Hannah Montana. The very name is enough to chill the heart of any parent desperate to dodge the scourge of our age – the commercial exploitation of young children.

Miley Cyrus, right, with Billy Ray Cyrus in Hannah Montana: The Movie

Weak fool that I am, though, I gave in recently to my 10-year-old daughter’s pleas to watch the show.

“You get the best of both worlds,” crooned Miss Miley Cyrus as we tuned in to the Disney Channel. If only, I growled to myself.

Cyrus plays Miley Stewart, a supposedly average teenager who leads a double life as pop star Hannah.

Despite my curmudgeonly determination to despise the 16-year-old phenomenon, I couldn’t. Worse, I actually liked her. Cyrus is an accomplished actor and singer, as is her father, Billy Ray (Achy Breaky Heart) Cyrus, who plays the fictional Miley’s dad Robby Ray with obvious relish.

The young supporting actors are equally talented, the scripts are loaded with self-effacing wit, the plots are original and rely on characterisation as much as situation. I was captivated, and I’m far from alone.

Last year the show’s global audience was estimated at 200 million. For us, it was a short step to Disney’s other sitcoms, all similarly entertaining.

So much talent, so many laughs … so what’s to hate about Hannah or her friends?

It wasn’t long before I ceased to be dazzled and spotted the adult-inspired theme of virtually every episode of every show: dating.

The subliminal message is that normal kids, even little ones, have a boyfriend/girlfriend, or at least they want one.

Suddenly, pre-teen girls – the Disney Channel’s core audience – are being pushed into sexual awareness. It isn’t cute and it isn’t funny: it’s a deeply worrying trend that has emerged only over the past decade.

The self-deprecating nature of the scripting only makes the overall effect more insidious. See, these impossibly gorgeous creatures seem to tell us, we are real people just like you!

But they’re not, and to encourage our daughters to copy them is to let them walk unguided through a minefield. Among the injuries they risk are poor self-esteem and a distorted body image that can lead to eating disorders.

Even worse, these star-struck small girls are being actively seduced by merchandisers – not just from Disney – into believing they must be “hot” to be happy.

Check out the pre-teen girls’ departments in stores and online: bras from age six; toddlers’ crop tops and micro-shorts; manicure and make-up sets, heels, jewellery and bikinis.

As if girls don’t grow up too fast anyway, we have virtually sleepwalked into allowing into our homes a culture that threatens our children’s psychological well-being.

And there are males out there who need little encouragement to take advantage of a pre-pubescent girl’s belief that relationships are desirable at her age. These are not optimistic, fumbling little boys, but older boys and men who know exactly what they are doing.

The Disney shows portray nothing inappropriate on screen: all you see is the occasional chaste kiss or hug. But we know where that can lead in reality.

Amanda Gordon, past president of the Australian Psychological Society, says:  “If the message is that you should be sexy and grown up, then kids aren’t practising and learning how to be whole human beings … They are imitating adult behaviour without understanding it and that’s very dangerous for their development.”

Not so long ago, the worst Disney did was to sell little girls a dream of fairytale weddings to handsome princes, with matching plastic crown.

It is by no means solely to blame for the fact that those little girls are now tripping over their heels in an effort to be sexy, but it was quick to jump on the lucrative “tween” bandwagon and the enormous influence it wields via characters like Hannah means it must shoulder a large portion of the responsibility for any adverse results.

Now, I am sure Disney and other merchandisers are merely motivated by profit.

An Australian Senate committee on the sexualisation of young children reported last year: “The committee received no evidence to suggest that the production and marketing of products aimed specifically at children and young people was driven by anything other than commercial imperatives.”

But the Disney marketing juggernaut has enjoyed unparalleled success for decades, so why does it need to risk collateral psychological damage to its latest targets along the way?

A Disney spokesperson said: “Disney Channel maintains the highest standards to ensure that its programming is appropriate for children and families. All of the programs airing on Disney Channel first go through a rigorous review by the Standards and Practices department at every stage of development and production. Our policy ensures that all material is appropriate for a young audience.”

But how young?

Until it adapts its shows to the little girls who watch them, my family is tuning in to Animal Planet.

Most commented

18 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • persephone says:

      06:56am | 11/12/09

      A 16 year old girl who wasn’t obsessing about boys and her appearance would be very rare.
      And I’m talking about my own recollections of being one, over thirty years ago! And reading my mother’s diaries from the early 1950s, she seemed fairly obsessed with boys and her appearance, as well.
      ‘How young?” you cry. Well, Miley is 16, which isn’t very, when we’re talking children.

    • oldskool says:

      07:46am | 11/12/09

      “All of the programs airing on Disney Channel first go through a rigorous review by the Standards and Practices department at every stage of development and production.”

      What’s the bet they just run it through a computer and see if it has specific keywords (eg sex) and if it doesn’t, then it’s considered safe?
      Most shows - especially Kid’s shows - are laiden with subtle hints and implications every step of the way. The problem is that ‘adults’ think that kids are stupid.

      But it goes further than this. The media - every avenue of it - has spiralled downward into a sexually laced and based outlet. Radio advertisements about erectile dysfunction in the afternoons shouldn’t be heard by kids. Nor should they be forced to see the images that are shown on TV.

      What happend to wholesome values and good old fun? Or are we more concerned about giving what the Kid’s want because it’s “their right” and “easier” that way?

    • Simmo says:

      08:46am | 11/12/09

      Your article is the biggest load of crap I have read in quite some time, people should take all of these pre-teen, Disney shows for what they are - light entertainment for kids (I find HM actually a funny show to watch with my kids). if you think it’s wrong and don’t like it CHANGE CHANNEL!!!!!

      Another point, ost of the “subtle hints” you are making reference to kids don’t get anyway and it is usually only when their parent points it out to them that they realise what it is, get your mind out of the gutter and your kids won’t turn evil….

    • Peter Forster says:

      09:29am | 11/12/09

      Why I hate Claire Struthers. Oh look - halfway down the page she turns this into an ‘all girls are victims and all boys are predators’ diatribe. Misandrous bigot!

    • marley says:

      10:23am | 11/12/09

      Pretty silly article.  Anyone remember the teenage “beach” movies of the 60s?  How is this any different or any worse?  It’s all about teenagers being teenagers (not “children”) - flirting, dating, making friends, losing friends, exploring their world.  You might want to pretend that your 12 or 14 year old isn’t and shouldn’t be interested in these things, but girls were fixating on makeup and shoes at that age long before anyone ever heard of Hannah Montana (or Annette Funicello for that matter).

      As to the argument that companies like Disney must shoulder much of the blame for the early sexualization of kids, well, the last time I checked, most six year olds’ don’t actually hold down jobs which allow them to buy lipsticks, training bras or microshorts from their own wages.  Do the words’“parental responsibility” mean anything at all?

    • Interloper says:

      11:33am | 11/12/09

      Excellent article.

      The problem is not that teenagers watch the show, it’s that it’s pitched at eight-year old girls who shouldn’t be thinking about boyfriends. Crappy ‘tween’ books pitched at girls are exactly the same.

    • Melissa says:

      11:36am | 11/12/09

      Spot on Marley.

      Claire it’s a cop out to blame the Disney channel for the sexualisation of kids, like Marley said before me, the parents have to buy it for them, and allow them to wear it before any of this can happen. How about parents stop blaming everyone else for their problems and take some responsibility for how their children turn out.

      Hannah Montana, as much as i’m tired of hearing about her, actually has some really decent themes throughout. E.g. being real to yourself, treating people right, all that sort of thing.

      Besides, let’s take a minute to think of the film Blue Laggon, filmed in 1980. Brooke Shields is 14 when she appears in that film, and i think her character is meant to be even younger. That movie is filled with sex and nudity but was a widely accepted film.

      I don’t see any sex in Hannah Montana, Do you?

    • Little Miss SciFi says:

      12:56pm | 11/12/09

      I think you’re grasping at straws Claire.  Hannah is good light entertainment. Why does everything these days have to be about protecting our poor helpless kids from x, y and z.  The world is a real place - with all its wonders and its evils -  why shelter them from it.

    • Sam of Sydney says:

      02:08pm | 11/12/09

      @persephone
      Yes a 16 year old doing those things is normal, and I am sure that any reasonable person understands this. However, is targeting this at 8 year olds responsible and good for them, or should they be kids.

    • Evie says:

      03:00pm | 11/12/09

      Hmm there is something wrong with these comments. They are all supporting Hannah Montana - are you serious? Melissa, as far as I know Blue Lagoon was not a kids movie. And Little Miss SciFi, you say the world is a real place, and yet HM’s world is about the most fake, contrived thing around. Getting rid of Hannah Montana and others like her would not be ‘sheltering kids from the real world’, but it might help them see their own world with a more honest perspective. Fantasy is fantasy, but HM is something else.

    • persephone says:

      03:33pm | 11/12/09

      Sam of Sydney
      a question for their parents, surely? Or are you into 8 year old girls watching whatever they want to?
      Most TV shows are aimed at the same age group as the actors - this is because people identify with people like them. It’s not up to the TV programmers to determine whether or not the age group watching is appropriate, it’s up to parents.
      But just to be safe, let’s ban TV altogether, for everyone…on the off chance that some eight year old somewhere is watching a program that isn’t appropriate for them, and get ideas above their station.

    • T.Chong says:

      05:01pm | 11/12/09

      Claire, try using the remote and turn it off. Dont let an 8yo dictate to you, dont buy the offensive clothes.
      Easy
      PS why is it that the mothers (mostly ) buy this stuff?
      Anyone?

    • Frankie V. says:

      07:13pm | 11/12/09

      “The subliminal message is that normal kids, even little ones, have a boyfriend/girlfriend, or at least they want one.”

      Having grown up in a country where the state owns 90% of light entertainment, you may be unfamiliar with the 1969 story of a lovely lady, who was bringing up three very lovely girls.  All of them had hair of gold, like their mother - the youngest one in curls.

      Anyways, in the first season, the oldest girl Marcia is all worried about a big date because of her new braces, while the middle child, Jan, receives a locket from a secret admirer.  Then the youngest, Cindy, loses Marcia’s diary which contains the revelation that Marcia has a crush on Desi Arnaz, Jr.

      Like Patty Duke before it, it portrayed kids having boyfriends and girlfriends as normal.

    • Steve says:

      07:53pm | 11/12/09

      I agree with where you are coming from Claire. Stopping pre-teen girls from being brainwashed by HM into dressing beyond their age and being prone to the prying eyes of the Dennis Fergusons of the world. Yes this wouldn’t happen if the parents were responsible but not every parent is.

    • persephone says:

      10:08pm | 11/12/09

      So Steve, if we have to take into account that not every parent is responsible enough to stop their pre teen child watching Hannah Montana - surely one of the most whitebread programs available, have you watched any children’s television recently? - then the only solution, as I said before, is to ban all television.

    • Ilana Leeds says:

      04:11am | 13/12/09

      It just shows how the media manipulates and desensitises. I do think kids have to be kids. They are not mini adults. If you had asked me the meaning of hot at 15 or 16 I would have thought you were talking about the weather.
      It really peeves me off that we have to make girls aware of boys.
      Let’s go back to the old days of when girls who were sexually promiscuous were tramps and shunned by society. We need a return to values and family. Marriage should be on the cards and not this other rot. It is all part of the slackness of society and moral corruptness. The fact that some people can actually defend this tripe just goes to show how seductive and dangerous it is.

    • Ilana Leeds says:

      03:26pm | 13/12/09

      I do want to qualify my comment. Girls should be aware of boys within the context of marrying and having a family or career and family.  When I had a former friend’s seven year old tell me that an older girl walking along the beach was ‘hot’ and I asked her to explain, her answer shocked me. She probably had not much inkling what ‘sexy and a babe’ meant but she had been exposed to the wrong sorts of things on TV and with her mother and her friends,  therefore used such terms. I knew then it was time to cool the friendship with her mother and not have her and her children near my child. I do not want him contaminated by the values of a world where child porn and a lack of real family values and modesty is rife.
      And Persephone I have banned all TV from my house. I watch the programs (news that interests me) on the computer and read a weekly paper published by the Orthodox Jewish community that does not have pictures of women in it or inappropriate immodest content. There is some news and gossip that I don’t need to know. It adds nothing to my life. I can read in one line what it is about. What has Tiger Woods’s matrimonial life and privacy got to do with me??? Does it add anything to my life to know that he and his wife are having problems? No! Yet in the so called ‘modern world’ it makes some people wealthy to print such trash.

    • Steve says:

      10:38am | 15/12/09

      Pretty sure young kids have been having boyfriends and girlfriends since before Miley Cyrus came onto the scene.
      I just watched an episode of Hannah and YES there is a theme of having a partner….but what show or song for that matter doesn’t? At that age and at any age that’s what people are looking for…love and acceptance from a partner that’s a basic human need/instinct.
      You fail to mention the themes of:
      •  Listening to your parents
      •  Family bonding
      •  Friendships
      •  Following your dreams
      •  Discovering who you are
      •  Not succumbing to peer pressure

      All very important traits I would think for a developing child would you agree?

      The success of Hannah/Miley is the ability to relate back to its audience just as Sex and the City relates back to its audience.

      Take it for what it is and not make a mountain out of a mole hill.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ToryShepherd: Onya, @KRuddMP“@newscomauHQ: BREAKING: Kevin Rudd has come out in support of same sex marriage: http://t.co/CFaHrxyV5G

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @newscomauHQ: BREAKING: Kevin Rudd has come out in support of same sex marriage: http://t.co/2KEO6yEx5F

Daniel Piotrowski

True Rudd style. Bazillion word folksy statement

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @Rob_Stott: Like a lot of Republicans in the US, it's much easier to support gay marriage when you're no longer in a position to do anyt…

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter