The monkey is not just off the back – he’s on the floor, break-dancing.

If we didn’t win this time, we would never win at Lords ever again.

Highlights from the hideousness at Lords.

For 75 years that Aussies have dominated us at the home of cricket, but by Sunday we dared to dream. A lead of more than 500, two days to bowl the Aussies out – and a bowling line-up that consisted of four seamers, one spinner and two umpires.

Rudi Koertzen and Billy Doctrove had shockers, no argument there.

They committed the crime players in any sport despise – inconsistency.

They couldn’t refer Nathan Hauritz’s disputed catch but not Andrew Strauss’s. It was the wrong call.

But their level of inconsistency has been matched only by the criticism of the England skipper.

He genuinely believed he took the catch cleanly. You could tell that from his celebrations and those off the players around him.

There was none of the half-appeals and sideways-looks that usually accompany a dodgy catch.

Hauritz was the same, and certainly feels he took the catch fairly and squarely.

But now all and sundry are calling Strauss a cheat, while claiming Hauritz has been shafted.

The video evidence was also shaky for Hauritz, but I haven’t seen any condemnation of him – and nor would I like to.

There is every chance both men took fair catches – the camera does truly lie on those matters by foreshortening the image – so attacks on their integrity are off the mark.

Now don’t get me wrong, it’s undeniable that Australia didn’t have the rub of the green.

Hussey and Katich were also the victims of bad decisions on Sunday, and Ricky Ponting was given out caught at slip in the first dig when he clearly missed the ball.

(He was plumb LBW though, so that was probably the right outcome by the wrong means.)

But ultimately, 520 is a massive target and it is highly unlikely the Australians could have chased it down even without the howlers.

England were the better team and hopefully when all the furore dies down, most people will be able to acknowledge that.

On that note, I’d like to make one final point about Ponting.

I like bagging him as much as the next man, particularly if the next man is Duncan Fletcher.

But his post-match interview last night was pure class and would have won over many people.

He didn’t blame the umpiring; he blames his side’s poor performance, while praising England for theirs.

By letting everyone else talk about the issue, he can move on with his side and get ready for the next Test.

And what a Test it promises to be.

10 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • James says:

      03:31pm | 21/07/09

      “They couldn’t refer Nathan Hauritz’s disputed catch but not Andrew Strauss’s”
      You might want to rethink that Jon.

      Similar situation at Cardiff, except the poms got lucky with the weather, and Australia didn’t have 13 ‘players’ on the field like England did at Lords.
      Still, no excuse for some of the crap batting from Australia, and well done to Flintoff for some excellent bowling.  Hopefully we now have a good series on our hands.

    • davido says:

      03:35pm | 21/07/09

      England and Strauss in particular have dishonoured themselves.

    • dave says:

      04:02pm | 21/07/09

      All the Aussies in my office now hate Flintoff. “Arrogant”, - yeah, he’s a bit of a tit but watching the Aussies get narky just makes you love him even more.

    • Jack says:

      05:21pm | 21/07/09

      It’s “Lord’s”!

      Trust a Pom to not be able to accurately write the name of the ground at which winning means ‘the world’!

    • Kevin says:

      06:32pm | 21/07/09

      The way I saw Hussey’s dismissal, the English keeper was in a position to see exactly what had happened, he was just a couple of feet behind the batsmen, and by his appealing for the dismissal, he was obviously cheating.

    • Mark says:

      08:28pm | 21/07/09

      Disgraceful umpiring, disgraceful sportsmanship from the Poms, disgraceful first innings batting from Australia.

      Strauss…. you’re a disgrace.

      My God I’m responding to something in The Punch - disgraceful.

    • Pete from Sydney says:

      08:09am | 22/07/09

      Yep celebrate the win Jon…although I can’t be as gracious as Ricky…the apalling decisions by the umpires made a big difference, pure and simple. It was almost the whole top order…The rub of the green is a stupid way of putting it, consistent decent umpiring at the highest level of any sport is the bare necessity and this test had neither…how this is tolerated is beyond me. Strauss may not have cheated, but he certainly didn’t have his Howzat call tested as it should have been.

    • Chaos says:

      12:45pm | 22/07/09

      While some umpiring decisions went the English way in the second innings, one can’t excuse the poor shot selection by the Australians in the first innings. Katich, Haddin, North, Clarke and Johnson gave their wickets away cheaper then a $2 pop shop. Add to the fact Johnson leaked runs like a rusty ship, and the umpiring decisions pale into insignifigance.

      Frankly, that is where the game was won and lost.

    • Peter Warrington says:

      02:45pm | 24/07/09

      not sure I like the “now or never” intro. certainly not heading into the match, you would have thought it was “4 more years”.

      and purely coincidence that games got away in decent home efforts in 72, 77, 81 and 85.

      but Jon knows the future. England were doomed in 2013 if they didn’t win now.

      it’s like Johnny Warren and the witchdoctor’s curse on the Socceroos. or John Howard’s spooking of the ALP. all in the mind.

      Ponting always makes a good concession - Ashes 05, India 08, SA 08-9. very good loser for someone with so little practice!

      (PS clearly the better side won, but you want to be careful re statements that the howlers in the second dig didn’t make the difference… does 522-406 equal Katich, Hughes, Ponting*, Hussey? answer - we’ll never know. not out of the question.)

      * Ponting’s mind clearly affected by his sense of injustice hence the criminal sin of getting out to Broad.

      BTW, there’s no way Ponting was “plumb” in the first dig. no way he could have been given, given the unsuccess Hilfenhaus had in Cardiff with many more plumb shouts than that. maybe hitting leg, maybe not. good bit of bowling. better bit of appealing. interesting umpiring. very interesting third umpiring.

      BTW, Kim Hughes was LB 7 times from 12 digs in 1981. another coincidence.

    • Peter Warrington says:

      02:49pm | 24/07/09

      the other thing that’s always interested me is that Lord’s is named after Thomas Lord, who wasn’t one. Has nothing to do with aristocracy.

      me happy, ‘cause Australia’s winning t’war of the apostrophe, ain’t it so?

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter