Our society puts great stock in the merits of hard work.  You know how it goes.  If you work hard enough, you can achieve anything. 

No one ever accused Rudd of being a slacker. Picture: Kym Smith

Fail to achieve a goal?  If only you’d worked harder.  For an upcoming Lateline interview, I’ve read a book called Bounce by Mathew Syed. 

His theory is that God-given talent is a myth and that the key to achieving greatness lies in how hard you’re prepared to work. I’m not sure I buy all of that.

Certainly the failure to work hard virtually guarantees mediocrity.  But the reality is that hard work doesn’t always pay off.

There’s no better illustration of that than Kevin Rudd’s ousting as Prime Minister last week.

In politics, some people win and some people lose.  The difference between winning and losing isn’t necessarily hard work.  In politics, almost everybody works arduously.  But you can be working arduously towards losing. 

Defeat can be particularly stinging when you’ve given everything you have in the contest.

In 1999, I covered the NSW state election for ABC-TV News.  The Labor Premier Bob Carr took on the newly installed Liberal leader Kerry Chikarovski.  A little like Kevin Rudd and Alastair Jordan, Chika (as she was known) had a very close staffer named Nicola Feltis, who had been with her from the start. 

Nicola was a terrific woman and I’ve rarely seen anyone work harder, along with the rest of that team.

But over in Bob Carr’s office, he also had a group of professionals who worked tirelessly.  His media staffers at the time - Walt Secord, Wendy George and Amanda Lampe – were savvy and energetic.

Carr’s team won for lots of reasons.  But you couldn’t say one of those reasons was that they worked harder.  Both sides worked equally hard.  The differences between victory and defeat lay elsewhere: the electoral mood, the campaign messages, Carr’s communication and political skills.

Eight years later, on election night in 2007, I was assigned to John Howard’s headquarters at the Wentworth Hotel.  I watched him deliver his concession speech.  It is a fallacy to imagine that if Howard had only worked harder, he could have won the election.  The factors in his loss had little to do with effort or will.

Last week, watching Kevin Rudd at his painful farewell press conference, I believed him when he said he gave the job his all.  I am also certain that’s true of his staff.  But in politics, you can sometimes be giving your all without realising you’re in a losing battle.

People deal with failure in all sorts of ways.  Sometimes they say ‘If only I’d worked harder and gone that extra mile, things would have turned out differently.’ 

That way of thinking allows them to believe that the failure isn’t due to some intrinsic quality of their own.  Nobody likes to admit ‘Well I’m just inherently not good enough.’ 

Sometimes people deal with failure in the opposite way by saying ‘Well I tried my best and that’s what counts.’  They take comfort in the knowledge that they did everything they could.

I think that for particularly driven people (and I suspect Kevin Rudd is one) the knowledge that you could not have worked harder is of little comfort when you don’t succeed.

If you’ve given your all and you still fail, it can be a stunning blow to your sense of self-worth.

Sometimes people search for external agents to blame rather than looking inwards – Mark Latham is an example. I once said to a very driven politician that even if he lost a certain election, he would be respected for unexpectedly making it a real contest.

He replied that he wouldn’t derive any comfort from that because he wasn’t interested in being a well-regarded loser.

Here are this fortnight’s ten interesting things to read, watch or listen to:

1. It took fewer than 24 hours for some wag to do a ‘Downfall’ parody of Kevin Rudd’s demise and it’s obviously somebody who follows politics pretty closely. Very clever.

2. The novelist Shane Maloney unexpectedly found himself in Parliament House as the coup unfolded and wrote a unique take on events.

3. In the Sydney Morning Herald, Malcolm Turnbull – someone who well knows the sting of being dumped by his colleagues - quoted some poetry in his take on Kevin Rudd’s political downfall.

4. Kevin Rudd’s departure overshadowed another very significant story, Barack Obama’s decision to remove General Stanley McCrystal from his post as commander of US forces in Afghanistan.  The Rolling Stone article that sparked the sacking is an absolute cracker and well worth your time.

5. Perhaps small things amuse small minds, but these photographs of upside down dogs sure amused me.

6. Pete Quaife, the original bassist of the great 1960s band, The Kinks, passed away last week.  This song is one of the band’s very best.

7. A couple of years ago, Craig Sherborne wrote an amazing essay for The Monthly about his relationship with his ex-wife, from the day they met to her death.  “She is from Melbourne.  Her name is like a boy’s: Alexandra.  The ‘x’ crackles and fizzles on my tongue.”

8. Six academics offer their opinions about their e-readers.  It’s a useful article if you’re thinking about a kindle or an ipad or weighing up the differences between them.

9. If electronic readers do bring about the demise of books, one of the things we’ll miss is writing an inscription in the front.

10. Tony Martin writes on The Scrivener’s Fancy about corporations who threaten to pull advertisements: Australia’s “most effective form of censorship”.

Most commented

25 comments

Show oldest | newest first

    • stevie says:

      07:15am | 02/07/10

      I love that Waterloo Sunset song - always have. I fell in love for the first time while it was being played a million years ago. Who gives a toss about Wayne Swan and the Mining Tax when there are songs like that and great memories to replay.

    • tickets says:

      07:46pm | 02/07/10

      Apart from giving yourself a glowing review and ego trip ,do you have a point to make

    • centurion48 says:

      07:52am | 02/07/10

      Over a long and moderately successful career in the Army I worked with thousands of people but just three people amazed me with their apparent efficiency in work output while I seemed to work harder and longer. None of these people ever gave the impression that they were working hard or that they ever came close to finishing a task right at the deadline or, as I often did, just after. They always had time to spare. Even 25 years after I worked with the first of these amazing people I am in awe of their calm efficiency. I don’t think that they were exceptionally smart people but I wish I had known their secret.

    • Mick D says:

      09:01am | 02/07/10

      It’s not about working harder, it’s about working smarter.  This “hard work ethic” is based on crap.  More often than not, those that work “harder” are simply over-engineering things which ulimately comes to nothing.

    • Peter says:

      10:38am | 02/07/10

      I won’t name the organisation, but one last year gave their hard working AWA staff a 1% pay increase and then gave the bludging union workers 4.5%. Ive learnt hard work does not really pay off. Im fortunate i think because i enjoy working and do it till late at night and on weekends, but would i expect to be appropriately rewarded for that, no way…

    • The Redman says:

      01:02pm | 02/07/10

      Perhaps you should’ve joined the union then. That, you see, is the strength of collective bargaining and the complete lie that AWA’s will make workers better off, as Howard claimed. This example is proof positive that AWA’s where instituted solely for the benefit of employers. And I don’t see why you shouldn’t name the organisation. What is really offensive is your imputation that a union member equates to a lazy, unproductive employee. Maybe those on an AWA didn’t work as hard as union members, and therefore deserved only a quarter of their payrise? You’ve just assumed that union members have received an increase they don’t deserve, but you’ve no proof that that is the case.

      The only redeeming feature that AWA’s represent, and the only aspect that I think should be made law, is that only members of the union benefit from the work of union delegates. If this issue was duplicated throughout the workforce, I think you’ll find union membership will soar. If you don’t want to belong to a union, well that’s fine and it’s your choice. But don’t you bitch and complain when those who choose to belong to a union, thereby giving them the benefit of collective bargaining are more successful in negotiating better wages.

      You see, the difference between the union and those on AWA’s is that if employers refuse to adequately compensate their union workforce, then they might find themselves without a significant part of the workforce. Employers cannot simply say “this is it, take it or leave it” to unionists, even if only a quarter of their workforce is unionised. A person on an AWA, however, laughingly attempting to negotiate their own personal conditions, has no power at all. An employer can say “Well, I’m actually going to reduce your pay, and that’s the final contract. Take it or leave it”. Employers can take the absense of one employee without even noticing it. They can’t ignore it if a quarter or a half of their workforce walks off the job.

    • Peter says:

      02:06pm | 02/07/10

      I won’t name the organisation because i work for it and i like them believe it or not..

      Im happy to become a member of a union but im not going to give them money for no reason. Being on an AWA, you have a right to be a member, but you don’t have a right to be represented, so what’s the point? I am more than capable of negotiating an outcome for myself, but that’s not because the AWA gives me the right to do it, it’s only because im in a position to do it, most people aren’t. They’ll just get told to find another job (a most disrespectful way to treat loyal people).

      Back on the unions, we give them our dues, they pass them on Labour and we get nothing in return.. We have Labour in power now on the back of union money, so what are Labour doing with that workers money? They still seem to be in the pockets of big businees, we still have AWA’s, so why should i pay? What incentive does a person on an AWA have to part with their money? It’s not as if a union can then come in and negotiate a pay rise for you? What is Labour doing about this? Labour has been treating workers like mugs ever since Hawke left governement.

      Don’t worry, I’ll be on Gillards case about AWA’s. That was her core promise at the last election, to get rid of WorkChoices. She hasn’t done that. She abolished the name, and that’s what Tony Abbott was refering too. At least he was being honest..

      Gillard, that was your number one promise. Do you intend to keep it?

    • Rocket Surgeon says:

      06:13pm | 02/07/10

      Seriously, you’ve already explained that they’d get you an extra 3.5% pay rise. If you due is less than this you’re ahead. Your basic failure to grasp this concept probably explains why you only received 1% and think the economic policies of the coalition are a good idea.

    • Jenni says:

      11:09am | 02/07/10

      Leigh - you have to subscribe to read Craig Sherborne’s piece on The Monthly :(

      The piece on e-readers was very good, I myself can’t see me ever becoming a huge fan of them, I enjoy too much the joy of running my fingers along the spines of the hundreds of books on my shelves, choosing which much-loved and well-worn favourite I will immerse myself in today. In the same way I spend hours each week browsing bookstores, reading the back covers of books, flicking through a few pages, seeing what jumps out at me to pique my interest (and then heading to a department store to see if the same books are available at half the price LOL).

      I just can’t imagine ever getting the same enjoyment reading from a screen. Oh, and you can’t read them in the bath either wink

    • Zeta says:

      12:11pm | 02/07/10

      I wish Rolling Stone would stop covering musicians no one cares about and devote themselves completely to political reporting. Between Matt Taibi’s work on global finance, and now this piece on McChrystal, the Rolling Stone is leading public debate on some of America’s most weighty issues. I wonder if the rest of the US media finds that embarrasing. I wonder if in some smokey, peyote fueled heaven, Hunter S. Thompson is looking down on the Rolling Stone bull pen and cheering.

    • bella starkey says:

      04:21pm | 02/07/10

      here here!

      I used to buy rolling stone as a teenager and by the time i gave up on it i only read the public affairs articles each issue and skimmed the pretty pictures.

    • The Redman says:

      12:50pm | 02/07/10

      I had no idea Peter Quaife had died. He left a great legacy. His major achievement, I think, is surviving the Davies’ brothers! I’ve read a fair bit of the history of The Kinks, and they might have been great songwriters and good (not great) musicians, but they sure sound like wankers!!

    • stephen says:

      01:51pm | 02/07/10

      But they don’t read like it mate, cause they could do it.
      Get it ?
      Got it ?
      Good.

    • Kevin Lee says:

      12:51pm | 02/07/10

      Leigh, I agree with some of what you’ve said in this article, but I particularly don’t agree with this:

      “If you’ve given your all and you still fail, it can be a stunning blow to your sense of self-worth.”

      I note you said the word ‘can’, but may I just say that if you’ve given your all and still fail, but you understand the factors that have contributed to your failed attempt is all but outside your control, then it is a matter of learning to manipulate those external factors or timing to minimise the influences of those external factors (if you can’t manipulate them at all) next time around if you want to attempt it again.

      It does not have to be a blow to one’s self worth, its all a matter of perception and holding on to the principle of continual learning and being true to yourself.

    • Bob H says:

      01:32pm | 02/07/10

      That fact is most people work very hard, some people get to gain outward signs of success and put it down to hard work not realising how hard others work just to get by.  Ignoring circumstance, access to resources and plain old good fortune is niaive at best.  Most bankrupcies will have people who have worked harder than most to stay trading, but ending in failure.  I’m surprised someone of your calibre is to interview someone with such a childish notion, it must be an editors decision.

    • Ziggy says:

      01:50pm | 02/07/10

      To have anyone who is clueless and causing much damage work harder is the last thing we need. Rather let him do as little as possible! Nothing causes more destruction faster then a person without any real ability who has a strong personality and work ethic to get what he wants (e.g.Latham). Hard work does not necessarily equate to vision or leadership.

    • Aiden says:

      01:56pm | 02/07/10

      How do you find all these great links?! You must follow some good people on twitter. Your column has become my favourite weekend reading list. Thank you.

    • Jenni says:

      11:36am | 05/07/10

      thanks for the link David C, that was a good read smile

    • DD Ball says:

      10:35pm | 02/07/10

      It isn’t about work. It is about political maneuvering. Thieves work hard too.

    • mick says:

      10:38am | 03/07/10

      I hope my competition agree with you.

    • Anglo-Celtic Bastard says:

      02:08pm | 04/07/10

      How about a 90 % New Super Tax on Australian News Media?
      70 % could go to the mental Health budget and the rest to re-educate all Australian journalists.
      A small part could also be used to invent a computer software: “My Online Safety Plan”  to block all main mass media.
      After that people could be eligible to vote!

    • Kathy says:

      05:56pm | 04/07/10

      It’s not all about just working hard, but also working effectively.  Setting priorities, delegating & in politics, anticipating your opponent’s next move.  An ability to see the whole picture & not get bogged down with details is also essential.  I think Rudd lacked a lot of these abilities, in spite of his obvious intelligence & work ethic.

    • Ture Sjolander says:

      11:41am | 06/07/10

      Can you imagine the whole Australian population of 22 million citizens being dogs and you have to pick a PM among them?
      I would pick a Golden Retriever.
      It struck me after seeing the interview with Alexander Downer on TV.
      There is less politicians talking during parliamentary debates than during the Q&A sessions at ABC television and the conversations on television are more cultivated as the audience are more demanding than they are in the parliament.
      Is too many overpaid inactive senators !
      Alexander Downer would make a good PM if Julia Gillard could transform herself to be an Australian shepherd dog chasing the terrier Abbot on his bicycle like a Tour de France race 24 hour but for the next 5 years.

      I can’t really see any solution to the current political mess in Australia unless everybody start from square one again and look at the real population composition.

 

Facebook Recommendations

Read all about it

Punch live

Up to the minute Twitter chatter

Paul Colgan

How the totally awesome weather in Australia recently is hurting retailers http://t.co/4dvDwDlNZG

Paul Colgan

Hell, your name is Excel and Powerpoint.

Anthony Sharwood

Great fun yarn by @the_mattyoung and @DebKillalea. What the hell annoys you about the evening commute? http://t.co/Eyi82lHiBQ

tory_maguire

RT @_sarahwilson_: "We have reached peak bullshit...And those who push back against the noise + nonsense will be rewarded" @TheAtlantic htt…

Recent posts

The latest and greatest

The Punch is moving house

The Punch is moving house

Good morning Punchers. After four years of excellent fun and great conversation, this is the final post…

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

Will Pope Francis have the vision to tackle this?

I have had some close calls, one that involved what looked to me like an AK47 pointed my way, followed…

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

Advocating risk management is not “victim blaming”

In a world in which there are still people who subscribe to the vile notion that certain victims of sexual…

Nosebleed Section

choice ringside rantings

From: Hasbro, go straight to gaol, do not pass go

Tim says:

They should update other things in the game too. Instead of a get out of jail free card, they should have a Dodgy Lawyer card that not only gets you out of jail straight away but also gives you a fat payout in compensation for daring to arrest you in the first place. Instead of getting a hotel when you… [read more]

From: A guide to summer festivals especially if you wouldn’t go

Kel says:

If you want a festival for older people or for families alike, get amongst the respectable punters at Bluesfest. A truly amazing festival experience to be had of ALL AGES. And all the young "festivalgoers" usually write themselves off on the first night, only to never hear from them again the rest of… [read more]

Gentle jabs to the ribs

Superman needs saving

Superman needs saving

Can somebody please save Superman? He seems to be going through a bit of a crisis. Eighteen months ago,… Read more

28 comments

Newsletter

Read all about it

Sign up to the free News.com.au newsletter