It is 2009 and even Hillary Clinton has to remind people she thinks for herself.

Admittedly it was an African student who yesterday showed such stunning disrespect for the US Secretary of State, by asking her what her husband’s views were on Chinese contracts in the Congo.

I doubt very much anyone in the United States, or here, would dare be so brazen - to her face. But the rest of us put up with it all the time.

Mrs Clinton was in Kinshasa on an official visit when she was forced to put this idiot on his arse during a Q and A, which she did with great aplomb.

He said: “What does Mr Clinton think, through the mouth of Mrs Clinton?”

She said: “You want me to tell you what my husband thinks? My husband is not the secretary of state - I am. If you want my opinion, I will tell you my opinion. I am not going to be channeling my husband.”

Peeved is an understatement for facial expression during the exchange.

The former first lady has no doubt had a trying couple of days, after her husband, former President Bill Clinton flew home from Pyongyang accompanied by two American journalists he’d just rescued from the clutches of Kim Jong-il.

World-wide headlines yesterday such as: “Hillary Clinton: I’m secretary of state, not Bill”, “Hillary Clinton loses cool at question on Bill” and “Hillary snaps on student” must have just topped off her week.

Of course she lost her cool. She’s the Secretary of State, not an idiot, and I’m very glad she resisted the diplomat’s urge to ignore the comment for the sake of saving embarrassment. She’s done us all a bit of a favour.

The other day a good friend of mind told me she’d that during a recent pay negotiation she’d been asked by her manager how much her husband earned - because, you know, that’s relevant to what she should get paid for the job she does at the office.

I’ve had people question what I write because of who I was seeing at the time.

And my colleague Sue Dunlevy described the other day how Tony Abbott had once asked her why she was questioning him instead of being at home looking after her husband.

Sue, one of the most experienced journalists in the Canberra Press Gallery, was also the subject of a bizarre piece of sexism involving Malcolm Turnbull’s former media advisor Tony Barry.

According to The Australian, Barry was upset over something Sue wrote in The Daily Telegraph so confronted - you guessed it - her husband, who works for a television network.

Barry quit the Opposition leader’s office last week, just after Australian Story put to air his admission he’d have to look up the word “concocted” in the dictionary. I bet his wife, if he has one, knows what the word means.

Anyway, Hillary is a very smart woman who’s husband happens to cast a bigger shadow than most.

I hope if anyone every asks her a question like that again she tears them to shreds.

18 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • Eric says:

      06:38am | 12/08/09

      It’s a fair point that people shouldn’t generally be judged by their spouses.

      Yet in Hillary’s case, her husband is responsible for her own political career. Without being Mrs Clinton, she would never have been Senator or Secretary of State.

      Rise by the spouse, fall by the spouse.

    • Pete Davies says:

      07:03am | 12/08/09

      Hillary has a brain but she is a puppet sadly, to the interests that funded her into the position. But no balls. She has not stepped up and changed the Bush regimes aggressive, expensive and sacrifice of young soldiers for the rich mans war. Cold hearted without conscience. She is a redneck in a suit with delusions of world domination. Back home (Kansas) we call her Hillary Clintwood. I can’t repeat some of the funnier and explicit names on here from anti-war folks! She needs to have her boat rocked once in a while to keep it real.

    • Kate Guest says:

      07:44am | 12/08/09

      I know it made great footage but apparently the nervous student meant to ask for President Obama’s views, not former president Clinton’s. Hillary accepted his explanation, they shook hands and it was all fine by the time she left!

    • Cascade Lily says:

      08:28am | 12/08/09

      Apparently the question was mistranslated. The student actually asked what President Obama thought, but the translator accidentally substituted ‘Clinton’. I think Hillary will regret such an outburst. PR 101 would have told her to say, in a controlled manner, ‘You should direct that question to President Clinton’, not fly off the handle at a student! But geez it makes great headlines and column fodder, no?

    • Tory Maguire

      Tory Maguire says:

      09:02am | 12/08/09

      I know the question is now being spun as a mistranslation. Possibly it was. Equally possible is the idea the translation line is a face saving exercise. Clinton is, after all, a diplomat.
      Regardless, the coverage of Clinton’s reaction has been widespread, and was generally along the lines of “Hillary snaps”, which goes to my point.

    • Eric says:

      09:17am | 12/08/09

      That snappish response wasn’t very diplomatic. Hillary, like her boss Obama, is not particularly competent.

    • Emma Ashton says:

      10:54am | 12/08/09

      I don’t blame Hilary snapping, but sexist coverage of female politicians also occurs in Australia.

      Just recently I read an article on Julia Gillard, and her change of hairstyles over the years complete with pictures. I mean really do we get articles on Kevin Rudd, and Malcolm Turnbull on how their hair/ties or eyeglass wear have changed? No.

    • Eric says:

      11:39am | 12/08/09

      I’ve seen plenty of mockery of John Howard’s glasses, eyebrows and height—all facets of his appearance. So that type of thing applies to men in politics.

      As for changing hairstyles—women care about those things a lot more than men. Don’t blame men for fashion reporting, it’s a girl thang.

    • David C says:

      11:44am | 12/08/09

      Isnt she the US’s most senior diplomat? She gets asked a curly question which she does not seek to clarify, instead she chucks a hissy fit.  She is in a foreign country being asked a question through an interpreter, isnt this just the usual supposed US arrogance to expect it to be literal? Sorry I think she was wrong, I think this article is the spin.

    • SD says:

      12:27pm | 12/08/09

      David C: I agree.

      She could have very easily said that she doesn’t wish to speak for Bill - and then continue on to offer her OWN opinion.

      Pretty poor effort for a supposed diplomat.

    • Waz says:

      01:31pm | 12/08/09

      I don’t see why she got so antsy at the question at all. OK, apprently the questioner meant to ask what President Obama thought, not Clinton.
      But so what? People are often asked what their spouse thinks of this or that.
      And more, her husband is the previous president, he had a lot to do with China and Africa. They would talk things over, one assumes - but I wonder in Hillary’s case now.
      Why did she get so cranky? If it was a man being asked, he would be criticized for carrying on like that, and rightly so. Even “my spouses opinions are private” would do, rather than a tantrum.
      She better get used to it… when she hits misogynists like those that run the middle east, for example. (yeah I know, they don’t think their misogynists. But their laws and customs definitely are)

    • Jim says:

      02:02pm | 12/08/09

      Hi Tory,
      I’m impressed that you have time to write a column, what with all that housework to do.

    • Shakesquiller says:

      02:37pm | 12/08/09

      I so agree with David C.
      Clinton must be very very insecure about herself if she has to chuck a wobbly at a question like that!!!!!
      A very very poor response from a Diplomat.

    • Tory Maguire

      Tory Maguire says:

      03:47pm | 12/08/09

      Don’t tell anyone Jim but I put the clean tea towels straight in the cupboard this morning without ironing them. So bad.

    • johnv_au says:

      04:01pm | 12/08/09

      Can you imagine what she would have said if the guy had asked about monica

    • Razor says:

      06:14pm | 12/08/09

      At least he didn’t ask her for dry-cleaning advice or whether she smokes cigars.

      Funny how Billary stayed with her man when he was unfaithful, yet in the article above about Sport Stars being louts the females who stay by their man are criticised.

    • G says:

      09:56am | 13/08/09

      This is a complete non issue and the question is not invalid.

      Bill Clinton was a very successful former president and is her husband, so of course she would discuss these types of issues with him. 

      If it was a male secretary of state and his wife was the former president would he would react the same way, I can’t say, a former president would have great insight in to various issues?

      Its not a matter of gender, she made it about gender, and if she wants to be the victim then go for it.  But, If the secretary of state of one of the most powerful countries in the world cannot handle a simple question from a student then they should not be the secretary of state.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Dementor doing a good job for sweden #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

Ukraine song pinches chord progression from The Verve's Bittersweet Symphony. Fo real #sbseurovision

Anthony Sharwood

RT @GerardDaffy: @antsharwood all the talk over there is the grannies will win.they entered to get a church built,feelgood story

Anthony Sharwood

These peole insult my grandmothjer, who was born in minsk, belarus #sbseurovision

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

Abbott’s crass logic: trash the Parliament in order save it

An email was sent to almost every politician in Australia this week saying that someone should cut off…

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

Our special forces don’t always need special treatment

We admire them, but we’re not entirely sure why. We allow them to operate in the shadows; we rarely…

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

A good holiday is about unrest, not rest

Like a fat full-stop, it lay in my hand. A small orange – not exactly fresh, but purchased anyway…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

Michael S says:

"A teacher at Geelong Grammar had criticised her for using words that were too long, which had left her confused and had made her doubt her ability to write essays. She became ''quite distressed'' when her English marks began to fall." I can sympathise. My scholastic mentors conveyed to me a causal relationship… [read more]

From: Welfare for breeders is a bonus for everyone

Change Up! says:

I have no problem paying my taxes. As a single, childless person on a very decent income, I can afford it and not have my life severely altered. Plus I understand that my taxes paying for things like schools, childcare and infrastructure is ultimately a good thing. A better community is better for me… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

They must pay for one’s bitter disappointments

A private school girl’s family is sueing her elite, extremely expensive private school for not… Read more

243 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free daily Punch newsletter