Do you remember the choose your own ending tales of your childhood? Well, I hope so, because this is a choose-your-own beginning kind of opinion piece, and trust me, no one’s going to choose the beginning that it is meant to go with it.

Carrie and Big, together at last and not sure what they're up to

Beginning one would start with “My good friend’s boyfriend has not gotten laid in four weeks” and everyone would feel sorry for him. But they’d tell him to hang in there and go with it, because four weeks is not so long and maybe there’s a dry spell hovering over the relationship that a little holiday in the Hunter couldn’t fix.

Suppose this article opened with beginning two, where I’d say “My good friend’s boyfriend has not gotten laid in four months”, and everyone would be horrified and encourage him to leave, or go elsewhere for that physical part of life that everyone is entitled to but he is clearly lacking.

But beginning number three goes against all modern social norms and it’s the one I’m going with:

MY GOOD FRIEND’S BOYFRIEND HAS NOT GOTTEN LAID IN FOUR YEARS.

This is not because they are going through a dry spell, or because he has problems that a billboard-advertised nasal spray can fix. It’s not because he and his girlfriend are bible-hugging, praise-Jesus screaming evangelists nor because they might be stoned to death should their relationship turn physical.

But it is attributed to the fact that she decided that 14 that her virginity would make a hell of a wedding present to her husband, and she has not wanted to go back on her promise.

And, because her relationship is all about love, the boyfriend who had to swear off sex has cast the actions of John Della Bosca and Bill Clinton as don’t-go-there’s, and is still faithfully waiting by her side.

Don’t get me wrong, this is a man who, at 25 years old, still has carnal desires like all others. He knows what he wants and he really wants to get it.

To put it simply, he has options, but he is not going to exercise them, knowing that his ‘it’s just a part of being human’ argument is not going to slide. And as long as we continue to believe in real and undeniable love, it is something that never will.

It’s not because we’re ignorant or childish though. Yes, we did have Disney, and Disney princesses got their happy ever afters. But despite growing up in an age where promiscuity was everywhere and it didn’t mean anything, we’ve still turned out quite reserved.

Oddly enough, in her book What’s Happening to our girls?, writer and media commentator Maggie Hamilton reveals that her studies have shown that younger generation-Y women and teenage girls want to marry younger, and live in a traditional monogamous relationships.

You’d think this wouldn’t be the case since we’re aware of the ‘fabulous’ existence of Samantha from Sex and the City (her words, not mine), but let us not forget that this was also a show where main character Carrie Bradshaw crucified herself constantly for cheating on the perfect Mr Nice Guy Aidan Shaw, with the heart-breaking, I-don’t-do-monogamy Mr Big.

And, might I add, a movie where even the resident feminist, lawyer Miranda Hobbes, left her husband for cheating on her even though they had not had sex for six months. SIX MONTHS. And she, in all her feminist glory, still expected him to stay faithful.

Why? Fidelity is just not about sex, and even those of the all-accepting, free spirited, be-who-you-wanna-be members of Generation Y would agree.

It’s about recognising that you’re in a cocoon of trust and love with someone, and it’s not fair to juggle them while you’re juggling someone else unless you’ve agreed from the outset that it is ok to do so, because although fidelity is a choose-your-own option in a relationship, it is still something that can be achieved when the couple are in it whole heartedly.

We might have come a long way, baby, but some generation Y’ers still believe that fidelity is a big deal. And judging by the reactions of NSW to the Della Bosca affair, or the world to Jennifer Anniston and the Brangelina saga, the majority of our society is no exception.

FIDELITY is something that you can have in a relationship. You can also have FALLIBILITY, but so long as you do not FORGET the promises you made in FAITH to one another, and FOREGO your own (when they are selfish) needs when another pretty human waltzes into your life, you will be ok.

This choose your own beginning story tells us that even if a man has not gotten laid in four years and he is still waiting, then yes, he can master his carnal desires and mind over matter any day, and no amount of science can tell him otherwise.

If our attitudes are anything to go by, we’re still choosing the fidelity option for our life stories, and maybe it’s because we know, that in an entirely literal sense, real love is about foregoing a f**k that you might really want because you know it is not cool when your partner gets f**ked over.

Mind over matter baby, and just look how far we’ve come.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

30 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Fluffy says:

      06:09am | 12/10/09

      Your [caps lock] key is stuck.

      Women are as faithful as men are. Truly.

    • David says:

      07:10am | 12/10/09

      This is co-dependancy in its extreme. Control and be controlled. Sad, really.

    • RT says:

      07:31am | 12/10/09

      The five Fs, huh? Here’s a sixth: false dichotomy. I agree with Fluffy. The idea that men and women are fundamentally different when it comes to being faithful is a myth.

    • intepid says:

      07:58am | 12/10/09

      So you’re saying there’s something admirable about committing to a relationship which depend rely on (among other things) sexual compatibility, without actually verifying that such compatibility exists? Even better to enter into relationship having no sexual experience with anyone else I presume.

      Sounds like a recipe for a miserable life of mediocre sex and crushing doubts about the roads not taken.

    • David says:

      08:00am | 12/10/09

      i reckon the best way to keep a long term relationship going , heterosexual or not , married or not is to live in peaceful coexistence . Fidelity is undefinable and is impossible to generalize . Also , one is unfaithful until they are caught with their pants down .

    • Clover says:

      08:07am | 12/10/09

      I like this article Sarah, thank you. I feel like our society is placing less and less value on patience and accountability, which seems short sighted and self destructive to me.
      Cheers for that.

    • Tim says:

      08:13am | 12/10/09

      This boyfriend must have mighty big forearms and one hell of a porn collection by now.
      They should just married. He can always get divorced in six months if she is a dud in the sack.

    • Zeta says:

      08:49am | 12/10/09

      @ Fluffy - Caps Lock is cruise control for cool.

    • KM says:

      09:32am | 12/10/09

      Actually Tim, I feel sorry for HER… if HE turns out to be a dud in the sack….
      She won’t know any different about how good it could be :-(
      But despite that risk, I hope it works out well for both of them at the end of the day. Good on them for honouring a commitment I guess, because many people are incapable of that, male or female.

    • Paul H says:

      10:01am | 12/10/09

      That is most strange Ms Ayoub because the last time I had a quick peek at the mountainous filth that passes for womens magazines not one had a single cover story about a happily monogamous “married for 50 years” couple on its front cover. Rather, 100% dealt with all sorts of sexual chicanery from sex parties to Britneys XXX forays or Paris Hiltons latest sex tape! You women never cease to disgust me! You bang on about monogamy but consume large quantities of turgid tripe spewed from the stench of the 60’s rock counterculture!
      Most confusing as I am directed by the so called denizens of liberal morality that as a white bloke I am expected to be an upstanding monogamist yet these same elite turn around and accuse me of being nothing more than a boring scum sucker and fill the media airwaves with all sorts of licentious activity and goad me with the message “See what you are missing out on”!

      So spare us your hypocritical crap

    • maree says:

      10:24am | 12/10/09

      Ummm Paul H….. have you seen what’s in ‘Men’s’ mags?!??! does that cover every man???
      reading the rest of your rant though, Im a little worried about your mental wellbeing, more than debating with you…..
      geez louise…talk about straying from the subject matter!

    • Simon Ingram says:

      11:03am | 12/10/09

      Congratulations Sarah. This is a fantastic article, and a wonderfully refreshing and hope-inspiring appendix to Catherine Lumby’s blog of tripe next door.

      But I don’t see the need to beat up on Christians in paragraph three? The hero & heroine in your story have the same values. And it is fantastic to see! A beautifully refreshing change from the deceiptful, empty rubbish this world presents us as “freedom” and “happiness”.

    • Mr Subramanian says:

      11:33am | 12/10/09

      Their first time is going to be over rather quickly, I suspect. And although special, probably a little bit disappointing. But you know what? That’s perfectly okay, and something they can work together on over time - this idea of “sexual compatibilitY” is overblown, and belongs to the same category of ideas that a marriage will last “because they love each other”. Maybe so, but the thing that will make more of a difference over the long term is how much they talk to one and how willing they are to put the other person’s needs and wants ahead of their own.

    • AFR says:

      12:42pm | 12/10/09

      Not sure why so many think their first time will be special. Like most teenage guys, I had no bloody idea what i was doing (lets face it most sex-ed comes from porn), and i highly doubt it was enjoyable for her. I would have hated that to be my wedding night shag!

    • Mattyo says:

      01:27pm | 12/10/09

      Right on, Simon Ingram. Apart from those broad brush strokes and the CAPS LOCK ISSUES, an otherwise well constructed and thought provoking piece.

    • stephen says:

      01:42pm | 12/10/09

      Is SJP on the floor already ?

    • Jan says:

      01:48pm | 12/10/09

      There are an awful lot of opinions from one side of this issue and very little from the devastated other half and the thousands of children who blame themselves for one parent’s infidelity,  and find there lives destroyed. Open your eyes, people! If it hurts so much (and believe me it does!) then there is something fundamentally wrong with someone having fun at the costly expense of others.

    • Joe says:

      01:52pm | 12/10/09

      A good positive, hopefull article. Good stuff.

    • Factcheck says:

      03:22pm | 12/10/09

      Given that the median age for a first marriage was 31.6 for men in 2007 and 29.3 for women, your friend has quite a wait in front of him.  (Also, the median age for marriage has been rising steadily since the 80s and the 90s, not dropping so even if people may say they want to marry younger, this isn’t happening.  (Please see http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/3306.0.55.001Main+Features12007?OpenDocument) The 2008 yearbook also points out that de facto relationships are on the rise not the decline.

      And, according to Sex in Australia (See summary at http://www.latrobe.edu.au/ashr/papers/Sex In Australia Summary.pdf) the median age for the onset of sexual activity is 16 for both men and women born between 1981 to 1986.  Since numbers clearly aren’t your thing, this means that half of all the people between the ages of 23 and 28 reported to having had sex by age 16. The report goes on to say that the majority of school leavers are sexually active.

      But neither virginity nor marriage have anything to do with fidelity.  What’s interesting is that for all the hype and moral indignation that arises when private infidelities are exposed in public, they are relatively uncommon. The Sex in Australia study found that only 4.9% of men and 2.9% of women reported to having concurrent sexual partners in the last year. Our actions are more relevant than our attitudes.  But I suspect that the reasons behind why most of us tend to be serial monogamists has little to do with the second-rate fairytale that your opinion hangs itself on and a lot more to do with the realities and complexities of making relationships work.

    • Joe says:

      04:36pm | 12/10/09

      Factcheck says:04:22pm- So you are simply saying that on your stats people are marrying older on average and are having sex on average at a younger age. I sense you are you trying to justify something here.  What the article is about is that “some generation Y’ers still believe that fidelity is a big deal”. Sarah isn’t trying to say all gen Yers are not bed hopping so you don’t need to attack that.

      Why so often do we have to be dragged down to what some people are doing than instead celebrating what many are doing to turn things around for the better? Lets be more positive here.

    • Nicholas James says:

      05:38pm | 12/10/09

      Great article.

      But like Simon Ingram stated, shame about the Christian bashing…

    • Toad says:

      09:52pm | 12/10/09

      Very, very weak argument. Look at the previous generation who in many cases waited until marriage before having sex, the percentages are higher that they are divorced than still together. Very old fashioned and poorly thought out plan to wait until marriage…..what happens if they do get married and they find out they’re not suited sexually?? What do they do then!! Divorce?? And as we all know, it gets better the more you practice so when they do finally do it after they get married it will be all over in seconds and she’ll never want to do it again. Will he wait another four years for his second one?? I don’t think so.

    • Ben G says:

      10:21pm | 12/10/09

      I stopped reading when I realised the author thought that a phrase like “Gen Y” means something.

    • factcheck says:

      07:20am | 13/10/09

      The facts matter because they don’t support the author’s (unsupported) argument that there is a ground swell of marrying earlier or waiting longer to have sex among people in their 20s.  (Ben G, I agree these fuzzy marketing terms should be avoided.)

      Of course neither delaying the onset of sexual activity nor marriage have anything to do with monogamy (practiced by many de facto couples, another kind of relationship on the rise not the decline.)  In the 50s the age of first sexual activity was about 19-it would be interesting to find out if the propensity to ‘cheat’ was greater when people delayed sexual activity and married younger. Anyone know any research into this?

    • Sarah Ayoub says:

      08:05am | 13/10/09

      Dear FactCheck, For someone all about the facts, you don’t do much fact checking outside what you seem to know, or think you know. I don’t know what article you actaully read, but nowhere in my piece did I imply that there is a ‘ground swell’ of people waiting longer to have sex (because my friend is one person and therefore not considered a ground swell). Furthermore, unless you were skimming the lines, you would have seen that my statement that younger women want to marry earlier came from a book based on a specific study conducted by a sociologist- not from the depths of my cranium.

      And just because you missed the point, I will reiterate: This piece is about monogamy still being achievable if that is something a person and their partner really want, and considering the majority of society’s opinions on the matter (and I had some cases there for you fact check), something that is still expected and acceptable. The case of my friend and her boyfriend is not about how bad their first time will be, nor about how long after their marriage they’ll divorce if either one is a dud in the sack. What it is about is putting sex second and love first, and, in the case of her man, choosing to stay faithful even when you live in a sex-saturated world where sexual activity in a relationship is more than expected. It’s about putting a relationship first, and not jumping to the easiest option when things get tough… But then again, considering I dont have any numbers to prove that I am championing love, you’re not going to believe me. But I’d rather have hope over cynicism anyday, especially when cycnisim is likely to cloud my comprehension of a story.

      And as for Simon Ingram and Nicholas James, thanks for your support. Please note that, as a person with many bible-hugging friends whom I love and adore, my sentence was not intended to christian-bash. It was more of a disclaimer to say she was not an evangelical christian, because unfortunately in the world we live in, people would have quickly dismissed her choice, and thus my article, as something related to some sort of weird cult or group, which is sadly how many christians are viewed in our increasingly secular age.

    • Mr Subramanian says:

      09:37am | 13/10/09

      For those folks who believe you should get in some “practice” before going ahead with “the real thing”, studies (as reported in http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090713144122.htm) indicate that those who live together before getting married actually have a higher chance of divorce than those who wait until after they’re married to move in together.

      Nice to hear from you again, Sarah

    • intepid says:

      10:46am | 13/10/09

      Sarah Ayoub says: “What it is about is putting sex second and love first, and, in the case of her man, choosing to stay faithful even when you live in a sex-saturated world where sexual activity in a relationship is more than expected.”

      So you think an exclusive relationship can be healthy even if desire fades and the sex is bad? Human coupling is determined by our sexual preferences; to pretend that sex can be merely subservient to love seems more than a little naive.

      It sounds like you are making a virtue out of people choosing to deny their sexual nature and stay in an unfulfilling marriage, but honestly (if there are no children) what is the point?

    • ChelseaLee says:

      11:53am | 13/10/09

      To those who claim that there’s chance of disappointment, or being attached to a ‘dud in the sack’ for the remainder of your doubt-filled and sex-deprived days - how do two people who have experienced nothing but each other know any different? And how could one possibly be disappointed when there are no comparisons, and no competition?

      Saving yourself for one person brings sheer delight - a safe haven of complete comfort, where both people are free to be themselves without any fears or barriers. It opens the door for complete intimacy, and disposes of all inhibitions. How is that disappointing?

    • Mr Subramanian says:

      12:15pm | 13/10/09

      The rest of my earlier comment seems to have been lost: “Nice to hear from you again, Sarah. It seems clear that your own boyfriend / fiance / husband is (a) going to have a high mark to live up to! and (b) is (going to be) one fortunate guy smile

      Intepid, I have no idea how you get from Sarah’s quote to your conclusion. Why the assumption that the sex is bad? For mine, that’s the whole point of Sarah’s post - if sex isn’t the priority in the relationship, but the other person IS, then the sex is going to be much better for it. Most gaps in sexual preferences can be closed if the two people communicate honestly about it and if both people have the OTHER person’s satisfaction as their own priority. It’s the gap is that humungously enormous that it can’t be overcome by this, then there’s probably other a bunch of other issues (with one or both people) that also need to be dealt with…

    • zoe says:

      12:18pm | 13/10/09

      ChelseaLee I agree.  My husband and I were both virgins when we got married, 8 years ago, and our sex life gets better even after having kids.  I’d much rather start low then you can only improve, I don’t think many couples that have been with many partners could say that their sex lives has gotten better and better and still be saying that after 8 years together.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter