What if the dire prognostications of the RBA, the IMF, the ABC, DOFA and other be-acronymed institutions were simply ignored?  What if people tuned out from depressing financial static and peddlers of economic voyeurism?

Not a jobs line: Shoppers in Brisbane earlier this month.

As the recent GDP figures showed, Australians are stubbornly refusing to lie down and pull the covers over their heads as the various hyperbolic chief economists that plague our media keep predicting they will.  Maybe it’s the Rudd Government’s stimulus that is keeping things going.  Whatever the reason, retailers are still retailing, baristas are still baristing, bookies are still fielding, hookers are still hooking and travel agents are writing tickets to Bali faster than they can manage.

Maybe it’s the Prime Minister’s war-cry of “keep spending” that’s keeping nannies, baby-sitters, house-cleaners, and lawn-mowers busy.  Or maybe it’s the indomitable and irreverent free spirit of Australians and the small business entrepreneurs who serve them.  Whatever the reason, the real economy is shrugging its shoulders at the broadsheets and ordering another beer.

I have the sneaking suspicion that Canberra hasn’t the faintest clue about what is really happening out there in Australia’s suburbs and regional towns. This is because our leaders, those who provide them with advice, and those who commentate on them are yet to come to grips with the fact that three quarters of the Australian economy works in the services sector.

We’ve been mining and farming this country since the 18th Century and manufacturing since the gold-rush. And we’ve been governing to suit those industries since Elizabeth Macarthur first stabbed a clean ledger book with her quill and some poor broken-hearted pickpocket stubbed his toe on a lump of coal at Newcastle.

Over those years our institutional infrastructure - the way we govern ourselves - developed to serve these industries.  And we got an early taste of how government would treat neo-liberal service-sector entrepreneurs when the rum-trade was efficiently stamped out. 

Thus we’ve neatly arranged our Parliaments with the owners of capital in mining, farming and manufacturing on one side and the labour serving those sectors on the other.  And around them we’ve built massive, self-serving institutional edifices in bureaucracy, academia, unions, lobby groups and media.  On a constant, self-supporting feedback loop, they measure our national economic health by our success in digging up, chopping down and making things.

And that’s the way bureaucrats, in particular, like it.  You see, they’re scared of what they can’t measure, of what they can’t “drop on their toe”.  The services economy is an anathema to them.  Sure there’s some diligent and heretical converts to the new reality whispering away in scared little groups in Industry House.  But at the Holy See of Treasury and Finance, the service-sector devotees are treated like primitive lost souls when the Inquisition of the budget razor gang rocks around.

Thus, under the Howard Government any purveyor of an industrial or agricultural process that could cobble-together a submission including the words “export” and “research and development” would be showered with taxpayer dollars from a bottomless well of generous innovation funds.  Meanwhile good ideas in the services sector had to scrabble around in the sock-drawer of the EMDGS scheme for loose change.  Unfortunately, nothing much has changed. 

Consider my perennial favorite, the Australian Tax Office.  Two years ago the ATO bought down a GST ruling on deposits.  Fair enough.  However, the ATO later admitted they forgot - forgot¬ - to consult the services sector. There were consequential cash-flow and red-tape nightmares for SMEs who operate on high turnover but small margins. 

Then there’s the Rudd Government’s “Award Modernisation”.  This might work fine on the factory floor; however it is causing much angst in industries such as tourism and hospitality where seasonality and irregular work hours rule. 

Some MPs are seeing the light and championing the service economy’s cause to a foot-dragging public service. But for every Craig Emerson or Steve Ciobo, there’s Barnaby Joyce, who recently said:

We are not going to be able to sustain ourselves in the long term through service industries, that is the economic form of trying to make a living by taking in someone else’s washing

Obviously Barnaby’s forgotten that education and tourism exports are worth more than all his precious agricultural exports combined and without tourism many country towns would fall over.

However, nowhere was our institutional blindness to services more obvious than the shock we saw recently when it emerged, contrary to many learned opinions, that retail sales went up, jobs were continuing to be created and people were still travelling.

Maybe it’s the cash economy – a factor that nobody is talking about and which may be seriously underestimated.  The GST was meant to clean-up the cash economy but anyone living in a service and housing-construction based region might argue the opposite. And, if bureaucrats have enough trouble measuring the circulation of cash in the official services economy then they’ve got no hope in the unofficial one.

And one thing’s for certain, if the PM and the Treasurer continue to draw an artificial line between “rich” and “poor” at $150,000, then the cash economy will continue to grow, and economists and their ilk will continue to receive a few more shocks.  And those of us who believe that people are free, liberal, independent and intelligent beings rather than predictable economic algorithms, would argue that that’s not a bad thing.   

Matt Hingerty’s opinions are his own and not of his employer and he would also like to point out that he pays all his taxes – so there.

2 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Shelley says:

      01:16pm | 11/06/09

      lol.

      ‘... he pays all his taxes – so there’

      Good on you.  Me too.

      We must be mugs.

    • Jane Drake-Brockman says:

      10:28am | 22/06/09

      Matt is 100 percent right.  Australian official published data is effectively useless as an analytical base in trying to understand what is going on in the services economy,  and seeing its 3/4 of the total Australian economy, this is a national disgrace.  The ABS released the latest services export data on 17 June.  After tourism and education, the next most important and rapidy growing cluster of services exports are those described as “Other”.  These include architecture, engineering, surveying, legal, accounting, management consulting, advertising, R&D and all sorts of other high value added professional and technical services.  We have no idea from the official data where there export markets are - because they are all added up together with no sub sectoral breakdown so they seem to be sold mainly to the United States, United Kingdom, New Zealand and Singapore.  For most of the these individual professional services industries, this information is obviously nonsensical and a very poor guide to export promotion efforts.  Any architect will tell you that anyone of Australia’s large practices are exporting more than the official data tells us, and its mainly to China, India, ASEAN, etc etc.  Treasury’s information base is very poor.  But this suits the modellers, who wouldn’t yet know what to do with services data if they had it.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter