The one advantage that paper-based magazines have had on their electronic counterparts is usability and look. The ability to turn the page and take in the beauty of a well-designed magazine is something that most web sites can’t match.

iPad therefore I am

Portability is the other area where magazines have had the edge. Carrying them around is lot easier than a standard computer.

As such, many have scoffed at Rupert Murdoch’s aim to get people to pay for digital content. After all, lots of online content is currently free and there’s been nowhere near enough ‘value-add’ to warrant people paying for content. However, the launch of Apple’s iPad tablet could well be the game changer that proves Murdoch right. With their new ultra-portable tablet, Apple can change the publishing industry to the same degree that they’ve changed the music sector.

The tablet version of ‘Sports Illustrated’ shown in this clip shows why and clearly demonstrates why we’ll eventually see the demise of traditional paper-based magazines.

If I had the choice of reading these articles in the normal magazine, for free on SportsIllustrated.com, or owning a multi-media version as shown above, I’d pay for the multi-media magazine. High quality interactive content on new tablet technology like the iPad will provide the tipping point where ‘pay for content’ comes to life. In my opinion, it offers a much better reading experience than normal magazines and it can look as good if not better than the printed edition.

Paper magazines simply do not have the flexibility of a well-designed electronic counterpart like the ‘Sports Illustrated’ example. Electronic publications free publishers and readers from the constraint of a 96 page format and the limited number of words and photos in each article. Readers can search for key words and find them in an instant. Content can be updated and articles can be shared via Facebook. It even allows publishers to give readers the full audio of an interview (the paid Guardian iPhone app is already doing this).

The ability to hear the unedited viewpoints of the interviewee rather than the edited selections of the journalist provides a depth to the article which the printed page cannot match. Backing up the article with relevant video and background information gives further value that also warrants payment for the electronic alternative.

Advertisers win too

The benefit that publishers can offer advertisers is also clear. Readers of interactive electronic magazines can click on ads and be taken straight to a store featuring that product. They can watch a video, or even view the product in a different colour. The interactive and direct response ability of the advert is something that paper-based magazines cannot match. One could even argue that publishers should charge more for these ads – particularly if they could be updated when readers log on to the Net.

The environment wins as well

Environmentally, it’s also the right way to go. When you end up reading magazines on the iPad and other tablets, you don’t have to chop down trees (unfortunately a lot of paper used in Australia is still not accredited by the Forest Stewardship Council).

Around the world, turning those trees into paper uses up a vast amount of energy and water. The whole process of making and disposing of paper generates many millions of tonnes of greenhouse gases. Whilst computers use resources to run and make, the overall benefit of a switch to computer-based magazines is clear.

Where to next?

A well-designed magazine will have life in it for quite a few years to come. But one has to ask how long they can continue in their current form. Publishers would do well to bring newsagents on board this push towards electronic magazines as downloading magazines with substantial video content could negatively affect people’s download plans.

One way to proceed is for electronic magazines to be sold inside a traditional magazine cover in newsagents. Nobody expects to be given content free in a newsagent and it would safeguard the publishing industry from Apple having too much control over distribution. It would also sell the new generation of electronic magazines via outlets where people traditionally buy their magazines. To that end, it would minimise the culture shock arising from a shift to the electronic alternative.

Familiarity is key

The iPad’s interface is essentially a supercharged iPhone. As such, millions of iPhone users will already feel at home with the device. But what makes the iPad really sing is its speed and portability. Turning pages on the iPad’s screen has a natural feel to it that’s a world away from Microsoft’s valiant but faltering efforts to establish tablet PCs.

In short, the technology has finally caught up with the vision of a paperless magazine. And it’s because of this that publishers will finally be able to charge for electronic titles that match the quality and depth of their printed counterparts.

Murdoch has called it correctly in the past on other media innovations. Saying he’s wrong about paid content runs the risk of underestimating how fast this technology is developing. Comparing Amazon’s Kindle to the new Apple iPad is already like comparing old vinyl discs with Blu-ray DVDs. It’s an entirely different proposition that will be a major game changer. Whether publishers can take full advantage of it though is another question.

PaperLessAlliance.com: Do Something’s Paper-Less Alliance aims to reduce Australia’s use of paper.

Follow Jon on Twitter: @JonDeeOz

Follow The Punch on Facebook

Most commented

20 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      05:36am | 29/01/10

      More likely, magazines will die out as people can get better content for free on the Internet. The iPad just makes it more convenient to avoid the dying media.

    • Bah says:

      05:44am | 29/01/10

      No camera,  no USB ports, no SD card ports. Who do they think they’re kidding? Even my bargain-basement netbook does all those.

    • dancan says:

      11:36am | 29/01/10

      This is what’s making me hesitate.  I could do without the SD port, the lack of a usb port makes me go hrm.  But if it had a webcam/camera in it I could forgo the other two features, it would even become my second or even first method of communication.  It would be great to be able to open a video conversation while reading my paper/book when I’m out

    • Nigel says:

      05:53am | 29/01/10

      This certainly has potential but publishers need to take into account not only the price point but the buying habits of customers.  I don’t subscribe to any magazines but there is a woodworking magazine I buy every month and about once a year I buy a computer magazine.  Every couple of months depending on what I see on the cover I’ll buy a car magazine and which mag I choose will depend on the cover story.  Newspapers most, but not all days.  I will not sign up for a 12 month subscription for any of those so the newsagency style of selling has potential.

    • woof says:

      08:01am | 29/01/10

      Sorry Mr Dee, let’s not jump to the conclusion (you seem to have done so) that paper has a larger carbon footprint than online - the following figures relate to the carbon cost of reading the Stern Review - a 700 page document on climate change commissioned by the British government.

      Print 85g
      The printed version of The Stern Review was validated in the report as 85 grams of CO2 in total for the complete manufacturing process and the paper. Because it is a finished printed book, that is the maximum CO2 it will ever amount to and can be read as many times as you like over the next 100 years. And it sequesters carbon while it sits on the shelf.
      Online 226g
      For every hour that a person reads The Stern Review in PDF format on a typical desktop computer*, 226 grams of CO2 are generated. This does not include the CO2 footprint for the IT infrastructure to deliver the PDF via the Internet, nor does it include the footprint to print it out on an inkjet or laser printer.
      Of course, a typical reader will print out parts or all of the report. Why, because we want to read it in hard copy – the majority’s preference?
      Also of note is a study completed by well know Australian printing industry expert Phillip Lawrence of Eco Strategies, who concluded that one single colour A4 sheet printed on a laser printer, equalled 100 pages of four colour process, printed two sided on a cold set web offset press.
      CD 300g
      A study in 2007 by Australian Dr Tony Wilkins, Group Manager, Environment & Climate Change for News Ltd, has validated that the manufacture of a CD with The Stern Review data generates 300 grams of CO2 per disk or a DVD 350 grams and that is even before it is put into a computer and viewed or printed.
      *2.13 GHz Intel Dual Core 1GB RAM, CRT Monitor (Panasonic PanaSync E701) and Wireless Router Modem (Belkin VoIP 802.11g). Computer energy costs sourced from Choice Australia, May 2008 and conversion coefficients used are sourced from the Australian Greenhouse Office Factors and Methods Workbook December 2007.

    • iToss says:

      01:38pm | 29/01/10

      I have spent over 30 years in the print industry, from book publishing, to newspaper to packaging and, trust me, carbon CO2 footprint figures are very loose, to put it mildly. As for sequestering carbon while sitting on the shelf pfffahhhahahahh. (wipes tears from eyes) no, seriously….

    • Brando says:

      08:02am | 29/01/10

      Just one more way Apple can suck money out of its adoring faithful and one more gadget that I can quite happily live without.

      Just like the iPhone, of I want something along these lines I’ll wait until Apple’s competitors build something even better without the financial ties.

    • Matt says:

      08:12am | 29/01/10

      The one point everyone is missing is how this is going to hurt Telstra.
      Currently I pay about $100 or so a month for a wireless broadband card for my laptop. That’s with about a 5 gb limit I think.
      AT&T in the US is going to be offering a FREE iPad with unlimited downloads for US$29.
      Telstra is going to have to offer something similar (or Optus will, because obviously the ability to price it that cheap is there).
      Which means people are going to really question why they are paying so much for wireless broadband via a USB stick or similar.

    • cats says:

      04:03pm | 29/01/10

      Huh? Telstra owns all the networks in Australia lol!

    • Craig Lambie says:

      08:31am | 29/01/10

      Interest thoughts there mate, but I don’t think so.
      I read the Paper every day on my laptop, a Fujutsu Siemens Lifebook S6410…. is about the same size as an ipad, but I have had it for 2 years (yes time for an upgrade… but I won’t be getting an Ipad)
      I don’t pay for content now, and almost never would.  Advertisers pay, even when I don’t pay any attention to their ad’s.  I don’t know why they do it…. I don’t even know why “The Road” keeps advertising to me….. I have seen it.
      Anyways the Ipad is missing so many features you would be crazy to buy it…. bit.ly/9PVSnW however I am sure plenty of people will…. I mean they bought the iPhone…. Once again… I have had a Nokia N95 for 2 years which has Apps, and does all the things the iPhone does, slightly clunkier… but the battery last longer, and I have had it for 2 years.
      Apple are good at marketing, and making products that lots of people can use, but paid content… I don’t think so.  iTunes is still not making anywhere near as much cash as the hardware side of the Apple business….

    • eZpc says:

      09:13am | 29/01/10

      Why cant content by the saviour of paid content?

    • paul says:

      10:02am | 29/01/10

      exactly - rupert and his mates keep reducing the size of newsrooms, spilling more rubbish easy press release stories onto pages.  ?Without quality content, why would anyone pay this clown?  Have a look on rapidshare for how many ebooks are available for those unwilling to pay.

    • Jon Dee says:

      10:56am | 29/01/10

      This is partly the point I was trying to make. It’s content and the way that the content is delivered that is key. I think that the ‘Sports Illustrated’ video shows a really dynamic way of delivering great content - this would make me buy it. However, I wouldn’t buy it if it was just plain text on a web site.

    • Susan says:

      10:45am | 29/01/10

      The Kindle as it stands has a very wide range of available newspapers and magazines, much wider than the iPad. It alone will do nothing to save old-style journalism that other devices aren’t already doing. The business model for news has to change if it is to survive.

    • TB says:

      11:32am | 29/01/10

      Who would’ve thought that somebody would shill for Murdoch on a Murdoch-owned website? Why, I’m shocked and appalled, sir. Shocked AND appalled.
      [/sarcasm]

      History has shown only one trend in regards to information - technology is constantly making its flow easier, eroding barriers to its flow eventually until they are eventually swept aside, sinking into the murky depths of memory. The internet is finally on the cusp of rendering the old media empires obsolete and irrelevant. And I say good riddance to the lot of them.

    • AT says:

      11:43am | 29/01/10

      It’s not the iSaviour, it’s just (as the author says) a supercharged iPhone.

      All the gushing about how this will open fantastic new opportunities with the ability to share on facebook, link to ads (ooh yeah, I really really really wanna pay for that privilege), embed audio and video, eliminate paper etc etc, is the same mogul wannabe spiv’s wet dream spiel that is trotted out every time a new product or service launched.

      All that stuff/potential is already commonly available on existing not-that-much-more-inconvenient platforms and the only novel aspect of the iTampon is increased portability. It’s only the prefect types doing their master’s bidding who bleat about how wonderful the same old crap will be on a shiny new toy that you have to buy and accessorise, upgrade every three days and pay for bandwidth and content insultingly described as groundbreaking — like the video, which is 10th rate TV or the audio, which is 10th rate radio or the ephemeral reading experience on it, which can never equal the immutable tactile proprietorial pleasure of paper.

      If you were to calculate how much you spend during the lifespan of the iTampon on its purchase cost, its access fees and content during that time and compare it to how much you would have spent on buying just the hard copy equivalents, I reckon you’d be in for a bit of a shock.

      Nevertheless, it’s the most plausible product so far for the long promised brave new world of digital everything, but it won’t redefine anything. If the idea, regardless of the product, takes off, it’ll be just a few years before there’s very many more iGeneric iTampons than there are iTampons at a fraction of the cost. And very many more illegal iDownloads of content than legitimate sales.

      iPad: does everything bigger an iPhone can, except make calls. Smaller than a laptop, but without half of its function. Saviour? No. Interesting niche product? Yeah, probably, but that’s all.

    • Bald Eagle says:

      11:50am | 29/01/10

      You only talk about magazines. I never buy magazines. The only time I read a magazine is in the waiting room for a doctor or such. Will ipads be sitting on coffee tables in waiting rooms? This Ipad does nothing that you can’t already do with a notebook.  This is all about the “buzz” that Apple are so good at. Macophile zombies might be impressed, as will the mindless who follow any trend. The truth of the matter is in this magazine world you talk about, there is more fluff, infotainment and advertorials than in the trashy Murdoch press. There is nothing insightful in reading a magazine that portends to give you the best technique for satisfying your boyfriends carnal desires, or telling you what Britney is up to. Paid content will only ever be a niche area for people with a specific need for timely information, particularly when you have organizations such as the ABC, PBS and BBC churning out real information for free.

    • Jon Dee says:

      01:16pm | 29/01/10

      I agree that there is lots of information that will remain free on the Internet. The examples you gave such as ABC, PBS and BBC will continue to publish free high quality content as they are public service organisations.

      However, the fact is that many millions of people will buy the iPad. Many more millions will no doubt buy products that will come out to compete with the iPad. It is these people to whom publishers like Rupert Murdoch will be able to charge for high quality multi-media digital magazines.

      With regards to your claim about Britney Spears and other celebrities, why do you think people buy Woman’s Day and New Idea etc? If they’re prepared to pay for the print version of these magazines, why would they not pay for a better quality digital version of the same thing? I’m not sure I follow your argument there. Just because you’re not part of that target market, doesn’t mean that others aren’t - indeed, you need to remember that those magazines are amongst the biggest selling publications on the Australian market.

    • Bah says:

      03:19pm | 29/01/10

      “Saviour of paid content”. Uh huh, yeah, sure.

      How?  It doesn’t even do Flash video! Let alone multi-task.

      Fer Chrissakes, can’t you drones turn your own pages? That’s *all* it does!

      I will spend the same amount on the gadget as I do - and will -  for online content: $0.00.

    • Andy Grace says:

      10:14pm | 30/01/10

      Unfortunately for Murdoch et al, it doesn’t matter how you package it, there will be only a tiny market for paid online content. This will be in niche areas such as business news where high end consumers don’t care about cost.

      For the mainstream, the only thing News Ltd/Time Warner and others will add is a presentation layer.  The information is already out there for free and the display of this information, thanks to RSS and what comes thereafter, will end up being controlled by the device and the user.

      I see Jobs is attempting to remove elements from the ecosystem to give these ‘great white hope’ business models a go.  This is obvious in the deliberate omission of Flash from iPad, explained away as making the system more reliable (which is true)  but also rendering the AppStore far harder to bypass.  A version of any official app could be just written in Flash and run in a browser.    Jobs knows however, that HTML5 will get around that one -  in the meantime he can still sell it to the moguls desperately looking for their revenue stream.  It’s 1995 and The Microsoft Network all over again!

      To answer your previous question, I doubt the great unwashed New Idea/Womans Day/Womens Weekly set would pay for digital downloads.  Those magazines serve a purpose - something to read whilst you are waiting in a queue.  For your money you feel like you’re getting something ‘real’ too - paper.  Now that copying MP3s and MPEG4 movies is considered legit because nothing physical is being taken,  re-educating the public this far down the track seems unlikely.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

Found a TV meteorologist on Twitter with the last name Piotrowski. There's a whole newsroom of Piotrowskis out there

Paul Colgan

RT @businessinsider: Man Being Questioned For Boston Bombing Connection Shot And Killed By FBI by @paulszoldrahttp://t.co/OtypP2PRgI

Daniel Piotrowski

This is a must read @TheAtlantic. Whether you think you know everything or think you know nothing http://t.co/naoUutCoWF

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @JoshuaWithers: Have you seen the Australian version of Breaking bad? He get's cancer and Medicare covers his costs and the series ends.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter