While some argue Tony Abbott has “opened up the culture wars” by declaring the practice of respecting traditional Aboriginal land owners at official gatherings as “out of place tokenism”, you can’t deny that though controversial, the Ab-Blaster has a point. These repeatedly enforced preambles for the Whatever Tribe Of Wherever grow ever more meaningless each ensuing shindig, and are at best, descending into farce.

What is the point of repeating this ritual over and over every year?

It isn’t culture, it’s clutter. PCYC CEO Chris Gardiner has also picked up the dustpan and brush, declaring kicking off parliament with the Lord’s Prayer is not only intolerable, but “anachronistic at best… superstitious at worst”. The message is clear – it’s time for a clean out Australia!

This is a big, brown and far too dusty land, and there’s plenty more mouldy, moth-eared, curry-stained tokenistic traditions still loitering about the flat, in desperate need of either chucking in the wash, or just a good old chucking out.

Anzac Day marches:
This bizarre annual tradition of old blokes marching up and down city streets, blocking shopping access to discount fashion outlets and electrical goods warehouses, has surely done its dash.

Every year it’s the same old tired routine; same old dudes, same old war that was so like, ages ago. Most of them don’t even bother actually marching anymore and resort to sitting lazily in their cars, waving aimlessly at a bunch of out-of-focus onlookers.

Really, what’s the point? You’ve got your R.S.L clubs for this ridiculous indulgent nostalgia, please stop forcing it on our footpaths. It’s in the past old-timers, time to move on. Lest we forget? Lest we bloody try to!

Christmas Day:
A long time ago, some bloke claiming to be the son of god was born and yada yada yada. Yeah, we know. In fact we know so well, we based our entire calendar around it. Jesus, what more do you want from us?

The only thing that’s become more part of the furniture than the Christmas story, is Christmas Day itself.

Every year the carbon copy of boredom is the same; wake up in the morning to screaming kids if you have them, or a screaming hangover if you don’t; trundle your sorry state to some sort of family gathering and try not to get into a fight with an in-law. Talk about obligation on a biblical scale.

Jesus Christ died for our sins people, so let’s not make it harder for the guy by cluttering our collective souls with more of ‘em. Stick a fork in Christmas, it’s done.

Voting:
As you should be well aware by now through shocking fines or shocking boredom, voting is compulsory in Australia. Now if we’re talking token efforts, surely the manner in which we choose our nation’s leaders is the mother of them all.

The sleep-inducing voting process is like dull de ja vu - same boring candidates, same boring forms, no fun word jumbles or Sudoku puzzles between the House of Reps and the Senate, just the mindless colouring in of tiny squares on offensively oversized pieces of paper. You don’t even get coloured pencils to choose from.

Where’s all the passion and excitement as promised on the hustings? It is of course totally absent, obliterated by the totalitarian obligation to roll up, or else. The whole thing needs abolishing. All those in favour, say meh.

Funeral ceremonies:
Ashes to ashes, dust to d… yawwwwwwwn. Really, what’s the point of all this morbidly overblown pomp and ceremony?

“He was a great man”. “I’m sorry for your loss”. “She’s in a better place”. Oh please. I bet you say that to all the grievers.

Furthermore it’s so typical of human beings, even after they’ve shuffled off the mortal coil, to force their survivors to sit through another a self-aggrandising sideshow of “me-me-me”. Selfish creatures ‘till the bitter end. R.I.P to funerals I say, and may God have mercy on their souls.

Foreplay:
By very definition, foreplay is a redundant notion. As the tiny green Jedi master Yoda might say, “Foreplay? There is no foreplay. There is only play, or play not”.

Come on, we’re all consenting adults here. We’ve been around the block a few times, we know what’s going to happen. Yet each time, women get all uppity when blokes even dream of skipping the pointless preamble of respecting the traditional owner of the woman’s body, and leap straight into the meat of the matter.

Foreplay is just another token effort that needs a binning, along with sticking around once the formalities are over, and any suggestions that maybe the speeches could “go a bit longer next time”.

Saying hello:
This is probably the most shocking token offender all. Every day, Earth’s population seem hell-bent on being polite to each other by actually saying, “hello”. Some even go so far as to embellish this meaningless social ritual with physical contact, by holding the other person’s hand and literally shaking it up and down in a warm and welcoming manner.

Give me a break. I can see you, you can see me. We are both aware of each other, and that at some point we might interact. So can we just drop this ridiculous greeting charade once and for all?

I implore anyone who actually meets Tony Abbott not to offend him with such an insultingly empty, token gesture.

64 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • SecondChild says:

      02:46pm | 30/03/10

      I think we should add marriage to that massive list of stupid things smile marriage is stupid and pointless because i believe if you love a person and they love you - thats wonderful. WHY DO YOU HAVE TO PROVE IT WITH A PIECE OF PAPER!? what is THAt going to do? don’t you realise somebody can just come right along (possibly your husband who has been having an affair for the last two years with his secretary) AND RIP IT INTO TINY PIECES! you waste a lot of money on a dress, flowers, making sure everyone is eating the best food at the best place, you have expensive cars to drive you there all the guests then have to buy you an expensive gift like a punch bowl that u dont even like just to make up for the amount you’ve spent on making it all feel worthwhile… PEOPLE.. SERIOUSLY.. is it really worth it!?

    • Lady Fong says:

      05:59am | 19/03/10

      Gregory: all traditions begin at some time. Christmas after Jesus was born.
      Anzac after Gallipoli. Compulsory voting after federation and constitution, so on and so forth. OK Ernie Dingo began the tradition in 1974 of acknowledging the original owners of this land. In 2074, your great grand children will consider it as a taken and won’t remember its genesis. We remember Anzac because the diggers ‘fought for our freedom’. Can we not then remember that from 1788 onwards the aboriginal people ‘gave’ us their land for free. Can you imagine paying for 9 million square kilometres?
      Our wealth is based on this land. Sure we’ve added value but it always all begins with land. No, there’s no need for white guilt but let’s have gratitude and Yes, let’s have the acknowledgements…and mean them. Learn the names of every piece of land that is acknowledged. That way our understanding would become far deeper and sincere. It’s is only tokenistic if it is unmeant.

    • Kim says:

      03:59pm | 18/03/10

      I think that most men already have rid themselves of having to say hello.  Have you ever noticed that when they see another male that they know, they either just say “hey” or nod at each other.  The nod seems to signify that: “I’m a bad ass dude and I recognise that you too are a bad ass dude.” 
      It seems that the manlier you are the less you have to say…...  That’s what it looks like to me anyway, but hey, I’m female so what would I know.

      funneee article Chris D.  Loved the tongue in cheek jibes.

    • Mike says:

      05:58pm | 18/03/10

      To paraphrase a greater man than me,

      Water is wet, Sky is blue, men don’t make sense, women have secrets. And old Satan Claus, Kimmy, he’s out there, and he’s just getting stronger.

    • Tony Monk says:

      03:52pm | 18/03/10

      Chris, If you knew half as much as what you think you do you’d know less than half of what you previously thought you knew,  your words carry the weight and stench of a sodden sponge left at the bottom of the sink all day.

      Tony Monk

    • Kate says:

      03:29pm | 18/03/10

      Wow. People are totes dumb n shit. Except for Chris. You is smart and funny.

    • ab says:

      02:51pm | 18/03/10

      All in favour! *raises hand*. I know that the writer is not really being serious, at least not mostly, but even so I actually agree. All those things make our lives all the more drab.

      I especially like the idea that we would abolish compulsory voting. While I believe it allows for a fairer system, I think if we made it voluntary those who don’t really care wouldn’t come in voting for Labor or Liberal and screwing up elections just because they have to.

    • Mik says:

      03:54pm | 18/03/10

      Then there’d be no fun!  I love having to take time out of my day off to vote for *Fudo*.

      BTW, on a more serious note, someone told me that any *dud* votes actually go to the current in place polly, is that correct?  Or are they just having a go.

    • Christie says:

      02:38pm | 18/03/10

      Bravo Chris! Totally agree.

    • Dave says:

      02:36pm | 18/03/10

      I love it when 97% of the responders miss what the author of the article is actually saying. The sarcasm threw most of them off the scent.

      Kudos Chris.

      But I am heartened to see that elements of the ‘meeja’ are still pushing the ‘barrow that if you don’t agree with some indigenous issue you must be racist/xenophobic/redneck/knuckledragger/white supremacist/bogan/*insert derogatory term to show off your university educated prowess over perceived lower socio economic classes*. It shows us all how you can beat a dead horse long after the carcass has rotted away in the hot sun and your just left with bones with a bit of sinew and gristle on them.

    • Khrystene says:

      02:33pm | 18/03/10

      I’m with Ellen. Social commentary at its best Chris.

    • Me says:

      12:27pm | 18/03/10

      The apologist’s comments simply highlight the need for a sarcasm font to be created! Then there would be no confusion.

    • Chris Deal says:

      12:36pm | 18/03/10

      Oh come now Me, where’s the fun in that?

      And can you please choose an actual name next time, I feel like I’m talking to myself. Which I have been known to do, quite often, rocking back and forth and shouting at the wind.

    • BTS says:

      12:38pm | 18/03/10

      I don’t think so Me, I think it’s sometimes useful to understand that you have acted foolishly and need to revise your perspective through internal dialogue.

    • EJ says:

      12:14pm | 18/03/10

      In WA the Aborigines are complaining because they don’t have cleaners to clean their houses. Maybe it would be easier is we actually abolished cleaning altogether for all Australians. Now that’s a damn ritual I’d like to see take a hike!!!

    • Gregory says:

      03:12pm | 18/03/10

      I didnt miss the point of the article, the person who wrote the article missed the point of the issue. There is and never has been a tradition of the welcome to country speech to honor and respect Aboriginals. Besides, such a speech is tokenistic, only further divides the community along cultural/racial lines and fails to approach the real issues that present Aboriginals - like health, education and welfare. Something like this cannot be compared to ANZAC Day, not even in a badly written sarcastic context. There are no valid comparisons to the welcome to country speech, so the entire article is just a piece of white guilt garbage.

    • Lady Fong says:

      01:57pm | 18/03/10

      Not nice EJ! You, Gregory and Dave should really immerse yourselves in Aboriginal culture and the history of their treatment in Australia. The Welcome to Country speeches have nothing to do with any politician, be he Abbott or Rudd. It is to show respect and honour to the people who were here before any of us. If there was any sarcasm, it is from the three of you. NB is right you’ve totally missed the point of the article.

    • Gregory says:

      12:00pm | 18/03/10

      What terrible sarcastic twaddle. The sarcastic comparisons arent even valid. Even though I despise the guy Abbott has a point when he questions the tokenistic PC mad nature of white guilt attached to opening ceremonies with such a remark. The fact that you tried to lump it in with everything else that may be considered tokenistic is hardly a true comparison, each have their own levels of complexity. Epic fail on all levels.

    • DaveC says:

      03:29pm | 18/03/10

      So Gregory, it’s ok for Abbott to question the “tokenistic PC mad nature of white guilt attached to opening ceremonies”, but not ok to question the motives behind such a controversial statement? No one said he was a racist. An opportunist perhaps, but not a racist.

    • The Cricket says:

      03:03pm | 18/03/10

      Gavin, I think the point so many have made is this isn’t a tradition. It only goes back a few decades and has oly become commonplace in the past few years as middle-class white people attempt to assuage their guilty consciences and flash their politically-enlightened credentials.

    • Gregory says:

      03:07pm | 18/03/10

      DaveC, or how about you make your own assumptions on his thoughts and policies. He’s just another white man who is criticising something involving another race/culture so to people like you and Chris Deal he must automatically be a racist.

      Gavin, wow, didnt realise the “traditional land owners introduction” was a strong Aboriginal tradition. But then again it is a western tradition of white guilt, so in your own words maybe it is worth keeping.

    • Gavin says:

      02:08pm | 18/03/10

      You’re right. Only Western traditions are worth keeping.

    • DaveC says:

      12:18pm | 18/03/10

      I agree Gregory, Abbott does have a point. But are you willing to accept he’s been in deep talks with Aboriginal elders for a some time to identify and discuss the ways in which Welcome To Country speeches could be done more appropriately, if at all? Or do you think there could be an election brewing and goodness me isn’t it advantageous to polarise a nation on race issues?

    • Lady Fong says:

      11:21am | 18/03/10

      Suggest removing any ofthe above token gesture, except the acknowledgement of the original peoples, a howl will be heard nationwide and cries of ‘unAustralian’ will be the response from every corner of the country. Anything positive, be it ever so small for Aboriginal people, is rejected. This country would rather give all aboriginals the Italian middle finger salute.  What Australians have done to the original peoples is the real tokenism, hence the disadvantage, the life-span gap, etc.

    • Fred says:

      10:53am | 18/03/10

      hahahhaha great article Chris

    • Phil says:

      10:22am | 18/03/10

      Finally some sense! Glad someone has been reading my youtube comments over the past few years!

    • BTS says:

      10:07am | 18/03/10

      Can’t you two duke it out at the next Star Trek convention or something where similar nerds can judge you with the necessary expertise.

    • Colleen A says:

      09:36am | 18/03/10

      “Foreplay? There is no foreplay. There is only play, or play not”

      Surely Yoda would say: “Foreplay? No foreplay there is. Play, or play not there is only”

    • Chris Deal says:

      09:57am | 18/03/10

      Sorry Colleen, I’ll have to take you to task on this stridently important matter.

      Empire Strikes Back, Degobah, Yoda’s giving Luke an earful about The Force and believing and all that Jedi hippy stuff that is pretty much just Zen Buddhism with light sabres.

      Anyway, Luke says, “All right, I’ll give it a try”. To which Yoda responds: “No. Try not. Do… or do not. There is no try”.

      May the midichlorians be with you.

    • Martin G says:

      09:28am | 18/03/10

      Please ditch the compulsory vote.

    • Moi says:

      09:17am | 18/03/10

      ha ha ha fantastic Chris…though I sense the tone with which you intended this article to be received has been lost on some of your readers.

    • the apologist says:

      10:58am | 18/03/10

      not lost, just not accepted.

    • erbert says:

      09:00am | 18/03/10

      And what about asking someone out on a date? Why can’t you just ask them out for a shag?

    • BTS says:

      01:38pm | 18/03/10

      1 out of 10 you say… I like those odds!

    • Jason says:

      01:19pm | 18/03/10

      Yes - and it works on average 1 out of 10 times for men (and probably 1 in 3 for women.)

    • Jonathan says:

      07:54am | 18/03/10

      And I thought I was the only person in Australia that thought these things…

    • the apologist says:

      07:47am | 18/03/10

      Surely you must have been laughing at your ‘opinion’ even as you typed? This is ridiculous.

      Anzac: men died and gave their lives so you can enjoy many of the privileges that you do today. The marches are part of the way that the nation collectively respects that sacrifice. Your disrespect is ignorant and offensive.

      Christmas: i’d like to see the media treat the Islamic prophet with that sort of disrespect, you’d get shot down in flames. You clearly don’t take Jesus claims seriously either. At least you don’t reduce him to the ‘he was a good teacher’ kind of approach though.

      Funerals: i’d like to see you barge in and share these thoughts at someone’s funeral. You wouldn’t have the guts. And you wouldn’t be too impressed if someone disrespected one of your loved one’s funerals i’m sure.

      I’m not gonna bother addressing your other comments, because it’s clear you don’t have any appreciation or understanding.

      With an attitude like yours, why not toss out the constitution too? The foundation of our nation. You think prayer in parliament is bad, just have a read of the constitution.

      I thank God that the nation hasn’t been made after your ideas, we’d have a slogan of ‘live for the moment, history is worthless’.

      Do us all a favour and don’t write drivel - try to actually write something, intelligent, thought provoking, and thoughtful - with respect. You could have addressed some of the issues you raise in a much more tactful way.

    • Leah says:

      06:54pm | 18/05/10

      Live for the moment indeed!

    • the apologist says:

      03:21pm | 18/03/10

      Chris, there’s a difference between critiquing something someone’s written, and making a judgment on the person themselves.
      I think what you wrote was tactless and offensive; if you want to argue that it wasn’t thoughtless, feel free. It’s not to say you are necessarily thoughtless – as I said, you come across as reasonably intelligent from what I can gather. It is possible for intelligent people to write thoughtlessly, and it is fair to comment on one’s opinion of what has been written.
      Perhaps your piece wasn’t completely thoughtless, but it gave me that impression. As I said, please argue the points you made in the article further if you think I’m being unfair.

    • the apologist says:

      02:20pm | 18/03/10

      ps. didn’t mean to leave your comment pasted in mine - my bad.

    • Chris Deal says:

      02:08pm | 18/03/10

      “My critique of your ... writing as being thoughtless, tactless, offensive drivel still stands - but that’s not a personal attack”.

      In short - you have no brain, no social graces, and write deplorable dollops of devil scratchings… but don’t take it personally.

      That could well be the funniest thing I’ve ever read. And I should know, I own three editions of Mad magazine.

    • the apologist says:

      01:58pm | 18/03/10

      @Chris D:
      Apologist: a person who makes a defense in speech or writing of a belief, idea, etc. (not someone who always says sorry…)
      I’m happy to apologise to you if i’ve wronged you. My critique of your (in my opinion) writing as being thoughtless, tactless, offensive drivel still stands - but that’s not a personal attack. You seem to be reasonably intelligent, and i’ve got little basis on which to accuse you of being a monster (which I didn’t do…).
      Perhaps I was a bit spiteful in my expression. Apologies!
      But I do stand by my opinion of what you’ve written if you would care to engage my comments.

      So do I get an apology too, or am I still a thoughtless, unintelligent drivel monster? Unless of course are you The Ironist and not The Apologist, in which case I apologise.

    • Chris Deal says:

      01:15pm | 18/03/10

      @ the apologist

      So do I get an apology too, or am I still a thoughtless, unintelligent drivel monster? Unless of course are you The Ironist and not The Apologist, in which case I apologise.

    • the apologist says:

      12:04pm | 18/03/10

      @NB: (again)
      On further consideration, you have a point. I was pondering over my lunch break, and realised that the overall point may have been to attack the ridiculousness of binning orthodoxy/hypocritical ceremony in public life (?).
      I must admit that if this is the case, it caught me by surprise, because in a twisted way, that might actually mean Chris was defending the use of the Lord’s prayer in parliament (and land greetings etc). That’s not something you’ll see everyday.

    • the apologist says:

      10:34am | 18/03/10

      @NB: care to elaborate? if his point wasn’t to challenge the orthodoxy of what he’s criticising, what was it? My point was that he has poorly, unintelligently and offensively attempted it.
      @BTS: you can’t excuse offense just for the purpose of having a laugh. It’s like when people say ‘no offense’ and then go on to say something offensive anyway.
      @Jason: I didn’t say I wanted to get rid of the constitution, I actually think we should get back in line with it (sadly this seems unlikely). Marriage - it’s a foundational institution intrinsic to human nature (so i’d like to see you try to toss it), but yeah, good point: there’s a lot of baggage attached that we could rid of (i.e. the monetarily driven additions you mention)
      @Isabel: there’s a difference between offending/inappropriate comment and humour. I wouldn’t have thought the overall objective of the punch was a cheap laugh anyway, more along the lines of stimulating intelligent thought on important issues - with humour as a component of course.
      @Chris: that was hardly the point I was making, although i’ll admit i’ve got a vested interest in looking to challenge people with what Jesus said.

    • Chris Deal says:

      09:15am | 18/03/10

      @the apologist:

      “You clearly don’t take Jesus claims seriously either”

      Really? What tipped you off?

    • Geoff says:

      08:19am | 18/03/10

      I love the funeral . How many eulogies have I had to sit through and not one tells it how it was..he was great larger than life blah blah blah

    • Isabel says:

      08:11am | 18/03/10

      I think he understands all too well. Perhaps we could insist of some folk having a sense of humour?

    • Jason says:

      08:11am | 18/03/10

      I agree apologist, let’s get rid of the constitution!  What a waste of ossified precedents.

      Marriage has had it’s day as well.  Time to dump that tokenistic rubbish.  It only lines the pockets of wedding planners and divorce lawyers.

      And get rid of show days and the Country Womens’ Association.  They once might have meant something when we rode on the sheep’s back.  However, now they’re just a hollow sop to an impoverished minority holding on to ancient traditions.  Hmm, reminds me of something…

    • BTS says:

      08:05am | 18/03/10

      I think it was written with ‘tongue firmly planted in cheek’, so if you approach it from that perspective, you would appreciate offense wasn’t the intention of the article.

    • NB says:

      08:06am | 18/03/10

      Mate, I think you have compeltely missed the point of the article…...

    • Joe Stephens says:

      07:56am | 18/03/10

      surely you can detect sarcasm.

    • Jonathan says:

      07:22am | 18/03/10

      Hey Watty: wtf?

    • Daisy says:

      07:57am | 18/03/10

      I am a fully adopted & named person of 2 Aborigninal tribes of Arnhem land (I don’t want to mention the specific tribes). I spent many years interacting & visiting all tribes of many areas & never was there a “Welcome to country” performed.
      There is a tradition of calling out to the spirits when entering a sacred place or burial ground.
      All the white PC bleeding hearts who are coming out of the woodwork to champion this “Welcome to country”  ceremony are laughed at by genuine Aboriginal full bloods. This is an urban ceremony & nothing more than tokenism.

    • watty says:

      07:52am | 18/03/10

      Just a couple of questions Jonathan…..perhaps you can assist?

      Has been rumoured that “welcome to country’ is about 35 years old and was thought up by Ernie Dingo and a few mates.
      If true ...hardly traditional?

    • fox says:

      07:17am | 18/03/10

      Lets get rid of shaking hands, not only is it an out of date medievil custom, it is also dangerous with 80% of common infections being able to be spread by the hands.

    • Adam says:

      07:17am | 18/03/10

      I understand you’re having a giraffe here, but I think you’re on to something with the ditching Christmas thing. Let’s see what our fellow commenters have to say!

    • mickey says:

      07:13am | 18/03/10

      I presume you meant “bining” balanda?

    • watty says:

      07:03am | 18/03/10

      Nice try rabbit man Make it humerous and nobody will notice your heart bleeding all over the page.

      I believe in the good old days only full blood and initiated Aborigines were allowed to allow entry into each other’s patch and visiting tribes had to ask permission top enter or cross another tribe’s land.

      Nowadays anyone who claims to be Aboriginal appears to have the right to “welcome to country” even though according to Aboriginal tradition they don’t have a given right to speak for land or “country”

      Perhaps you can provide some evidence that this is a 40,00-60,000 year old traditional Aboriginal custom not a recent “invention” by some part Aborigines?

    • BTS says:

      09:39am | 18/03/10

      Do the Aborigines acknowledge the original inhabitants of Australia?

      Have they said sorry?

    • Eric says:

      08:01am | 18/03/10

      Yes, BTS. Mungo Man is a skeleton that was discovered to be of a different type to those of modern Aborigines, and preceded them. That type was displaced by later waves of immigrants, who became today’s “Aborigines”.

      In addition, Aborigines caused the extinction of several species of large mammals and a radical change in Australia’s ecology by hunting and firesetting over tens of thousands of years.

      Also, “Welcome to Country” was invented by Ernie Dingo in 1976.

      http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/aboriginal-australia/ernie-dingo-claims-the-first-welcome/story-e6frgd9f-1225841577128

    • BTS says:

      07:21am | 18/03/10

      Who did the Aborigines wipe out when they came to the land? Some early prehistoric inhabitants?

    • AFR says:

      06:40am | 18/03/10

      After spending half my December going nuts at Westfield trying to find a gift, I called my family during a particularly frustrating afternoon at Myer to tell them that this was the last Xmas I was doing….. ever.

    • acker says:

      05:04am | 18/03/10

      Keep Anzac day and Welcome to Country (at appropriate events)...I agree ditch Christmas, Lords Prayer and Funeral Ceromonies (throw me a party while I’m still alive you stingy buggers)...I’m OK with compulsory voting, but I prefer foreplay be renamed amusement time wink

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter