Don’t you hate Twitter? All those people, twittering away, typing all that rubbish, telling people about their lives as if any of us are interested.

As if anyone cares what they ate for lunch today or what they’re watching on TV or what they think about So You Think You Can Dance. Isn’t it just rubbish?

Of all the modern social trends I find personally offensive, Twitter has the greatest direct negative impact on my day-to-day life. All the banality. All those people being so dull.

I spent seven hours the other day just reading random people’s Twitter feeds and I can assure you that in all that time, not one person said anything worth reading.

It was so boring, it was all I could do to keep going for seven hours, and you don’t want to know the kind of mental anguish I went through when I started again the next morning.

All the people whose Twitters I spent all that time reading have no lives whatsoever.

Thank God there are people like me to expose their vacuousness with well-crafted indignant articles.

What’s happened to us? What does it say about the modern world that so many of us spend so much of their time typing mindless rubbish about themselves, completely ignoring the fact that I am not interested in it? I mean, really, have we lost the ability to really connect with real people? When did we decide that “Tweeting” was a legitimate substitute for genuine human contact?

When did we get away from simply talking to each other?

Nobody talks anymore; certainly not to me, anyway. Sometimes, in fact, people go out of their way to not talk to me. Today I came in to work and started up a conversation about how awful Facebook is, and suddenly everyone had run back to their desks. Sad, it was, seeing all these people such slaves to their “online social networks” they couldn’t spare the time for conversation.

And remember when people used to write? Not on the internet; that sort of writing is objectively useless – but write letters? What happened to the art of writing letters? Of sitting down with a fountain pen and writing long, detailed paragraphs about the interesting things that were happening in one’s life?

And oh, what interesting things we wrote about! It was a golden age, when all our thoughts, words and movements were filled with such weighty import that we almost collapsed under the weight of our own fascinatingness.

Not like today, when young people are in danger of floating away, so filled are they with the helium of idiocy.

It seems that “human interaction” is a dirty word these days. In fact, it’s two words, not that young people today would know that, seeing as how they’re all completely illiterate and innumerate, with their iPhones and their MMORPGs and their roflmao cheezeburger kthxbai.

All this networking, it rots the brain. Children these days aren’t taught the three Rs, they’re just taught how to log on and download and cyber-bully and such nonsense. Back in my day, we didn’t cyber-bully. We had the work ethic to bully people in person.

It’s the arrogance of these “Tweeters” that really burns me up. Just who do they think they are? What devilish spirit of presumption has possessed them to the extent that they feel justified in transmitting their every thought to the world? How dare they strut about updating us all on the progress of their meals, their new book, their cat’s ulcer. What gives them the right to tell us about themselves?

Where, in short, do they get off?

I don’t remember asking to be bombarded with the mundane updates of a day in the life of this imbecilic young battalion, their scattergun thoughts vomiting from their underdeveloped, alcopop-addled brains like a sort of boring online Tourette Syndrome.

Given this, I think it is fair enough that, when these people I have never met post tidbits of their activities for the information of their friends, I take it as a personal insult. It’s a lot like the whole mobile phone thing. I never asked people to talk on mobile phones in public places where I happen to be; how unbelievably self-centred of them to think they can do so with impunity.

And that’s the key to the whole issue: self-centredness. In the end, what we have here is an entire generation brought up to think it’s OK to express themselves in any way they choose via new media, without any regard to how I might feel about it.

Just how up yourself can you get?

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

64 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Werner says:

      06:41am | 18/11/09

      There is a simple solution.  Ignore Twitter.

    • Helen says:

      07:11am | 18/11/09

      ROFLMAOBBQ Ben! A friend of mine was huffing and puffing about twitter the other day, I think you’ve encapsulated it perfectly. “an entire generation brought up to think it’s OK to express themselves in any way they choose via new media, without any regard to how I might feel about it.” I’m sure when the telephone was invented people thought teenagers chatting on it represented the end of civilisation.

    • davido says:

      07:14am | 18/11/09

      Couldnt agree more. Twitter really divides the world into losers who bleat about their turgid existance and the rest of us.

      As for facebook, dont even get me started. Pick up a phone people and try being a human.

    • Colin Campbell says:

      07:27am | 18/11/09

      YAAAAAWWWWN…..

      Why obsess about twitter? Just ignore it if you hate it so much. What a waste of space this article is. Oh and why did you spend seven hours on something you hate? Do you have a problem?

    • Andrew Goff says:

      08:18am | 18/11/09

      And the score at 7:15:

      Irony 1
      Idiocy 2

      We’ll keep you up to date with the latest scores they come trhough today…

    • Nick says:

      08:29am | 18/11/09

      At last, someone writes an ironic summary of all the idiotic cliches that grumpy, technophobic conservatives use to reject new social media. Though no doubt many readers will miss the point.
      If you tapped a random phone line you’d hear banal mush as well. People like trivia, and they bond over shared experience, no matter how inconsequential. Get over it, whingers, or choose another species. I hear the musk ox maintains a noble silence.

    • James says:

      08:30am | 18/11/09

      Is this a joke? What a strange article. I can’t tell if the author is serious, or is commenting on himself writing a whining pointless article. You miss the time people wrote letters? People communicate more today than 20 years ago.

      I guess it would be wonderful if people stopped reading news online and started buying papers again as well. Oh, the glory days!

    • Pete from Sydney says:

      08:34am | 18/11/09

      1 Point for Irony

      However to a degree the irony is sort of lost on me ‘coz I do believe it’s a bunch of crap that no one should want to read…and comparing it anything in the past is not valid, a one on one phone is nothing like this….

      Anyway I can choose to tune out and I do

    • Alyssa says:

      08:51am | 18/11/09

      Haven’t you just done the same? Albeit in several hundred more characters?  PS. Last report out said only 22% of Gen Y use Twitter.

    • BPobjie says:

      09:14am | 18/11/09

      @Colin Campbell: “Oh and why did you spend seven hours on something you hate? “

      Oh my God Colin you have just put your finger on the fatal flaw in my argument! Why DID I spend seven hours on something I hate? It seems so stupid!

    • BPobjie says:

      09:16am | 18/11/09

      @James: “I guess it would be wonderful if people stopped reading news online and started buying papers again as well. Oh, the glory days! “

      Of course it would. Imagine if this article had been in a newspaper instead of online! How much better it would have been!

    • BPobjie says:

      09:17am | 18/11/09

      Whoa, Alyssa, whoa…you just blew my mind.

    • Peter says:

      09:20am | 18/11/09

      Oh another predictable VERY hackneyed attack on Twitter from someone complaining about its impact on him. Nobody NEEDS to look a Twitter stream. And the now tired old slagging about the trivia on Twitter. Of course a lot is trivial just as in real life. And as in real life context is everything in shaping often sharp meaning. But this superficial easy dismissal obscures what is actually happening with Twitter and Social Media generally as a medium especially its fascinating role in journalism. I suggest to Ben if he wants to be actually relevant, he should do some real research and swim in the pool himself before saying the water is not fine. This was a waste of cyberspace. Get out your Waterman and write a belle lettre then.

    • Ariane says:

      09:28am | 18/11/09

      Exactly! So incredibly up themselves! Something should be done about it.

      More pressingly though, I feel we need a national task force to address the fact that irony detection levels are catastrophically low.

    • BPobjie says:

      09:38am | 18/11/09

      “Get out your Waterman and write a belle lettre then.”

      Peter, I would prefer it if we kept the homophobic slurs out of it. Let’s stay classy people, yeah?

    • Annik says:

      09:38am | 18/11/09

      @yall - I ate a boiled egg on toast with tomato sauce for breakfast. LOL!

    • lisadempster says:

      09:40am | 18/11/09

      I only use twitter in the hopes that my banality will feed your muse, Ben Pobjie. I do it all for you.

    • Peter says:

      09:58am | 18/11/09

      Homophobic slur??? WTF. Your “subtle” irony eludes me, Ben.

    • tina says:

      09:59am | 18/11/09

      I can’t believe people could have read that whole thing and missed its dripping sarcasm. Sheesh. Have people any sense of humour anymore or has social networking sucked it dry?

    • Kathleen says:

      10:06am | 18/11/09

      Ben Pobjie I am so insulted!

      UNFOLLOWED.

      Where are we up to with the irony count?

    • Ramona says:

      10:08am | 18/11/09

      Ben, I only use twitter because it’s the only way you’ll communicate with me.

    • K says:

      10:12am | 18/11/09

      I predict the impact of this article to be as follows:

      15% will agree with your point of view entirely and have no idea that you just ripped the piss out of them
      20% will just be confused
      40% will twitter furiously about what a bastard you are
      25% will actually get it, laugh, nod and say “nice work dude” under their breath before getting on with their day.

      Nice work dude.

    • BPobjie says:

      10:19am | 18/11/09

      “Homophobic slur??? WTF. Your “subtle” irony eludes me, Ben. “

      Why the scare quotes? Are you saying that a gay man can’t use genuine subtlety? Because they’re second-class citizens who have to be obvious about everything?

    • BPobjie says:

      10:22am | 18/11/09

      K, that…was…uncanny.

    • B says:

      10:23am | 18/11/09

      Yeah we get it is irony Ben, after all how could we miss it, you constantly tell us so. The problem is that it is poorly written, badly constructed irony which jumps all over the place and certainly doesn’t flow nicely and is not a pleasure to read. I am in one of the 45% according to K who get it, but you certainly will not be getting a ‘nice work dude’ from me, more of a ‘give it up you fool’

    • Andrew Goff says:

      10:24am | 18/11/09

      Irony: 4
      Idiocy: Infinity

      Blow the whistle ref.

    • TheMonkeyBoy says:

      10:31am | 18/11/09

      Twitter has been around for ages people!

      Back during the days of Pompeii before it blew up, people wrote on the walls of the city about the most mundane stuff. Check out what they wrote about here: http://www.pompeiana.org/Resources/Ancient/Graffiti from Pompeii.htm (via the article “8 Online Fads You Didn’t Know Were Invented Decades Ago” from Cracked.com).

      We’ve been going down the road of being shallow and vapid for centuries. We are doomed as a species I tells ya! DOOMED! *sings The Doom Song* - http://www.metacafe.com/watch/717889/invader_zim_the_doom_song/

    • Little Miss SciFi says:

      10:45am | 18/11/09

      Oh here we go, another so called ‘blogger’ on their anti-social media soapbox, moaning about how there’s no such thing as real human contact anymore. Please spare us.  If you don’t like the medium, then don’t use it.  If you’re so worried about human contact, why don’t you try to engage people, instead of waiting for them to come to you.

      Maybe nobody talks to you becuase you’re just as boring as the rest of us. Did you ever think that?

    • Tom says:

      10:47am | 18/11/09

      I don’t really understand the point of this. I’m guessing he’s being a bit tongue-in-cheek and ironic or whatever, but to what purpose? Why does this article exist?

    • BPobjie says:

      10:57am | 18/11/09

      @Little Miss SciFi It’s like you’ve known me all my life!

    • BPobjie says:

      10:59am | 18/11/09

      @Tom: Because standards have slipped alarmingly.

    • Kitty says:

      11:02am | 18/11/09

      LOL I HAVE TO TWEET THIS ROFL.

    • Kat says:

      11:14am | 18/11/09

      Haha.  Nice work!

    • Sadhbhzilla says:

      11:21am | 18/11/09

      @Tom Perhaps he is being satiric, when you have already moved on to post-satirism?

      Someone recently described themselves as post-ironic in my hearing, which I can only assume means they are incapable of getting jokes. Perhaps, judging from some comments here, being post-ironic is less pretentiously bad phrasing and more of a common medical condition.

    • Sam Whiteman (@blanchomme) says:

      11:23am | 18/11/09

      Twitter is valuable to those who show good judgment by choosing who they follow carefully, in letting everyone know who spent several hours to find no one has anything interesting to say shows your poor judgment, not a failure of twitter.

      I can’t have dinner with the likes of Chris Anderson (TED) or Annabel Crabb every night but knowing what they’re thinking about and saying is bloody useful to me. If they become boring and talk about their lunch, I unfollow them in the same way I avoid the boring people at a party.

      Surround yourself with people smarter than yourself, one place you can do that is on Twitter.

      Anyone looking for further ‘insight’ from Ben can watch him fumble his way through interviewing Christan Lander (Stuff White People Like) earlier this year (podcasted from SWF on Fora.tv). Perhaps an ear to the ground and some research may have been useful rather then.

    • Jonathan says:

      12:18pm | 18/11/09

      This article makes me want to punch myself in the throat.

    • eyeswiredopen says:

      12:26pm | 18/11/09

      I love the way all Australians without exception think the Americans are idiotic for supposedly lacking a sense of irony. The moment an Australian online reader is faced with something that is obviously ironic it shoots over the heads of about half of them. Little Miss Sci-Fi, dont pretend to look the other way, I’m talking about you - amongst others.
      Durrrrrrrr.

    • davido says:

      12:43pm | 18/11/09

      I dont like the medium and I dont use it.

      Doesnt stop it being a huge signal as to who the losers are in our society.

      If you work and have time to use Twitter or facebook you should be sacked.

    • Chris says:

      12:56pm | 18/11/09

      I thought Rove quit comedy.

    • Andrew Goff says:

      01:15pm | 18/11/09

      Rove was in comedy?

    • Terry Wright says:

      01:22pm | 18/11/09

      I agree with K (10:12am | 18/11/09). Nice work dude.

      What’s with the complaints? Lighten up for FS. But that’s the problem with comments on a Murdoch media website (The Punch, Daily Telegraph, HUN, CourierMail etc.) ... there’s always someone making a point about how much they hate something. Even a tongue-in-cheek piece like this.

      For those who have been reading Ben’s stuff for a while, it’s a pleasant surprise to see him pop up at The Punch. Keep ‘em coming Ben.

    • Terry Wright says:

      01:31pm | 18/11/09

      Karl Rove quit comedy?

      Does Kim Beazley know this?

    • Damo says:

      01:33pm | 18/11/09

      What does Irony mean?

    • K says:

      01:46pm | 18/11/09

      Hehe - nice one Damo.

    • Lyn says:

      02:01pm | 18/11/09

      It’s always highly amusing to see the responses when Ben posts somewhere new.

      I would like to know what the irony/idiocy score would have been if those of us more familiar with his work had held off a little longer.

    • ChelseaLee says:

      02:14pm | 18/11/09

      So in a nutshell - Kim Beazley, the author of the article, is not only not being ironic in his satirical stance on homophobic Facebook tweets, but is also painting a clear picture of Ben Pobjie’s resignation from comedy, due to his fear of human interaction, particularly with Rove?

      I’m just glad I don’t fall into K’s 20% confused category.

    • Jasmeen says:

      02:36pm | 18/11/09

      K: you forgot me.

      I get that it’s ironic, I get that it’s tongue-in-cheek etc. But I also get the impression that you’re dressing it up as irony to get away with saying it in public because 95% of it is true and not exaggerated at all.

      But then I started to think how gracious and wonderful you were because you were actually replying to your comments… then I realised you only replied to the ones that bagged you out so you could have the last word.

      Yup, I confirm my original sentiment; you’re an arrogant, self-centred prick, albeit an erudite and vaguely witty one.

      Ad hominem, I know. But hey, this is an opinion piece, not a logical, step-by-step scientific argument. It’s probably one of the few arenas where ad hominem is allowed!

    • thatmosis says:

      02:41pm | 18/11/09

      I actually feel sorry for people who feel the need to put all their mundane thoughts out there for the world to see. They must be very lonely people . I have put Twitter of the banned list on my computer along with Facebook. I dont need the ravings of the pseudo intellectuals and downright idiots clogging up my PC and my life thank you very much.

    • Stuart says:

      02:52pm | 18/11/09

      “All the people whose Twitters I spent all that time reading have no lives whatsoever.
      Thank God there are people like me to expose their vacuousness with well-crafted indignant articles.”
      “Just how up yourself can you get?”

      Think you just answered your own question.

    • Terry Wright says:

      03:26pm | 18/11/09

      K has a category?

    • Cam Smith says:

      04:08pm | 18/11/09

      “I unfollow them in the same way I avoid the boring people at a party. “

      Sorry, did somebody say irony was dead?

    • Catharine Lumby says:

      04:25pm | 18/11/09

      Ben, It’s fabulous how many people take you literally. Does it mean there’s something wrong with me because I can’t understand why anyone misses the satire? Or…oh no…what if you’ve been serious the whole time and the idiot in the room is me. Always a possibility. Fabulous to see you in The Punch.

    • K says:

      04:31pm | 18/11/09

      Jasmeen - 20%
      Is he arrogant - damn sure he is. Self Centred - not as much as you think - missed the joke in the article there I think.

      Prick - wow, really?  Why can’t we all appreciate the humour in someone just yanking everyones chain for the sheer joy of it. This article insults every single side of the argument, and it does it in a delightfully vicious but often underhand way. It’s a great bit of writing.

    • Chris says:

      04:56pm | 18/11/09

      Ahhh, big penny just dropped. You clever bastard. If in ten years Rove comes out and claims to be a satirist and that his entire career was one big gag, he’ll trump your arse. Then, and perhaps only then.

    • Susan says:

      04:58pm | 18/11/09

      irony? tongue-in-cheek?
      You are still an idiot.

    • Catharine says:

      06:56pm | 18/11/09

      And here’s the obvious problem. The comments on your columns are arguably funnier than the columns….How many pseudonyms do you have? Come to think of it I’ve always thought Pobjie sounds suspiciously made up. Admittedly that’s a bit rich coming from someone whose last name is Lumby.

    • BPobjie says:

      12:01am | 19/11/09

      @Jasmeen: ” I realised you only replied to the ones that bagged you out so you could have the last word.”

      Annoying, isn’t it?

    • BPobjie says:

      12:04am | 19/11/09

      Susan, it’s unfair to use your intimate personal knowledge of me in a forum such as this.

    • BPobjie says:

      12:05am | 19/11/09

      I’ve been alerted that I have been remiss in only replying to those who bag me out. So to those who didn’t bag me out: you’re right, I am awesome.

    • Paul Farrell says:

      12:20am | 19/11/09

      Wow.  This discussion really says a lot about the quality of the Punch’s readership.  Depressing.

    • alliewonder says:

      01:50am | 19/11/09

      Maybe we shouldn’t be pointing out the irony/satire to the people who have missed it flying over their heads. They should come to realise it themselves, sitting up in bed at 3am, exclaiming ‘Oh, a joke… I get jokes!! ”

    • Facebook User says:

      03:53pm | 19/11/09

      Hilarious thread is hilarious.

      I also like your postmodern textbox. My cursor is gone and I cannot highlight text. How delightfully existential!

    • Angela says:

      10:49am | 20/11/09

      I know the twitter you refer to and I hate it absolutely I do not want some stranger telling me what they ate for dinner that’s stupid and lame.

      My twitter is all about business, the internet and anything that captures my eye to help you along, that other twitter is for the birds lol.

    • hotel hotel conti am hauptbahnhof in muenster says:

      03:06am | 07/04/10

      Price Depend,discover see volume warn least criticism enterprise respond outside development worry code game size near shape permanent although happen increased finally legal interest window works publish sense move deny scene line against bit relevant arm gas since ahead aware expense degree appeal style child weather technique iron officer wear argument late how end match investigate including status propose band secure result long ministry run house mass device comment grow there matter many since appointment almost university king when medical male memory steal will

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

RT @lillithtitania: Pictures show Adolf Hitler practising poses for his speeches - and relaxing in lederhosen http://t.co/7Idp5dWY via @news_com_au

Malcolm Farr

More gay marriage legislation than you can point a straight stick at. http://t.co/k2SC4xNp

Paul Colgan

@c41 yes it is.

Daniel Piotrowski

Tomorrow on The Punch: why we're being shafted at the ATM.

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

ICB:  If I could offer you only one tip for the future…

ICB:  If I could offer you only one tip for the future…

Welcome to this week’s I Call Bullshit, an irregular regular column on calumny and codswallop.…

Six prominent Aussies with a case of the dreaded “yips”

Six prominent Aussies with a case of the dreaded “yips”

The yips. It’s an old golf term which refers to golfers who lose the ability to putt. They stand…

The humourless hysteria of the holier-than-thou

The humourless hysteria of the holier-than-thou

In I Spit On Your Grave, a young woman is gang raped in a remote woodland. She is beaten and tortured…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Punch on: Open thread 09/02/2012

marley says:

I'm one of the older ones, so I've certainly seen a few changes in my time. When I started school I learned to write with a nib pen, dipped in an inkwell (no, I'm not kidding). My mother became a dab hand at getting inkstains out of my clothes. Flicking ink at one another in the classroom was an essential… [read more]

From: I’d rather have a piece of toast than listen to crap lyrics

Erick says:

Led Zeppelin are responsible for my all-time favourite mixed metaphor: "There you sit, sit and stare, like a book on a shelf rusting." (Misty Mountain Hop) I laugh every time I hear it. Hmmm, I believe I've decided what to play on the way to work today. [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

No wuckin forries. These nuckin futs are tuckin fops

Well, puck me with a fitchfork. The F-word is apparently an acceptable part of Australian speech. That’s… Read more

151 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter