In today’s society, most Australians are pretty comfortable with sharing personal information, with at least one major caveat – that we clearly know what our information is being used for.

Google staff at work in California.

Understanding how the information that organisations collect from us is used is the key guiding principle of our Privacy laws. Our privacy regime is consent-based – if you understand why private and personal information is being collected and consent to the purpose for which it is being collected then that information can be used for that purpose.

Social media and the more successful Internet business models fundamentally challenge this notion – because commercial success is often predicated on knowing as much as you can about your individual users and being less than upfront about how that information will be used.

However, this lack of transparency may start to erode confidence in the online environment and ultimately harm the development of the Digital Economy. The last national survey into privacy attitudes undertaken by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in 2007 found that it may have already been having an impact.

Fifty percent of respondents were more concerned about providing information over the Internet than they had been when the previous survey was undertaken in 2004.

Many online services (like social media) can appear to be an altruistic public service – a way to find and share information, communicate and collaborate with friends. This view is supported by the sector. The less visible the business model - which in most instances is essentially monetising your personal information – the less concerned you are providing this information in the first place.

But will this lack of transparency start to undermine the future success of the Digital Economy?

Many online players fear that the more you know about their business models, the less likely you are to part with your valuable information.

Facebook has been the subject of some pretty heavy scrutiny of recent and has taken some steps to improve the controls around your private information.

At the end of the day, you ultimately control what information you put on your profile on Facebook, it’s very visible to you and those concerned about how it might be used can publish less about themselves.

Google however, is a different beast. Google has slowly built a business by profiling the online habits of the world’s population unbeknownst to most. Ads are served to you not just on that specific search term, but your history of searches. Google knows what you’re interested in.

This ability to segment the Internet user community according to their personal interests is a valuable commodity to marketers and advertisers - which is ultimately how Google makes money.
Google’s increasing breadth of offerings only increases the breadth of personal information that it has access to and can combine to profile its users:

• Google’s mobile phone platform, Android, has GPS location-based tracking software built into it which can be used by third party application developers for advertising;

• Nearly 200 million Gmail email accounts that Google automatically scans the text of emails for keywords to serve you targeted advertisements;

• Google Apps require you to sign up for an account, providing information such as your name and email address and potentially credit card data, which Google may combine with information from other Google services or third parties; and

• Google’s Streetview plus the Google Goggles application on Android will allow people to hold a phone camera up to a house and then get information about the location and potentially who lives there.

This is ultimately a clever strategy because for the consumer the majority of these services cost very little or are free. How Google makes money is often fairly invisible to the average consumer.

But there are increasingly questions about how Google uses that data. Google has already demonstrated a willingness to use contact data in Gmail for other purposes without user consent – including pre-populating the Google Buzz and Google Voice applications.

The revelation that cars taking photos for StreetView were also collecting information such as passwords and entire emails from unsecured Wi-Fi connections, demonstrates the increasing hunger that Google has for marketable data.

Reflecting a dismissive tone on these issues, Google CEO Eric Schmidt recently responded to privacy concerns around StreetView by stating: “Street View, we drive exactly once . . . So, you can just move, right?”

Most don’t realise what value they provide in return for using social media or online search, but nothing comes for free.

It’s about time the industry was more upfront and transparent on how it makes money and that your personal information is their valuable commodity. Or don’t they want anyone to know?

Eric Schmidt did also famously say: “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.”

- David Masters is an adviser to the Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace (ICOMP) and a former Ministerial adviser on Information Economy issues.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day
Get The Punch on Facebook

Most commented

21 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • acotrel says:

      06:12am | 10/11/10

      ‘Eric Schmidt did also famously say: “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.” ‘

      Must be the ultimate in control and manipulation?  Perhaps we should put the Pope in charge of Google?

    • Rossco says:

      09:26am | 10/11/10

      if we did that the child porn searches would go up by 20,000 %

    • Scot says:

      11:19am | 10/11/10

      Well Google is not doing anything with my data as I use OPENDNS to deny them and the many other sites from gathering information. I also use the high level encryption feature on my WiFi so their hunting and gathering will be NIL. If you think Google is bad try Microsoft, they are ta it all day and night watching what you are doing. This is why China and other governments are so paranoid about them and the US Government.

    • Steve says:

      07:06am | 10/11/10

      You are very correct in your article. I run a company that gets most of its leads via online paid and unpaid referral services, i am also a sponsored link in Google.
      Social media is here to stay and the experts are saying to me that people will find companies through social media outlets like Facebook and uTube and referrals from friends. 70% of leads may eventually come via this route, we are at the beginning of social media, Google may well be a sunset business in its current model.

      The one thing we don’t know is where it is going to lead us, it is driven by the consumer, or the clicker. Companies like mine will react to the way consumers search for us and the Google’s and Facebook’s of the world will continue to charge us a fortune for linking us to our clients

    • iansand says:

      07:57am | 10/11/10

      Google’s motto is “Don’t be evil”, so everything is OK.

      In other online fora there seems to be an odd dichotomy - google is OK but Yahoo/Microsoft/.... is wicked.  I have never understood that.  Perhaps, as the article implies, their real genius is in dissembling.

    • Matthew says:

      01:37pm | 10/11/10

      Personally I put Microsoft up there with some of the most trustworthy of the big Tech companies.  I’ve been using their OS for the last 15-20 years and they haven’t leaked anything of consequence (ie, I’ve never had my identity stolen or extra stuff appearing on credit cards etc).  Apple is the one I don’t trust.  Install iTunes and suddenly all your media files are hijacked, you have quicktime and bonjour installed and Safari is ready to install for any unsuspecting user that thinks an update is just an update.  I’m on the fence with Google, as long as they’re only using my information to target advertising at me (which in the online world gets ignored/blocked) then I don’t care either.  Installing software without my knowledge/consent is likely to get you on my hated list.  Yes Sony and Apple, I’m looking at you.

    • Ajent says:

      06:55am | 11/11/10

      @Matthew
      Like pretty much every program you download onto your computer, iTunes has options. You can choose not to install various features, and you can override its defaults. it comes up with a box that tells you what updates/installs are available and you just select the ones you want. If you bother to stop and read what is on the screen in front of you, you might find the process less distressing.

      As for Microsoft, the whole company is a giant pain in the backside. For a company that makes billion in profits, you’d think they could hire some decent programmers and developers and actually make it work. I’ve got a 7 year old iBook G4 that is still going strong, updates actually improve the system! But I have beent through at east 3 windows systems in that time - the software clogs up, the updates are incredibly system heavy so you have to choose between a slow system or a broken system.

    • Danny B says:

      08:43am | 10/11/10

      There are two things I’d like to know:
      1) How is it that Google is able to act as a law unto itself when it comes to privacy?
      2) Where did that colour photo come from?  The vaguely soccer-ball shaped things in the background only appeared in one black-and-white episode of ‘Doctor Who’, back in the 1960s.

    • Timmuh says:

      05:27pm | 10/11/10

      Danny, the BBC took a lot of still shots of early Doctor Who, and everything else they made at the time, known as “telesnaps”. It could be one of them, it may be from the lost and apparently brilliant “Power of the Daleks”. The flame looks like a later add-on; quite recent and not very good Photoshopping.

    • Brimstone says:

      08:45am | 10/11/10

      i trust Google more then the Aussie government. at least Google isn’t run by Luddites, hippies, and censors

    • kyzz says:

      09:11am | 10/11/10

      Yeah google shouldn’t be taking unsecured wifi info, just like your 15 yr old neighbour shouldn’t be using your unsecured wifi to download porn. Google stealing your wifi info is not the same as someone breaking into your house and taking your personal information. Having an unsecured wifi network is the equivalent of hiring a billboard along the busiest freeway in Australia and plastering all your passwords and banking details, etc over it. Especially in suburbia wifi does not stop at your fence line, All of the wifi routers I have ever used specifically ask you to password protect them during setup! If you don’t put a password on your wifi when the screen flashes and in bold red states the dangers of an unsecured network you can only blame yourself if your download allowance mysteriously disappears every month.

    • BobbyDan says:

      09:45am | 10/11/10

      There are no secrets in your life as far as governments are concerned, your birth is registered and filed, your sick and you go to a doctor on a Medicare Card, it has a number, mum/dad register you for day care/school and you are shown on thier taxation file, you start work get TFN, get your wages paid into a bank account, prove who you are etc until you die, and your registered again.
      Your computer has a number on the internet that can be accessed, your IPod/Mobile phone have a GPS so “they” can trace you.
      So you might just as well spew out all your life on a social chat channel with photos and let your peers judge you too.

    • Al says:

      11:42am | 10/11/10

      I know I have a number of secrets that the government and Google DON’T know.
      How do I know this:
      1) Don’t use Google to search for things you don’t want them to know.
      2) Don’t tell the government any more than you are REQUIRED to by law, and there is a lot that they ask that you don’t have to give them.

    • Thehippo says:

      11:40am | 10/11/10

      @Kyzz
      Anyone with a laptop, a piece of software and 10mins can hack just about any WiFi from the street in front of your house. There is exceptions but you need to have some idea of how your home network works.

      As for Google. I think a critical point has been missed. Google is yet to misuse any information it gathers. In almost all cases the information is used to better your experience of there products. They do not hide the fact they gather this information actually they clearly outline that its being gathered and what they use it for.

      Not their fault you didn’t feel like reading the gajillion page EUA when you clicked the accept button.

    • Wayne Kerr says:

      02:40pm | 10/11/10

      I can guarantee you won’t be able to hack into my wireless network

    • Ryan says:

      12:18pm | 10/11/10

      You missed Google Chrome that sends every keystroke back to Google.

    • JD says:

      01:50pm | 10/11/10

      It’s true that Google mines data - but so does every single player in the online space. News sites have tracking devices so they can sell advertising. Apple stores huge amounts of data generated by people using their products and, unlike Google, Apple simply refuses to release any information about it’s data storage (think about how much Apple knows about every one of it’s iPhone users from name, address, to where they are at every moment in time). What is more concerning is that the Australian Government is planning to build a Data Retention Scheme where all our data - every Australian - is stored in case one of us turns out to be a criminal in the future. As policing agencies lose their power to “tap” phones (because we are not using telephones as much to communicate) they are turning to increasingly draconian measures. At least with Google you can opt out - don’t have a gmail account. You can’t opt out of using the internet.
      http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/ec_ctte/online_privacy/index.htm

    • Cate P says:

      03:24pm | 10/11/10

      That astonishing sense of entitlement to do what they like because they can that Eric Schmidt shows with pronouncements like “we drive by once - so you can move, right?” is something that also came out really clearly in the movie The Social Network - Zuckerberg was a whizz programmer who thought he was brainier than everyone else, therefore he had the right to do what he liked, including make public property of local databases and pinch other peoples’ ideas because naturally it was really his because he could programme stuff.

    • Fiddlesticks says:

      12:00pm | 11/11/10

      The strikes against the Google behemoth keep mounting up. The China
      affair, the Books v copyright fiasco, the odiously snoopy StreetView and
      its WiFi leakery, their lacklustre handling of Spam, their cavalier
      treatment of on-line image search, etc etc etc.


      As an example, there’s a new Oz site on a favourite Oz topic, coming soon:
      http://www.drinkle.com/

      It was going to be “Groggle” but….

      The evil-drones at Google chucked a spazz and declined all attempts to bring common sense to bear.

      Anyway, soon to come on line as Drinkle, to help you find the essentials for a cracking good Oz weekend.

      Google: do all the crap we see fit to feed you.

      Bad as GatesVille, really.

    • imarion says:

      05:34am | 14/12/11

      I think a critical point has been missed. Google is yet to misuse any information it gathers. In almost all cases the information is used to better your experience of there products. They do not hide the fact they gather this information actually they clearly outline that its being gathered and what they use it for.
      http://www.btscene.eu/

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

ToryShepherd

@Bogans_Heroes @1fatbogan Ha! So Adelaide, so creepy. Gilles St, then Unley, then Pembroke.

Paul Colgan

@joekiely just beat the crus. No sweat eh?

Paul Colgan

@bolgo101 Stick ROG in front of the posts and you still have white knuckles

Paul Colgan

@joekiely how far out was he?

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter