The UN Climate negotiations in Cancun, Mexico will be wrapped up this week after two weeks of steady negotiations. Delegates are furiously trying to reach consensus so that decisions can be made by Friday this week.

The COP-16 conference in Cancun - like mardi gras but more earnest. Picture: AFP

The story that seems to have gained the most traction back home is the question of Kyoto’s survival. Journalists seem to be advocating a range of conflicting messages – from the immanent death of the treaty to the fighting hope of its perseverance.

Reality is a little more nuanced than that and the Kyoto Protocol is one of myriad issues that need to be resolved in the next week. None the less, it is certainly not time to write off Kyoto.

Kyoto harbours such significance because historically it is the first, and indeed currently the only, international legally binding treaty to reduce carbon emissions.

141 countries have signed the Kyoto Protocol. It holds 37 developed countries to an overall target of collectively reducing carbon emissions by 5% by 2012 (on 1990 levels).

There is a lot of debate surrounding Kyoto and controversy around who is signatory and who is not, who is fulfilling obligations and who fails to do so.

Like every other treaty, it has substantial flaws. However, Kyoto is so significant because it is the only legally binding treaty that currently exists to reduce emissions.

It is also based on a very important principle of common but differentiated targets, whereby developed countries are held to specific targets whilst developing countries are not bound, in recognition of their historic lack of culpability in contributing to climate change.

Kyoto’s target commitments expire in 2012 and one of the objectives pushed by many countries (both developing and developed) in Cancun this year was to secure a second commitment period.

Japan has made a public statement that they are not prepared to support a second commitment period under any circumstances. This unequivocal statement has come as a surprise considering the origins of the historic treaty.

There has been much discussion amongst the negotiators as well as the different non-government groups present in Cancun about the ramifications of this.

Firstly, it is important to clarify that Japan’s move does not indicate the end of Kyoto. Only one part of Kyoto was bound to the 2012 expiration, the rest of the treaty will continue.

Furthermore, Japan is just one country out of 37 developed nations that are bound by the treaty. However, it is a demonstration of a marked lack of leadership that Japan has withdrawn its support at this point and there are valid concerns that other countries will follow in its footsteps.

Secondly, Australia has an important role to play here as chair of the Umbrella group in committing to targets and demonstrating leadership when it comes to progressing the Protocol.

The European Union, Norway and Australia have all openly declared their support for a second commitment period; now that Minister Combet is in town hopefully this support can be further build and cemented in a decision.

Finally, if worst comes to worst and a second commitment period is not achieved – the Kyoto Protocol will not end. It will simply cease to bind countries to specific targets.

We already know that the US is not in a position to commit to Kyoto because of its domestic political situation. COP16 in Cancun is an opportunity for negotiators to explore other means of binding countries to targets that are outside of the Kyoto framework, possibly under Long Term Cooperative Action (LCA).

This last week in Cancun is filled with early mornings and late night meetings and countries desperately trying to cross political, economic and geographical boundaries in order to reach a consensus.

Japan’s stance on Kyoto is testament to how difficult this reconciliatory process can be. However, the words of key players like Christiana Figueres give us much hope.

In a meeting with the non-government organisation Adopt a Negotiator, Figueres acknowledged that she had inherited a “diminished earth”. She expressed the necessity that that earth not be further depleted before it is handed on to yet another generation.

Most commented

29 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      04:50am | 09/12/10

      “It is a demonstration of a marked lack of leadership that Japan has withdrawn its support at this point ...”

      That sounds more like a demonstration of leadership - taking the first step in an action.

      “... and there are valid concerns that other countries will follow in its footsteps.”

      Which, of course, would be a validation of Japan’s leadership role.

      By all means criticise Japan for doing something you don’t like, but please don’t mangle the English language while you do so.

      P.S. Climategate.

    • Kurisu Sonsaku says:

      08:26am | 09/12/10

      I read that earlier today, it appears the UN and their associated floaters, dribblers, rent seekers and shills have gone all out to corner the weapons grade stupid market

    • Super D says:

      08:53am | 09/12/10

      What is basically demonstrates is that when assembled in large numbers sheep are easily herded.

    • Tom says:

      05:17pm | 09/12/10

      @Great find TimB. I rolled around laughing at the thought of these free-lunching spivs being sprung.

      Is this a new type of student? Is it the rebirth of common sense?

    • Super D says:

      07:26am | 09/12/10

      Well played Japan.  It is absolutely ridiculous for western nations to bind themselves to emissions reductions while the biggest emitter, China, does not.  The earth can’t tell which country is generating the CO2.  The whole notion of some sort of climate debt is just the politics of redistribution writ large. 

      If CO2 emissions are a problem it is overwhelmingly clear they are going to get a lot worse before they get better. 

      Thankfully the whole CO2 causing runaway global warming hypothesis is a complete crock.

      Also the Authors bio doesn’t tell us anything about her though a quick google indicates that Sophie is currently NSW Director for the Australian Youth Climate Coalition.  Lets hope she grows out of it.

    • michael j says:

      07:55am | 09/12/10

      Clearly not a lot of people give a stuff about climate change
      IN reality who that is 40+cares if the planet is even here in
      2100 ,,these meatings inCancun are only a junket rippin money
      money off poor people,,excatley what ms Gillard’s CARBON TAX
      will do,,read (late night meetings)as ‘lets hit the piss tonight),n.
      early morning ones as ,,shit i shouldn’t have had so much to drink last night),,
      the earth cannot be further depleated b 4 handin it oba ta another
      generation,,Yes i would have thought that to but i m quite often wrong,,,,and it was like that when i got here,
      Furthermore, Japan is just one country out of 37 developed nations that are bound by the treaty.,,,,,Who have now said you
      can take your ideas and put them where they don’t count,
      cause less ice means more room to KILL whales so we’ll be off
      proberly didn’t even stay for a drink,,
      37 developed nations bound by treaty,,,what does that mean?
      they will be hit with trade embargo’s,,invaded by conventional
      forces,or threatened with NUKES if they say sorry we just going
      along with the crowd we didn’t mean to sign,so it does not really count,,,,,WELL 1 thing is for sure while ever there is a power
      plant that uses fossil fuel AUS will be supplying them with coal,,

    • Syl says:

      01:16pm | 09/12/10

      Im sorry, i don’t speak gibberish.  Perhaps a quick run through google translate and a repost is in order?

    • Kurisu Sonsaku says:

      08:46am | 09/12/10

      Well i’m glad Japan is going to bail out of this foolishness, even the Japan Times is expressing doubt (FYI the JT is the rag of choice for warmenistas in Japan).

      When you’ve begun losing support from the JT then the jig is up.

      http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20101207a5.html

    • The Badger says:

      10:11am | 09/12/10

      Yes Sonsaku

      Japan has a population of more than 127 million people
      The Japan Times (an engrish language newspaper) has a circulation of less the 40,000
      by contrast,
      Yomiuri Shimbun - circulation in excess of 10 million
      Asahi Shimbun - circulation in excess of 8 million

      Yes Sonsaku, The Japan Times is very influential

    • Kurisu Sonsaku says:

      10:38am | 09/12/10

      The ger

      I never said it was influential, i said it was the rag of choice for warmenistas. Of course reading skills don’t appear to be the forte of warmenist otaku

      Asahi - my favourite beer

      Kobe Shimbun - 821 000 (the wife likes to read that one)

      Nice to see you can google mondonewspapers

    • The Badger says:

      12:13pm | 09/12/10

      baka yaro

      Got a lifetime subscription to the Daily Denier do you?

    • Kurisu Sonsaku says:

      01:11pm | 09/12/10

      Wow - someone knows how to google idiot in another language.

      Ecchi na no wa ikenai to omoimasu

      As far as trolling skills go you’re a floater.

    • The Badger says:

      06:46pm | 09/12/10

      Oni

      Pot kettle black?

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:18am | 09/12/10

      Carbon Tariffs are the way of the future. They are unilateral and benefit the country implementing them.

    • tipster86 says:

      01:23pm | 09/12/10

      Yes, because consumers paying higher taxes on their imported consumer goods is a “benefit”. Who dosen’t love higher prices caused by an extra tax? Who dosen’t appreciate being able to afford to buy less because a new tax must be paid out of your existing household budget?

      You are correct Shane: citizens of the future want less consumer goods and lower standards of living. Politicians who are courageous enough to announce that they will burden them with taxes, so they spend less on their own well-being, will be immensely popular and win democratic elections.

      Wait a minute…

    • Randal says:

      10:17am | 09/12/10

      There was a time when an article such as this on The Punch would spark a whirl wind of fury and debate in regards to ‘Global Warming’.

      Judging by the blogs above it would seem that the wind is well and truly out of the sails of this debate and that ‘Global Warming’ is being treated with apathy by the general public - a view further supported by recent polling.

      A view if continued into 2011 will provide an interesting political conundrum for the Prime Minister as she considers implementing a Carbon Tax in 2011, and in keeping the Greens on side to maintain power she may discover that at the ballot box, a public no longer fearing endless summers and rising seas, may end her political career altogether.

      Many pundits believe this issue destroyed our last Prime Minister’s credibility and could it be that our newest is putting her head in the same political career ending greenhouse inspired noose?

    • TimB says:

      10:40am | 09/12/10

      Here’s hoping. I just hope the noose tightens before the legislation gets through.

      Who knows Gillard might have a bit of integrity and let the issue go on the table for the next election. Then we’ll see what’s what.

    • Super D says:

      10:50am | 09/12/10

      There is a difference however, if a pro or anti climate message is posted by a politician then their staffers and party tragics all chime in to support or attack as the case may be.  Witness Bronwyn Bishop’s post yesterday. 

      This post by an NGO no-name just doesn’t generate the same interest.

    • Muzz says:

      11:00am | 09/12/10

      Give it time Randal and the true believers will come out of their corner throwing punches in all directions. Yes, post 1/7/11 we might be in for some interesting political stoushes.

    • michael j says:

      12:32pm | 09/12/10

      Rudd didn’t have any cred to start,and it was the
      super profit mining tax that got him ,
      what can ya do when ya best(twiggy) turns on ya
      Ms Gillard seems to be giong the same way ,she
      folds on what i believe was a fair tax,
      Now she is on about a carbon tax which i
      believe is an unfair tax,,
      When asked about Nuclear Power she says no its
      to expensive,siencist say its not,,then she saye well its
      against labour policy to use this wonderfull product’‘’‘’‘
      labour can shove ther policiers,,bob hawkie had a policy
      when he was Chief tat by 1990 no aus child would be in poverty,,,ms Gillards new carbon tax will put half of this nation
      into povity because the day it comes in it will go up
      250% and like all labours policy fed an state they can
      be countred on to break thier word,,,
      nuclear power ? for mine is a good stop gap for a few
      hundred years till they can get solar n wind power to actually
      work,,,,,but as i said be 4 this is a desion 4 those under 40
      i wont b ere in 2100,,,,

    • MarK says:

      11:31am | 09/12/10

      Seriously all you have to do is look no further than the fact no world leaders of note are talking this up or even attending apart form an obligatory wave.

      The good news is the world is not dying . Relax. Enjoy. Shame about the dodgy science, computer modelling that doesn’t work and some wealth redistribution that will not occur but meh.

      You guys will find another windmill to tilt at.

    • tipster86 says:

      01:11pm | 09/12/10

      Ironically the greatest achievement of the green movement will be reinvigoration of the nuclear and hydro power industries they stopped in the 1980s.

      My guess is the next windmill they tilt at will be damns and nukes.

    • Razor says:

      04:50pm | 09/12/10

      To answer the question:

      Hopefully not.

    • iansand says:

      07:09pm | 09/12/10

      I hope you blokes are right.  If you are not the ride could get very bumpy.  Hanging onto your hats won’t quite do it.

    • Colin J Ely says:

      07:41pm | 09/12/10

      Is it true that the next Conference will be held at South Melbourne Beach? wink

    • NESLIHAN KUROSAWA says:

      03:58am | 10/12/10

      Hi Sophie,

      Cancun, Mexico seems like a great location to hold talks about Kyoto Protocol.  However, I am not very hopeful at all about the actual outcome.  It has very conflicting sides and opinions, there is no end in sight to a positive outcome.  May be in the future!!  It does not look very promising right now, as we are not holding the “biggest polluters” responsible at all. And double standards seem to apply here again.

      For the first time because of the fact that the icebergs are melting at such rapid rate, that oil exploration has actually begun in Alaska.  To me that should be enough of a warning to all of us. We should take these signs very seriously, if you ask for my personal opinion.  Best regards to your editors.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Found a TV meteorologist on Twitter with the last name Piotrowski. There's a whole newsroom of Piotrowskis out there

Paul Colgan

RT @businessinsider: Man Being Questioned For Boston Bombing Connection Shot And Killed By FBI by @paulszoldrahttp://t.co/OtypP2PRgI

Daniel Piotrowski

This is a must read @TheAtlantic. Whether you think you know everything or think you know nothing http://t.co/naoUutCoWF

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JoshuaWithers: Have you seen the Australian version of Breaking bad? He get's cancer and Medicare covers his costs and the series ends.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter