exactly. Loved the man. He was a ruthless businessman and so he should be.
      He knew how to relax, enjoyed his gambling his horses, polo, yachts etc. He did whatever any says work hard, but was a great delegater. He trusted his management to make decisions, but if they got in wrong, then look out.
      I agree as said above that noone on their death bed says, i wished i worked more. I had a health issue gave up a successful company for very little reward, then decided I would work at my level. Nearly back financially where I was, cept I now hget to see my familty. We dont need that much more money that we currently get, and I am happy and healthier than I have ever been.

    • Elphaba says:

      11:12am | 21/07/10

      One of my friends is a workaholic.  I try and be patient, but it’s very hard to socialise with her when she puts her job first.  She complains about it a lot too - but secretly, she loves being the martyr.  It’s annoying.

      I’m not a workaholic.  I work hard at my job, and pitch in when required, but come shortly after 5, I am out the door.  I make enough money to pay my bills, and do the things that make me happy.

      I wouldn’t trade it for a million bucks and the inevitable heart attack/stroke and lonely life that comes with workaholism.  It doesn’t make me lazy, or less intelligent.  It just makes my priorities different.

    • Chris says:

      11:33am | 21/07/10

      I remember working in a military posting in Canberra. Most people other than those on shift left at 4.30 pm (mindful that most started at 7.30 am). I would often stay until about 6.30 pm because it enabled my wife to pick me up after her work (she started at 9.00 am). Life BC (before children) enabled this to occur. The last hour was always generally reading a novel or some other non work activity because by then my brain was fried and work effectiveness was a lot lower towards the end of the day.
      I guess my point is that those who are working insane hours are probably no more effective (in fact less so) than those who work more reasonable hours.

    • James says:

      12:09pm | 21/07/10

      You’re going to vote liberal because your lazy? sweet.

    • Julia says:

      01:56pm | 21/07/10

      To be lazy voter, you donkey vote. And get someone to get you an application for a postal vote.

    • Cecil says:

      12:23pm | 21/07/10

      You going to end up just as dead as anyone else in the end. Workaholics miss out on life and family and all for almighty dollar. When you die the kids will inherit your hard earned money and squander it at an extremly fast rate. Relax and enjoy the only life you will ever have. And yes in my younger years I did the double shifts ect, but I realised my children had grown up and I hardly knew them. I am catching up on lost time now

    • officespace says:

      12:54pm | 21/07/10

      Why work your life away earning all that money for an extravagant lifestyle that you never get to enjoy?  I would rather enjoy what I have and be happy with what I’ve got, it’s much more enlightening to find peace with what we have than it is to hammer away at something you may never grasp.

    • Bob H says:

      12:56pm | 21/07/10

      There is a lot of “faux busy” around, it seems fashionable for all to say “I am so busy at the moment” as though it is a badge of honour fashion statement.  A facade of a full and bursting schedule is a must have item with never a meeting or catchup arranged without three “I’m busy then”.  After telling me how hectic and time poor their lifestyle is, they proceed to tell me all about TV gossip - methinks they are not as busy as they make out.  I blame this silly behaviour on the filofax, when competitive scheduling came into its own.  The filofax thickness and no free time slots meant you won the game.  Real hard workers are rare, the self employed and the ridiculously dedicated are even rarer.  The rest of us?  stop trying to show off,  if you are too busy at work then I hope you’re being rewarded for giving your life away because when you slow down, time slows down with you.

    • Jenni says:

      01:40pm | 21/07/10

      I remember working with a bloke who worked three jobs, averaging 16-20 a day over all seven days (no, I don’t know when he slept either). On Fridays and Saturdays he would work his “day job” until 5pm, then the second job from 6pm-2am, then had a 3am start cleaning glasses after the nightclubs closed. His “reason” for doing all of this was to put 5 kids through private school, as well as extracurricular activities for them.

      I never understood this - his kids (to my mind) won’t ever remember that their father worked so hard to provide for them, what they’ll remember is that he was never at their school plays, or soccer matches, or carnivals, or even at dinner with the family! I always thought it was kind of sad.

    • Greg says:

      02:19pm | 21/07/10

      It’s all quite easy for people out there to be running the “don’t work long hours, its only money” line, but when the bills are there without money to pay them, thats a feeling worse than any amount of overtime. I think I agree with the approach of working at different paces in different stages of life. Most people I know who worked very hard when young have already started strongly toward taking the foot of the pedal by the time they hit 40, kids or no kids (and yes, children to make a massive difference to the equation). I’ve only recently wised up to the idea, and have begun to reap some small rewards. Sure, it does cost me time away from the kids occassionally, but if I am to be judged for that by them in the future, I can only hope that they will see the truth of my having done so with only the best of intentions for them.

    • Rod for Laos says:

      02:40pm | 21/07/10

      Work aholics a just very insecure people.

    • TDJ says:

      03:24pm | 21/07/10

      It is one thing when these idiots want to run themselves into the ground, but they expect other people to do it. It just shows you that they talk about “work life balance” , but they don’t practice it. They are pathetic hypocrites.

    • TheRealDave says:

      04:48pm | 21/07/10

      Must be sad to think all you have in your life is your work…..

    • Chris says:

      04:55pm | 21/07/10

      If alcoholics are addicted to alcohol, does it follow that workaholics are addicted to workahol, or chocaholics to chocahol?
      I’m obviously quite partial to blogahol; however, I resent any suggestion that I am a blogaholic. The tendency is well under control.

    • Ellie says:

      05:00pm | 21/07/10

      It’s not that easy for a true workaholic to take a turn for the better. As a ‘recovering workaholic’ (pathetic sounding isn’t it) it is not just about changing physical habits such as going home at 5pm instead of 8pm. It’s about reversing deeply ingrained mindsets, for example: “If I’m not busy or stressed, I must be lazy and I’m not working hard enough”. Workaholics I think have an inbuilt fear of laziness and tend to swing in the opposite direction.

    • Rebbecca says:

      06:15pm | 21/07/10

      For God sake Bring back balance for our health , our kids , and our futures sake.  Big corporations are becoming slave drivers and we should not take it any more. The are bullying us into the ground. We must stand together free ourselves away from this stressfull, anxious, and deppressing situation.  Thank you for speaking up about this. I work for a large beverage company recently bought out,  and the work load has become horrendous for everyone.  I fell All my past efforts have been in vain. They will chew you up and spit you out , as long as the shareholders get their dividends.

    • Old Rod the Mod says:

      06:36pm | 21/07/10

      You need to listen to “Smithers Jones” by The Jam

    • Daniel says:

      07:05pm | 21/07/10

      Kevin was ok but he was just too work obsessed and Australians ended up switching off.

    • Michelle says:

      08:28pm | 21/07/10

      Overwork was not Rudd’s problem. Rudd was an ideologue, unhinged from ordinary sensitivities - that was his main problem. The focus groups went ballistic when Rudd announced his desire for a “big Australia”. Did he miss out on sleep that night? Immigration and foreign student numbers were increased to record levels under Rudd’s tenure. Did he skip breakfast that day? He relaxed foreign ownership rules leading to Chinese buyers forcing locals out of the real-estate market. Did he get a bad in-flight meal that day? No.

      The mistake is to view Rudd through the prism of nationalism. But he is not a nationalist, he is a card-carrying globalist. Those who mistakenly view Rudd as a nationalist look to personality faults to explain his erratic behaviour e.g. overwork, non consultative, too independent, control freak, etc. But, when Rudd is viewed as a globalist, everything becomes crystal clear. Rudd’s top order priorities were regional integration of Australia into Asia, and advancing global governance. Domestic policies were a low-order priority that Rudd engaged in to maintain a nationalist facade. Ban Ki-moon enunciated Rudd’s core belief: “This is, after all, an era of integration. Regional integration is taking place all over the world”. Hence, like the European Union, Rudd declared that Australia and Asia should move towards dissolving into one superstate by 2020, called the Asia-Pacific Community.

      Subsequently, Rudd worked on two fronts: to weaken our national identity, and to promote regional standards in its place. He weakened our identity by maximising the transnational flow of people, ideas and business: hence Rudd’s record high immigration and foreign student numbers, relaxed foreign ownership, Asia-centric education, endless free trade agreements, diversifying the military, etc. He was also centralising education, health, law, national security, as a precursor to harmonising with forthcoming regional standards. Climate change was a handy crisis for advancing global governance. The economic stimulus was about shoring up global interdependence and preventing a backslide into protectionism.

      When Rudd announced his Asia-Pacific Union, he said: “In the 1950s, sceptics saw European integration as unrealistic. But most people would now agree that the goal of the visionaries… has been achieved. It is that spirit we need to capture in our hemisphere. Our special challenge is that we face a region with greater diversity… But that should not stop us from thinking big”. Rudd also told Time magazine: “I am acutely conscious of what happens when you simply allow things to drift to unrestrained nationalism”.

      So there you have Rudd’s ideology: nationalism is dangerous, open-borders allowing the free movement of people like the European Union is good, and that is the “spirit” he tried to bring to this hemisphere. But Rudd’s big population, relaxed foreign ownership, and inattention to domestic concerns, backfired. Why? Because he was an ideologically-driven wrecking ball, as opposed to someone of ordinary sensitivities who would naturally balk at such a radically transformative agenda. Ordinary people were worried about immigration straining social cohesion and choking infrastructure. Rudd’s brain was focused on ideology, not these ordinary concerns. And that’s why, rather than bowing out of politics gracefully, Rudd now wants to be Foreign Minister, because that was his main agenda all along.

    • DD Ball says:

      02:21am | 22/07/10

      It can be a balanced life if it is devoted to service, not personal gain. Rudd’s agenda was not to be PM, and he achieved that. I spend as much as sixteen hours a day on my business, but I love it. It is giving me a balanced life too, but then I’m not asking it to pay my bills or have my babies. It is ok to work hard, and to have your work close to your life. But it can be a nightmare too when you don’t want to do it, and it doesn’t help with your life. When you can’t include it in your day to day living .. when you don’t go in with the attitude of a servant, but a miner.

    • geophysics says:

      02:10pm | 22/07/10

      Rudd was a (top) bureaucrat but not a leader.

      “I divide my officers into four classes; the clever, the lazy, the industrious, and the stupid. Most often two of these qualities come together. The officers who are clever and industrious are fitted for the highest staff appointments. Those who are stupid and lazy make up around 90% of every army in the world, and they can be used for routine work. The man who is clever and lazy however is for the very highest command; he has the temperament and nerves to deal with all situations. But whoever is stupid and industrious is a menace and must be removed immediately!”

      —General Kurt Von Hammerstein-Equord, 1933

    • business online says:

      08:11am | 29/12/10

      Beneficial info and excellent design you got here! I want to thank you for sharing your ideas and putting the time into the stuff you publish! Great work!

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @latikambourke: Yes, @PeterSlipperMP is genuine.

Anthony Sharwood

It's terribly unfashionable to admit but my Cityrail train just left on time again

Paul Colgan

Can't believe this yoghurt mob thought they'd get away with the John Butler trio sound-a-like http://t.co/Hn0rMchs

tory_maguire

Irritated by barrage of articles about mummy guilt, mums in crisis blah blah blah. Am I only noticing now or is this a newish avalanche?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Interest rate barney barely even rates as interesting

Interest rate barney barely even rates as interesting

Stop all the cheering, cut off the champagne. Prevent the pollies from barking and silence the drums.…

Life slips away while you’re filming it on your phone

Life slips away while you’re filming it on your phone

Some friends of mine had lunch on Saturday with a mate who spent so much time artfully composing photos…

Other stuff to be angry about today (with chorizo pic)

Other stuff to be angry about today (with chorizo pic)

That dopey Spaniard. Three-time Tour de France winner Alberto Contador has been banned for two years,…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: City vs country: What would you change your life for?

Dieter Moeckel says:

We made the tree change from Darwin to Wonbah more than 15 years ago. After fencing, a road, and couple of dams our money was gone. Super is enough to live comfortably. We have geese growing old and stringy the only one that made it to the pot committed Kamakazi by flying into a tree; the chooks are… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

150 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter