Update 2.10pm: Reuters is reporting White House sources have confirmed President Obama’s trip to Australia and Indonesia has been canceled.

Confusion still reigns among politicians, diplomats and police in Canberra as to whether US President Barack Obama will in fact pay a visit to Australia in mid-June, with US officials now seriously doubting whether the President will show.

.Oh, the cat's in the cradle and the silver spoon, when you coming Barack?

The itinerary is all but locked in. The Punch understands President Obama is set to arrive on the 17th of June with his family, on the 18th to meet with Kevin Rudd the Governor General possibly the cabinet and Tony Abbott, followed by an address to a special sitting of Parliament. A trip to Sydney to see the sites is apparently planned for Saturday the 19th.

The Australian Federal Police are ready. Sources close to the AFP say preparations for President Obama’s visit are in full swing, with police being told to cancel leave and reorganise shifts to ensure everybody will be working ahead of and during the visit. The ACT police are said to be “devoting their full resources” over the period of the 17th and 18th of June.

But there remains uncertainty among American diplomats and the Australian Government as to whether Barack Obama will risk leaving the States in the midst of the BP oil leak, as one US official close to the preparations told The Punch the chances of Obama coming “right now are 50-50, and I’d say he won’t come”.

While a visit to Australia by Barack Obama has obvious domestic advantages for Kevin Rudd, they also exist for Barack Obama, and won’t be as sunny.

Like his decision to cancel his March trip, domestic problems are looking like they’ll force Obama to postpone yet again.

The President himself has described the Gulf of Mexico oil leak as the worst environmental disaster in US history, and despite the repeated claims by BP to have found a solution to stem the flow, latest reports say that it could be as late as Christmas before the leak is plugged .

Journalists in the United States are beginning to question the worthiness of President Obama’s trip to Australia amidst the chaos that the oil leak has caused.

Obama’s deputy spokesman Bill Burton admitted in an interview aboard Air Force One that there have been recent discussions about scrapping the trip.

“Well, obviously, there’s a lot of reasons to take the trip . . . Regardless of any discussions that might have been had on that, as it stands the trip is still on schedule,” he told wire agency AFP yesterday.

While the White House officially says that the trip is still scheduled, that’s quite different from saying that the President is actually coming.

The cheery US ambassador to Australia Jeff Bleich is continuing to tell US embassy staff that the President is coming, but privately staff say that it’s looking less likely.

As another Australian based US official said yesterday: “it would make my life easier if we knew whether the President was coming.”

There’s grumbling around the US press corps too, with White House photographers complaining that there has been no accommodation booked for the trip yet.

US State Department sources say the arithmetic of cancelling the trip is pretty easy, a visit to Australia is not politically significant in the US or on the world stage, and it would not be a good look for the President to be hugging koalas at Taronga while back at home fisherman line up for welfare.

While Australian Foreign Affairs officials remain confident that Obama will not cancel on us a second time from fear of it being interpreted as a snub, the reality is that snubbing Australia is not the greatest diplomatic faux pas, especially given that Obama will be easily forgiven.

The bigger issue for the Americans to consider is whether Obama would risk cancelling on Indonesia as well.

Obama is also set to go to Canada in late June for the G20, a much more palatable trip for the public and the media, but it would be risky to have two in a month, especially if one is on other side of the world.

The Prime Minister’s office won’t officially comment on the trip, saying it’s all a matter for the Americans, but Kevin Rudd’s office aren’t showing signs of being very confident.

Foreign Minister Stephen Smith was asked about the trip and did not sound like a man who’d be putting on his good head of state tie on anytime soon:

We have indicated through the Prime Minister to the President that he is welcome to visit Australia at any time; that whenever it is a convenient time for him he will be welcomed not just by the Government but by the Parliament and the Australian people.

Obama delaying a second time could even mess with election plans here.

Rudd would be keen to capitalise on any popularity that might rub off from the Obama visit by calling an August election, a no-show by Obama could make the prospect of an early election even less likely (although hanging around with Bush and world leaders during APEC in the last election campaign didn’t help Howard).

Either way two weeks from today the President of the United States is supposed to be here in Canberra, and American and Australian officials have no idea whether it’s actually happening. This fact doesn’t inspire confidence that we’ll be hearing Hail to the Chief any time soon.

64 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      06:09am | 04/06/10

      Obama is perhaps the most indecisive President ever. He’s also one of the least competent and least popular at home.

      Just watch the disasters build ... starting with the November elections for Congress.

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      07:52am | 04/06/10

      Eric would rather G W Bush back in the drivers seat, he loves that shoot from the hip or was it lip texan swagger.

    • Macca says:

      08:40am | 04/06/10

      Eric, I’ll see your “least competent and most indecisive” and raise you a real Health Care reform.

      At least the US have a leader who is prepared to risk his position for the things he stands for. We have a PM who backs down on everything he believes in just to restore his own power base

    • Richard says:

      10:04am | 04/06/10

      Rob r Charteris would rather a charismatic puppet it seems. The difference between Bush and Obama is simply that the mistakes Bush made during the financial crisis were repeated by Obama, only on a much larger scale. Both Presidents approved stimulus plans and bailouts, both Obama and McCain as senators voted for bailouts, which in reality was nothing more than kleptocracy: wall street bankers were given the keys to the treasury by their ex-colleagues who now line the halls of power in washington (Paulson, Geithner et al). It was a inside job, and the populace were fleeced. It was, and still is an outrage, and Obama was in the very thick of this dirty business. Kevin Rudd blames capitalism for the GFC, but how can capitalism work if there are no consequences for taking huge risks and losing trillions of dollars? Its like rolling up to jupiters casino and betting big on the baccarat tables, and every time you win you get to keep the money but everyt ime you lose they give you back what you bet in the first place. Thats not capitalism! That’s a rigged system, and Bush and Obama are both to blame for perpetuating this scam.

    • PeterD says:

      10:33am | 04/06/10

      Yeah send Obama back home. Last time George W came for APEC, it shut down the city and business and cost us taxpayers hundreds of millions for all of Howards paranoia - for what exactly?

    • Bruce says:

      12:41pm | 04/06/10

      Eric: What would expect from a right wing liberal like Obama and the democrats !!

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      05:30pm | 04/06/10

      Richard says:10:04am; Good to see the conspiracy theorist are alive and well, on’ya Champ! you get a gold star!!

    • Richard says:

      06:57pm | 04/06/10

      re: Rob r Charteris says:05:30pm | 04/06/10
      “Richard says:10:04am; Good to see the conspiracy theorist are alive and well, on’ya Champ! you get a gold star!! “
      That’s your retort? Stating bald facts hardly classifies me as a conspiracy theorist. FACT: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG (which owed billions of $ to Golman Sachs) were prevented from going bankrupt because the government handed them trillions of $$$. FACT: Henry Paulson was formerly CEO of Goldman Sachs, Timothy Giethner was Chairman of the NY Fed. FACT: Goldman Sachs would have gone bankrupt just like Lehmann Brothers if AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had been unable to pay their debts to Goldman Sachs (which Goldman Sachs accrued by betting against their own products that they themselves were selling to instutional investors in good faith).
      Fine call me a conspiracy theorist if you need someone to laugh at, it seems that everyone who supports the government wants to label independent thinkers that way. But your mocking lacks all credibility unless you are willing to accept plain facts and use deductive mental facilities to question the official narrative every once in a while.

    • Matt says:

      07:05pm | 04/06/10

      Rob r Charteris

      Such a drone.

      Masterchef should be on for you tonight no?

    • Adam says:

      09:48pm | 04/06/10

      Always nice to meet someone whose understanding of the world comes from Fox News.

    • Jan says:

      09:01am | 05/06/10

      Obama needs to stay home and concentrate on showing some leadership on the Israel / Palestine drama and on the ongoing oil leaks around the world. The BP oil leaks happens every year in Nigeria unstabilising the area too…

      Otherwise he is continuing the legacy of Baby Bush in the incompetent destabilisation of the worlds economies and the ongoing support for fundamentalist wars between Christians/Jews and Muslims.

      @PeterD correct - it was a sad day for NSW Police - when many of their staff - decided to take off their badges to face the Bush peaceful protesters. We don’t need that lawlessness and redneckism in our cities.

    • Andy says:

      06:21am | 04/06/10

      Seriously:

      1) Get the oil leak fixed - hire the best in the world and get the best equipment and get it fixed.

      2) Sue BP for $50 billion + interest + introduce new regulation for off-shore drilling with adjacent wells.

      3) Forget Australia - i’d rather know that something is being done about saving the environment than smiling for 2 days in Australia. We will survive.

    • BTS says:

      07:13am | 04/06/10

      So the rest of the world should stop for the oil leak? 

      If there are 20,000 people working on it, many of them experts, what’s an unqualified President going to achieve, given that ‘his’ people (his own experts) are continuously involved in the matter?

    • acker says:

      07:34am | 04/06/10

      1) Get the oil leak fixed ???? I don’t think Obama is planning or required to put on scuba gear and go under with a hacksaw and oxy-cutter
      2) Sue BP for 50 billion +interest ???? I don’t think Obama likes the idea of sending many US BP employers to the unemployment lineand creating another big fuel shortage
      3) Forget Australia ???? Australia will consider that a snub, might start awarding some lucrative defence contracts to China & Russia, think about pulling out of Afghanistan quicker and would see no good reason why the President would not have a mobile device capable of talking with any of his people anytime.

      4) There might be benefits in Obama getting some unbiased veiws from Australian experts on petroleum exploration and oil spill environmental matters for a day or two rather than just taking it from people in the US and UK (BP)

      5) It would benefit Australia’s political leaders both sides to listen to what Obama has to say about this BP mess, as Australia also partakes in a lot of off shore oil production and I’m sure there are some lessons to be learnt.

      6) It would also benefit Australian political leaders to talk about bushfire fighting assets with the US as the Californian fire season is in our winter and I’m sure many assets and key staff could be shared

    • Gary Cox says:

      07:54am | 04/06/10

      I know the blokes to fix the oil leak. In my local the other night the oil leak came on the TV and two regulars one a concreter and the other a truck driver started a 10 minute conversation about it saying stuff like “What they need to do is….” and “I don’t why they haven’t tried…..”. If Obama was to have turned up I would been only too happy to introduce them.

    • acker says:

      08:45am | 04/06/10

      @Gary Cox ...I wouldn’t sell those concreters short, sometimes they might have more effective problem solving ideas than some BP exec at the top trying to produce a cost driven half rsed solution that is tailored to please the BP board of directors.
      In the modern corporate world everyone wants to be the hero if it works and nobody wants to go near it if it fails.
      Unfortunately also there is a natural corporate habit to muck around with the original plan in a blatent attempt to shave off costs.

    • neil says:

      10:25am | 04/06/10

      Heres a great link if you want to see how big the spill is.

      http://www.ifitwasmyhome.com/#x=-88.389722&y=28.738889&z=7

      To get some perspective put it in bass straight, type Grassy, Australia in the location box (it’s on King Island) it spreads from the SA boarder to Wilsons Prom and from Apollo Bay to Tassie.

      To see how insignificant it is, put it over Hawaii and zoom out. Yes it’s a local disaster that will effect the Gulf for years. But in twenty years everything will be back to normal. Just like Prince William Sound there will be no long term effects.

    • TC says:

      11:19am | 04/06/10

      Yeah Yeah Gary. Film directors reckon they can fix it too

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      07:17am | 04/06/10

      It would certainly be an historical event if Obama did make the trip, but do you really think any political points could be gained by his visit??? I’m all for another term of Kev but I did have to giggle a lil after the PM of the Maldives was kind of trying to talk up Kev on the big stage.

    • Jezza says:

      03:22pm | 04/06/10

      You’re all for another term of Rudd??  Mate you need to see a doctor quick smart. Another term of his wild spending will bankrupt us even further. Abbott is marginally better than Rudd but at least the Libs would say “NO!” if old Big Ears decided to get us into even more debt with China. If you want Rudd in power I suggest you bypass him & elect the Chinese regime instead. It would save the country a bit of money by saving us having two elections!

    • John A Neve says:

      03:40pm | 04/06/10

      Jezza,

      Firstly, this country is far from “bankrupt”, secondly we have one of the lowest debts in relation to GDP in the world. Thirdly to say such a thing you must be an idiot.

      Based on your post, your knowledge of China is limited, that is limited to crackers, which surely you are.

    • Ziggy says:

      07:59am | 04/06/10

      I worked for years in finance and property development in Chicago. No arguments from anyone in the US that it is home of the dirtiest politics of them all. You simply do not become a Senator from there with clean hands. Impossible. So now the US has an empty suit for President - with who knows what obligations to whom? Sealed academic records, no record of any achievement whatsoever, cannot make the simplest of speeches without using a prompter - he is a puppet to his Chief of Staff, Emmanuel.

    • Joan says:

      08:49am | 04/06/10

      Who cares if Obama comes to Oz.? A visit to Oz won’t change a thing - Obama has more important things to do in USA than have photoshoots with
      Mr 100% guarantee liar and more important things to do than to inspect PM copycat vegie garden at lodge. Obama probably can’t wait to get a signed PM written kiddie book- Rudd can always mail it if Obama can’t make it. Rudd is on the nose in Oz why would Obama bother associating with dare I say a loser?

    • Angie says:

      11:12am | 04/06/10

      hahaha that is GOLD

    • antiperspirant says:

      01:13pm | 04/06/10

      Who cares if Obama comes to Oz.? = KRudd

      Desperately needs the boost and distraction. Would time the election around it if he could the clever politician in him couldn’t resist the chance.

    • iansand says:

      09:13am | 04/06/10

      What, apart from volunteering as a plug, can Obama do?

      I don’t understand this modern obsession with having a leader present at every disaster.  What did Kristina Kenneally do at Lennox Head, apart from taking up resources and getting in the way with her press pack?

    • Frank Drebbin says:

      11:15am | 04/06/10

      Kristina Kennally and the Obama-man have a lot in common…...both from the “Midwest” and both horribly incompetent….I wonder if KRudd was born there too? Heaven knows the story of his backgrounud has more holes in it than the BER scheme or insulation or the Budget…...you get the drift.

    • Adam Diver says:

      12:57pm | 04/06/10

      Why even have a president then? Sure they won’t have the nuts and bolts neccessary to fix the issue but by being on location they can use what they see to help make informaed decisions based on advice from the experts. Particularly when there are differig point of views someone has to make a decision and the process certainly speeds up when the boss is on site to make such decisions.

      Ever work for a big company and need a decision made? Seen how long it gets as it goes from your manager to thier manager etc until someone finally makes a decision? Times that by 100 to know how governments work and suddenly it makes sense for the head of state to be on site for a natural disaster.

    • Chris says:

      09:35am | 04/06/10

      Do we really need the President of one ailing nation to prop up the Prime Minister of another?

    • TC says:

      11:23am | 04/06/10

      Ask Kevin

    • Mick In The Hills says:

      09:39am | 04/06/10

      What’s Obama coming here for anyway?

      I thought it was a whistle-stop sleep-over on his way back from Indonesia, where he has some real reason to visit, shoring up a government there that’s got a tricky job of managing tens of millions fundamentist muslims. Now that’s a reason for a visit from the leader of the free world.

      Dropping in to Australia - pfffft.

    • neil says:

      10:14am | 04/06/10

      Obama has obviously been briefed that Rudd is on the nose and that he should avoid being associated with him.

      I can’t wait for the next G20 it will be just like Copenhagen, Rudd will be going from room to room asking “has anyone seen Bakack?”, while Obama will be hinding under a desk whispering “has he gone yet?”

    • Super D says:

      10:42am | 04/06/10

      I look forward to seeing Tony Abbott PM greeting Obama some time next year.

    • Super E says:

      12:51pm | 04/06/10

      In your dreams little D.

      Tony Abbott will not even be in politics next year.

    • Andrew says:

      03:35pm | 04/06/10

      If that happens I’m going to resort to desperate measures (i.e. move to New Zealand).

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      05:35pm | 04/06/10

      Super D says:10:42am; I wonder what Abbott would say to him…. ah ah ah er er er um um um um that’s the the the gos gos gos gospel t t t t truth. you want a load of gravel???

    • LLoooooi says:

      12:11pm | 04/06/10

      So that puppet presidente meets this puppet pm
      No thanks
      The socialist congratulating over how they are destroying their countries by spending trillions of dollars, can take place via skype and save the tax payers a few lousy millions

    • nic says:

      12:20pm | 04/06/10

      Let him come. I just hope the media plays both sides and complains as they did about Bush, how much the trip cost Australian taxpayers and about undue American influence in Australian political affairs, especially in what may be an election year, as was also said during the Bush years.

    • luke09 says:

      12:27pm | 04/06/10

      Do we really need Obama to visit? No.

    • Ryan says:

      12:39pm | 04/06/10

      Why oh why would Obama want to talk to a unprofessional cur like Rudd who is known to have leaked a private conversation between himself and the previous president to the media to try to make himself look clever?

    • Robert Smissen , rural SA says:

      12:44pm | 04/06/10

      Why should we pay for a dead duck one term president to come to Oz? ? ? For me it is a toss up between Little Kevvy & Obama as to who is the worst leader. Why don’t we invite the Queen of Australia for another visit? ? A lot less expensive & far more relevant than Obama. To steal a line from the movie “The Castle”, tell them they are dreaming if you think Obama is coming.

    • Louisa says:

      12:53pm | 04/06/10

      Kevin’s head is large enough to plug the oil spill

    • acker says:

      01:46pm | 04/06/10

      Obama and the USA need to be punished by Australia if they snub us, or Rudd will appear like he is subservient and weak….on the International stage ..and Australian’s will probably punish him even more in the election for that. Australia is a proud nation and Obama is trashing our patient invitation.

    • Chris says:

      04:05pm | 04/06/10

      Acker,

      You have seriously made my day with your post. What are we going to punish them with? Banning exports of vegemite and koala bears!!!
      It would be like flogging them with a wet hanky.
      As for making Rudd ‘appear’ subservient and weak on the international stage, wasn’t that achieved in Copenhagen?
      I think Australia as a nation is proud enough to keep going on without Obama’s visit and I do not think he is trashing our invitation - he has more than enough on his plate at the moment.

    • Super D says:

      02:38pm | 04/06/10

      The real reason he’s not coming is that he isn’t into short term relationships and reckons Rudd will be a oncer.

    • Lucy says:

      02:48pm | 04/06/10

      Sorry T, keep watering that vegie garden you built at the Lodge, the one you decided to build just like Michelle Obama did, darling.

    • stephen says:

      03:16pm | 04/06/10

      Yeah, you go help her Luce… your hands are dirty already, darling.

    • luke09 says:

      03:01pm | 04/06/10

      Maybe Kevin can get lady gaga to address parliament. She’s very popular at the moment and could give his image a much needed lift.

    • dancan says:

      03:18pm | 04/06/10

      Rudd is like that uncool kid who got your mobile number from a friend of a friend after you met him at a party.  He keeps sending you txt messages trying to meet up and hang out or invite you over to his place for beers.  But you really just don’t like the guy and keep making excuses not to see him, hoping that he gets the message and goes away.

    • markuspd says:

      03:25pm | 04/06/10

      I just realised how much Obama looks like Don Knotts.

    • Mitzi says:

      03:26pm | 04/06/10

      Oh THANK YOU God!  I was nauseated imagining Rudd preening for the camera’s as he clasped Obama’s hand, which would be as sickening the pathetic loser posing with little kids in their classroom. What a prat!!

    • Matt says:

      03:29pm | 04/06/10

      I don’t want another war monger puppet coming here. Thanks.

    • TheRealDave says:

      04:13pm | 04/06/10

      I thought he won the Nobel Peace Prize there Matt ?? Or did I mis-read the Peace bit??

      You’re not trying to tell me that the Nobel Prizes might be a bit of a snow job do you Mattt? That would take some of the glitter off stellar achievements like Al Gore’s Nobel for…umm…

      nevermind….

    • julia says:

      03:33pm | 04/06/10

      Didn’t think he’d come.

    • Against the Man says:

      03:53pm | 04/06/10

      Obama would be interested in coming here if we had a good PM, as Rudd is looking incompetent in the eyes of world leaders, I can understand why Obama wants to give Australia a miss. Another slap in the face of a already pathetic PM Rudd.

    • stephen says:

      03:56pm | 04/06/10

      The President will come when he can, and until then, yous lot kin stick yer noses in Walt Whitman, John Steinbeck and a bit of Saul Bellow, so that when he does come, yers kin tip your hats instead of droppin yer bundle !

    • Greg says:

      04:17pm | 04/06/10

      Kev could always invite his mate Gordon Brown - I understand he is available for parties, weddings, anything. OMG it really is a national emoergency.

    • Rob r Charteris says:

      05:39pm | 04/06/10

      Greg says:04:17pm ‘emoergency’ is like a Goth thing?

    • BTS says:

      06:26pm | 04/06/10

      No emo’s and goths aren’t the same thing.

    • Brad Coward says:

      04:44pm | 04/06/10

      Think of the money that the Commonwealth will save with the big “no-show” !  You can kill off the mining tax now, Kevin !

    • Julie Coker-Godson says:

      05:14pm | 04/06/10

      He might as well stay at home.  By the time he has solved all the problems that require his presence, we will have gone into “caretaker government” mode:  there might even be a government of another hue!  It would then be interesting to see how quickly he comes over here then.  Just a thought folks.

    • nosthow says:

      05:48pm | 04/06/10

      Well Leo we wont be seeing him and his lovely wife after all - would have been a buzz for Australia. Lets hope that when he gets on top of this BP oil spill disaster he will make time for a visit to Australia.

    • Labor Marketing Dept says:

      06:38pm | 04/06/10

      Sorry Kev, it’s back to the hospitals for the photo ops

    • Brian says:

      06:55pm | 04/06/10

      Your comment:Am glad hes not coming, no photo ops for rudd, they’re both as useless as tits on a bull anyway.
      obama won’t be missed

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter