Headhunters have been digging around digital dirt, ever since Google became a verb. Since there’ll be a few politicians looking for new jobs after the election, I thought it’d be amusing to analyse their tweets from an employment perspective and ask “would I, as a headhunter, offer a politician a job based on their twittering?” 

Should have avoided the ranga tweet

I’ll disclose from the outset that my analysis is based on no more than my past six months hanging out in the twitter-verse building up my business, and from my time as a recruiter. For something more sensible and scholarly take a read of this research: Social media and the 2007 Australian election.

Let’s get the easy elimination out of the way. If you say something stupid on Twitter you’re toast. People have been fired for lesser crimes than calling rivals “rangas,” like Barry O’Farrell did. 

Assuming you’re smart enough to master Twitter, plus be a bit more discreet, you do need to be mindful of how you actually interact online. Some social media researchers say that as much as you may want to project a vanity version of yourself, it’s pretty hard to do that consistently. If you hang out online for long enough you’ll find you just can’t help yourself. Parts of your real personality ultimately show through and a long line of tweets can become very telling!

Twitter tells me as a recruiter, how engaging you are. So if I see only “today I announce” and links to your websites, but no responses or acknowledgements, I conclude you’re a shouter, not a sharer.  Shouting is fine if you’re a celebrity with a fan club, but for the rest of us, it’s not. If you’re all talk and no listen, it suggests self importance.

I liken this scenario to being cornered by a bore at a party. I’ll listen and nod politely for a while, then make my excuses. I’m human and I have an ego. I want to spend extended time with people who show a little bit of interest in me.

I’ll look at who you follow.

This one’s a little harsh, but it potentially has merit. Anyone’s who’s gotten stuck into Twitter knows that sometimes at the start, you don’t always pay attention to all the people you follow. So if I was headhunting and you’re a Twitter newbie, I wouldn’t scrutinise your followers too closely, knowing how easy it is to hit “accept.”

But a long term Tweeter should know how it works. They’ll be following people they find interesting and want to share ideas with. So if you’re an obvious active user and you’re following the KKK, I am going to judge you by the company you keep.

I ask if you’re relevant to your audience. I know this by whether people re-tweet your tweets. The Chaser chased Greens Senator Christine Milne for tweeting about her water feature and chamomile lawn at the time Kevin Rudd was deposed. It was funny but on target. She’s a politician. Her realm is to put forward a position. She looked a little silly.

If you are tweeting for professional purposes and not just for fun, I look at how you’re listed. How your followers label the “professional you,” again tells me again how relevant you are. If I was looking for a Digital Marketer, I’d want someone to label you a social media expert in a list. It means that many of your tweets have hit the right mark.

So what’s the bottom line here? You might easily say that a politician’s tweets will only tell us is that they’re tightly controlled and on message, or that they’re too scared to get out and get dirty amongst us. Perhaps it is just their tweets that are the most telling of all.

PS: Senator Christine Milne’s tweeted response to the Chaser shows how you can use Twitter effectively. During the show they also featured Julie Bishop in a staring competition with a gnome. The Senator tweeted: “Thanks Chaser for promoting my gardening blog. I can offer a safe haven for maltreated gnomes.”

Karalyn runs employment consultancy InterviewIQ. You can also find her on Twitter.

Most commented

5 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Ziggy says:

      07:32am | 03/08/10

      Anyone who uses a headhunter is saying a lot about themselves i.e.
      - no confidence in own ability and judgement
      - afraid to take responsibility
      - risk averse and not entrepreneurial
      - have already risen beyond level of own competence
      Like the batteries of ‘tests’ they end up with someone in the safe middle grey area of mediocrity.
      None of the great industrial pioneers or leaders would have resulted from ‘headhunting’.
      And they are even more dangerous to use for so called ‘screening’ because that is when they rule out the mavericks, slightly bonkers etc - like Richard Branson for example. There are many, many more.
      It’s an expensive way to end up failing to achieve the low standards you set yourself.

    • acotrel says:

      08:44am | 03/08/10

      We should view our political leaders as a selection panel would.  After all we ARE going to employ one of them in the top job!  Of Tony Abbott, Bob Brown, and Julia Gillard, I know who I wouldn’t want working for me!

    • Ryan says:

      03:25pm | 03/08/10

      Are you for real? Calling someone a ‘Ranga’ is a fire-able offence now?
      How pathetic have Australians become, lets all become big cry babies shall we and have a sook at just about anything.
      What a crock and a blatant fit-up for an obvious political jibe. You surely HAVE to be able to do better than something as pathetic as that!

    • James Evangelidis says:

      04:47pm | 03/08/10

      Good article Karalyn. Interesting insights. Barry’s faux pas reminds me of the career killer committed by Catherine Deveney on Twitter back in May this year. Its amazing how 4 lines of text can change what the world thinks of you!
      Regards, James http://www.howtogetajobwith.com

    • Daniel says:

      08:15pm | 03/08/10

      O Farrell is just as bad as Abbott. Off the cuff and totally reckless. Wake up and vote Greens.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Daniel Piotrowski

.@newscomauHQ is now Australia's number #1 news website. WINNING. http://t.co/1iHnDre2Ki

Malcolm Farr

RT @jackaargh: @farrm51 @murpharoo Is the plural of humdrum hadra?

tory_maguire

Why didn't he cop a contempt charge? http://t.co/kO9wqscaQH

ToryShepherd

@anderson_lainie He he. And congrats to Max!

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter