In the wake of the Copenhagen anti-climax there’s been a political vacuum in climate change politics.

The expectations were enormous at the UN summit and the talks collapsed into rhetorical justifications by Kevin Rudd, Barack Obama and other world leaders as China and India flexed their muscles.

At home last week, the Greens tried to step in and fill that vacuum and reassert themselves in what is a bedrock issue for them.

Throughout the debate on an ETS in Australia the Greens marginalised themselves by asking for too much. They could and should have made themselves more relevant by adopting realistic targets and demands. The Government’s maximum target of 25% cuts in carbon emissions by 2020 was the Greens minimum.

To start this election year the minor party’s leader Bob Brown announced a compromise plan, a flat $20 a tonne carbon price for two years until a longer term solution can be achieved. It would get the ball rolling in terms of setting a market signal and give the politics of the issue some breathing space. It was an idea first proposed by the Government’s own climate adviser Ross Garnaut in his original report.

Whether or not the Government can go that far in adopting a flat carbon price in the absence of a global deal is highly unlikely if not impossible but at least the Greens are being constructive. If Bob Brown and co. are to be a serious balance of power party they need to try and drive outcomes on issues of importance to them rather than simply jump for the moral high ground like Greenpeace or some lobby group that has no legislative power.

For the Prime Minister at the moment, the less said about Copenhagen the better. Kevin Rudd’s first week back at work has involved a series of speeches around Australia, all on the economy. In stark contrast to his climate malaise the economic story is a strong one.

The unemployment rate for December fell against all expectations to 5.5% as the jobs market and the economy continue to pull through the downturn remarkably well.

The Government faces the dilemma of rising interest rates in the months ahead but with Australia ahead of the rest of the developed world, this is the ground the Rudd Government is marking out in 2010.

Kevin Rudd knows the election is likely be won in large part on his economic record and, at this stage it appears, in spite of his flagging green credentials as his plans at home and abroad remain paralysed.

The climate change issue was a key point of strength for Rudd Labor at the last election and economic credentials were yet to be earned. At the start of this election year that political orthodoxy has been turned on its head.

59 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      05:50am | 27/01/10

      Kieran, both you and your boss David Speers have given Krudd and lie that is man made climate change a free run for the whole of 2009. To watch am and pm Agenda has become a bit of a joke around here. When are you guys going to ask some serious questions of the Labor party? You or anyone here can correct me if I am wrong but I can’t recall a mention any where on your program ever about the leaked emails from the IPPC. You have had many opportunities to put some hard questions to our political leaders but shy away every time. I’ve lost count of the amount of time you guys have answered questions in support of and on behalf of the government. We need you guys to hold our government to account, not just the Liberal party. I know you and Spears are true believers in man made climate change and Krudds ETS but how about you stand back for a minute and have another look at it and then start asking some real questions. I bet you will find there is a fair bit of mileage to be made out of it. Your bias to Labor is nearly as obvious as in the Tracey Spicer piece of garbage that is written here on this other Labor dominated site. I must admit I was getting sick of screaming at the tele last year so have a bit of a think about it hey. It would give my vocal chords a break and it might just be good for ratings. In relation to your article, he would be very brave indeed to start the year off as he finished the last one, on a vote losing issue.

    • jack gilbert says:

      07:10am | 27/01/10

      you and lucie are typical liberal wingers

    • Fog Badger says:

      07:39am | 27/01/10

      I agree, Wayne. I wan’t surprised to learn this morning that Kieran was a member of the dopey press gallery.

      Come on, Kieran, where are your b…s?!

    • ann jacqueline says:

      09:38am | 27/01/10

      hear hear Wayne i agree totally it’s so sad our media in general is without pride in their work ethos and and the Agenda programmes are perhaps the most one eyed on TV.

    • Faten says:

      12:56pm | 27/01/10

      For once Wayne I agree with you!
      Kieren, If you believe for a minute that the majority of Australians still believe in climate change, then seriously you need to wake up. Most people who were climate change believers are now skeptics, I never believed that humans were playing a large part in the destruction of the world through carbon emissions, please! In school you were taught that the Earth constantly goes through climate changes, nothing to do with man!
      When are you journalist going to hold this Krudd accountable, the only reason he wanted to put through the ETS is to earn back the money he spend on the stimulus package!
      Australia was always in the position to ward off the harshness of the GFC, our economic link to China would have foreseen this. It was scare mongering that allowed the economy to slow. So if you believe he has any economic credibility than think again, it was the policies of Howard/Costello and Keating before them that allowed Australia not to be caught up in the world recession, I hardly doubt that a labour government that has been in power just over two years, had anything to do with it!

    • Carl Palmer says:

      04:46pm | 27/01/10

      Strange world, Opposition leader (who spent sometime studying to become a Jesuit priest) has a view about how his kids should respect themselves and carefully consider their decision and he gets plastered for it.

      You then have a PM who seems to frequent “gentlemen’s club’’ – commonly know as strip joints you know those seedy places and who said that I had had too much to drink that night and couldn’t remember…. this is commonly know as getting plastered.  And this bloke is a “good bloke” – for who himself?

      @ D’oh can you please add another epic fail to your impressive two part grand epic fail list….. The $40M wasted handout to Frank Lowy to host a failed “Football World Cup”.

    • Alicia says:

      06:46am | 27/01/10

      I think the fact that Kevin Rudd will only talk about issue’s that make him look good, and anything that looks like it may be unpopular or losing popularity gets dropped like a dirty rag shows weak Leadership and will do him more harm than good. He appears to be afraid he might piss someone off and stalls on making decisions. At the end of the day he leaves you wondering what he actually believes in, especially after the moral delema of Climate Change he crusaded on, and now nothing 2 months later. In contrast Tony Abbott doesn’t seem to be afraid to say what he thinks or believes, popular or not, this could work in his favour. You seem to get a scence of who Tony Abbott is, like him or hate him.

    • Lucie says:

      06:54am | 27/01/10

      I agree totally Wayne, 2009 Agenda would never ask Rudd the hard questions, it was as if Gilbert and Spears were almost gushing over Rudd. Lets hope in 2010 with a new Leader for the Liberals they can ask the hard questions of Rudd and Labor Ministers as they have done with the LIberals.

    • Luke says:

      07:13am | 27/01/10

      So are you going to pander to Kevin Rudd and allow him to just drop the climate change issue because it isn’t in his best interest or are you going to make him stand by his mantra and make him continue to defend his stance. How about throwing a few Leadership issue’s at him. Gillard looks more like a leader than he is.

    • persephone says:

      07:19am | 27/01/10

      In the lead up to the 2007 election, industrial relations - WorkChoices - was THE issue.

      Action on climate change and the environment was well behind this, with both sides of politics running much the same policies.

      If, in the lead up to this year’s election, jobs and not the environment is again the focus, nothing’s changed.

      However, to draw a long bow and say that Rudd is going to play dead on climate change, as this article implies, is a bit presumptuous at this stage.

      Rudd and Wong have only just got back from holidays. Garrett has still be plugging away on climate change in the meantime, but the media has concentrated on the fact that (surprise, surprise) Rudd hasn’t been saying anything, whilst ignoring his ‘off duty’ status.

      That was a pretty dishonest approach.

      Now Rudd’s back. He’s made it clear he wants the CPRS passed in February and made it clear he’ll be putting a target on the table by the end of this month.

      Once parliament’s back, and the CPRS is on the table again, we’ll see if the government’s running dead on it or not.

      It’s simply too early to judge at present.

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      07:43am | 27/01/10

      persephone says: 08:19am | 27/01/10
      In the lead up to the 2007 election, industrial relations - WorkChoices - was THE issue.

      Spot on the persephone….

    • Fog Badger says:

      07:43am | 27/01/10

      persephone - sush! Rudd has gone quiet of climate change and it is disgraceful. He’s back at work now and has chosen not to focus on it; given his alarmist and abusive preaching before Copenhagen, that’s not good enough!

      Stop being an ALP tool and a KRudd apologist!

    • watty says:

      07:52am | 27/01/10

      Are you for real Gilbert?

      You and Sppers have given Rudd a dream run since you both covered the “meeting of the grat minds” at the Canberra gabfest.

      Not one question about the corrupted IPCC.Not one question about how much Rudd and Wong knew about the fiddling of the books before Copenhagen.

      Not even a question about what happened to the world after the “greatest moral issue of our time (Global Warming) bit the dust in Denmark.

      You and Speers make Red Kerry and Tony Jones (ABC) sound like right wing fanatics and no doubt will continue displaying your loyalty to Rudd in the lead up to the next election.

      Happy New Year Comrade.

    • mickey says:

      07:58am | 27/01/10

      Perhaps the heading should be “why won’t Kieran ask Rudd or Wong a hard question about the collapse of the Copenhagen Conference?

      Could it be that this would clash with Sky’s Global Warming propoganda unit , the ECO program, which blindly followed Rudd,Gore and felow alarmists?

    • Jennifer says:

      08:19am | 27/01/10

      Rudd has been running around saying older Australians must work longer and descimination of older workers in the work place needs to stop. Then the next day you let Emerson on Sky say the Liberals need to tell Bronny, Ruddock and the Nats Tuckey and other older politicians to move on. Emerson also admitted Labor encouraged older politicians in their party to move on to make way for new and younger politicians, as we have seen with 2 Labor Fed seats resigning with in a week. Is this not discrimination of older people in the work place?  Which Rudd has been banging on about, coming out of the mouth of one of his own ministers with in days? I noticied this contradiction immediatley, how come you allowed him to get away with it. If I noticed it, surely you did too but chose to let it go.

    • Sherlock says:

      08:30am | 27/01/10

      Since the release of the climategate emails hardly a week has gone by without some revelation of just how dodgy the climate change story is. Of course unless you’ve been following the various climate change blogs you’d have no idea as the mainstream press’ environmental reporters simply ignore anything that doesn’t conform to their collective view that the world is going to hell.

      Even the IPCC report, the bible of the climate change movement, is looking more and more like something put together in someones garden shed. Each day brings yet another story of sections being based on unscientific research. This is a document that may literally change the way we, our children and our grandchildren live on this planet. Please forgive us if we feel such an important document should not be based on guesses.

      More than 50% of the western population now think climate change is a load of crap. The worldwide press have abandoned it as printing that the world is going to boil itself to death hardly makes your paper look credible when the majority of the world is freezing.

      If you want to find a climate change article you have to look for them when before climategate they were everywhere. Think I’m exaggerating, have a look back and compare the number of climate change articles here this year.

      Those that still support the theory of climate change are beginning to look a little strange. It won;t be long before we give them that same condescending smile we give those who still insist that the Y2K bug was a genuine threat.

    • Wayne Hutchins says:

      08:34am | 27/01/10

      Shock Horror! Sky news just interviewed Lord Monckton… I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. Poor interview but all in all I was pleased to see an opposing view. I do believe by the time this guy has completed his speaking tour of Australia, Krudds ETS will be dead in the water. The globe hasn’t warmed for 15 years and it has cooled slightly in the past 9 years.  Ask Kev about that for me will you.

    • Eean Thorne says:

      08:41am | 27/01/10

      It’s simple, I got so tired and annoyed at Sky News, Speers, Gilbert and Spicer continual and sickening promption of the “Communists” (ALP) that I cancelled Austar.  Funny how when I cancelled their biased service delivery I was offered six (6) months free service.  I would never consider returning to a pay TV service unless I can decide what channels I want to watch.

    • Super D says:

      08:53am | 27/01/10

      The reason we will hear economics and not environment is because the two are mutually exclusive.  To proceed now with an ETS or carbon tax is to make Australia unilaterally poorer for absolutely no environmental gain.  That means higher expenses and lower standards of living for working Australians.  The ETS will be scrapped before the end of February or will hang like a millstone from the neck of a government desperate not to be a one term wonder. 

      Residents of NSW well know that the modern ALP values power over principle.  We can expect the government to set up an enquiry into climate change that won’t report until after the next election to put the issue on ice until then.

    • D'oh says:

      11:44am | 27/01/10

      @Blossom @ 11.34am

      “Keep your very narrow minded comments to yourself.”

      I assume you were referring to me in that last comment?

      There was nothing very narrow minded about my comment.  I slimply suggested that you read the source and make up your own mind (i.e. be open minded) rather than parrot Julia Gillard’s view of the world (i.e. narrow minded).  but it appears you have read the article so at least you have sighted the primary evidence.

      Judgin by your response though, it appears that your comment had nothing to do with Abbott’s comment but rather to spin it to your own advantage (in a fashion similar to Julia Gillard) to make a political attack on Abbott.

      “Your obviously a very arrogant young Liberal, another good reason not to vote for the man”

      Notwithstanding the fact that I am not a Young Liberal (although Labor’s performance over the last few years has seriously swayed me in that direction) I fail to see your “good reason” to not vote for this man.

    • D'oh says:

      08:56am | 27/01/10

      He can’t talk about it because the bluff on anthropogenic climate change has been called.  Unfortunately Rudd stepped in to bat for the junk science and YOU the compliant media have been cheerleading. 

      It is not just this issue, the press gallery have generally let Labor get away with blue murder.  Folk like you Kieran have destroyed my faith in our “free press”.

      Start asking the tough questions i.e. do your jobs.

    • Kim says:

      09:31am | 27/01/10

      I just hope you guys put some focus and scrutiny on the Government this year instead of spending the majority of your time focusing on the Liberals.

    • Blossom says:

      09:40am | 27/01/10

      You should be more concerned about Tony Abbotts lack of respect towards women..we can and do vote. Tony Abbbott is the last man who will ever have any say in my bedroom romps. He needs to keep his moralistic misguided veiws to himself. Australian women have no intrest is sexist comments. Tony Abbott to all accounts had sex before marriage himself, so who is he to tell Australi8n females what to do. Hes a hypocrite.

    • Sherlock says:

      10:14am | 27/01/10

      So in your view giving advice to your daughters to wait to marriage to have sex but if you can’t then use contraception are “moralistic misguided views”?

      I think to most people it would seem rather reasonable advice for a father to give his daughters. That’s right the question was what advice would he give his daughters regarding virginity. He wasn’t telling all Australian women what to do and the comments were in no way sexist.

      You’re just another mad leftie who obviously has problems with reading.

    • Fog Badger says:

      10:34am | 27/01/10

      Mrs. James, I’m 45.

    • David C says:

      12:28pm | 27/01/10

      Please highlight the phrases/ sentences that show Tony Abbott telling women what to do with their bodies? Wasnt it just a comment he made abotu what advice he would give his own daughters?

    • D'oh says:

      10:32am | 27/01/10

      @Blossom

      It sounds as though you are going solely on what Julia Gillard say.

      Why don’t you read the full interview and make up your own mind.  You will see just how badly Gillard spun his comments around.

    • jim forrest says:

      12:32pm | 27/01/10

      what lack of respect Blossom he was talking about his family and his hopes for his 3 daughters not about your morals.

    • Sing says:

      12:37pm | 27/01/10

      Do you have daughter’s? so when prompted with the same question that Tony was, which was “what advice would you give your daughters regarding virginity?” what would your response have been? would you tell your daughters that its natural for women to sleep with as many men as possible? or would you hope your daughters have some high moral standing and will be responsible with there sexuality? such as say waiting for mariage (true love supposedly) and if you can’t wait maybe use contraception like all responsible adults who aren’t trying for a child probably should do? So if you think Tony’s wrong? you must be one of those mothers that advocates their daughter’s sleep around?

    • don't believe the hype says:

      01:12pm | 27/01/10

      Blossom, he did NOT tell all Australian females what to do.
      He was asked what advice he might give his three daughters.
      I am female, mid thirties and would expect most fathers to give similar advice to their children. In fact the lack of family and moral values and over sexualisation of young teens is a major problem in my opinion. And I am not religious, I just believe families (and society) should nurture children and young adults. Is that hypocritical?

    • Darryl Price says:

      07:32pm | 28/01/10

      Blossom; read the article in question. Helloooo - just because Julia Gillard says it, doesn’t make it true. They get away with this shit all the time when Labor drones base their opinion on only what they hear on the tv news. Look it up for yourself, and tell me honestly if you are a mother of daughters, that you would not express similar sentiments to them in the same circumstances. I imagine that what weighed heavily in his advice to his daughters was his own experience with pre-marital sex. For mine, I got as much as I could before I was married. My advice to my daughter will be similar to that of TA, don’t give it away cheaply to bastards like me - meet some man who truly loves you first.

    • Charles says:

      09:46am | 27/01/10

      Kieran, this is your chance to step up to the plate and become what we assume a journalist is, i.e. someone who asks questions after doing some background research on the topic.

      Now I know it is easier just to paraphrase whatever Lachlan Harris passes to you, but this head in the sand approach to politics does not make for very exciting television.  We are looking for critical discussion, not an empty PR exercise.

      On the other hand, I can appreciate that since the media has invested so much in the AGW theory to the point they actually own it now, there does come a time when you are going to have to abandon this love child of yours, as it has developed some rather unfortunate stenches and is rapidly becoming socially unacceptable.

      So, at the risk of sounding somewhat patronising why don’t you try and read and absorb some of the mountain of literature that is developing that falsifies the AGW theory, and then form some of your thoughts on the matter.  That way we can all gain something from the exercise rather than the endless re-runs of the Green propaganda and ideology.

    • Janey says:

      09:57am | 27/01/10

      Are you going to interogate Julia Gillard over her rediculas comments accusing Tony Abbott of lecturing young girls on their virginity. Abbott was asked a question about his own daughters and she has got away with changing this around to suit her own political agenda. Julia Gillard not Tony Abbott should be made a spectacle out of for doing it. Very poor taste on Gillards part.

    • Alicia says:

      10:26am | 27/01/10

      Janey - It just goes to show the Government are struggling with rise of Abbotts popularity with Australians. Something they never thought they were going to have to deal with. Should be an interesting year. Rudd/Labor are about to learn a lesson in being “over confident”. Also they should realise Australians prefer honesty over all else. What a refreshing change Abbott is. I don’t think the media even know how to deal with his honesty.

    • Evan Findlay says:

      09:44pm | 27/01/10

      Yes Alicia. Abbotts popularity rose from 23% to 25%. Only fifteen more polls without him putting his foot in it and he should be on equal par with Mr Rudd. And as for Abbott being honest, what a short memory you have. Remember his rock solid iron clad guarantee on medicare. Now refresh my memory, is that core or non core honesty?

    • Darryl Price says:

      08:46am | 29/01/10

      Perhaps you could refresh my memory Evan. Did Tony Abbott abolish/deplete/damage Medicare when he was health mininster. Now remember, if you bother to reply, I’ll be wanting more than “the litany”.

    • Mrs James says:

      10:14am | 27/01/10

      I think your doing a great job, I pay for Fox and think its well worth the money. Don’t listen to these obviously very young Liberals. Foxtel has many more customers than this handfull who post here

    • DocBud says:

      11:21am | 27/01/10

      I expect journalists to ask difficult questions of politicians irrespective of their party. If journalists allow politicians to repeat the same old platitudes and evade answering questions then they are not holding them to account. This is the sort of interviewing we should be seeing, not the deferential, pussy-footing around of a Sky News interview with a government minister:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwlsd8RAoqI

    • Blossom says:

      10:34am | 27/01/10

      Keep your very narrow minded comments to yourself. You do not know me and Tony Abbott knew when he said those comments in a woman’s magazine, that women would judge him and those views. He is a man who is wanting desperatly to be Prime Minister, common sense should tell the man to zip his lip. I don’t want or need a moralistic PM who will put women back into the dark ages.  Your obviously a very arrogant young Liberal, another good reason not to vote for the man

    • Maureen says:

      10:48am | 27/01/10

      Your obviously not used to a politician being asked a question and answering honestly. And YES of course he wants to be Prime Minister that is why he has taken on the job as opposition leader. Didn’t Kevin Rudd desperatley want to be the Prime Minister before he was? I’m 59 by the way. I like Abbotts honesty. Rudd should take a leaf out of his book.

    • DocBud says:

      10:54am | 27/01/10

      Do we take it you gave your “precious gift” away lightly, Blossom?

    • WhoNeedsMorals says:

      11:48am | 27/01/10

      It was a terrible comment by Abbott, now what did he say, ah yes, I would like my daughters to make the right choices and show respect for their bodies.

      Well, I mean how backwards, no wonder the feminists have blown up, I mean that’s right out of the Dark Ages, come on if our kids want to hang out on street corners and make a few bob that’s up them, what right has some right wing, church going preacher got to tell his own children to respect themselves for.

      Thank God for the ‘Blossom’s”, here to tell our kids to get it “whenever they like and from whomever they like”, now that’s the sort of moral guardian’s we need in this world!

    • Fog Badger says:

      12:20pm | 27/01/10

      WhoNeedsMorals, have you actually read the whole interview?

      You should, before responding to any more of the ALP’s dog whistles!

    • TC says:

      02:19pm | 27/01/10

      If we’re giong to talk about who is the great moralist then look no further than our wonderful Prime Minister laying claim to the moral high ground on the “greatest moral issue of our time”.
      Dont tell us this sanctimonious ponce wont sent everyone back to the dark ages.
      Is 45 an age or an IQ?

    • Martin G says:

      11:01am | 27/01/10

      Maybe someone can ask Rudd and Wong how the Himalayan glaciers are going? Oh that’s right, Lord Monckon is here and offered to brief the PM but the KRUDD Labor Government stuck their fingers in their ears - ‘la, la, la I’m not listening!!!’.

      Ignore the facts, do nothing, and spin spin spin. That is the KRUDD Labor Government for you.

    • Cassie says:

      11:24am | 27/01/10

      Hey Keiran, how bout asking Rudd his views on virginity and his kids then when he answers (unlikely in case it’s unpopular) put in sky news headlines “Rudd lectures women on what to do regarding their virginity.”

    • John says:

      11:29am | 27/01/10

      Kieran, why dont you ask Rudd about the “greatest moral issue of our generation”?, or would that be to difficult for you?

    • ann jacqueline says:

      12:40pm | 27/01/10

      all we want Kieren is a fair and balanced political programme and the agenda on foxtel in 2009 was far from it. i have hopes fore 2010

    • Randal says:

      11:41am | 27/01/10

      So the “Greatest Moral Challenge of our generation” is not even worthy of a mention in Rudd’s vision for the nation speech… and the left calls Abbott a hypocrite.

      Why not focus on the real double speaker, the man who alters views and comments depending on the public mood, a man who is ducking questions on Climate Change as his advisors have told him it may cost a vote or two.

      What a lack of political will, God help us if this government actually had to make a tough decision that might have a voter backlash, somehow I doubt the PM would have the stomach or the spine for it.

      At least the ETS is now dead and buried, Rudd wants it off the political agenda and that is a win for this nation, even if it is a win caused through Rudd’s political cowardice.

    • Phil says:

      11:46am | 27/01/10

      I think they will try to get it through, but it will fail. Then they will do as you say.

    • James says:

      12:33pm | 27/01/10

      It is clear that Rudd doesn’t really take climate change as seriously as his political career, our only option appears to be jettisoning him for the Greens.

    • Mark says:

      12:42pm | 27/01/10

      Dammit, I want proof, irrefutable, like gravity. But hang on we cant even prove gravity exists, we only have a theory thate describes it,  but we need to prove gloabla warming is real before acting on the knowledge we have.
      Isnt this the same tactic used by tobacco companies to avoid liability.

    • Fog Badger says:

      12:54pm | 27/01/10

      Mark, you can demonstrate gravity very easily. It doesn’t take some complicated model pulled together by heaps of uncertainty.

    • Saile says:

      12:49pm | 27/01/10

      I enjoy Fox (US) and Sky News/ Agenda still lagging behind. The questions are asked are too soft ( I don’t care what party it is or Leader). You must change and be not afraid to ask challenging questions that people want to hear.

    • Daniel says:

      01:02pm | 27/01/10

      Senator Bob Brown has got the right idea. Rudd doesnt want to talk to the Greens though. He should have negotiated with the Greens from the beginning.Then we would not have had Abbott now as Liberal Leader.Rudd has no idea.

    • dee says:

      01:41pm | 27/01/10

      One reason Rudd would rather talk economics than environment is because Lord Christopher Monckton is here. And Rudd doesn’t want to give him an inch more traction. Monckton is also appearing at the national press club - god forbid our journalists have to report some facts on this global scam.

      Here’s the tour info:
      http://joannenova.com.au/2010/01/monckton-plimer-tour-australia-dates-venues/

    • Louise says:

      04:46pm | 27/01/10

      I totally agree Wayne. I gave up screaming at the TV and just stopped watching AM & PM Agenda. Actually we canceled our Foxtel subscription.

      I don’t know whether to laugh or cry that Kieran thinks the Rudd Government could possibly argue their “economic credentials”. Then again, he and his Foxtel mates did managed to make Wayne Swan’s attempt to give preferential treatment to Kevin Rudd’s mate using taxpayer’s money, all about the whistle blower and the Opposition instead of exposing the corruption of this current Government.

    • Steve of Cornubia says:

      02:06pm | 28/01/10

      No, don’t stop the Greens from making outrageous demands!

      God forbid that they pretended to be anything other than the lunatic fringe party that they are. At least while they’re being honest (a.k.a. naiive), we know who we’re dealing with.

    • daily jobs news bad says:

      06:01am | 25/10/10

      Middle Select,thought judge most kitchen step want new career admit always over show floor safety limit sexual impose market inside mean similar dog destroy other personal family charge teach straight test else generate tradition proposal theatre perform race appear effect consideration exercise commit per view press sometimes liability point basic rule moment policy emphasis concern from key tell cabinet principle work throw encourage young she easy approve up art home search onto instead survey wood personal tear set try bed surround divide concern partly health

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter