I’m not sure what we called “body image” as an issue before it was called “body image.”

A genuine victim of the media's obsession with perfection. Picture: Getty

It’s certainly not a new thing. When I was a teenager it was everywhere, we just didn’t have a name for it, so I don’t think we thought of it as an “issue”, just part of being an adolescent.

Now it’s not just an issue, it’s the biggest issue, according to the latest Mission Australia national Survey of Young Australians. Asked to rank a whole list of issues of personal concern, 31.1 per cent of the 50,240 people aged 11 to 24 years named body image a “major concern”. In the 20-24-year-old cohort the figure was 40.3 per cent.

Body image topped the list ahead of family conflict, coping with stress, school or study, personal safety, bullying, alcohol, drugs, suicide, depression, the environment, physical/sexual abuse, self harm, sexuality and discrimination.

Before 2007 body image wasn’t even included on the list as an option, but once it was it went straight to number one with a bullet.

Mission Australia head of research Anne Hampshire says the topic was included after kids kept raising it in their comments. Today’s teenagers are a self-aware bunch who clearly know how to articulate what they’re facing.

It could be interpreted as excellent news that what seems like a pretty standard teenage condition outranked darker concerns like drugs, suicide and depression.

Indeed the survey found body image to be a highly personal topic for the people surveyed - not an entirely surprising outcome for an age group most of us consider to be highly self-absorbed. In the list of “important issues in Australia today”, about national challenges, it came last with 2.2 per cent.

Hampshire says the respondents indicated three levels of concern about the topic, the way it directly affect them (their own self-esteem), worry about their peers who might be suffering, and then the more macro issue of how it plays out in the media and advertising.

Some of the responses to the survey included:

Although I have grown up in an environment where I’ve been told I’m perfect the way I am, & I have been quite happy with my appearance throughout my entire life, it is still difficult to feel truly happy about body image in a society so motivated by beauty. Everyday I am presented with pictures of women who are physically superior to me, even if they’re not smart or kind or generous.

Female, 20.

I want to look fit and strong.

Male, 14.

I am becoming seriously concerned with the amount of female friends around me who have incredibly negative opinions about their weight, & who persist in unhealthy ways to achieve the ‘ideal’ skinny body, such as by starving themselves.  I believe the media has a huge amount of responsibility for this problem & do not seem to care about the millions of people they effect, & are not trying hard enough to stop the obsession almost all young women have about being thin.  Today’s perception of a ‘healthy’ or ‘attractive’ body is now so distorted, and yet nobody is approaching this issue head-on with enough success. I think fashion magazines need to stop using underweight models & stop using digital enhancements in their images.  Enough is enough.  People’s mental and physical health is more important than a creative licence to promote unattainable beauty.  … the whole world needs to slow down and take a step back and see what they have done to the minds of its young population.

Female, 16.

And the media and its impact on young people is where much of the public debate about body image now sits.

The most recent catalyst is the release of a book by Australian-born actor Portia Degeneres about her long battle with an eating disorder.

I haven’t yet read the book but she recently told her wife Ellen Degeneres in an interview her issues started when as a 12-year-old model she faced intense scrutiny of her body, and peaked during her years on the 90s hit show Ally McBeal. Degeneres’s was by no means a typical experience of young adulthood - she was right at the epicenter of fashion and entertainment.

It’s a bit like how when I was in about Year 9 we were shown the movie about gymnast Nadia Comaneci, in a good natured attempt to warn us of the dangers of anorexia. The problem was none of us were record-breaking Olympic Gymnasts so the message wasn’t entirely clear.

It’s been just more than a year since the Federal Government’s Body Image Advisory Group reported its findings and recommended a voluntary code of conduct for the Australian media to encourage the use of healthy weight models and “realistic” images.

The BIAG also proposed “a focus on peer interactions, parenting, and the role of schools and community groups.”

When the Group’s report was launched a large part of the focus was on the code of conduct for the media, and at the time it was all the rage in Australian magazines to publish un-retouched photos of (admittedly gorgeous) women.

But since then it’s dropped off the radar.

Carriage of the report and the implementation of its findings have shifted Ministerial offices from Kate Ellis, who originally drove it, to Peter Garrett.

Garrett’s office last night couldn’t even provide The Punch with an update on the issue. Clearly it’s low on the agenda.

But what we also learned from the Mission Australia survey, is that for young people the influence of their parents and friends far outweighs the external impacts of the fashion and media industries.

Asked where they turned for advice and support, friends ranked 85.9 per cent, parents 74.9 per cent and relative/family friend 60.9 per cent.

Magazines scraped in with 11.4 per cent, just ahead of school counselors on 9.1 per cent, who it appears need to lift their game.

My point is “body image” was a pretty hot topic for a pretty short period of time about 12 months ago, but has since somewhat fizzled out.

Meanwhile teenagers remain consistently worried about something I think they’ve probably always been worried about, and it’s their parents and friends who need to help them deal with it.

As Hampshire told The Punch: “Should we be worried that young people are worried?... We do need to know this stuff. And awareness is only one step, then we’ve got to teach them how to deal with it.”

And that’s really what parents and friends are for isn’t it.

70 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Gladys says:

      06:48am | 17/11/10

      In Peanuts, Charlie Brown would say he had low self-esteem. Lucy would tell him to snap out of it and charge him 5c.

      My grandmother gave me the best advice: there is nothing that careful dressing and a little make up can’t disguise.

      And sepia is a wonderful way of making sure you have a nice photo of yourself in case you need it.

    • T.Chong says:

      07:09am | 17/11/10

      Gladys- No doubt dear old Gran was ( is) a fine lady, but the “careful dressing…” philosophy of life does has fairly limited applications, specially if seeking substance over form.

    • Gladys says:

      10:55am | 17/11/10

      Why? We don’t walk around nude, and there is nothing that careful dressing can’t disguise or make more attractive. Trinny and Susannah have made a mint out of the philsophy.

      Putting the onus back on a human being to be some random stranger’s ideal of perfect when they’re standing nude in front of a mirror is absolutely ridiculous.

      Got a bit of a tummy? wear scary stomach holding in pants. Feel your legs are too short? Wear a skirt that makes them look longer. Got a pimple, use a cover stick.

      Most of all, don’t read trashy women’s mags because they’ll just make you pick pick pick at your imperfections.

    • stephen says:

      11:37am | 17/11/10

      Yeah and what happens when yer take her home ?
      (She kin leave her boots on but that ain’t gonna fool all of us yer know .)

    • Biteme says:

      06:49am | 17/11/10

      It must be a fairly rare problem, because from where I walk around during the day I would say we have the opposite problem. Too much influence from Macca’s and Doughnut King.

    • Fugly says:

      08:19am | 17/11/10

      Bravo Biteme!
      From what I see and hear the ‘Body Image Issue’ is the symptom of a general inability or unwillingless of individuals to do anything about it requiring sustained effort.  Each generation is getting progressively lazier in mind and body, expecting something for nothing. A quick fix or somebody else to take responsibility.  Oh I’m not perfect so I’ll feel sorry for myself and eat (or starve) my way through it.  Sorry no sympathy here.  Do the work.  Get on with living!

    • Macca says:

      08:50am | 17/11/10

      @Biteme & Fugly, I’ve always found going for a run does wonders for my self-esteem. Maybe it’s the endorphins, but feeling healthy makes me feel better about myself.

    • Geoff says:

      09:31am | 17/11/10

      This is true. Another puncher in a thread a week or so ago put out a challenge to go back to a 1980’s highschool movie and look at the “fat kid”. Well, the “fat kid” in the 1980’s would be classed as one of the normal kids if those movies were made today.
       
      Also, so i don’t comment twice. “Girl 16” appears to be regurgitating the same garbage they spew in SOSE (studies of society and the environment - Also known as leftie class) where the media is this devil of a thing designed to make people feel bad. Thats not her opinion, its just what shes been told in class.

    • T.Chong says:

      10:01am | 17/11/10

      Geoff re “female 16”  dont know about the leftie class bit, but do agree that her response does seem a bit too generic, with all the usual suspects and victims in attendance.

    • BK says:

      11:42am | 17/11/10

      Speaking of lazy, I have always suspected that these other women who want to be more attractive, really want to become another of those beautiful women who coast on their looks and get whatever they want. They need to get up off their backsides and work for what they want.

    • PJ says:

      06:57am | 17/11/10

      Hi Tory. Does the modern microphone need to be that big and held so tightly to the bosom?——precisely your point. Regards.

    • Trent says:

      09:25am | 17/11/10

      Is that a microphone? My mistake. I was wondering about the pic…

    • Macca says:

      07:00am | 17/11/10

      I’d be more concerned for the Teenager that doesn’t go through a period of self-loathing and puberscent awkwardness.

    • Michael says:

      07:01am | 17/11/10

      The problem is really an individual’s problem of interpretation. If I pick up a magazine, I don’t want to see the type of people I see wombling through the local mall. I don’t want to see tired, miserable looking people with guts and straggly hair - I want an escape from the every day. A fantasy. Glamour and colour. Excitement… If I have some kind of issue, it’s mine to own and deal with. It really is not the issue of the media, models or anyone else.

    • KH says:

      09:05am | 17/11/10

      Less than 1% of women are over 180cm.  Of those, only a few will be pretty or beautiful enough to be a model.  Then they have to have the right body shape.  How can the vast majority of women ever attain that?  You are then told this is what you should be trying to achieve - every day from the day you are born.  Even these few women - most of them are not naturally that thin - they have to starve themselves, or go through brutal regimes of exercise and diet that is literally a full time occupation - believe me, as someone who has been there on the diet side, when you don’t eat enough, you think of nothing but food.  Nearly all the time.  It wrecks your mind and makes it almost impossible to function properly.  Most people are average - which means average weight and looks - these magazines not only pick out the smallest percentage of people in the most extreme end of the scale, they then photoshop them to be even thinner, or have longer legs, or even take out hair and marks to make it even more unrealistic.  Then they present it as real.  And this is where the damage is done.  Fantasy is all very well and good, but when it is presented as reality, the distinction isn’t made that easily - especially for young girls.    The media is responsible for this - they are the ones manipulating the images and then passing them off as real - there is no disclaimer.  As an adult it is easy to understand what is done - but for many young girls being told this, and then trying to ignore these images is not that simple.

    • Jim says:

      09:58am | 17/11/10

      Who are these people that are are ‘telling’ girls how to look, KH? I can’t imagine anyone being sat down and told they must look like a supermodel. In fact, the only ‘telling’ I see is fuzzy feel good commentators and opinion pieces telling fat people they are beautiful! Yes, let the cholesterol and fat build up to a point where it’s unhealthy, but if Oprah says you’re beautiful then that’s all that counts.
      Magazine pictures don’t ‘tell’ anyone anything; people choose to believe they should look like that.

    • Markus says:

      10:07am | 17/11/10

      KH who is telling them this is what they should be trying to achieve? I have seen these trashy magazines before and have never read anything of the sort.
      The only people I have heard saying that this is what these magazines are telling women are women, to other women.

      Yes magazines portray the most attractive 1% of the population, because just as sporting codes portray the best 1% of players in that sport, that is what people want to see.
      The only malicious meaning behind this is what the consumer chooses to take out of it, or what they are told by other people to take out of it.

    • Spanish Girl says:

      10:17am | 17/11/10

      There is a simple solution to all this:  STOP BUYING WOMEN’S MAGAZINES.  If everyone did that, we’d all be much happier.  I stopped buying them in the 80s and I’m very glad I did.  I know when I’m getting a little chubby and I take steps to deal with it.  Quite frankly, I think it’s ridiculous to look to “supermodels” as role models.  Look to yourself and be the best person you can.  That’s your role model right there.

    • KH says:

      12:30pm | 17/11/10

      Jim and Markus - no one writes it down, or says it directly.  The cumulative effect of all this imagery isn’t perceptible in the way that being hit with a dead fish is perceptible - there is a cumulative effect of constant exposure to imagery that implies success and beauty = super thin model.  Subconciously you build a picture of what society thinks is beautiful - and if you aren’t it, it can have a devastating effect on some people’s self esteem.  There is no escape - you can’t avoid this stuff, even if you don’t buy trashy magazines (which I don’t).

    • Jim says:

      01:18pm | 17/11/10

      I see what you’re saying KH, but by blaming it all on imagery is insulting to peoples intelligence and willpower. It’s a cop out.

      By the same reasoning young girls might now think that to get anywhere, like…oh…running a country, you have to be a conniving, ruthless, backstabbing liar with questionable morals and shifting allegiances. But I like to think people are better than that.

    • Biscuit says:

      01:53pm | 17/11/10

      hear hear michael!! when will people start taking responsibility for themselves and stop blaming all external forces (mainly the media) for everything, down to the way they think about themselves??

    • Jay says:

      03:28pm | 17/11/10

      It all gets a bit tedious - no sooner than one woman feels she isnt tall & slim enough, another (tallerer, slimmer) woman complains that she’s not curvy and her breasts arent big enough - the media supposedly responsible for this dichotomy.

      No one is ever happy apparently.

    • Reg says:

      07:04am | 17/11/10

      In my youth the guys who felt shortchanged in the good-looks department, all grew beards. A bit tough for the ladies I guess but they still resort to the hair thing.  Now that you mention it I don’t recall ever seeing a bald guy without a beard to distract from what he considers to be his short-coming. Hair rules!

    • BK says:

      07:32am | 17/11/10

      The ugly can still grow dreadlocks to create a distraction.

    • BK says:

      07:40am | 17/11/10

      Anyone who is dis-satisfied with their looks is told that they have a mental problem called “low self-esteem”. Most of them are rational people with a realistic self-concept. Most people who think they need to lose 5kgs probably do. Why tell them that they have a mental problem that they don’t have?

      I find the obsession with women’s self-esteem incredibly paternalistic. We don’t feel a need to protect men’s feelings anywhere near as much.

    • Markus says:

      09:21am | 17/11/10

      I’ve been thinking along a similar line lately.
      Why spend all this time trying to convince everyone they are ‘fine just the way they are’, when given that over 50% of the population are overweight or obese (the minority of people who fall into this category through high muscle mass excluded), odds are that they aren’t?

    • AdamC says:

      11:40am | 17/11/10

      That is actually an extremely insightful comment, BK.

      In paricular, I think we have to accept that there always has been, and always will be, a socially-dicated ideal of beauty that most mere mortals will not meet. This obviously includes body shape and size.

      If anything, what has changed in recent times is the growth in the number of people who miss the standard so egregiously that we apparently have an obesity ‘epidemic’ on our hands.

      The self-esteem movement, as you point out, seems to be an aspect of the current fad for internalising and pathologising everything. While previously people ignored mental illness (which I am not advocating at all) now it seems that every aspect of people’s emotional lives is assessed in that framework. It concerns me, for example, that people who are told they are suffering from anxiety, depression or stress may do better to change aspects of their work, family or personal lives rather than take pills.

    • BT says:

      08:30am | 17/11/10

      It seems that as usual many are missing the point here, and are blaming the individual rather than understanding that the volume of people suffering very real, debilitating mental health issues is indicative of how sick and dysfunctional our society is. The best thing I ever did for my self esteem was take a course in marketing/advertising, and learnt how they first create a problem (ie screaming at you how dire it is to have a pimple and how no one will ever look at you, you will be alone and DIE if you don’t get rid of it NOW) and then creating a product that will “solve” the problem. Sure, one of these messages can be shaken off, but children are fed these messages ten times a day from birth, eventually it’s going to sink in and stay with them to adulthood. It’s time we stopped blaming the individual, claiming that they are weak if they succumb to this relentless pressure and start looking at how we as a society treat one another.

    • BK says:

      11:48am | 17/11/10

      Women’s magazines are the ones who tell women that they absolutely must feel beautiful and also the ones telling women that they can buy all of these advertised products to let them feel beautiful. They have misused the whole issue terribly.

    • Jim says:

      08:37am | 17/11/10

      You’re right Tory, if it doesn’t have a label then it’s not a problem. But people need to label stuff, and if it’s not dramatic enough the label will change. RSI has become ‘regional musculoskeletal disorder’, ADHD before the 90’s was simply ‘you have a shit of a kid…lay off the sugar’, even the ‘tension’ in PMT became a ‘syndrome’!
      ‘Body Image’ is simply another label that makes people forget they actually have a choice in how they look.

    • fairsfair says:

      10:14am | 17/11/10

      How true Jimbo. As always on the money.

      I am just about to sink $50 on a mouse pad for a colleague who has regional musculoskeletal disorder of the shoulder. Strap a pair on, get out and go for a walk on your lunch break instead of sitting at your computer and deal with it and lets put that on the bar at the Xmas party on Friday.

      I am so sick of other people’s problems becoming my own. Thankfully I believe I have the personality to not let it affect me too much, but some people are like a moth to the flame. Just like we see Sunnies on other people and decide we want them we all deep down want some problem to blame our failures on so we look to other people for similarity. Thankyou labels - you are ruining the world! Man, my shoulder is starting to hurt…..

      wink

    • Steve says:

      09:05am | 17/11/10

      Now there is a new syndrome for us to worry about, I forsee more requests for funding grants and all blame will be sheeted home to the heartless/ruthles/exploitative ‘industry’. 

      Not sure which ‘industry’ just yet, but they will be blamed.

    • Colleen A says:

      09:15am | 17/11/10

      I would say it is the same with road rage. Until it got a name and people knew they could surcome to it, it was not so prevalent.

    • Warwick Wakefield says:

      09:27am | 17/11/10

      Dear Tory,

      either you do not know how to write or you do not know how to think. Look at your first sentence: “I’m not sure what we called “body image” as an issue before it was called “body image.”

      As it stands, this sentence is meaningless.

      Maybe you meant “was” an issue.
      But in that case you would have written,  “what we CALL body image.”

      Perhaps you simply misstyped, and because the subeditors were drunk, or know nothing more than how to press the spellcheck key, this meaningless sentence got through.

      Either smarten yourself up or tear a strip off the subs.

    • Crystal says:

      11:14am | 17/11/10

      I agree! This article is so poorly written and constructed. One of the worst articles I have ever read outside of the Gold Coast Bulletin.

    • fairsfair says:

      01:11pm | 17/11/10

      lay off the hatoraide

    • Shama says:

      09:29am | 17/11/10

      The possibility exists that if you simply stop writing about female body issues, it will go away.  Its about the only thing that gets covered these days under the heading “women”-I am already over Portia’s issues.  God knows it makes me miss old style women’s magazines which at least concentrated on jam making, mending, children and the like.

      Like many men, a lot of women are professionals with families.  Once in awhile we may notice a grey hair, a few pounds, the lack of the latest fashions but it doesn’t bring our world crashing down or make us embrak on a quick reconstruction program-indeed in my profession people would look askance at it. The same goes for teens. Maybe the media needs to stop pretending at the risk of page views that the world of women is not simply a whole bevy of celebrity women who need to stay in the news and who by virtue of profession are always going to be slave to the body image? And please if deep levels of insecurity are generated by looking at a picture of some celeb, then we are in deep trouble. Most girls I know may view these images and admire them but it hasn’t stopped anyone from getting a degree or eating a pie or realising that true heroines come in all shapes and sizes.

    • darren says:

      09:43am | 17/11/10

      If a girl is buck toothed she can always join the young Liberals - they are full of such woemen - all on the hunt for a mate

    • Eric says:

      03:48pm | 17/11/10

      Why is it that Labor Party trolls bring their political hatred into every thread?

    • notSue says:

      08:37pm | 17/11/10

      Probably for the same reason that you bring your misogyny into almost every thread, Eric. It’s called obsession and they have a cream for that nowadays.

    • nosthow says:

      10:46am | 17/11/10

      A bit of praise where praise is due Tors and of course I am referring to the doyen of body images young Tones Abbott who is, by todays standards, a fitness freak. What better body image can be presented viewers than Tones emerging from the water clad only is a tiny pair of Lycra budgie smugglers carefully cradling all that Tones holds nearest and dearest - I ask you ?

    • fairsfair says:

      01:19pm | 17/11/10

      Actually, you make a good point. The man is fit, active and no oil painting and wears practical swimwear for the activities in which he is engaging. Gee wouldn’t all boys aspire to be fit, healthy, average looking and confident in a pair of DTs if they received such a favourable review by Nosthow. As the media shares this view you have just proven Tory’s point.

      I would now go on to say that you are probably someone who has a head like a smashed crab -  but that would be a personal attack with no factual basis and I am trying not to be like those people as it is just a tad pathetic.

    • Keith hammersmith says:

      01:31pm | 17/11/10

      sweet another completely irrelevant dig at Tony abbot in his budgy smugglers…in an article that it has nothing to do with

      you sound like a broken record…  ask permission from your labor minders to post about something else if you must post about each and every article.

      Tony’s level if fitness is an accomplashment that is deserving of praise no matter who accomplished it. It shows dedication and will power.

    • nosthow says:

      03:39pm | 17/11/10

      @Keith hammersmith - me old mate Keef - how are you fella - couldnt think of anything to say huh ? Have another go fella - thinking cap on !

    • nosthow says:

      03:43pm | 17/11/10

      @fairsfair - buddy thanks for the revue ! Mate when Abbott was Johnny Eyebrows Health Minister he was bloody hopeless in that position - drove Public Health back 4 decades but boy did he look the part - bike riding and super fit so I will acclaim him that way. Sadly hes now moved to another position as Lib Opp Leader wheres hes even more hopeless but again super fit !

    • fairsfair says:

      05:27pm | 17/11/10

      are you on acid?

    • Keith Hammersmith says:

      11:13am | 17/11/10

      To be perfectly honest, the culture of “fat is beautiful’ bugs me alot more than some skinny model in a magazine.
      We encourage plus size models, we have people like oprah telling us that fat is beautiful, when the reality is our society is one of the most obese in the world, and that is not healthy at all.

      I really have no sympathy for some fat person that is upset at seeing a skinny model in a magazine,
      people need to get over that crap, harden up,  i dont get upset when i watch Darryn Lochear play in state of origen because he is fitter and stronger than me, I just admire him for his accomplashments and the pleasure he brings us viewers, same when I see a hot skinny model, i admire her, sure my wife is 5 kilo’s heavier, but i wouldnt trade her for some skinny model for anything.

      eye candy is just that,  if you want to read more into it, then it isnt the picture of the skinny model causing the problem, the problem was already there.

    • Mia Freedman says:

      11:35am | 17/11/10

      I think the main difference now is what teenagers and kids are exposed to. Sure, we all went through feelings of ambivalence and dissatisfaction with our bodies when we were kids but we weren’t bombarded by the wallpaper of digitally altered images like kids today are.
      When all you see reflected back to you in magazines and billboards are images of people who don’t actually exist in real life, how else are you going to feel when you look in the mirror and see a real person?
      And THAT is something friends and family can’t change. The media, advertising and fashion industries can.
      They simply refuse to.

    • Lauren says:

      01:54pm | 17/11/10

      But you’re doing a good job trying to make them Mia

    • Admiral Shaft says:

      03:30pm | 17/11/10

      This issue is always blown well out of proportion.

      Of course you’re going to come up short if you compare yourself to Victoria’s Secret Angels or Brad Pitt.

      But in the competitive world not every guy can get a VS Angel (as much as they want to) and not every woman could land and keep Brad Pitt. Eventually, you’ll find someone willing to settle for you.

      But you do need to keep yourself fit and healthy. There is never an excuse for letting yourself go.

      Whining about body image is like whining about property prices. There’s nothing you can do about so live with it and do the best you can.

    • Shama says:

      12:30pm | 17/11/10

      I believe Godwin’s Law needs to be rephrased.

      Any online discussion will quickly devolve into fat bashing and “think of their health”! Yes folks, if you run a mile a day and slavishly lower your BMI you will be immortal!!!

      And before anyone jumps onto the obvious I am a size 10 who thinks articles on body image are shallow and tiresome

    • FFS says:

      12:41pm | 17/11/10

      I have a mate who is a personal trainer and he said to me once: “It is unbelievable the torture people will put themselves through just to avoid doing half an hour of exercise a day or a couple of hours a week. Particularly women.” Obviously he meant the starvation diets every 2 weeks, the varying degrees of bulimia, or ultimately the self-loathing and bitterness towards the ‘skinny’ people of the world. And he’s right. Some regular exercise and a few less cans of soft drink or meals from Mcdonalds might be a better idea than blaming the media for making you feel bad.

    • Markus says:

      01:23pm | 17/11/10

      Haha I have noticed this too.
      Some women see Jennifer Hawkins looking beautiful in a magazine, start whinging “it’s not fair she is naturally beautiful bla bla” while seemingly ignoring the article going with these pictures stating that she exercises for hours a day and largely prepares all her own meals to avoid fast food.

      Once again, how is it a magazine’s fault that some women can see an article on healthy eating and good exercise and come away thinking a stupid diet involving eating lemons for 2 weeks is going to have the same result?

    • Peter says:

      12:56pm | 17/11/10

      “Oh, I’m too fat”.  Pfft. #firstworldproblems.

    • Salvador says:

      01:04pm | 17/11/10

      I’m sick of being told that ‘real women’ have curves and that ‘real models’ are size 14 up.  I’m a size 8, 175cm, with no curves.  I’m bigger than models, but still not a real woman, by media standards. 
      My cousin is really thin and she is trying to put ON weight because she’s sick of people in the street saying that she’s thin.  You couldn’t go up to a fat person and say ‘wow you’re fat’, but obviously you can to thin people.
      We can blame it on the magazines/media all we want, but it comes down to demand.  There’s a demand for stick thin models, as you buy the magazines, you increase demand.
      Once we start making up excuses for the way we look (e.g. ‘I’m fat because of genetics/big bones/medication/I couldn’t resist the mars bar), we ignore the fact that we can change it. 
      We do have control over our lives, we can exercise, buy flattering clothes (modern trends don’t look good on everyone) and eat well.
      The definitions/syndromes are only there so that people can remove the responsibility that they have for their own well-being.

    • FFS says:

      03:00pm | 17/11/10

      That is such a good point about the clothes. One thing that should be advertised frequently and made known to everyone is that the jeans, pants, shirts etc. that models/actors wear in photo shoots, fashion shows or movies are mostly custom-cut to fit that particular person. So no, just because it looks good on Miranda Kerr, it doesn’t automatically translate to looking good on everyone.
      I’ve noticed, even amongst the women in my family or social circle, a refusal to accept that they are actually a size bigger than what the label on a particular garment states. This leads them to look overweight by wearing clothes to small for them, whereas if they bought the next size up, they would actually look healthy and more attractive. Still, that must be the media’s fault too.

    • Salvador says:

      09:45pm | 17/11/10

      I’ve noticed that people seem to think that if they can get it on and do the buttons or the zip up, then it fits.  Which it not true.
      I see so many women in the street that should be in the next size (or two) up.  Many times (I know it’s mean) but I wonder if they bothered to look in the mirror, or get a second opinion before they walked outside.

    • CSA says:

      01:51pm | 17/11/10

      step 1 in any marketing research is the Problem Definition stage.
      Regardless of the content of this story I am perplexed by the title.

    • Jason says:

      01:54pm | 17/11/10

      I suspect obesity is probably a worse long term health problem which will affect more people, for longer periods of their lives than anorexia or other eating disorders.  Gen-Y should harden up and get fit, so many fatty uni students wandering around wearing leggings - they are not pants and your thighs are disgusting… go for a bike ride or a run and stop feeling sorry for yourselves.

    • Outraged says:

      02:28pm | 17/11/10

      Feminists keep telling us: “Pictures of thin models encourage anorexia!”...but then how come we are the fattest nation on Earth?

      If anything, we need MORE pictures of thin/fit people in the media to motivate all these fat people to lose weight!

      It is scary how being fat is considered “normal” now!...and if you are a thin GUY, then you are considered a freak! I am a tall/slim guy, and lots of fat women at my work constantly make fun of how thin I am and how “little” I eat?! Yet, if I made jokes about their weight, I would be hauled to HR. It’s a world gone mad!

    • Richard says:

      03:04pm | 17/11/10

      There is an unspoken, insidious villain at work in today’s society, the culprit for all of or body image, diabetes and add illnesses. It is sugar addiction, and its even more prevalent than caffeine addiction. It makes tobacco and drug addiction look like minor problems in comparison (although regarding alcohol addiction it does play a role in this one).

      Everyone suffers from it baaaaad. Oh you don’t think you do? have plain eggs (no toast) for breakfast, chicken salad for lunch (no sandwiches) and then a green vege and beef stir fry (no rice) and then see just how strong your sugar cravings get.

    • AdamC says:

      03:58pm | 17/11/10

      Richard, it sounds to me like you are suggesting that our bodies’ hunger for carbohydrates as a food group is tantamount to an addiction. By your logic, I could argue that we are all, to a man, addicted to water. Put another way, in arguing that we are addicted to just about everything you are causing the concept of addiction to lose all meaning.

      In any event, your claims sound like junk science to me. Is there any peer-reviewed literature on this?

    • Richard says:

      06:37pm | 17/11/10

      The healthiest diet is the Palaeolithic hunter-gatherer style diet. The fossil record of our ancestors is free of degenerative diseases, heart diseases,  tooth decay etc. up until the period when grain cultivation became widespread, at which point in time people started developing similar diseases to the ones we still suffer from today.

      But in the last 20 years or so diabetes epidemiology has really sky-rocketed. Yes our bodies can use carbohydrates; but when they are taken in such huge quantities, and they are so highly refined and high G.I., they cause diabetes, obesity and heart disease.

      Do you know AdamC that humans will die if protein is excluded from their diet? And they will die if fat is excluded from their diet. But people don’t die if carbohydrates are excluded totally from the diet~ did you know that? Ever heard of ketosis?

      My logic is correct, because you would die without water, so its not an addiction. But you won’t die without tobacco or caffeine or alcohol or yes, carbohydrates, so it is an addiction.

      And honestly AdamC, there is so much peer-reviewed evidence out there about the Palaeolithic diet, if you want to dispute this with me at least put in a bit of effort yourself.

    • Kika says:

      03:35pm | 17/11/10

      Personally, I don’t understand when women’s mags say one week target certain celebrities carrying a few extra kilos than the size 0 waif and announce that they are ‘CURVY AND PROUD’, next week they are knocking the very same celebrities for being overweight, making claims that they are sad, lonely, depressed because of this, that and the other. It’s hilarious! No wonder we are all so confused when the very media messages we are subliminally absorbing is giving us conflicted messages about whether being ‘curvy and voluptuous’ is better than being thin or visa versa?? I can’t say I’m perfect. I’m pretty bad. But buying new clothes and getting a new hair-do helps!

    • Jade says:

      04:50pm | 17/11/10

      What bothers me is that we are changing an industry because of the concerns of parents and teenage girls. As a teenager, I was simply not allowed to read fashion magazines until I was about 17. All my counterparts had been reading Dolly, Girlfriend, Cleo, Cosmo and the rest from when they were about 12.

      When I was allowed to read fashion magazines, my mother sat me down and showed me the techniques that these magazines use. I watched documentaries on the subject of model lifestyles and anorexia, and was made to read up on techniques like airbrushing, photoshop and the like. What this gave me was the power to understand that the images in these magazines are no more real than a cartoon.

      Perhaps mothers should actually spend some time with their daughters, and simply refuse to buy their daughters something that besides being so unhealthy for them, is actually more aimed at my age group. I appreciate looking through a magazine at the fantasy of fashion advertisements and catwalk shots from fashion shows.

      And I happen to be a relatively slim, average height woman of 27.

    • Jon G says:

      08:23pm | 17/11/10

      The 30-40% of 11-24 year olds surveyed who expressed concerns with body image have a very real prospect of becoming the 50-60% of adult Australians who are overweight or obese. Replacing healthy eating with energy drinks is sending them at a frightening pace towards type II diabetes, and an absence of athletic endeavours leaves them exposed to the risk of early cardiovascular disease. Feeling bad about yourself pales into comparison when considering a diabetic amputation at 30, or a fatal heart attack at 40. When it comes to fashion, the priority of the government should dispelling the normalisation of ‘plus-size’ as an acceptable option. Fat is not beautiful - it is a time bomb that has finally overtaken smoking as the greatest burden of disease for this country. Welcome to the first generations to live shorter lives than their parents and grandparents.

    • talitha says:

      09:19pm | 17/11/10

      I think the issue of ‘body image’ and ‘being overweight’ are too often considered to be the same thing, as evidenced in these comments. Well, they’re not.

      I remember being 15 and very perturbed by the girl with perfect skin in an add who got one pimple and couldn’t go to a party… perhaps me and my teenage hormones shouldn’t have been having any fun either? As someone with not perfect teeth, seeing those shiny photoshopped toothpaste adds makes me want to faux-smile in photos. 

      There’s also little one can do about how their face looks. diet and exercise don’t really change that a whole lot - pilates can’t thin your nose, and daily runs won’t make your hair less frizzy. These are body images issues, especially when the faces we’re shown in magazines are usually not only of very beautiful people, but are of these people altered to look even better than they already do.

      And in terms of weight - the body image debate is not saying that big and unhealthy is beautiful. I fall well within the healthy BMI range, and wear a size 10. I’m not fat. But, my legs aren’t as long and my tummy isn’t as flat, my tan not as even, and my thighs aren’t quite as smooth as that there photoshopped magazine model. It’s not about being fat or skinny, it’s about representing an image that is completely unattainable - even for the slim, beautiful models posing for the photos

      As a grown woman, it’s not much of an issue for me anymore. But I have a sixteen year old sister, who plays a lot of sport, is slim, but now keeps a chart of her weight and measurements every day. why? because with puberty came stretch marks and hips and pimples, and no one she sees in magazines or on tv has those - so they must not be normal.

      that’s the real price of the super-edited image portrayed to us by the media - it’s not the overweight lady claiming she’s a real woman, it’s your average, pretty, vulnerable teenager who somewhere along the way has swallowed the lie that she needs to look perfect.

    • Caz says:

      10:12pm | 17/11/10

      Exercise is the key.  It is nature’s antidepressant and the mood benefits of regular exercise are well established. If overweight people got off the couch, binned the antidepressants, got moving, they would discover improved coping and resilience to life’s ups and downs, as well as a fitter, healthier body.  The drug companies know this but in my drug rep friend’s opinion - ‘people would rather take a pill’.  How true and we are all seeing the effects of this everywhere we look…......fat dissatisfied people being poor role models for their children, and so the cycle continues…....

    • iansand says:

      07:21am | 18/11/10

      I wonder how many of the posters here have actually been in the same room as a 16 year old girl, let alone walked down the street with one.  They are working out how the world works and what their place in it is.  They are inherently insecure, and compare themselves to everybody.  Their friends.  Their enemies.  Random strangers they see in the street.  And they compare themselves to the images they see in the media.  The presentation of “ideal” but unrealistic images in the media has a very powerful, usually negative, effect on kids.

      Of course my views are almost certainly skewed by actually being the father of a 16 year old girl.

    • OchreBunyip says:

      07:35am | 18/11/10

      The media existed when I and my peers were young and impressionable; part of our education was learning personal filters. The phrase I recall was “Stand guard at the gates of your mind”. Rather than expecting governments and industry to control and regulate and legislate for everything, we learned to accept thoughts and ideas only after we had critically appraised them. There is no doubt that there is a lot of junk media out there but when you filter it out it no longer matters.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

#markwebber just wasted petrol faster than everyone else in monaco #f1

Anthony Sharwood

In my sports column on The Punch tomorrow: why Eurovision was easily the best game on the weekend. Mummy bloggers, you'll like this one!

Daniel Piotrowski

The Logies could learn a lot from Eurovision #lamethings#sbseurovision

Daniel Piotrowski

RT @ellehardytweets: Already despondent about the next fifty one weeks. #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter