A common saying in Afghanistan is “we’ve got the watches they’ve got the time.”  A perfect metaphor to describe the Western obsession time and the Taliban’s eternal patience.  That is why U.S Secretary of Defence, Robert Gates’ statement that the United States will not be leaving Afghanistan is exactly the message to send to the Taliban.  If you don’t have the time don’t start a war in Afghanistan.

One of these men is telling it like it is on Afghanistan. Picture: Getty

The simplicity of life in Afghanistan is also a camouflage for the Afghan’s ability to withstand asymmetrical threats from the climate, terrain or a foreign military.  We have failed to recognise their historical capacity to adapt.  Ahmed Rashid, one of the best contemporary authors on Afghanistan, suggests that the devastation of the Soviet invasion and subsequent civil war influenced the Taliban state of mind.  The longer we engage the more they evolve – both politically and violently.

They know they don’t have to win the war.  They just have to outlast our domestic time constraints and out-govern Karzai and his corrupt Provincial representatives.

The Taliban know all about counterinsurgency.  Messages would come back to me from the Quetta Shura to say “we don’t want those men working because they won’t have time to fight.” 

Some Taliban leaders are even encouraging reconstruction projects where the corrupt Provincial Governor is only interested in lining his own pockets with international aid money.

Success in Afghanistan starts with a better understanding of this human terrain.  This is an unconventional war in a deeply tribal society where foreign forces are attempting something that has never been done in Afghanistan. 

In fact it is not really a war.  The conflict in Afghanistan was described to me by a U.S Provincial Reconstruction Team Commander as “international policing amidst random acts of horrendous violence.”

Sure, the character of the Afghan people may be beyond our control, but we have complicated the atmospherics by things we have done that are in our control.  It has been made harder by mostly international NGOs who lack the guts to engage with the population outside the wire.  They are too Kabul centric.

Endless green tea at the Governor’s compound is not counterinsurgency.  We have also spent too long funding Warlords and tolerating corrupt Governors.  A sub-Governor in Ghazni who raped a young girl was simply shifted to another District.  He was only sacked when he did not steal enough wheat from the World Food Program for the former Governor of Ghazni, Usmani Usmani. 

What makes a murdering warlord or a corrupt Government official any better than the local Taliban?  Most importantly, we continue to treat the Taliban as a homogenous group of insurgents.  We have failed to turn the local Taliban against the foreign insurgents coming from Pakistan who have no interest in the future of Afghanistan.

International security forces are not the only “foreigners” in Afghanistan.  The local Taliban could have been turned against the foreign insurgents by facilitating an organic uprising.  Similar to how General David Patreaus took advantage of the Awakening movement of disaffected Sunnis against the barbaric degradation of al-Qaeda in Iraq. 

The Sunnis rose up against the foreign al-Qaeda.  General Petraeus armed and supported the Sunnis who were far more effective and ruthless in eliminating the foreign insurgents. 

Abdul Mohammed, a local Talib interviewed by The Telegraph in March 2010, was one of a force of around 160 Taliban fighters from Helmand Province.  As well as local Afghans, his unit was composed of Tajiks, Uzbeks, Arabs, Chechens and Pakistanis.  Abdul said the foreign fighters kept themselves apart from the Afghan Taliban, who they regarded as being less committed to the cause of global Jihad.

Local Talibs like Abdul could easily pick up an AK-47 to shoot Coalition forces one day and a shovel to clean a canal the next.  Yet, and this is the key, both actions are in direct support and protection of their local interests.  Neither action is intended to be part of a global terrorist network.

To understand this state of mind requires a level of emotional intelligence that is difficult to acquire within the strict rules of engagement for Coalition Forces and the current approach of civilian development organisations.

In Afghanistan it helps to have two interpreters.  One to translate the literal meaning of your discussion and the other to watch and sense what is “really” being said – this person is more important than the first.  This is as much about winning the mind games as it is about winning the war games.

We also need to start learning how to shoot and chew gum at the same time.  By that I mean fight and negotiate, with the local Taliban.  In Afghan tribal society even when engaged in war against another tribe, lines of communication are maintained.

Dialogue between elders from rival tribes is often what resolves disputes not military defeat.  Once members of al-Qaeda in Afghanistan had been dismantled, direct engagement with local Taliban should have occurred.

Australia could look to shift its game across three areas: military, civilian and political.  We need to cut deals with local Taliban and turn them against the foreign insurgents, warlords and criminals.  Our forces should establish Village Engagement Teams – who move into a village and live, eat sleep with villages to provide a protection and security blanket.  This is a superb concept put forward by a member of a U.S Human Terrain Team I worked with in Southern Afghanistan.

We need to arrest warlords and corrupt Governors and sub-Governors.  Our tolerance of these scoundrels simply feeds into the foreign insurgents.  Australia has gone somewhere towards increasing our civilian commitment by taking over the Provincial Reconstruction Team in Uruzgan but they need to learn how to operate outside the wire away from armoured vehicles.

They need to be trained on how to blend into the community.  On the political front Australia needs to apply direct diplomatic pressure in bi-lateral and multi-lateral forums on Pakistan.  Australia’s Foreign Minister, Kevin Rudd, had the opportunity to do this with U.S Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton, during her recent visit to Australia.  Again and most importantly, resist the domestic political pressure to put time frames on our military or civilian commitments.

Not only is conflict 80% political and 20% military, the 80% in Afghanistan is virtually 100% local.  In that context, foreigners feel they know better and dont have the patience to build deep relationships at the local level. 

One of the most prescient lessons from T.E. Lawrence, in his famous 27 Articles published in 1917, is not to do too much with your own hands.

There is always the temptation to impress upon the locals how we can do things better.  Better the local people do it tolerably than you do it perfectly.  What was so true in Afghanistan is our practical work was never as good as, perhaps, we thought.

Most commented

22 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • QLD Afghan Vet says:

      07:37am | 15/11/10

      This is merely a random selection of COIN cliches.  Nothing new here.  Also, you would have a bit more credibility if you had actually served in the military, rather than just pretend you have.  I note your self-scripted and deliberately misleading job description: “Recently returned from overseeing counterinsurgency operations with US forces in South East Afghanistan”.  You managed an aid project!  Self promotion like this does not help your cause either: “messages would come back to me from the Quetta Shura…”.  You must be very important.  Finally, it is plainly clear you don’t think much of your average coalition soldier.  To say it takes some type of superior “emotional intelligence” to understand how a fighter can switch back to being a farmer is insulting.  Having spent months in the field in Afghanistan, this is the only form of fighting we know.  We get it.  Our rules of engagement can cope and I assure you my American and Afghan friends get it too.  You should be proud of your aid work, but trying to spin it as something more action-packed than managing a budget is a bad look and turns people off your message, whatever it is.

    • JB says:

      01:51am | 16/11/10

      Mate I was also in the field in for about 8 months and found this article to be pretty well thought through. However, your reply was a cracking arguement. Good darts.

    • Sludger says:

      09:29am | 15/11/10

      Not at all sure what you are trying to say here.  You do not seem to have even a basic understanding of the military, or of the intellignece of our personnel.  Running aid is not the same as fighting and you do yourself no favours by pretending to be what you are not.  You are also insulting those of us who have served.  Your piece is rambling and cliche.  It has no point, no direction and is devoid of any considered thought.  Try again.

    • Qld Afgan/Iraq Vet says:

      09:30am | 15/11/10

      Mate I think you missed his point. While he may be a shameless self promoter and want to talk up his contribution, most NGO’s are like that. The main message of the article was actually a good one……we need to be there till the jobs done. Not until some arbitrary timeline set by a western politician facing an election next year. IF we hold the course and use good COIN methodology we can win in Afghanistan no matter what the pinko, treehugging neo communist hippy types think.

    • Shane From Melbourne says:

      09:50am | 15/11/10

      Yep, I favor keeping the troops there until the job is done. Back to Afghanistan you go and stay there until the war is won.

    • Adrian says:

      11:45am | 15/11/10

      That’s also what I interpreted as the point of the article, which I quite enjoyed. The external pressure placed on politicians by the media and the anti-war sentimentalists does us no favours in the long run. Patience is required in this war of attrition.
      And to the soldiers and vets posting, you guys are awesome. Many thanks and much respect!

    • stephen says:

      10:56am | 15/11/10

      Karzai wants the US and Nato forces to stop killing all those Taliban (or at least to slow up), so we know the Taliban have been talking to him, probably under the auspices of these so-called ‘deals and truces’ that were proposed by General Petraeus.
      So far then, a waste of time, and I reckon we should only talk if they come on their knees.
      Begging.
      (And someone get that crook Karzai a pair of knee-pads, could yer ?)

    • BMJ says:

      11:11am | 15/11/10

      What’s the definition of “win” and how is it measured and when will it happen?

    • Richard says:

      11:23am | 15/11/10

      With due respect to the people posting above me, I actually really like this piece. He’s right, we cannot set an arbitrary timeline on withdrawal, that just encourages the enemy to hang on through the tough times in anticipation of it.

      This is also why I opposed the parliamentary debate about the Afghanistan war: what sort of message does that send to the enemy? That our politician’s are losing their nerve and all of a sudden after 9 years feel it necessary to have a big blab, giving away our strategies and undermining the enemies perception that we are resolved to see this thing through to the end?

      It might take a long time, but transforming Afghanistan into a stable, peaceful and prosperous democracy is a win-win situation for everybody (except of course militant jihadi extremists).

    • Rosie says:

      12:28pm | 15/11/10

      Totally agree and the nay sayers should speak to the soldiers. The soldiers will say they would sooner be fighting terrorism in Afghanistan then here in their homeland!

    • Yet another Iraq/Afghan vet says:

      12:35pm | 15/11/10

      Of course everything he says is probably correct - he is just regurgitating what he has read elsewhere in countless other publications and commentaries. I would much rather have read about Jason Thomas’ experiences and views, which I am sure would be insightful given his job, rather than this unoriginal article. And I agree with the others about the “overseeing counterinsurgency operations” tagline - Mr Thomas should have some confidence in his actual line of expertise, and stop trying to glamorise himself.

    • Pakistani says:

      12:47pm | 15/11/10

      Essentially this article is saying we should shift support from the warlords to the Taliban provided the Talibs eject the foriegners (incidentally Pakistanis aren’t foriegners in Afghanistan).

      That’s a reasonable point of view. It should have been the one pursued in 2001 and the whole war could’ve been avoided. It is redefining victory, which is ultimately what has to happen.

      That’s the thing about all the “new” strategies, there aiming to get back to where things were in 2002. Afghan army? Minimum coalition involvement? Um, had that. A better question is what happened to them.

      COIN won’t work. The coalition doesn’t have a clear idea about what the war is about anymore. They seem to think al-Qaedia is somehow relevant. Pakistan, Karzai, and parts of the Taliban are all positioning themselves for a post-US Afghanistan as if an American defeat is inevitable.

    • coattailsrus says:

      12:56pm | 15/11/10

      Finally, the Letters to the Editor page from “Army News” has made it to the blogospere… what a triumph! Now all we need is the official response from an Army Office staff officer (pick me, pick me - not!!)...  Yes, Jason is probably exaggerating his past activities - I have no clue (but then I don’t really care). As usual though, the major points of the stated issue are overlooked for the bickering about who has more credibility or who has the coolest stories (pr memorabilia).  The actual truth is that we will stay there as long as the US requires our participation and then we will leave making two things apparent; 1 - we were superior (if we can’t claim victory) and 2 - we left of our own accord (because we are a totally sovereign nation).  When you structure your foreign policy on the basis of riding the coattails of the largest foreign power you can agree with, you just have to suck the rest of it up.  Pretending that the 1550 Australian bodies there will somehow determine the outcome of this episode in AFG is ludicrous. But like Army News - it sure does lead to some hilarious comments…

    • ANOTHER Afghan vet says:

      01:26pm | 15/11/10

      I think this just shows that the only people who bother to read stuff about Afghanistan are those who are involved. Most Australians unfortunately couldn’t care less.

    • Gregg says:

      01:16pm | 15/11/10

      Jason, no doubt you will have a view from your experience in aid within a particular area of Afghanistan but as much as Afghanis may have particular traits much as could be said for Australians tou will see that represented in different ways dependant on what they are wanting for their patch of turf just as in Australia.
      That says something for the concept of embedding military people in communities if it was only going to be taht simple to maintain security and lines of communication.
      But as for saying Australia should do this and that and get out and operate in no man’s land, it is a bit ridiculous on a number of fronts, they being:
      1. Australia is just a portion of the entire military presence, a rather small portion and though they can have a local influence their area of operation and despite some politics being local, the bigger picture is what will dominate.
      2. Obviously keeping our people secure is paramount and it is so easy for you to say operate outside the wire, perhaps even sleep with the enemy!
      3. Politics is not really the role of the military and you would seem to propose more of a martial law role in policing.
      And then who is going to keep the interpreters interpreter honest!
      You do not learn another culture more so than absorb what you can by being there and language is always going to be an obstacle.

      That Karzai is getting embedded with the Taliban and Gates may not be saying exactly what Obama is who wants out underway before he has no chance of being back in nearly makes Gates an initially Republican appointment perhaps secretly acknowledging Obama will be a one termer and it all in general sets the mess up to continue.

      The US had their wars of independence, civil and Vietnam and all point to resolution from within, a simple enough lesson not too readily understood.
      Afghanistan also has much history of confict, three wars with the Brits and the US will either with Obama or his successor decide enough is enough.
      Australia needs to have its exit plan set for rapid exit some time sooner than later.

    • Ryan says:

      01:32pm | 15/11/10

      The Labor party has more watches, grocery watch, fuel watch, bank watch, roof fire watch, emptying bank accounts watch, increasing utilities watch and their all time favorite, watching you go bankrupt.

    • St. Michael says:

      07:13pm | 15/11/10

      Just can’t control yourself, can you Ryan?

    • Ryan says:

      11:47am | 16/11/10

      @St. Michael: yep you are right, sorry I am ashamed of myself.

    • Sadiq Farris says:

      02:02pm | 15/11/10

      Australia should get out of Afghanistan, iraq and timor right now.Stop wasting taxpayers money.

    • Watch this... says:

      06:06pm | 15/11/10

      Well said Ryan. Its time the Labor party changed its policies, so the Liberal party can adopt them….

    • Marilyn Shepherd says:

      02:01am | 16/11/10

      Why are we in Afghanistan when all we are doing is watching poppies grow and propping up corruption?

      We spent $370 million to lock up a few Afghans on Christmas Island, $200 million to build an illegal prison for them in Curtin and $98 million per year to run it, $50 million for an illegal prison in Leonora, another $165 million to rebuild Northam, - over $1 billion in all to jail a few thousand asylum seekers under a regime deemed to be illegal.

      And gave just $20 million in aid to the 500,000 Afghans we claim to be helping in Oruzgan.

      There is no actual Taliban, talibs are students and the people wanting us out today are not the students who lived in Pakistan after the Russian war.  They are Afghans who don’t want us killing their citizens anymore and occupying their lands.

    • Ken Maynard says:

      11:54am | 16/11/10

      The way I hear this, I do not see where we win.  It seems to me the Taliban, al-Qaeda & the Karzai government are about the same.  Each are prepared to business with us on a piecemeal basis, or only when it is in their interests to do so.  Each are capable of corruption if its in their interests to do so. Each are prepared to fight us, or betray us if its in their interest to do so.  I can not conceive of any stability of administration from any of these..

      Patreaus took advantage of the Awakening movement of disaffected Sunnis against the barbaric degradation of al-Qaeda in Iraq, yet this did not permit IRAQ TO FORM A GOVERNMENT which is what it is all about.  Do we keep using Karzai to contain the Taliban, the Taliban to contain al-Qaeda, al-Qaeda to contain Karzai.  No one faction reliable enough to form a stable government so just stay there & keep playing musical factions until 3010.     

      What concerns me, if we stay there long enough, & learn to think like them as this article advocates, do we finish up joining them by becoming the same as they.  Do we need to understand these people, if understanding requires a level of emotional intelligence which turns us into the same type of people as them?  Do modern systems of western thought, need to be re-programmed by Islamic fundamentalists.  Can civilization win by joining them.

      Lastly they have the time, we have the watches.  What does time buy for them?  The west has low birth rates, Islamic fundamentalism high birth rates. (Recently boosted by child health programs provided by the west)  Time buys a change in the balance of power off population demographics.  People, we only have watches, we do not have time to play this game out on their terms.

            Ken Maynard. 
            http://www.communichristi.org.nz      Use a Firefox or Safari browser.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Lucy Kippist

Man fined $2400 for renting his NYC apartment to tourists, http://t.co/NTHFIBGDUd

Lucy Kippist

RT @ToryShepherd: "We have children, and our children are loved and our children are cherished", @SenatorWong says http://t.co/CQhJFpdf2o v…

ToryShepherd

"We have children, and our children are loved and our children are cherished", @SenatorWong says http://t.co/CQhJFpdf2o via @newscomauHQ

Paul Colgan

Sergio Garcia made an appalling fried chicken joke http://t.co/UyUBjZ3ivr

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter