As the 100th anniversary of International Women’s Day approaches, we can and should celebrate a century of achievements for women, both small and gigantic.

My name is Luca, I work the second floor.

But no-one could say gender equality is ‘done and dusted’. As we celebrate, we should pause to acknowledge the areas in which there has been insufficient progress, including in our working lives.

Our workplaces are still fraught with gender pay inequity, an underrepresentation of women in leadership positions, unequal treatment of men and women with caring responsibilities and the omnipresent scourge of sexual harassment.

And daily, far too many women among us live with domestic or family violence.

“That’s not a workplace issue”, I hear you say. But I am here to tell you that it most certainly is.
In 2005, over 1.2 million women across Australia experienced domestic violence at sometime during their lifetime.

Almost every week in Australia, one woman is killed by her current or former partner[ii], often after a history of domestic violence. Research in Victoria has found that domestic violence is the leading contributor to death, disability and illness in women aged 15-44 years, being a greater contributor than factors like high blood pressure, smoking or obesity.

And domestic violence has a financial cost. Combined with sexual assault perpetrated against women, it costs the nation $13.6 billion per annum.

So how is it that in 2011, on the 100th anniversary of International Women’s Day, we still haven’t put a stop to this?

Part of the problem, I think, is that awareness of the incidence of domestic violence is still quite low and people do not understand the patterns and the realities with which the victims – women – have to live.

This is particularly so in Australian workplaces.

So often I go into businesses and talk about sexual harassment. We have an engaging and constructive conversation. But when I mention the words ‘domestic violence’, I am politely told that “domestic violence is a private matter” - that workplaces have no role.

Not true.

We know that almost two thirds of women who experience domestic and family violence are in paid work, so there is no question that the issue of violence affects many in our workplaces.

Domestic violence may result in lower performance and productivity at work, as victims struggle to put on a brave face.

It may result in frequent or prolonged absenteeism, job loss because of trauma or the need to preserve and prioritise their safety.

Women who experience domestic violence are more likely to have a disrupted work history - to have to change jobs and work in casual and part time work - than women with no experience of violence.[vii]

A recent State University of New York study found that some abusive men use a range of tactics to try to sabotage women’s work efforts. These tactics include turning up at the woman’s work and physically or verbally abusing her, refusing to look after the kids at the last minute, or hiding her clothes, so she can’t go to work.

These women lose their jobs, suffer humiliation and embarrassment. Ultimately they lose their self esteem.

The point is that these penalties and disruptions to a woman’s working life have profound financial consequences, and the economic price that women pay is life-long.

But some businesses are taking a stand and beginning to see domestic violence as a business issue.

Over the last six months I have become aware of a number of organisations, in both the public and private sector, which have developed policies that support staff living with domestic violence.

Some have included an entitlement to domestic violence leave in their enterprise agreements. Others have created workplace policies to support staff by offering flexible work, special leave, the ability to change extension numbers, the possibility of working in another office or the inclusion of domestic violence support information with the workplace safety training at induction.

In Brisbane there is even an organisation called CEO Challenge that is breaking new ground by taking the message of domestic violence into workplaces. And I hope that similar organisations will soon proliferate throughout Australia.

It is incumbent on all of us to work together to address this issue. The creation of innovative and bold workplace policies is critical.

To quote noted Australian family violence expert, Betty Taylor, “The effects of domestic violence are all-pervasive. Women suffer silently and business continues losing money unawares. Business should address it not just because of the bottom line, but because it will take all sectors of society to eliminate this blight on our nation.”

After a century of advocacy for women’s rights, surely this is not too much to ask?

Elizabeth Broderick is Australia’s Sex Discrimination Commissioner

Most commented

23 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Jugg says:

      04:50am | 08/03/11

      Yes please, add another layer of cost to the goods and services I purchase.  Let’s bring responsibility in the home into the workplace, make people attend speeches and training days and pass on the cost to the consumer.  This country and it’s lack of personal responsiblity… PC wankers are killing the place.

    • Carz says:

      06:14am | 08/03/11

      But we are already paying the price. Or did you miss the part where the author said that domestic violence costs Australia over $13 billion dollars per annum? Surely anything that can reduce the effects of domestic violence, thereby reducing the cost, can only have a positive flow on affect for the country.

    • Jugg says:

      07:07am | 08/03/11

      What makes you think talk in the workplace will ‘actually’ have an effect at home?  Do you think the person prone to violence is going to 1) listen, 2) think it applies to them, 3) take anything out of it, 4) recall it in the heat of the moment in the home?  If you do, then you don’t really no much about the profile of a person who commits these crimes to begin with.  It also doesn’t cater to the vast amount of offenders who are not employed.  Further cost passed due to expense of provding these so-called ‘services’ and futher cost through lost productivity.  At best minimal difference at excessive expense.

    • deb says:

      05:46am | 08/03/11

      a\Abuse is abuse.some women are abusive too.They cause problems for their partners at work.goes both ways.
      Mental abuse is just as bad as bruises.
      Laying on the guilt trips and making the man of the house feel like a second class worm.
      I speak as a woman who has been abused and seen women abuse their men too.They used to call it henpecked!

    • Dave says:

      07:17am | 08/03/11

      Here we go again. “Our workplaces are still fraught with gender pay inequity”. Why is it that those who claim that women are paid less then men doing the same job can NEVER give even one example? Is it because women are never paid less then men? If you were an employer and had to choose between a male applicant and an equally qualified, experienced woman, but you could pay the woman 10% - 20% less, you’d obviously pick the woman, right?  So would every other employer, and the workforce would be completely made up of women. But the workforce is not made completely made up of women, even though they supposedly cost less to employ. Funny that.

    • Tubesteak says:

      07:57am | 08/03/11

      There is no gender pay inequality. It’s a myth. They think that a woman working in industry A should be compared to a man working in industry B or that a woman working at position 9 should be paid the same as a man working in position 3, a higher position.

      It’s the intellectual bankruptcy of such an argument that shows why they’re not earning high salaries.

      OT: maybe if women stopped going out with deadbeats they wouldn’t be victims of domestic violence.

    • Knemon says:

      08:49am | 08/03/11

      Spot on Dave @ 07:17am. Every place I’ve ever worked had awards in place for wages Etc. They never once had one for women and one for men, the only discrimination was based purely on age (for obvious reasons, experience Etc.) and not gender. Surely if gender pay inequity is happening, then why is it not reported?

    • David says:

      09:39am | 08/03/11

      @ Dave, let me give you just one example of real “gender pay inequity”:  The Australian Open tennis.  There women and men are paid the same amount even though the men play best of 5 sets and the women best of 3. There are plenty more.

    • Jade says:

      11:38am | 08/03/11

      My ex-boyfriend used to work at Birch Carroll and Coyle cinemas. He and his female counterpart were both ushers (the people who take your ticket). They were both the same age. He was shocked to note on her payslip that she was paid 50 cents less an hour than he was. Considering that he started AFTER she did, and was in exactly the same role, he had questions as to why.

      He offered to go with her to the employer’s office with his payslip to seek an explanation. She refused, stating that she had gone in once before when she noticed the discrepancy with another employee, only to be told that pay information was private and that she could be fired if such an occurrence happened again.

      There are other examples. Most employers bank on the fact that pay information is private, and that people simply won’t speak up about inequity if it is discovered.

    • Tim says:

      12:01pm | 08/03/11

      Jade,
      Well I have this friend of my mum’s cousin’s father’s sister’s son who knows a woman who gets paid $5 an hour more than a man doing the exact same job. It’s discrimination I tells ya.

      The situation you describe is ILLEGAL. If it really happened (which it didn’t), then a simple call to her union or a workplace representative would have fixed it and the company would have been in some serious trouble.
      However, you can’t legislate against stupidity.

    • James1 says:

      01:34pm | 08/03/11

      Equity is different to equality.

    • Bilby says:

      08:22am | 08/03/11

      Empowerment. A fundamental feminist principle most people would agree? Yet the empowerment of men is not seen as an important factor in the reduction of domestic violence. Both from the perspective that here we have the one person specifically responsible for addressing discrimination positioning DV as a women’s issue, and from the perspective that disempowered people do all sorts of things to address that, usually taking it out on those around them. We all need to feel that someone is listening; that we are not on our own, or we understandably take matters into our own hands. It isn’t right, but it is understandable.

      Show respect for all members of society. It doesn’t sound radical, but it does seem to be beyond the understanding of too many people.

    • Tim says:

      08:28am | 08/03/11

      I wish Elizabeth Broderick would stop bringing up “Studies” which have massive flaws in their methodology and in some cases are full of outright lies.
      The definitions they use for “violence” and the way they calculate costs to the economy are ridiculously inclusive.

      I’m all for stopping violence against anyone but when government funded bodies produce rubbish and misleading reports in support of their arguments they do their whole cause a dis-service.

    • Your Uncle Bob says:

      09:22am | 08/03/11

      Gender equality is done and dusted.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      11:26am | 09/03/11

      Generally?  Probably.  But there are still spot fires of inequality all over the place. Some have women burning men.

      I’m new to this Women’s Studies and Feminist Theory thing.  I used to fear and diss it but now find observing how Women’s Studies are being applied a great study in itself. Many Punch feminists appear to be driven by a person agenda and ignore the big picture to focus on the spot fire that interests them.

      And in putting out spot fires burning women some feminists have been content to allow spot fires of inequality to grow against men. Fighting fire with fire.

      Have a read of wikipedia’s History of Feminism paraphrasing of Nancy Cott. I.e feminism changed from representing women as a whole to representing women’s individuality and diversity. in the early 20th C.  That’s when it shifted from its home on the right to being at home on the left. Very interesting don’t you think? I do.  Helps me try to see through the smoke bombs of ideaology.

      Bob. Don’t fight feminism.  Or any ism’s for that matter . You just make it stronger. And create monsters (Same applies to religions) But certainly fight the spot fires. But more imprtantly: fight BS.

    • Squeeze the Middle says:

      09:25am | 08/03/11

      Hear Hear Elizabeth. Violence against Women.  Australia Says No. (c)

    • sam says:

      09:43am | 08/03/11

      I’ll worry about violence against women when something is done about voilence against men by women - from someone with personal experience.
      Good-bye!

    • Ryan says:

      09:50am | 08/03/11

      Isn’t this getting quite pathetic, seriously. I know of many workplaces where men are not allowed to work, I know of few if any where women aren’t allowed to work. Gender discrimination certainly exists today, the one where men are discriminated against and women claim issues with pay gaps because they are too soft to fight for a pay increase. If you don’t fight for it, you don’t deserve it, simple.

    • Theo says:

      10:38am | 08/03/11

      What about bullying perpetrated by women against men in the workplace?  In my previous employment there were two women who decided to gang up on me and treat me like the office chump.

      But women are always the victims aren’t they?  Right?

    • Reg says:

      11:59am | 08/03/11

      It’s caused they wanted to have sex with you, mate. It’s like little boys hitting little girls they like… they were probably gagging for it.

      You should have tapped both and filmed yourself doing it to show to others (their husbands too if they had them). Only way to respond to such things.

    • Steve says:

      10:58am | 08/03/11

      There is NOTHING to celebrate women retaining their self preserving sexist status while continuing to view men as nothing more than expendable for womens health, longevity and wellbeing. This status of men has not changed. I want 100,000 feminist women murdered by government before any mention of equality.

    • nanna from vyle bay says:

      02:10pm | 08/03/11

      men belong with men and not families.
      the dog is man’s best friend but the dog doesn’t even want to share its kennel with men..
      the pub could be the father of all men.
      the pub is men’s place of worship and not the church.

    • haverin books says:

      10:13pm | 31/03/11

      Why… is it okay to talk about murdering 100,000 women? How could you think that was an okay thing to even think of murdering 100,000 people, let alone say it? If just one (ONE!) of you so-called men had stood up and said to my ex-partner, “Mate, it’s not okay to assault the woman you love” he would have stopped. But none of you did. Because you’re too cowardly to have that discussion with another man in the real world - only with anonymous women on the internet.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

tory_maguire

@nswpolice very polite and helpful officers manning the Pyrmont road closures this morning

David Penberthy

@KevCorduroy @SallyHitchiner it's a great idea I doubt he'd go for it though far too laid back

ToryShepherd

. @mcguiremi is journo of the year! #samediaawards

ToryShepherd

.@mariamosco @msmarto Super Smarto. And Shirley Stott Despoja into the Hall of Fame #samediaawards

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter