The worst kept secret in the gambling world is the statement “the house always wins”. No casino on Earth hides this fact. In fact, they seem to proudly embrace the mantra as an open challenge to morons. And surely in the realm of unashamedly unfair advantages, Lotto is the mother of them all.


There’s an old saying in the poker game, “If you can’t spot the sucker at the table, then the sucker is you”. In the Lotto world, the saying should be “If you’re not the extraordinarily unlikely winner of bucketloads of cash, then you’re an idiot”.

As the Oz Lotto draw that stopped the nation entered its final week and the jackpot hit Def-Con Ridiculous, reportedly half of the adult population of Australia flocked to pay their idiot tax, salivating like St Bernards over the impressive $106 million bone, in the vain hope of striking it rich in the biggest possible way, and being able to tell their bosses once and for all, to shove it.

A quick call to NSW Lotteries revealed that last week alone Australians forked out exactly $209,670,609 in lottery tickets. Over two-hundred million schmackeroos in just one week. Citing legal reasons, NSW Lotteries declined to reveal exactly how much money was spent in the total ten-week period leading up to the draw, most likely because the figure would have had so many zeroes on the end even Wayne Swan would have had difficulty saying it.

One thing’s for certain, you don’t have to be a mathematical genius like Rusty Crowe in A Beautiful Mind to figure out that the house is still most definitely on top in this equation.

And while to spite the cynics the jackpot did go off, with two lucky punters earning a cool $53 million each, the remaining division prize values dropped so steeply that as a lesser ticket holder you’d probably be better off seeing Moira in the gift-shop than cashing in your slim pickings.

But the most curious part of this whole Wonka-esque ticket buying frenzy is how we are oddly in national wonderment not only at the size of the pot of gold, but how got there in the first place. Somehow we seem to think that the cash has literally fallen from the heavens, plucked straight from the great ATM in the sky.

“What would I do with the money?” “Can you imagine!” “I’d never work again!” Blah blah blah.

This is not found money. If you break it down, basically the people of Australia had a gigantic office whip-round, randomly picked two people to give over $50 million each, and paid Oz Lotto a princely sum to organise and distribute the collection envelope for us. And we scorn at charity collectors when they approach us in the street. If it wasn’t so stupid, it would almost be commendable.

And once again, the house comes out on top, ready to do it all over again to the amazement of wide-eyed dreamers the nation over.

For some reason, public lotteries have avoided being painted with the same brush of ill-repute that other forms of gambling have. Blackjack addictions ruin lives, the dogs are breeding grounds for blue collar misery, and pokies surely are faceless automatons that suck not only the livelihood but souls out of all who cross their shiny metal palms with silver.

But Lotto? Oh mate, it’s the stuff that dreams are made of. Sorry, why is that exactly?

Before I start to paint myself as a dreadful wowser, I need to state that though I’m clearly not jazzed about it, I’m not morally against the lotto. I’m not really against gambling either. I went to Vegas. I sat down at a poker table at the MGM Grand, soiled my trousers in fear, played terribly and burned through US$100 in twenty minutes. The second time round I managed to compose myself enough to actually play a few hands.

I won nothing. It was terrifying and exhilarating all at the same time. But it was a game, and I enjoyed being a player.

And there’s the difference. There’s sport in poker. There’s sport in blackjack. There’s even a bit of sport at the races. Where exactly is the sport in lotto? Where is the thrill of not just winning, but playing?

Lotto is just as mindless as sitting in front of a poker machine, only you don’t get the benefit of sticky VB-soaked carpet, the ungodly stench of ageing smokers, and the incessant digital chimes of The Queen Of The Nile.

And hell, if the ordeal of actually choosing Lotto numbers yourself is still too much for you to handle, you can even get a computer to pick them for you. Seriously, how much of a deadshit do you have to be to play this stupid game exactly?

Each week we are reminded by all and sundry that you have more chance of being struck by lightening than winning Lotto, yet we relentlessly line up to feast on the boring bait. Honestly, I don’t know why you people do it.

Oh that’s right, $106 million dollars. Sorry, forget everything I just said.

8 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Wes says:

      09:11am | 03/07/09

      I heard that winning the lotto is a 45 million to 1 shot.  If the jackpot is $90 million thats good odds.

      And at least the money raised goes to the state - think of it as a stupid tax.

    • wolf says:

      09:12am | 03/07/09

      I agree that lotto is a stupid way to spend your money, and the profit margin is obscene. However I still bought a ticket for the midweek draw.  With the odds of winning at around 45 million to 1 a jackpot that big made the odds close to ‘fair’ for the individual.

      I’ll let the idiots plump the jackpot back up to an equitable level before I buy another ticket.

    • Damo says:

      10:55am | 03/07/09

      I liked the figure I saw used the other day that said if you’re around 20 years of age you are 200,000 times more likely to die this year than win lotto.

      Having said that, my parents won lotto which more than justified my father’s lifetime spending on it. On the other hand, all that money went very quickly, I suspect this is the case with most winners.

      As above, at least the profits goes to the state, now if only we could get them to spend our taxes sensibly.

    • Fry says:

      10:57am | 03/07/09

      Didn’t win this week hey Chris?

      Me neither…oh well!

      Oz Lotto actually has the worst odds of all lotto options at 45,379,620:1.

      Lotto is 8,145,060:1 per game - that means you are 5.6 times more likely to win Lotto than Oz Lotto.

      Powerball is the worst. Because the ‘powerball’ comes from a separate machine all together, the odds blow out to 54,979,155:1!

      I guess at the end of the day, you have to be pretty bloody lucky to win, and pretty bloody silly to spend thousands of $$$ trying to win.

    • benvolio says:

      01:18pm | 03/07/09

      Outliers have always been a fascination… leading to afro-hipster-new-york types to write entire books about them (http://www.gladwell.com/outliers/index.html).

      Cab driver this morning… “it can happen. The guy in Queensland had never bought a ticket and now he has 53million.”

      Hard to resist this kind of simple logic. But it’s a fallacy - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler’s_fallacy - that simply fills the pitiful state coffers.

    • S says:

      01:24pm | 03/07/09

      Actually, Wes, the money no longer goes to the state.

      In Queensland, at least, the Golden Casket has been sold to Tattersalls.

      So while there was a ‘windfall’ to the state, it’s no longer the case.

      Now, it’s just a donation to another faceless corporation.

      (disclosure: I still occasionally buy a lotto ticket - but I no longer think ‘at least my losses help pay for hospitals’)

    • Jean says:

      02:46pm | 03/07/09

      I buy a lottery ticket every week, if I’m passing the paper shop- takes about 30 seconds. I reckon it’s all about time management. While my lottery habit indicates I am not morally opposed to gambling, I don’t want to waste any more time on it than is necessary. Spend the afternoon in the TAB? Boring. And the return? A whole week of fantasising about what I’ll do with the money. Worth the $7.20, I reckon. And of course there’s the odds. Try to dazzle me with mathematical probabilities as much as you like, but I know what MY odds are- 50-50. Only two possibilities.  I’ll either win, or I won’t grin

    • Jane says:

      09:49am | 04/07/09

      I’m done with Sergio, he treats me like a rag-doll

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Malcolm Farr

TAbbott to fight PHI rebate cuts on behalf of 2.5 million to pay extra, but won't say what he'd do as PM. http://t.co/lXWpMXXF

Anthony Sharwood

Numerous workplace safety rules (no harness, fall arrest etc) broken in this pic of Roosters coach Brian Smith http://t.co/jx4PgtBs

Anthony Sharwood

Yo, mummy bloggers! Your expert input is required in this doozy of a child-rearing dilemma http://t.co/0JfOnCq1

Daniel Piotrowski

How we're getting ripped off at the ATM http://t.co/Vpu8DuHy

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Would you kill for a job?

Would you kill for a job?

Who would work in an abattoir? Most of us have done jobs we didn’t want to do because we needed…

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Friday Dilemma: child cruelty or harmless fun?

Parenting. It’s the new oneupmanship. Ah, how quaint the days now seem when parents could raise…

Hipsters with hip replacements

Hipsters with hip replacements

Someone once told me that when people reach a certain age they begin dressing in the manner they did…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter