I have glimpsed the future of motoring and it turns out that in twenty years from now we’ll all be zipping around in ludicrously over-accessorised Segways. At least that’s if General Motors has any say in the matter.

I'm just popping out for a broccoli colonic…

GM’s new ‘Electric Networked Vehicle’, or EN-V,  which was recently shown to the motoring public in Shanghai, looks like a Segway on steroids, which is not all that surprising given that it was developed in partnership with Segway.

Weighing in at less than 500 kilograms, measuring just 1.5 metres long and powered entirely by electricity, the EN-V is being touted as a solution to pollution, urban congestion and road accidents.

According to GM’s Director of the EN-V program, Chris Borroni-Bird, ‘this vehicle represents a complete vision of the future — not only a vehicle, but a complete mobility system’.

It all sounds exciting, until you realise that for this ‘complete mobility system‘ to take off, quite a few things will need to change. For starters, given that the EN-V only seats two people, families would have to be composed of two — and only two — people.

In addition, in GM’s vision of the future we’ll all be eating out a lot more, since the EN-V has no boot in which to stow a big grocery shop. Alternatively, GM’s engineers may be assuming that in the future we’ll all be growing food in our backyards.

Another possibility is that they’re banking on the development of foods in capsule form, or perhaps they’re hoping that in the next 20 years humans will be have the capacity to photosynthesise, thus eliminating the need to eat altogether.

Not only will we not have to eat or buy food, we’ll all live in cities where the most travel anyone will ever have to do are short trips on well maintained roads.

And then there’s the whole pollution thing. For countries like Australia which are heavily dependent on fossil fuels for electricity generation, we’ll also have to develop a completely new energy source if the EN-V is to be truly emissions-free.

But, of course, I’m getting ahead of myself. The EN-V is a ‘concept car’, which means that it will never go into full production. As the New York Times reported, the point of the EN-V is to showcase ‘what might be possible by 2030’.

This is a nice idea, but what are we supposed to do about congestion, pollution and accidents now? Of course, the EN-V isn’t really about the future at all. Concept cars like the EN-V are really about addressing the public relations problems that car companies have in the here and now.

These high-tech baubles are supposed to get us to believe that car companies such as GM are really run by misunderstood environmentalists. This explains the tortuous acronym EN-V, which — Gosh! Did anyone else notice?  — are the first three letters in the word ‘environment’.

This is particularly important for a company like GM, which has a poor record when it comes to the environment. After all, this is the same GM which fought against Californian government laws in the late 1990s that mandated automakers begin to make emission-free cars.

This is the same GM that went to extraordinary lengths to ensure that the one electric car that it did put into commercial production — the EV-1 which was produced by GM between 1996–1999 — was removed from roads when the project was cancelled.

As the 2006 documentary Who Killed the Electric Car showed, despite being popular in California, GM only ever leased the EV-1 and reclaimed the vehicles when the leases were up. Many EV-1s were subsequently destroyed, even though some customers claimed that they had offered to extend their leases and to sign a waiver absolving GM from future maintenance costs.

The handful of EV-1’s still in existence have reportedly been deactivated, and the few universities and car clubs that own them have to sign an agreement with GM promising not to run it as an electric car.

If GM and other car companies want a real concept to address urban transport problems, then forget about pimping Segways. Instead, how about devising a low emission, low cost public transport system? Better still, make it child- and old person-friendly.

And while you’re at it, try working out how these might be integrated into a city’s existing infrastructure and road network along with other commercially viable low/no-emission vehicles.

It might not be as sexy, but it has more chance of solving urban transport problems than a publicity stunt.

Don’t miss: Get The Punch in your inbox every day

Get The Punch on Facebook

Most commented

31 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • WKH says:

      06:03am | 22/04/10

      EN- V.. Environment or Envy…

    • acker says:

      06:55am | 22/04/10

      Can they handle a speed bump ? Do they go fast enough for people living in far flung suburbs like Campletown or Frankston to commute ? Are they compatible to being on freeways with trucks ? And I notice the person in it is not wearing a seatbelt do they need one ?

    • WKH says:

      09:00am | 22/04/10

      They look more like futuristic wheelie bins…..

    • Scott Glennon says:

      10:53am | 22/04/10

      If GM’s concept’s get any worse there’s no doubt what their future will bring. Just like Lindsay Lohan, Smart has supplied us with years of humour! I guess it’s time they had some competition?

    • JenJam says:

      10:59am | 22/04/10

      Forget the bubbles, skates, and public transport - just hurry up with the flying cars and teleporters already *sheesh* wink

    • David C says:

      11:15am | 22/04/10

      I would prefer one of these to a pushbike

    • Harquebus says:

      11:49am | 22/04/10

      Where does the electricity to run these vehicles come from and why do we need them? Is the world running out of oil?
      Green vehicles and energy are a con.

    • Steely Dan says:

      01:12pm | 22/04/10

      @Harquebus, @Scott Glennon

      The electricity comes from your grid - which comes from a lot of different sources. But even if your electric car runs off 100% coal-fire-generated electricity, the emissions are significantly less than oil, whether we’re running out of the stuff or not. Run it off renewable energy and you have a GHG emissions-free car.

      Oh, and Top Gear’s Prius review was a joke. It only compared the Prius’ mileage in a highway situation (where it’s still excellent) and not in a sub-80km/hr city situation (where hybrids are phenomenal). As usual, Top Gear fails when they try and assess the costs and benefits of cars that aren’t 30cm high with a top speed of 10,000km/hr…

    • Harquebus says:

      01:29pm | 22/04/10

      Renewable energy generators can not generate enough energy to replicate, let alone supply. If they could, the planet would be covered in them. They can’t so they are legislated or subsidized. Renewable energy generators are manufactured using the energy from fossil fuels.
      Renewable or green energy is a con. It is more efficient to not use renewable energy generators. Hydro being the exception.

    • Steely Dan says:

      02:14pm | 22/04/10

      “Renewable energy generators can not generate enough energy to replicate, let alone supply.”
      Replicate what? The current capacity of non-renewables? Of course not, there’s not enough of them to do that (yet).

      “If they could, the planet would be covered in them.”
      You haven’t noticed a trend in energy production in the last decade?

      “They can’t so they are legislated or subsidized. “
      Subsidised like non-renewables are?

      “Renewable energy generators are manufactured using the energy from fossil fuels.”
      And probably renewable sources as well. Ironic, but what’s your point?

    • Scott Glennon says:

      03:35pm | 22/04/10

      @Steely Dan,

      Granted that Top Gear reviews are bias when it comes to fuel consumption. Although the initial run down on the production of the vehicle is what interested me.
      The only decent looking electric vehicle I’ve seen is the Tesla Model S. http://www.teslamotors.com/
      I can tell you now that idiots that drive around in these astronaut helmet looking go carts would want to be brave because I’ll be the one on the pavement pointing while holding my gut laughing.

    • HB says:

      04:12pm | 22/04/10

      @Everybody

      Let’s not forget the massive carbon footprint left by the Pruis manufacturing process. Parts shipped in and out of many countries - batteries, for example. That footprint is ten times the savings in output of the Prius in it’s entire usable life!!

      It’s a joke….....

    • Steely Dan says:

      04:41pm | 22/04/10

      @Scott Glennon

      Agreed - Tesla Motors look a lot more promising than GM.

    • Harquebus says:

      09:14pm | 22/04/10

      @ Steely Dan.
      Renewable energy generators can not generate enough energy to replicate themselves so, there will never be enough of them.
      The trend in energy production through “renewable generators” is subsidized or legislated and will always be the case.
      The point is, we would be better off without “renewable generators” and just burn the coal for energy production.
      The only solution to the energy problem is, depopulate and consume less, much less. Everything else is a con and I laugh at the mugs who fall for it.

    • Steely Dan says:

      09:40pm | 22/04/10

      I’ve heard that claim before, but never seen a source…

      Got one?

    • Steely Dan says:

      03:50pm | 23/04/10

      @Harquebus

      Sorry, should have mentioned that was actually @ HB.
      I’m not going to start another conversation on why CO2 is bad.

    • Steely Dan says:

      12:37pm | 22/04/10

      “It all sounds exciting, until you realise that for this ‘complete mobility system‘ to take off, quite a few things will need to change, given that the EN-V only seats two people, families would have to be composed of two — and only two — people.”

      Chris, this sounds like an awkward attempt to tie the population debate into the story.  Does the current sale of motorbikes, scooters and the many two-seater sports cars challenge the concept of the nuclear family?

    • Steely Dan says:

      12:42pm | 22/04/10

      “Instead, how about devising a low emission, low cost public transport system? Better still, make it child- and old person-friendly.”
      Sounds reasonable to me.  If you can sell that to an Australian public that generally views public transport as akin to state-mandated carstration, I salute you!

    • Trolldoll says:

      08:20pm | 22/04/10

      Carstration, LOL. Great, if perhaps unintended, pun

    • Meh says:

      01:08pm | 22/04/10

      There won’t be any move to such cars until oil clearly starts to run out. By then it will be too late, mass change to alternative fuels will be far too late for a seamless transition.. The whole world is controlled by oil companies. EV1 worked last century, but was killed and buried with all ties severed in paranoid, spectalular fashion. Honda Clarity FCX (hydrogen fuel cell) reviewed by Top gear in Jan 2009. Where the hell is it? Have heard nothing further. No infrastructure? Bah! Do you reckon when Karl Benz emerged from his back shed with an internal combustion engine there were petrol stations everywhere? Hells no. BMW has hydrogen fuel cell cars too. Reviewed 4 years ago.

      Why the hell have these all been shoved to the back of the warehouse, out of sight, out of mind of the oil companies… and we the sheeple keep pumping gas…

      Electric vehicles (notwithstanding the debate about electricity source for the moment) have very little maintenance. Maintenance is where car makers make their money. Just like servo’s here. Ironically they do not make much profit of their fuel sales (that all goes to the producers) - they make it off in- store sales. Yep, that is where all those awesome, quick and easy on-bowser card readers went - ditched so as to get people back inside and buying overpriced convenience crap. That’s why we have to wait while some idiot in front does their weekly shop when we just want to pay for fuel and get out. Only now are we seeing the re-emergence of on-bowser card readers, complete with restriction on only accepting their own branded and issued credit cards. Of course.

      The current green cars are just a facade to show ‘something’ is being done. No one has any balls to make it happen, and if they do, they are silenced. We are beholden to oil companies efforts to make sure their patch is not invaded. We all know it will end someday, but why not profiteer while the getting is good? especially as panic sets in at the end.

      My pushbike is looking good.

    • Poius says:

      01:27pm | 22/04/10

      and as for the Prius, forget it. Want to save fuel in the current market? then you get a Fiesta Econetic or Mini D. Cheaper and use less fuel, oh but they look the same as the other models in the series… unless you only drive auto’s. But then true green warriors will learn to swap cogs in the name of efficeincy wouldn’t they?

    • Steely Dan says:

      02:31pm | 22/04/10

      The Econetic (and maybe the Mini D, depending on who you ask) are both more fuel efficient than the Prius, although the Prius still wins on emissions.

      The real issue is the price gap - the Prius (and all hybrids, really) is way more $y than the diesels.  It’s a midsize car, but still… I can’t wait for the price of hybrids to come down.

      And what’s this about us greenies not driving stick? Real tree-huggers like myself know that manuals drink less… (Prius being the exception).

    • TwistedEar says:

      02:51pm | 22/04/10

      That’s rubbish - those Econetic’s save a whopping - wait for it - 0.1l every 100km’s. That’s a whopping saving per year, on the average of 20,000km/yr, of 20 litres. Which is about $30 if fuel reached $1.50/l. For a car that is really a two-seater with a token back seat that will only fit anyone under the age of 8, unless the driver is 5’0”. So green warriors need to ensure they.. don’t.. oh, wait, most green warriors are proponents of human eradication - so its not like they will bear kids because their carbon footprint will be too great. Hmmm, myabe their calls for ‘think of your children’s future’ is a load of bunk?

    • Steely Dan says:

      03:29pm | 22/04/10

      “most green warriors are proponents of human eradication”
      Understanding that a world of 60 trillion is less sustainable than one with less than 60 trillion is not genocide, TwistedEar.

    • Alyssa KT says:

      04:07pm | 22/04/10

      Looks a lot like these are made to replace walking. Reminds me of WALL-E…

    • facepalm says:

      07:24pm | 22/04/10

      If anybody wants to amass evidence as to just how inexorably broken the capitalist monetary system is, one just has to take a close, honest look at the motor car. Any reasonable, in-depth analysis of this crudely built, resource-wasting pile of metal and plastic that passes itself off as transportation in the 21st century should come back with the following conclusion - that efficiency, sustainability and abundance are the enemies of profit.

    • stephen says:

      02:40am | 25/04/10

      Er, yeah, I remember when i was a kid, we were supposed to be by now flying around the air like george jetson.
      Buckleys.
      What’II change things, though, is for the designers in Oz to come up with a decent convertible. (Plenty of sun, why not ?)
      The nicest one sold here is already gone : Ford Focus cc. Just didn’t sell.
      Prettiest conv. I have ever seen, however was the Ford Thunderbird, sold in the USA fron 2001 (?) to 2005. It was designed by JMays. (They’re famous for , rightly, bagging Chris Bangle’s design of the outgoing BMW.)
      In Oz,  roofless is the way to go.

    • Honda Generators says:

      04:33pm | 27/04/10

      I have to applaud the effort, expertise, and candor put forth in this piece. This is useable information, clearly presented to inform and educate the reader. As simple as that may seem, articles such as this are more the exception than the rule these days. Honda Generators

    • Generators says:

      04:54pm | 11/05/10

      The information put together in this article is extremely valuable to anyone with even a passing interest in this area. I hope you continue to cover this topic. Honda Generators

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Anthony Sharwood

Hey @Boyadee. Serious question. What are the other two terrible things in your top three? Thx for sharing your thoughts BTW. Peace

Lucy Kippist

A dying boy's last wish is to meet the Queen, so Helen Mirren steps in to fill the royal shoes: http://t.co/v4bVoOsPLZ

tory_maguire

Serious question. What's your definition of "terrorism"? Was the hideousness in London this morning a terrorist attack?

Paul Colgan

Emails reveal the direct negotiations between between Steve Jobs and James Murdoch on e-book prices http://t.co/D0n5VMCGfm

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter